English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51622441      Online Users : 558
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/153329
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153329


    Title: 永續表現與投資效率關聯性:論永續報告確信及外部關注度之影響
    The Relationship between Corporate Sustainability Performance and Investment Efficiency: The Impact of Corporate Sustainability Report Assurance and External Attention
    Authors: 陳毓琪
    Chen, Yu-Chi
    Contributors: 李佳玲
    Lee, Chia-Ling
    陳毓琪
    Chen, Yu-Chi
    Keywords: 永續發展投入績效
    投資效率
    永續報告書確信
    外部關注度
    Corporate Sustainability Performance
    Investment Efficiency
    Assurance of Sustainability Reports
    External Attention
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 14:46:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以我國上市公司為研究對象,以實證分析的方式,探討企業永續發展投入績效與投資效率間的關係,此外進一步探討是否有其他因素將影響二者間之關聯性。得出了以下結論:
    一、企業永續發展投入績效與投資不效率間存有負向關係,且於過度投資情況下較為明顯。
    二、在ESG三個構面的永續發展投入中,於環境構面(Environment)的投入績效,與投資效率間有最顯著的關係。
    三、永續報告書之確信對永續發展績效及投資不足間有顯著的調節效果,削弱永續發展績效及投資不足間原有的負向關係。
    四、外部關注度的高低對永續發展績效及投資不足間有顯著的調節效果,削弱永續發展績效及投資不足間原有的負向關係。
    This study empirically analyzes the relationship between corporate sustainability performance and investment efficiency, using listed companies in Taiwan as the research subjects. Additionally, it explores whether other factors influence this relationship. The conclusions of this study are as follows:
    1. There is a negative relationship between corporate sustainability performance and investment inefficiency, which is more pronounced in cases of overinvestment.
    2. Among the three dimensions of ESG, investment in the Environmental dimension shows the most significant relationship with investment efficiency.
    3. The assurance of corporate sustainability reports significantly moderates the relationship between corporate sustainability performance and underinvestment, weakening their original negative relationship.
    4. The level of external attention also significantly moderates the relationship between corporate sustainability performance and underinvestment, weakening their original negative relationship.
    Reference: 台灣經濟新報(2021年1月1日)。TESG 永續發展指標介紹。取自https://www.tejwin.com/news/tesg-%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95%E6%8C%87%E6%A8%99%E4%BB%8B%E7%B4%B9/
    台灣經濟新報(2022年2月3日)。TESG永續發展指標,台灣企業專屬的 ESG指標!取自https://www.tejwin.com/news/台灣的esg指標-tesg/
    台灣經濟新報(2023年5月26日)。ESG永續發展指南|6大ESG公司治理策略快速掌握!取自https://www.tejwin.com/insight/esg/
    Baker, M., Stein, J. C., & Wurgler, J. (2003). When does the market matter? Stock prices and the investment of equity-dependent firms. The quarterly journal of economics, 118(3), 969-1005.
    Bank, M., Larch, M., & Peter, G. (2011). Google search volume and its influence on liquidity and returns of German stocks. Financial markets and portfolio management, 25, 239-264.
    Barro, R. J. (1990). The stock market and investment. The review of financial studies, 3(1), 115-131.
    Benlemlih, M. and Bitar, M. (2018), “Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency”, Journal of Business Ethics, Springer Netherlands, Vol. 148 No. 3, pp. 647-671.
    Biddle, G. C., Hilary, G., & Verdi, R. S. (2009). How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48, 112–131.
    Bilyay-Erdogan, S., Danisman, G. O., & Demir, E. (2024). ESG performance and investment efficiency: The impact of information asymmetry. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 91, 101919.
    Blankespoor, E., Miller, G. S., & White, H. D. (2014). The role of dissemination in market liquidity: Evidence from firms' use of Twitter™. The accounting review, 89(1), 79-112.
    Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 237-333.
    Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility?. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125-169.
    Chen, F., Hope, O. K., Li, Q., & Wang, X. (2011). Financial reporting quality and investment efficiency of private firms in emerging markets. The accounting review, 86(4), 1255-1288.
    Cook, K. A., Romi, A. M., Sánchez, D., & Sánchez, J. M. (2019). The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(3-4), 494-537.
    Da, Z., Engelberg, J., & Gao, P. (2011). In search of attention. The journal of finance, 66(5), 1461-1499.
    Dai, L., Parwada, J. T., & Zhang, B. (2015). The governance effect of the media's news dissemination role: Evidence from insider trading. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 331-366.
    Deng, X., Kang, J. K., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of financial Economics, 110(1), 87-109.
    Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of accounting and public policy, 33(4), 328-355.
    Drake, M. S., Roulstone, D. T., & Thornock, J. R. (2012). Investor information demand: Evidence from Google searches around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting research, 50(4), 1001-1040.
    Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California management review, 25(3), 88-106.
    Friedman, M. (1970), “A Friedman doctrine: the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits”, The New York Times Magazine, Vol. 13, pp. 32-33.
    Fuhrmann, S., Ott, C., Looks, E., & Guenther, T. W. (2017). The contents of assurance statements for sustainability reports and information asymmetry. Accounting and Business Research, 47(4), 369-400.
    Gao, F., Lisic, L. L., & Zhang, I. X. (2014). Commitment to social good and insider trading. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(2-3), 149-175.
    Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889.
    Hayashi, F. (1982). Tobin's marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 213-224.
    Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1-3), 405-440.
    Ho, K. C., Li, H. M., & Gong, Y. (2022). How does corporate social performance affect investment inefficiency? An empirical study of China market. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 515-524.
    Hodge, K., Subramaniam, N., & Stewart, J. (2009). Assurance of sustainability reports: Impact on report users' confidence and perceptions of information credibility. Australian accounting review, 19(3), 178-194.
    Hu, X., Hua, R., Liu, Q., & Wang, C. (2023). The green fog: Environmental rating disagreement and corporate greenwashing. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 78, 101952.
    Jensen, M. (2001). Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European financial management, 7(3), 297-317.
    Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976), “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 305-360.
    Jung, B., Lee, W. J., & Weber, D. P. (2014). Financial reporting quality and labor investment efficiency. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(4), 1047-1076.
    Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value (Vol. 17). Boston, MA, USA: FSG.
    Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of financial economics, 115(2), 304-329.
    Liao, G., Wang, J., & Xue, J. (2024). Relative performance evaluation and investment efficiency. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 83, 102261.
    Liu, L., & Tian, G. G. (2021). Mandatory CSR disclosure, monitoring and investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Accounting & Finance, 61(1), 595-644.
    Luo, X., Zhang, J., & Duan, W. (2013). Social media and firm equity value. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 146-163.
    Richardson, S. (2006). Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 11, 159–189.
    Stein, J. C. (2003). Agency, information and corporate investment. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 111-165.
    Sun, Y., & Yu, L. (2024). Actions speak louder than words: Can credible green commitment facilitate bank loan financing? Evidence from China. Accounting & Finance.
    Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Managerial entrenchment and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(5‐6), 748-789.
    Swamy, V., Dharani, M., & Takeda, F. (2019). Investor attention and Google Search Volume Index: Evidence from an emerging market using quantile regression analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 50, 1-17.
    Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of money, credit and banking, 1(1), 15-29.
    Yoshikawa, H., 1980, On the ‘q’ theory of investment, The American Economic Review 70, 739–743.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    111353006
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353006
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    300601.pdf1232KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback