政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153290

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153290

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51789905 線上人數 : 543

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 經濟學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/153290

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153290

題名:	市場競爭與溫室氣體排放政策:系統性與網路的思考 Market Competition and GHG Emission Policies: Thinking in Systems and Networks
作者:	范誠修 Fan, Cheng-Hsiu
貢獻者:	何靜嫺范誠修 Fan, Cheng-Hsiu
關鍵詞:	網絡策略策略聯盟中心性溫室氣體排放政策 Network Strategies Strategic Alliances Centrality GHG Emissions Policies
日期:	2024
上傳時間:	2024-09-04 14:38:13 (UTC+8)
摘要:	市場競爭錯綜複雜，並不局限於單一產業或傳統的上下游框架。儘管網絡策略作為創新的來源受到越來越多的認可，但目前缺乏能夠通過系統性視角來處理市場競爭細微差別的理論框架。本論文旨在提供一個網絡模型，展示“網絡結構” 如何影響廠商的定價和網絡策略。然後我們將模型擴展到考慮戰略聯盟的存在，並探討溫室氣體排放政策(稅收和補貼)如何改變系統和廠商的減碳程度。我們的結果提供了一種新的視角來看待市場競爭和環境政策的影響。首先，我們顯示廠商在網絡中的定位將影響其與其他廠商的定價策略(策略替代或互補)，因此廠商的均衡價格和利潤與廠商在加權網絡中的 Katz-Bonacich 中心性正相關，這是一個廠商影響力的指標，可以分解為“互動連接強度”和“初始稟賦水平”兩部分。這為探索價格變化的可能途徑提供了一個有用的框架。至於“網絡策略”的效果，我們顯示增加與替代性產品的連接可以提高廠商的價格和利潤。其次，戰略聯盟的存在可以加強成員廠商與其他廠商的互動，並通過降低生產成本來增加成員廠商的稟賦。然而網路策略的總體影響將取決於組成成員的特性。最後，我們顯示稅收和補貼都會增加廠商的減碳程度。我們進一步顯示如果對所有廠商徵收排放稅，其均衡價格和利潤將會下降。然而如果排放稅僅對某一行業(例如污染嚴重的行業)徵收，其他廠商的均衡價格可能會上升或下降，這取決於廠商之間的互動。對於在“可持續策略聯盟”存在的情況下的稅收效果，我們的結果顯示排放稅和聯盟的環境意識對減碳有協同效應。我們的結果顯示，最優稅率和補貼水平與加權網絡中廠商 Katz-Bonacich 中心性的加權和正相關，且環境意識的存在將降低最優稅率或補貼水平。 Market competitions are intricate and not confined to a single industry or a traditional up-downstream framework. Despite the increasing acknowledgment of network strategies as a source of innovation, there remains a gap in theoretical frameworks that can address the nuances of market competition through a systemic lens. The purpose of this thesis is to provide a network model to demonstrate how the "network structure" can influence firms' pricing and network strategies. We then extend the model to consider the presence of a strategic alliance and address how the GHG emission policies (tax and subsidy) can change the system and firms' emission abatement efforts. Our results provide a new perspective to look at market competition and the impacts of environmental policies. First, we show that a firm's position in the network will affect its strategic properties of pricing (strategic substitute or complement) with other firms. Consequently, firms' equilibrium prices and profits are positively related to a firm's Katz-Bonacich centrality in the weighted network, which is an indicator for a firm's influence and can be decomposed into two parts: "the strength of interactive interconnections" and the level of "initial endowments". This serves as a useful framework to explore the possible channels for changes in prices. As for the effect of "network strategies", we show that building more connections with substitutive products can increase firms' prices and profits. Second, the presence of a strategic alliance can strengthen the member firms' interaction with other firms and increase the member firms' endowment by reducing production cost. However, the overall impacts of strategy networks will depend on the properties of member constitution. Finally, we show that both tax and subsidy will increase firms' emission abatement effort. We then show that if the emission tax is applied to all firms, their equilibrium prices and profits will all decrease. However, if the emission tax is only applied to one industry (say, the heavily polluted industry), the equilibrium prices for the rest firms could increase or decrease, depending on the interactions across firms. For the tax effects with the presence of a "sustainable strategy alliance", our results show that the emission tax and the alliance's environmental consciousness have a synergy effect on emission control. Our results show that the optimal tax level and subsidy level are positively related to a weighted sum of firms' Katz-Bonacich centralities in the weighted network, and the presence of environmental consciousness will decrease the optimal tax or subsidy level.
參考文獻:	Arasti, M., Garousi Mokhtarzadeh, N., & Jafarpanah, I. (2022). Networking capability: a systematic review of literature and future research agenda. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(1), 160-179. Busch, P., Kendall, A., Murphy, C. W., & Miller, S. A. (2022). Literature review on policies to mitigate GHG emissions for cement and concrete.Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 182, 106278. Campo, K., Gijsbrechts, E., Goossens, T., & Verhetsel, A. (2000). The impact of location factors on the attractiveness and optimal space shares of product categories. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17(4), 255-279. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of management, 26(1), 31-61. Doz, Y. L. (2023). Strategic alliances. Eisend, M. (2015). Have we progressed marketing knowledge? A meta-meta-analysis of effect sizes in marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 23-40. Itoh, R., & Li, Z. (2021). Effects of dual networks on tax strategies: geography and transaction. The Japanese Economic Review, 72(1), 97-128. George, G., Robley Wood Jr, D., & Khan, R. (2001). Networking strategy of boards: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises.Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 13(3), 269-285. Gillingham, K., & Stock, J. H. (2018). The cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 53-72. Huggins, R. (2000). The success and failure of policy-implanted inter-firm network initiatives: motivations, processes and structure. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(2), 111- 135. Leggett, J. A., Lattanzio, R. K., Ek, C., & Parker, L. (2009, December). An Overview of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Control Policies in Various Countries. In Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. Peng, T. J. A., Yen, M. H., & Bourne, M. (2018). How rival partners compete based on cooperation?. Long Range Planning, 51(2), 351-383. Sammut-Bonnici, T., & McGee, J. (2002). Network strategies for the new economy. European Business Journal, 14, 174-185. Wei, J., Zhao, J., & Li, Y. (2013). Pricing decisions for complementary products with firms’ different market powers. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(3), 507-519.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學經濟學系 111258016
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111258016
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[經濟學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
801601.pdf		1566Kb	Adobe PDF	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋