English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51713837      Online Users : 752
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153046


    Title: 早期超驗觀念論的自由概念與行動理論轉向
    The Concept of Freedom in Early Transcendental Idealism and Transition to Theory of Action
    Authors: 林達峰
    Lam, Eric T. F.
    Contributors: 政治大學哲學學報
    Keywords: 道德形上學;智性命定論;行動理論;選擇能力;超驗自由
    Metaphysics of Moral;Intelligible Fatalism;Theory of Action;Faculty of Choice;Transcendental Freedom
    Date: 2024-07
    Issue Date: 2024-08-21
    Abstract: 本文目標是重構早期超驗觀念論與行動理論的轉向，特別以萊恩浩 (Karl Leonard Reinhold) 1792 年出版的《康德哲學書簡：卷二》(Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie: Zweiter Band) 為重點。筆者首先解釋康德自由理論的內部疑難，特別是：其將自由與道德兩者等同，排除感性作為道德的基礎，將無法解釋道德善惡的問題。然後，筆者引入施密特的批評，其指出：將自由限制在實踐理性之上，無法體現自由。理性內部也是充滿了因果必然性，會產生智性命定論的難題，直接將自由歸於偶然因素。再者，筆者重構萊恩浩的論證，解決方法是將實踐理性與意志分離，並將後者視為絕對自由狀態，作為選擇遵守或違反道德律則的能力。絕對自由不表示將自由行動視為偶然事件，而是一原初未決定的狀態。萊恩浩的論證，正好顯示由道德形上學，過渡到行動理論轉折，將自由從可能性轉化成實在性。最後，筆者區分萊恩浩與康德的系統，總結兩者分別代表早期觀念論的兩種不同的自由型態。
    This article explores the transition in early Transcendental Idealism regarding freedom and the theory of action, specifically focusing on Karl Leonard Reinhold’s work from 1792—“Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie: Zweiter Band.” First, I outline the challenges within Kant’s theory of freedom, such as identifying freedom with morality, excluding sensibility as the foundation for action, and the difficulty in addressing moral good and evil. Then, I introduce Schmid’s critique of Kant, which confines freedom to practical reason but falls short of realizing freedom. This limitation arises due to natural necessity within reason, leading to the dilemma of intelligible fatalism and rendering freedom contingent. Then I reconstruct Reinhold’s argument, offering a solution that distinguishes practical reason from the will. This approach identifies the will as an absolute state of freedom, capable of choosing to obey or violate moral laws. Absolute freedom does not mean treating free actions as arbitrary events but signifies an original-undetermined state. Reinhold’s argument illustrates the transition from the metaphysics of moral to the theory of action, in which freedom evolves from mere possibility to reality. Finally, I differentiate between Reinhold’s and Kant’s systems and summarize how each represents two distinct forms of freedom in early idealism.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 52, 131-173
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202407_(52).0004
    DOI: 10.30393/TNCUP.202407_(52).0004
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    52-4.pdf1293KbAdobe PDF42View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback