政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152914
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51832727      Online Users : 540
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152914


    Title: 營業稅查定課徵之稅收損失研究
    Tax Gap Derived from the Business Tax Assessed by the Tax Authority
    Authors: 黃其斌
    Huang, Chi-Pin
    Contributors: 羅光達
    楊子霆
    Lo, Kuang-Ta
    Yang, Tzu-Ting
    黃其斌
    Huang, Chi-Pin
    Keywords: 加值及非加值型營業稅
    查定課徵
    租稅規避
    租稅逃漏
    Value-Added and Non-Value-Added Business Tax
    Business Tax Assessed by the Tax Authority
    Tax Avoidance
    Tax Evasion
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-08-05 14:46:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 查定課徵是我國實施加值型營業稅的配套措施，為了節省稽徵成本與順從成本，由稽徵機關查定估計小規模營業人的銷售額，課徵總額型營業稅，稅率較加值型低。然而，查定課徵制度破壞了加值型營業稅進銷項勾稽的機制，誘發租稅規避與租稅逃漏情事叢生，導致龐大的稅收損失。
    本研究使用財政資訊中心提供的行政資料，證實查定課徵引發查定銷售額低估、自動報繳營業人（小規模營業人的供貨商）低報銷售額與營利事業課稅所得額、查定課徵營業人低報給付所得額（例如員工薪資），致使營業稅、營利事業所得稅、綜合所得稅皆缺損。運用差異中差異配對模型估計，平均而言，每個小規模營業人的月銷售額被低估約67%，月進項金額被低報約85%，年總給付所得額低報約75%。各行業之中，餐飲業的規避與逃漏情形較其餘行業嚴重。將個體的異常表現套回母體，經試算，臺灣每年因查定課徵造成的整體稅收損失規模達數百億。稅收損失嚴重，證實查定課徵制度存在缺陷，有修正之必要。
    The estimated tax system is a complementary measure to Taiwan's VAT system. In order to reduce administration costs and compliance costs, the tax authority estimate the sales of small business and impose a flat-rate business tax, which has a lower rate than the VAT. However, this estimated tax system disrupts the mechanism of cross checking under VAT, leading to widespread tax avoidance and evasion, resulting in significant tax gap.
    This study, using administrative data provided by the Fiscal Information Agency, confirms that the estimated tax system leads to underestimation of sales, underreporting of sales and taxable income by suppliers for small business and underreporting of income payments for small businesses (e.g. staff salaries). These have caused tax gap in business tax, corporate income tax, and individual income tax. Using difference-in-differences matching method, it is estimated that on average, monthly sales for each small businesses are underestimated by approximately 67%, monthly input amounts are underreported by about 85%, and annual total income payments are underreported by around 75%. Among industries, avoidance and evasion in the catering industry are more serious than in other industries. Extrapolating these anomalies to the entire population, it is calculated that Taiwan suffers annual tax gap in tens of billions due to the estimated tax system. The significant tax gap derived from the business tax assessed by the tax authority underscores the flaws in the estimated tax system. There is a pressing need for reforms.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    于宗先、王金利（2008），《台灣賦稅體制之演變》，臺北：聯經出版社。
    中央研究院（2014），《賦稅改革政策建議書》，政策白皮書，臺北：中央研究院。
    毛治文、吳文傑（2016），「以差異中差異配對分析法檢驗雙元所得稅制度對經濟成長的影響」，《經濟研究》，52（2），169-205。
    石恩銘、伍大開、高秉澤、陳國樑（2023），「小規模營業人導入行動支付租稅優惠之政策效果分析」，會議論文，台灣經濟學會2023年年會。
    江美虹、吳朝欽（2015），「營業稅逃漏行為之研究──以留抵稅額為例」，《財稅研究》，44（1），81-105。
    吳中書、彭素玲、黃勢璋（2016），《營業稅徵收率調高對物價、逃漏稅誘因及稅收之影響》，財政部賦稅署委託研究計畫，臺北：中華經濟研究院。
    吳欣蕙、陳國樑（2020），「現行擴大書面審核制度良窳評估」，《財稅研究》，49（4），74-108。
    林安樂、林全（1989），「營業稅課稅範圍與稅率調整可行性分析」，《營業稅問題之研究（一）》，1-44，臺北：財政部賦稅改革委員會。
    邱瑾凡、徐偉初、韓幸紋、楊子霆、羅光達（2019），「推估臺灣綜合所得稅申報逃漏狀況之研究」，《財稅研究》，48（2），77-95。

    姚名鴻、邱麗君（2021），「我國加值型及非加值型營業稅稅收效率比值及其影響因素分析」，《財稅研究》，50（1），110-123。
    胡安寧（2012），「傾向值匹配與因果推論：方法論評述」，《社會學研究》，1，221-242。
    胡安寧（2015），《社會科學因果推論的理論基礎》，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。
    孫克難（2003），《五至十年內達成財政收支平衡方案之研擬》，行政院財政改革委員會委託研究計畫，臺北：中華經濟研究院。
    徐育珠、郭遵章、羅時儁、陳義、潘明正（1970），「簡化及改進我國現行銷售稅制之擬議」，《行政院附稅改革委員會報告書第三部專題研究彙編（三）》，649-734，臺北：行政院賦稅改革委員會。
    殷乃平（1995），《消費稅論》，臺北：華泰書局。
    高安邦、鄭宗典（1989），「小規模營業人課徵營業稅問題之研究」，《營業稅問題之研究（二）》，1-30，臺北：財政部賦稅改革委員會。
    張航、范子英（2019），「群聚分析法：原理、爭議及其應用前景」，《數量經濟技術經濟研究》，36（9），152-168。
    陳聽安（1971），《加值稅採行問題》，臺北：財政部財稅人員訓練所。
    曾巨威（2002），《各項租稅稅基侵蝕之全面檢討》，行政院財政改革委員會委託研究計畫，臺北：國立政治大學財政學系。
    游敏惠、吳朝欽（2015），「營利事業所得稅逃漏之研究—以擴大書面審核制度為例」，《財稅研究》，44（3），94-121。
    黃則強（1999），《營業稅逃漏：實務與模型分析》，碩士論文，國立政治大學財政學研究所。
    黃智聰、林建宏（2017），「小規模營業人改使用統一發票對其銷售額之影響—─以臺北市為例」，《財稅研究》，46（6），1-15。
    黃勢璋、陳國樑、羅時萬、蔡鳳凰（2019），《研析有效縮小我國地下經濟規模之財政政策及其對整體稅基與稅收之影響》，Visa 委託研究計畫，臺北：中華經濟研究院。
    黃勢璋、蔡鳳凰、廖珈𤫇、彭素玲（2022），「加值型營業稅率與民眾發票索取意向之初探」，《月旦財稅實務釋評》，31，55-61。
    楊建成（2020），「財稅大數據的應用」，《財稅研究》，49（5），47-61。
    賦稅改革委員會（1989），《賦稅改革總報告書》，臺北：賦稅改革委員會。
    鄭伃君、楊子霆、韓幸紋（2020），「租稅稽查與廠商租稅逃漏-來自擴大書審廠商的證據」，《經濟論文》，48（4），475-509。
    蘇建榮、李顯峰、吳世英、翁堃嵐（2011），「以未稽核所得申報資料推估短漏報所得」，《經濟論文》，39（2），215-243。
     
    二、英文文獻
    Agha, A., and J., Haughton (1996), “Designing VAT Systems: Some Efficiency Considerations,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 303-308.
    Albarea, A., M., Bernasconi, A., Marenzi, and D., Rizzi (2020), “Income Underreporting and Tax Evasion in Italy: Estimates and Distributional Effects.” Review of Income and Wealth, 66(4), 904-930.
    Angrist, J. D. and J. S., Pischke (2009), Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion, Princeton University Press.
    Atkinson, A. B. (2015), Inequality: What can Be Done? Harvard University Press.
    Baker, A. C., D. F., Larcker and C. C., Wang (2022), “How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-in-Differences Estimates?” Journal of Financial Economics, 144(2), 370-395.
    Callaway, B. and P. H., Sant’Anna (2021), “Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods,” Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230.
    Card, D. and A. B., Krueger (1994), “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania,” The American Economic Review, 84(4), 772-793.
    Card, D., R., Chetty, M. S., Feldstein, and E., Saez (2010), “Expanding Access to Administrative Data for Research in the United States,” American Economic Association, Ten Years and Beyond: Economists Answer NSF's Call for Long-Term Research Agendas.
    Crown, W. H. (2014), “Propensity-Score Matching in Economic Analyses: Comparison with Regression Models, Instrumental Variables, Residual Inclusion, Differences-in-Differences, and Decomposition Methods,” Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 12, 7-18.
    Engström, P. and J., Hagen (2017), “Income Underreporting among the Self-Employed: A Permanent Income Approach,” European Economic Review, 92, 92-109.
    Fathi, B. and M., Esmaeilian (2012), “Evaluation of Value Added Tax (VAT) and Tax Evasion,” Current Research Journal of Economic Theory, 4(1), 1-5.
    Feldman, N. E. and J., Slemrod (2007), “Estimating Tax Noncompliance with Evidence from Unaudited Tax Returns,” The Economic Journal, 117(518), 327-352.
    Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021), “Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing,” Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 254-277.
    Guo, S. and M. W., Fraser (2014), Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications, SAGE Publications.
    Harju, J., T., Matikka and T., Rauhanen (2019). “Compliance Costs vs. Tax Incentives: Why do Entrepreneurs Respond to Size-Based Regulations?” Journal of Public Economics, 173, 139-164.
    Heckman, J. J., H., Ichimura and P. E., Todd (1997), “Matching as An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating A Job Training Programme,” The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605-654.
    Hurst, E., G., Li and B., Pugsley (2014), “Are Household Surveys Like Tax Forms? Evidence from Income Underreporting of the Self-employed,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1), 19-33.
    Keen, M. and S., Smith (2006), “VAT Fraud and Evasion: What Do We Know and What Can Be Done?” National Tax Journal, 59(4), 861-887.
    Kleven, H. J. (2016), “Bunching,” Annual Review of Economics, 8, 435-464.
    Kleven, H. J., M. B., Knudsen, C. T., Kreiner, S., Pedersen and E., Saez (2011), “Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence from A Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark,” Econometrica, 79(3), 651-692.
    Kou, E., Y., Sun and L, Yue (2021), “The Response of Small Firms to VAT Thresholds: Evidence from China,” Applied Economics Letters, 28(17), 1526-1530.
    Kukk, M., A., Paulus and K., Staehr (2020), “Cheating in Europe: Underreporting of Self-Employment Income in Comparative Perspective,” International Tax and Public Finance, 27(2), 363-390.
    Lent , G. E., M., Casanegra and M., Guerard (1973), “The Value Added Tax in Developing Countries,” IMF Staff Papers.
    Liu, L., B., Lockwood, M., Almunia and E. H., Tam (2021), “VAT Notches, Voluntary Registration, and Bunching: Theory and UK evidence,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 103(1), 151-164.
    Luttmer, E. F. and M., Singhal (2014), “Tax Morale,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), 149-168.
    Matthews, K. and J., Lloyd-Williams (2001), “The VAT-Evading Firm and VAT Evasion: An Empirical Analysis,” International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(1), 39-49.
    Muthitacharoen, A., W., Wanichthaworn and T., Burong (2021). “VAT Threshold and Small Business Behavior: Evidence from Thai Tax Returns,” International Tax and Public Finance, 28(5), 1242-1275.
    Niizeki, T., and J., Hamaaki (2023), “Do the Self-Employed Underreport Their Income? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data,” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 67, 101244.
    OECD (2022), Consumption Tax Trends 2022: VAT/GST and Excise, Core Design Features and Trends, OECD Publishing.
    Onji, K. (2009). “The Response of Firms to Eligibility Thresholds: Evidence from the Japanese Value-Added Tax,” Journal of Public Economics, 93(5-6), 766-775.
    Pissarides, C. A., and G., Weber, (1989), “An Expenditure-Based Estimate of Britain's black Economy,” Journal of Public Economics, 39(1), 17-32.
    Rosenbaum, P. R. and D. B., Rubin (1983), “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
    Rosenbaum, P. R. and D. B., Rubin, (1985), “Constructing A Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score,” The American Statistician, 39(1), 33-38.
    Saez, E. and G., Zucman (2019), The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay, WW Norton & Company Press.
    Slemrod, J. (2007). “Cheating Ourselves: The Economics of Tax Evasion,” Journal of Economic perspectives, 21(1), 25-48.
    Slemrod, J., M., Blumenthal and C., Christian (2001), “Taxpayer Response to An Increased Probability of Audit: Evidence from A Controlled Experiment in Minnesota,” Journal of Public Economics, 79(3), 455-483.
    Tait, M. A. A. (1988). Value added tax: International Practice and Problems, International Monetary Fund Press.
    Wooldridge, J. M. (2010), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2nd Edition), MIT Press.
    Wu, D. K., J., Chen and S. C., Huang (2023). “VAT Thresholds and Tax Assessment: Evidence from Taiwan,” Applied Economics Letters, 30(10), 1314-1317.
    Zídková, H. (2014), “Determinants of VAT Gap in EU,” Prague Economic Papers, 23(4), 514-530.
    Zídková, H. and J., Pavel (2016), “What Causes the VAT Gap?” Ekonomický časopis, 64(9), 811-826.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    111255027
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111255027
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Public Finance] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    502701.pdf5980KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback