政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152849
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51781818      線上人數 : 607
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152849


    題名: 內外控傾向對公務人員創新行為之影響－組織繁文縟節的調節效果
    The Impacts of Locus of Control on Innovative Behaviors for Public Servants-The Moderation Effects of Organizational Red Tape
    作者: 商嘉禾
    Shang, Jia-He
    貢獻者: 董祥開
    商嘉禾
    Shang, Jia-He
    關鍵詞: 公務人員
    內外控傾向
    創新工作行為
    繁文縟節
    Public Servants
    Innovative Work Behavior
    Locus of Control
    Red Tape
    日期: 2024
    上傳時間: 2024-08-05 14:23:17 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 「創新」這個議題過去多以私部門為主，僅近年才出現公部門背景的研究，其中個人層次與組織層次因素的相互作用鮮少為人討論，因此本研究希望將「內外控傾向」的人格特質，與公部門「繁文縟節」的組織特徵結合討論，並藉由互動論架構及自我驗證理論進行分析，探討兩者的相互作用如何影響公務人員的創新行為。本研究使用次級資料分析法，資料來源為第四期「台灣文官調查」(TGBS-Ⅳ)中的第二波調查，研究對象為我國現職公務人員，共計722份有效樣本。研究結果發現: （1）內控特質正向影響創新行為及其面向；（2）依法行政繁文縟節顯著調節內控特質與創新行為之間關係；（3）依法行政繁文縟節顯著調節內控特質與創新行為面向（想法提倡及想法實現）之間關係。研究結論指出具備內控特質的公務人員為執行創新行為的潛在者，組織可以透過人力資源管理措施來發掘創新人才，並通過賦權與培訓推動公務人員創新。更為重要的是，政府機關應檢視組織繁文縟節情形，因本研究發現繁文縟節導致弱內控特質的公務人員牴觸創新，可以透過識別規則，針對失去功能與目的的規則予以調整，提供公務人力自由發揮才能的創新空間。
    The topic of "innovation" has traditionally been dominated by the private sector, with research on the public sector emerging only in recent years. There has been little discussion on the interaction between individual-level and organizational-level factors in this context. Therefore, this study aims to explore the interaction between the personality trait of "locus of control" and the organizational characteristic of "red tape" in the public sector. Using the framework of interactionism and self-verification theory, the study analyzes how these interactions affect the innovative behavior of civil servants. This research employs secondary data analysis, using data from the second wave of the fourth " Taiwan Government Bureaucrats Survey " (TGBS-IV), targeting currently employed civil servants in Taiwan, with a total of 722 valid samples.
    The study finds that: (1)An internal locus of control positively influences innovative behavior and its dimensions.(2)Red tape significantly moderates the relationship between an internal locus of control and innovative behavior.(3)Red tape significantly moderates the relationship between an internal locus of control and the dimensions of innovative behavior (idea promotion and idea implementation).The study concludes that civil servants with an internal locus of control are potential agents of innovation. Organizations can identify innovative talents through selection and management measures. Additionally, innovation among civil servants can also be promoted through empowerment and training. More importantly, government agencies should review the extent of organizational red tape, as the study finds that red tape causes civil servants with an external locus of control to resist innovation. Therefore, non-functional regulatory procedures should be adjusted to provide civil servants with the space to freely exercise their innovative potential.
    參考文獻: 朱錦鳳（2012）。國家考選的策略與可行作法。國家菁英季刊，8（1），19-39。
    李仲彬（2018）。與生俱來與後天培養： 影響公務人員創新態度與行為的因素分析。公共行政學報，54，1-40。
    邱文智（2023）。公共服務動機對公務人員創新影響之研究：兼論情緒智力中介效果。行政暨政策學報，76，71-99。
    陳重安（2013）。規範與繁文縟節。公共行政學報，44，161-166。
    陳敦源、簡鈺珒(2018)。 繁文縟節與組織績效:以臺灣作為個案觀察。文官制度，10(4)，25-60。
    陳敦源、黃建勲（2019）。繁文縟節如何影響公共服務動機? 2011 年臺灣文官調查資料之分析。文官制度，11（1），35-71。
    陳正昌、林曉芳（2020）。R統計軟體與多變量分析。五南。
    黃積聖（2014）。公部門績效指標建構困境與解決之研究。人事月刊，351，9-26。
    曾冠球（2015）。激勵公務同仁創新行為的概念分析。人事月刊，362，4-15。
    彭錦鵬（2010）。公務人員考選制度的變革與未來展望。國家菁英季刊，6（1），17-40。
    董祥開、楊庭安（2020）。從個人風險特質與組織激勵措施探討公務人員之創新行為—以計畫行為理論為分析架構。空大行政學報，34，1-40。
    董祥開（2020）。公務人員風險偏好、服務動機、與決策類型之關係－建立一個勇於任事的政府（台灣政府文官調查第四期，TGBS IV）（公共版）（E10448）【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-E10448-2
    廖明坤、溫福星、唐美芝（2014）。內外控特質透過組織承諾對公共部門組織公民行為影響之跨層次研究：以轉換型領導風格為調節變數。中山管理評論，22（3），429-468。
    蔡昀秦（2017）。探討內控型人格特質、組織創新文化對激勵員工創新行為之影響。科技與人力教育季刊，4（1），29-45 。

    Adam, C., Knill, C., & Fernandez-i-Marín, X. (2017). Rule growth and government effectiveness: Why it takes the capacity to learn and coordinate to constrain rule growth. Policy Sciences, 50, 241-268.
    Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., & Saeed, B. B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(8), 1270-1300.
    Afsar, B., Badir, Y., & Khan, M. M. (2015). Person–job fit, person–organization fit and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of innovation trust. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 26(2), 105-116.
    Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Holt.
    Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
    Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential
    conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
    Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987). Creativity in the R & D laboratory. Center for Creative Leadership.
    Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
    Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5),1154-1184.
    Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
    Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state‐of‐the‐science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147-173.
    Anderson, N. R., & King, N. (1993). Innovation in organizations. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 1–34). John Wiley.
    Anderson, N. R., & R. M. Gasteiger (2008). Innovation and creativity in organizations: Individual and work team research findings and implications for government
    policy(Eds.), Micro-foundations for Innovation Policy (pp. 249-272). Amsterdam University Press.
    Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
    Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 265-285.
    Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 963-970.
    Baer, M. (2010). The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 592-601.
    Baldwin, J. N. (1990). Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape: Their impact on motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 7-28.
    Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation. Policy Press.
    Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560-569.
    Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging innovation in the public sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 310-319.
    Borst, R. T., Kruyen, P. M., & Lako, C. J. (2019). Exploring the job demands–resources model of work engagement in government: Bringing in a psychological perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 372-397.
    Bozeman, B., Reed, P. N., & Scott, P. (1992). Red tape and task delays in public and private organizations. Administration & Society, 24(3), 290-322.
    Bozeman, B. (1993). A theory of government “red tape”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273-304.
    Bozeman, B., & Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk Culture in Public and Private Organizations. Public Administration Review, 58(2), 109-118.
    Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape. NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2014). Rules and red tape: A prism for public administration theory and research. Routledge.
    Bretschneider, S. (1990). Management information systems in public and private organizations: An empirical test. Public Administration Review, 50(5), 536-545.
    Brewer, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2010). The impact of red tape on governmental performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 233-257.
    Buchanan, B. (1975). Red-tape and the service ethic: Some unexpected differences between public and private managers. Administration & Society, 6(4), 423-444.
    Cable, D. M., & Kay, V. S. (2012). Striving for self-verification during organizational entry. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 360-380.
    Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295-316.
    Chen, T., Li, F., & Leung, K. (2016). When does supervisor support encourage innovative behavior? Opposite moderating effects of general self‐efficacy and internal locus of control. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 123-158.
    Chen, G., & Wei, J. (2023). How self-verification striving affects creative performance: the moderating effect of authentic leadership and the mediating effect of taking charge. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(3), 350-370.
    Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(2), 264-290.
    Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    DeHart-Davis, L., & Pandey, S. K. (2005). Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 133-148.
    DeHart-Davis, L. (2009). Green tape: A theory of effective organizational rules. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 361-384.
    DeHart-Davis, L., Davis, R. S., & Mohr, Z. (2015). Green tape and job satisfaction: Can organizational rules make employees happy?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 849-876.
    De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public administration, 94(1), 146-166.
    Dong, H. K. D. (2017). Individual risk preference and sector choice: Are risk-averse individuals more likely to choose careers in the public sector?. Administration & Society, 49(8), 1121-1142.
    Gatewood, D. R. & Field, S. H. (1998). Human Resource Selection. The Dryden Press.
    George, J. M., & Zhou, J.(2001).When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: an interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513-524.
    Gianakos, I. (2002). Predictors of coping with work stress: The influences of sex, gender role, social desirability, and locus of control. Sex Roles, 46, 149-158.
    Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
    Glover, J. A., & Sautter, F. (1976). An investigation of the relationship of four components of creativity to locus of control. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 4(2), 257-260.
    Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90-105.
    Hattke, F., Vogel, R., & Znanewitz, J. (2018). Satisfied with red tape? Leadership, civic duty, and career intention in the military. Public Management Review, 20(4), 563-586.
    Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 317-341.
    Howell, J. M., Shea, C. M., & Higgins, C. A. (2005). Champions of product innovations: Defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior. Journal of
    Business Venturing, 20(5), 641-661.
    Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151-188.
    Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17-34.
    Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort—reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Joumal of Occupational and Organisational Psycholog, 73, 287-302.
    Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co‐workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 347-364.
    Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 129-145.
    Jong, J. J. & Hartog, D. D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
    Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
    Kanter, R.M. (1988) When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
    Kaufman, H. (2015). Red tape: Its origins, uses, and abuses. Brookings Institution Press.
    Kaufmann, W., & Feeney, M. K. (2012). Objective formalization, perceived formalization and perceived red tape: Sorting out concepts. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1195-1214.
    Kaufmann, W., & Feeney, M. K. (2014). Beyond the rules: The effect of outcome favourability on red tape perceptions. Public Administration, 92(1), 178-191.
    Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.
    Legerski, E. M., Cornwall, M., & O'Neil, B. (2006). Changing locus of control: Steelworkers adjusting to forced unemployment. Social Forces, 84(3), 1521-1537.
    Madjar, N. (2008). Emotional and informational support from different sources and employee creativity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(1), 83-100.
    Martin, R., Thomas, G., Charles, K., Epitropaki, O., & McNamara, R. (2005). The role of leader‐member exchanges in mediating the relationship between locus of control and work reactions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(1), 141-147.
    Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Cooper, B. (2018). How leadership and public service motivation enhance innovative behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71-81.
    Miller, D., Kets de Vries, M. F., & Toulouse, J. M. (1982). Top executive locus of control and its relationship to strategy-making, structure, and environment. Academy of Management Journal, 25(2), 237-253.
    Mitchell, T. R., Smyser, C. M., & Weed, S. E. (1975). Locus of control: Supervision and work satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3), 623-631.
    Moon, M. J., & Bretschneiber, S. (2002). Does the perception of red tape constrain IT innovativeness in organizations? Unexpected results from a simultaneous equation
    model and implications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2), 273-292.
    Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40-53.
    Ng, T. W., Sorensen, K. L., & Eby, L. T. (2006). Locus of control at work: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1057-1087.
    Niu, H. J. (2014). Is innovation behavior congenital? Enhancing job satisfaction as a moderator. Personnel Review, 43(2), 288-302.
    Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
    Pandey, S. K., & Kingsley, G. A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 779-800.
    Pandey, S. K., & Scott, P. G. (2002). Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts and measures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553-580.
    Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1968). Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 65-105.
    Quratulain, S., & Khan, A. K. (2015). Red tape, resigned satisfaction, public service motivation, and negative employee attitudes and behaviors: Testing a model of
    moderated mediation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(4), 307-332.
    Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Research note: Public and private managers' perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 567-574.
    Raja, U., & Johns, G. (2010). The joint effects of personality and job scope on in-role performance, citizenship behaviors, and creativity. Human Relations, 63(7), 981-1005.
    Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 518-528.
    Reitz, H. J., & Jewell, L. N. (1979). Sex, locus of control, and job involvement: A six-country investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 22(1), 72-80.
    Rietzschel, E. F. (2011). Collective regulatory focus predicts specific aspects of team innovation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(3), 337-345.
    Robinson, R. N., & Beesley, L. G. (2010). Linkages between creativity and intention to quit: An occupational study of chefs. Tourism Management, 31(6), 765-776.
    Rosenfeld, R. A. (1984). An expansion and application of Kaufman's model of red tape: The case of community development block grants. Western Political Quarterly, 37(4), 603-620.
    Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
    Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2019). Leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior: The role of creative process engagement, core self-
    evaluation, and domain knowledge. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 105-124.
    Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
    Scott, P. G., & Pandey, S. K. (2000). The influence of red tape on bureaucratic behavior: An experimental simulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4), 615-633.
    Shane, S. A. (1994). Are champions different from non-champions?. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 397-421.
    Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 482-497.
    Srirahayu, D. P., Ekowati, D., & Sridadi, A. R. (2023). Innovative work behavior in public organizations: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(2), 1-11.
    Storms, P. L., & Spector, P. E. (1987). Relationships of organizational frustration with reported behavioural reactions: The moderating effect of locus of control. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60(3), 227-234.
    Swann Jr, W. B. (2012). Self-verification theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W.
    Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 23–42). Sage Ltd.
    Swann Jr, W. B., Kwan, V. S., Polzer, J. T., & Milton, L. P. (2003). Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: The role of individuation and self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11), 1396-1406.
    Tekeli, M., & Özkoç, A. G. (2022). The effect of proactive personality and locus of control on innovative work behavior: the mediating role of work engagement. Anais Brasileiros de Estudos Turísticos,12 , 1-12.
    Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277-293.
    Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
    Van Witteloostuijn, A., & De Jong, G. (2010). Ecology of national rule birth: A longitudinal study of Dutch higher education law, 1960–2004. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 187-213.
    West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4, 15-30.
    Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
    Wisse, B., Barelds, D. P., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2015). How innovative is your employee? The role of employee and supervisor Dark Triad personality traits in supervisor
    perceptions of employee innovative behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 158-162.
    Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
    Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1989). Individual differences in creativity: An interactionist perspective (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 77-91). Springer US.
    Woods, S. A., Mustafa, M. J., Anderson, N., & Sayer, B. (2018). Innovative work behavior and personality traits: Examining the moderating effects of organizational tenure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(1), 29-42.
    Xu, L., Du, J., Lei, X., & Hipel, K. W. (2020). Effect of locus of control on innovative behavior among new generation employees: A moderated mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality, 48(10), 1-12.
    Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342.
    Zhang, Q., Abdullah, A., Hossan, D., & Hou, Z. (2021). The effect of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior with moderating role of internal locus of control and psychological empowerment. Management Science Letters, 11(4), 1267-1276.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    公共行政學系
    109256031
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109256031
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[公共行政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    603101.pdf3234KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋