政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152665
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51831044      Online Users : 539
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152665


    Title: 數位經濟之結合管制——以使用者數據與殺手併購產生之影響為中心
    Merger Control in the Digital Economy — Focused on the Impact of User's Data and Killer Acquisitions
    Authors: 吳寧軒
    Wu, Ning-Hsuan
    Contributors: 王立達
    Wang, Li-Dar
    吳寧軒
    Wu, Ning-Hsuan
    Keywords: 數位平台
    科技巨擘
    結合管制
    使用者數據
    殺手併購
    動態競爭
    Digital platform
    Big Tech
    Merger control
    User’s data
    Killer acquisition
    Dynamic competition
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-08-05 13:23:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 數位經濟以創新和數據為驅動力，研發新的產品或商業模式，更透過使用者數據的應用與分析促進創新的循環，動態地帶動市場與競爭的變遷，造就平台的興起。平台建置基礎設施作為用戶間交易與資源共享的媒介，連結雙邊或多邊市場用戶。在網路效應、規模經濟、範疇經濟的作用下，平台的價值與影響力日漸提升，跨產品的組合形塑出數位生態圈，科技巨擘GAFAM隨此浪潮蓬勃發展取得穩固的市場地位。此等巨型平台透過併購不斷拓展版圖，甚至以搶占市場或排除市場未來競爭為目的瞄準新創事業為收購對象，引發殺手併購。
    數位經濟對於傳統結合管制帶來衝擊與挑戰，本文回顧歐美結合管制規範以及結合案件審查實務經驗。整體而言，事前管制從調整申報門檻著手，或聚焦於巨型平台，對其所為的結合交易課予作為或不作為義務。結合案件的審查將數位經濟的特色納入考量，發展出較具體化的衡量指標。靈活地運用附帶條件通過結合案，為結合管制的另一種解方。例如使用者數據的分享與授權、使用者隱私的保護、限制數據使用在特定商品或服務等諸多行為面矯正措施，如果搭配上監管人制度，將可降低限制競爭疑慮，亦得在結合完成後持續進行監管。此外亦可保留結構面矯正措施的實施空間，透過拆分構成殺手併購的結合事業，維持市場競爭並促進經濟效率。
    本文認為，國際間的執法經驗值得吾人借鑑與參考。考量在地連結後，可以針對殺手併購加入以交易價值界定的申報門檻，且在審查限制競爭疑慮之時應考數位經濟特殊性以及動態觀點，具體化質性分析的衡量因素。若能活用結合案件通過審查時所附加的附帶條件，將有助於達到維持市場競爭之目的。
    本文亦肯認使用者數據衍生之隱私保護，以及對於產生創新或未來市場競爭損害且對市場競爭存在實質限制競爭疑慮之殺手併購有加以管制之必要性。隱私得作為重要的競爭參數，分析非價格競爭是否存在限制競爭疑慮。而殺手併購之分析得在實體審查過程中透過兩階段的分析架構，辨認殺手併購以及衡量殺手併購對市場競爭之影響。此外，跨部門的協作以及數位市場的調查與了解，將對我國長期結合管制之執法有所助益。持續追蹤動態競爭的影響，方得採取適當地策略方針，有效地因應市場環境或競爭的變遷。
    The digital economy is driven by innovation and data, developing new products or business models, and promoting the cycle of innovation through the application and analysis of user’s data. Dynamic competition driving market changes in the digital era. The platform builds infrastructure for transactions to connect users in bilateral or multilateral markets. Under the influence of network effects, economies of scale, and economies of scope, increase the value and influence of the platform. And also shape the digital ecosystem by the combination of cross-products. GAFAM, the big five technology companies, maintained a strong position of market power as digital platforms and ecosystems become the dominant organizational form of the digital economy. GAFAM also expand into new markets or territories through mergers and acquisitions, and even target new businesses for acquisitions with the purpose of seizing the market or eliminating future competition in the market, which may trigger killer acquisitions.
    The digital economy has brought impacts and challenges to traditional merger control. This paper reviews European and American merger control regulations and practical experience in merger cases by the competition authorities in Europe and the United States. Adjusting the reporting threshold is a method of ex-ante control. European Commission focuses on big tech, imposing obligations on them for act or omission with their merger and acquisition transactions. The characteristics of the digital economy should be taken into consideration. To develop specific measurement indicators is also important. Flexible use of remedies is another solution to merger control. Behavioral remedies, such as the sharing and authorization of user data, protection of user privacy, restrictions on the use of data in specific goods or services, can reduce concerns about restrictive competition. Through the application of remedies maintains business competition and promotes economic efficiency.
    This paper believes international law enforcement experience would be instrumental. After considering local connections, a transaction value threshold can be added to bring potential killer acquisition cases into the scope of review. When considering restrictive competition, factors such as the particularity of the digital economy, data, innovation, and dynamic perspectives to reduce the risk of potential error costs in measurement due to subjective judgments or predictions of dynamic competition. The purpose of maintaining market competition can be achieved with remedies.
    This article also believes that it is necessary to protect privacy of user’s data and control killer acquisitions. Privacy can be regarded as an important competitive parameter to analyze whether non-price competition may restrict competition. Through the two stages of identifying killer acquisitions and measuring the impact on restrictive competition as the framework to assess killer acquisitions, helps to decide whether to pass the merger case or not. The development of merger regulation in the long-term digital economy relies on collaboration and exchanges between cross-sectoral sectors. Only by continuously tracking the impact of dynamic competition can we adopt appropriate strategies and effectively cope with changes in the market environment or competition.
    Reference: 一、 中文文獻
    專書論著
    1. 公平交易委員會，數位經濟競爭政策白皮書，2022年12月。
    2. 王明禮，雙邊市場平台經濟之競爭法課題——以相關市場界定與自然獨占問題為核心，第24屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集，頁33-50，2019年。
    3. 邱映曦，大數據發展下之資訊壟斷與競爭政策——以資料驅動之結合與法制政策發展為核心，台灣第27屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集，頁149-187。
    4. 郭戎晉，競爭法與隱私法之界線暨判斷標準之研究，第28屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集，頁71-107，2022年。
    5. 陳志民、陳和全，結合矯正措施之研究，第18屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集，頁179-238，2011年。
    期刊論文
    1. 王志誠，事業結合之典範變遷、執法檢討及展望，公平交易季刊，31卷3期，頁1-58，2023年7月。
    2. 王明禮、蔡明芳、莊弘鈺，數位平台經濟之結合管制，公平交易季刊，31卷2期，頁41-80，2023年4月。
    3. 王偉，平台扼殺式併購的反壟斷規制，中外法學，34期，頁84-103，2022年5月。
    4. 宋皇志，大數據之競爭法議題——以限制競爭為中心，政大法學平論，163期，頁49-138，2020年12月。
    5. 李宛諭，大數據與競爭法，公平交易季刊，29卷4期，頁123-180，2021年10月。
    6. 沈麗玉，事業結合之管制與變革—兼論公平交易法之最新修正—，公平交易季刊，11卷1期，頁43-94，2003年1月。
    7. 林廷機、陳凱娟，結合補救制度——從美國法的認知對公平交易法適用上之探討與啟示，公平交易季刊，20卷1期，頁33-76，2012年1月。
    8. 邱映曦，大數據環境下競爭法制與國家資料策略——從歐洲發展趨勢談起（上），公平交易委員會電子報，189期，頁1-2，2022年2月。
    9. 施錦村，事業多角化結合案件類型結構分析——以組合效果為中心，公平交易季刊，19卷1期，頁155-188，2011年1月。
    10. 翁章傑，我國結合申報義務之反思——比較美國法之規範與實務，公平交易季刊，30卷1期，頁97-164，2022年1月。
    11. 張媛筑，競爭法上使用者數據之應有定位與可能造成之衝擊，公平交易季刊，26卷4期，頁125-164，2018年10月。
    12. 莊春發，競爭的內涵與公平交易法規範，公平交易季刊，10卷3期，頁1-44，2002年7月。
    13. 許俊雄，結合管制與創新——歐盟案例簡介，公平交易委員會電子報，119期，頁1-3，2019年3月。
    14. 郭戎晉，競爭法與隱私法之界線暨判斷標準之研究，公平交易季刊，30卷，4期，頁1-56，2022年10月。
    15. 陳明，數位市場競爭政策與經濟秩序觀點──以歐盟數位市場法為思考，成大法學，45期，頁1-50，2023年6月。
    16. 陳琪，美國反托拉斯法之簡介，公平交易季刊，1卷4期，頁45-67，1993年10月。
    17. 陳韻珊，垂直結合的封鎖效果，公平交易委員會電子報，19期，頁1-3，2015年1月。
    18. 黃明超，歐盟普通法院認可執委會結合案件轉介新規定，公平交易委員會電子報，206期，頁1-3，2022年11月。
    19. 黃帥升，數位經濟競爭下的殺手併購，會計研究月刊，438期，頁46-51，2022年5月。
    20. 黃銘傑，公平交易法結合管制之問題點與盲點—以結合類型與實體規範要件為中心—，公平交易季刊，25卷2期，頁29-54，2017年4月。
    21. 黃銘傑，徘徊於事後管制v.事前管制之數位時代中的競爭法主管機關，台灣經濟研究月刊，46卷7期，頁95-101，2023年7月。
    22. 楊宏暉，從德國 Facebook 案談競爭與隱私之交匯，公平交易季刊，31卷1期，頁1-66，2023年1月。
    23. 楊宏暉，歐盟競爭法關於垂直協議規範之沿革、現狀及展望，公平交易季刊，27卷1期，頁113-168，2019年1月。
    24. 謝文喆，數位平台經濟之演進與發展潛能，台灣經濟研究月刊，45卷1期，頁18-25，2022年1月。
    25. 顏雅倫，雙邊/多邊市場之競爭與創新——論競爭法的因應，科技法學評論，13卷1期，頁219-226，2019年5月。
    26. 羅鈺珊，數據經濟下共融成長的挑戰：大數據的兩面刃，經濟前瞻，178期，頁87-93，2018年7月。
    學位論文
    1. 邱映曦，競爭法的數位紀元——論數位平台資訊力對競爭法適用之影響，國立政治大學法律學系博士論文，2019年1月。
    2. 鍾詔安，將創新納入水平結合管制——借鑑經濟理論與比較法，國立臺灣大學法律學院法律學系碩士論文，2022年7月。
    研究報告
    1. 王明禮、王弓、蔡明芳、莊弘鈺，數位市場與結合管制，公平交易委員會110年委託研究報告，2021年12月。
    2. 王素彎、鄭睿合、郭戎晉，數位經濟產業現況、發展趨勢及競爭規範——以我國為中心，公平交易委員會111年委託研究報告，2022年12月。
    3. 石世豪、吳志光、吳為涵，各國競爭法對於域外結合案件審查處理方式之研究，公平交易委員會109年委託研究報告，2020年11月。
    4. 林佳華、林慧美、陳巧芬，數位時代下隱私權保護與競爭法的互動，公平交易委員會109年委託研究報告，2020年12月。
    5. 林常青、胡偉民，市場界定實證分析法之應用，公平交易委員會107年委託研究報告，2018年12月。
    6. 邱映曦、戴豪君，大數據發展下之資訊壟斷與競爭政策，公平交易委員會109年委託研究報告，2020年11月。
    7. 戴貝宜、邱佳芸、陳惠君，我國結合申報門檻檢討，公平交易委員會108年研究報告，頁1-79，2019年12月。
    其他資料
    1. 林易典譯，德國限制競爭防止法第十次修正實體規範翻譯，https://www.ftc.gov.tw/upload/7e292da1-c603-4a3e-b333-0b1c05713d26.pdf.
    2. 高敬原，一手催生的平台被祖克伯搞糟，Instagram兩創辦人雙雙閃辭，數位時代，2018年9月25日，https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/50706/instagram-founders-leave.
    3. 許祐寧，美國眾議院發布反壟斷五大法案，恢復數位市場競爭並防堵科技平台壟斷，stli科技法律研究所，2021年10月，https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?no=64&tp=1&d=8725.
    4. 陳韻珊，結合管制與大數據——歐盟案例簡介，公平交易委員會電子報，103期，2018年7月。
    5. 鉅亨網新聞中心，Zappos創始人批露出售內幕：紅杉重錢不重文化，anue鉅亨，2010年6月8日，https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/3113284.
    二、 英文文獻
    專書論著
    1. AUTORITÉ DE LA CONCURRENCE & BUNDESKARTELLAMT, COMPETITION LAW AND BIG DATA (2016), https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/DE/Berichte/Big%20Data%20Papier.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.
    2. BOURREAU, MARC, GOOGLE/FITBIT WILL MONETISE HEALTH DATA AND HARM CONSUMERS (2020), https://cepr.org/system/files/publication-files/103123-policy_insight_107_google_fitbit_will_monetise_health_data_and_harm_consumers.pdf.
    3. BOURREAU, MARC, SOME ECONOMICS OF DIGITAL ECOSYSTEMS (2020), https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2020)89/en/pdf.
    4. CADMAN, RICHARD, DYNAMIC COMPETITION AND BIG TECH MERGERS REPORT FOR BRITISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW (2023).
    5. CAVANILLAS, JOSÉ MARÍA, EDWARD CURRY & WOLFGANG WAHLSTER ed., NEW HORIZONS FOR A DATA-DRIVEN ECONOMY: A ROADMAP FOR USAGE AND EXPLOITATION OF BIG DATA IN EUROPE (2016).
    6. CMA & ICO, COMPETITION AND DATA PROTECTION IN DIGITAL MARKETS: A JOINT STATEMENT BETWEEN THE CMA AND THE ICO (2021), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60a3c893d3bf7f288aaa5c9b/Joint_CMA_ICO_Public_statement_-_final_V2_180521.pdf.
    7. OECD, BIG DATA: BRINGING COMPETITION POLICY TO THE DIGITAL ERA (2016), https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/M%282016%292/ANN4/FINAL/En/pdf.
    8. OECD, CONCEPT OF POTENTIAL COMPETITION (2021).
    9. OECD, CONGLOMERATE EFFECTS OF MERGERS (2020), https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP(2020)2/en/pdf.
    10. OECD, EXPLORING DATA-DRIVEN INNOVATION AS A NEW SOURCE OF GROWTH: MAPPING THE POLICY ISSUES RAISED BY "BIG DATA" (2013), https://doi.org/10.1787/5k47zw3fcp43-en.
    11. OECD, OECD DIGITAL ECONOMY OUTLOOK 2020 (2020), https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/bb167041-en/index.html?itemId=/content/publication/bb167041-en.
    12. OECD, START-UPS, KILLER ACQUISITIONS AND MERGER CONTROL (2020), https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP(2020)5/en/pdf.
    13. PORTUESE, AURELIEN, ALGORITHMIC ANTITRUST (2022).
    14. SUBCOMMITTEE ON ANTITRUST, COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INVESTIGATION OF COMPETITION IN DIGITAL MARKETS (2020), https://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/competition_in_digital_markets.pdf.
    15. UNCTAD, DIGITAL ECONOMY REPORT 2019: VALUE CREATION AND CAPTURE - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (2019), https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2019_en.pdf.
    16. UNCTAD, DIGITAL ECONOMY REPORT 2021 CROSS-BORDER DATA FLOWS AND DEVELOPMENT: FOR WHOM THE DATA FLOW (2021), https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2021_en.pdf.
    17. VARIAN, HAL R., JOSEPH FAREWELL & CARL SHAPIRO, THE ECONOMICS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: AN INTRODUCTION (2004).
    專書論文
    1. Visconti, Roberto Moro, Alberto Larocca & Michele Marconi, Big Data-Driven Value Chains and Digital Platforms: From Value Co-creation to Monetization, in BIG DATA ANALYTICS: TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGY FOR EFFECTIVE PLANNING (Arun K. Somani & Ganesh Chandra Deka eds., 2017).
    期刊論文
    1. Adi, Fajar Purnomo, Amazon Anti-Competition Law in the International Political Economy, 558 ATLANTIS PRESS 608 (2021).
    2. Aravantinos, Stavros, Competition law and the digital economy: the framework of remedies in the digital era in the EU, 17(1) EUR. COMPETITION J. 134 (2021).
    3. Aydin, Ahmet Arif, A Comparative Perspective on Technologies of Big Data Value Chain, 11 IEEE ACCESS 112133 (2023).
    4. Bagnoli, Vicente, Questions that Have Arisen since the EU Decision on the WhatsApp Acquisition by Facebook, 3 MARKET AND COMPETITION L. REV. 15 (2019).
    5. Bagnoli, Vicente, The Big Data Relevant Market, 23 CONCORRENZA E MERCATO 73 (2016).
    6. Bartels, Nedo & Anna Schmitt, Developing network effects for digital platforms in two-sided markets – The NfX construction guide of Article100044, 2(2) DIGITAL BUSINESS 1 (2022).
    7. Bednar, Richard et al., Startup Revenue Model Failures, 14(4) MONTENEGRIN J. OF ECON. 141 (2018).
    8. Borgogno, Oscar & Giuseppe Colangelo, Data sharing and interoperability: Fostering innovation and competition through APIs, 35(5) COMPUT. L. & SEC. REV. 1(2019).
    9. Cooper, James C. & John M. Yun, Antitrust & Privact: It's Complicated, 2022 U. ILL. J.L. TECH. & POL'Y 343 (2022).
    10. Cui, Yesheng, Sami Kara & Ka C. Chan, Manufacturing big data ecosystem: A systematic literature review, 62 Robot. COMPUT. INTEGRATED MANUF. 1, (2020).
    11. Cunningham, Colleen, Florian Ederer & Song Ma, Killer Acquisitions, 129 J. POL. ECON. 649 (2021).
    12. Eroğlu, Muzaffer & Alptekin Köksal, Ex-Post Application of Structural Remedies to Large Online Platforms at a National Level, 9(1) İSTANBUL MEDENIYET ÜNIVERSTTESI HUKUK FAKÜLTESI DERGISI 135 (2024).
    13. Faroukhi, A.Z., I. El Alaoui, Y. Gahi & A. Amine, Big data monetization throughout Big Data Value Chain: a comprehensive review, 7 J. BIG DATA 1 (2020).
    14. Fast, Victoria, Daniel Schnurr & Michael Wohlfarth, Regulation of data-driven market power in the digital economy: Business value creation and competitive advantages from big data, 38 J. INFO. TECH. 202 (2022).
    15. Gautier, Alex & Joe Lamesch, Mergers in the Digital Economy, 54(1) INFO. ECON. & POL’Y 1 (2021).
    16. Hagiu, Andrei, Strategic Decisions for Multisided Platforms, 55 MIT SLOAN MGMT. REV. 71 (2014).
    17. Hemphill, C. Scott & Tim Wu, Nascent Competitors, 168 U. PA. L. REV. 1879 (2020).
    18. Henten, Anders & Iwona Windekilde, Demand-Side Economies of Scope in Big Tech Business Modelling and Strategy, 10(6) SYSTEMS 1 (2022).
    19. Hovenkamp, Herbert J., Antitrust Interoperability Remedies, 123 COL. L. REV. 1 (2023).
    20. Latham, Oliver, Isabel Tecu & Nitika Bagaria, Beyond Killer Acquisitions: Are There More Common Potential Competition Issues in Tech Deals and How Can These Be Assessed?, 2(2) CPI ANTITRUST CHRONICLE 26 (2020).
    21. Peret, Maayan, Digital Remedies, 35 BERKELY TECH. L. J. 1 (2020).
    22. Petit, Nicolas & David J. Teece, Innovating Big Tech firms and competition policy: favoring dynamic over static competition, 30(5) INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE 1168 (2021).
    23. Ren, Yi, Killer Acquisition: Antitrust Control on Internet Platform, 5(3) SCI. J. ECON. & MGMT. REV. 227 (2023).
    24. Ribera Martínez, Alba, The Facebook/Giphy Divestiture: The (New) First Of Many?, 1 J. L. MKT.& INNOVATION 95 (2022).
    25. Robertson, Viktoria H.S.E., The Future of Digital Mergers in a Post-DMA World, 44 EUR. COMPETITION L. REV. 447 (2023).
    26. Rong, Ke, Research agenda for the digital economy, 1(1) J. DIGITAL ECON. 20 (2022).
    27. Sidak, J. Gregory & David J. Teece, Dynamic Competition in Antitrust Law, 5(4) J. OF COMPETITION L. & ECON. 581 (2009).
    28. Van den Boom, Jasper, What does the Digital Markets Act harmonize? – exploring interactions between the DMA and national competition laws, 19 EUR. COMPETITION J. 57 (2023).
    29. Wong, Brandon, Freezing innovation: How the platform competition and opportunity act will freeze funds in the start-up market, 50 PEPP. L. REV. 399 (2023).
    30. Xing, Ziyi, Research on Market Definition of Digital Economy and Case Analysis: Based on the Perspective of Bilateral Market, 12 FRONTIERS IN BUS., ECON. & MGMT. 87 (2023).
    學位論文
    1. Alves Fulgencio, Aline, Killer acquisitions and European merger control in the digital era, Master's Thesis in European and International Trade Law (2021), http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9051039.
    2. Kolloge, Alexander, Killer Acquisitions in the Platform Economy: Do Tech Giants Acquire Target Firms to Leverage Innovation or Eliminate Competition?, Master’s thesis in Copenhagen Business School (2021), https://research-api.cbs.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/68333515/1150378_Killer_Acquisitions_in_the_Platform_Economy_S133465_S133363.pdf.
    撰寫中論文（Working paper/ Discussion paper）
    1. Bagnoli, Vicente, The Big Data Relevant Market As A Tool For A Case By Case Analysis At The Digital Economy: Could the EU decision at Facebook/WhatsApp merger have been different?, 12th ASCOLA Conference (2017), https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/5841763/mod_resource/content/1/Bagnoli%20Antitrust%20big%20data%20SSRN-id3064795.pdf.
    2. Barefoot, Kevin, Dave Curtis, William Jolliff, Jessica R. Nicholson & Robert Omohundro, Defining and Measuring the Digital Economy, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis Working Paper (2018), https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/papers/defining-and-measuring-the-digital-economy.pdf
    3. Barefoot, Kevin, Dave Curtis, William Jolliff, Jessica R. Nicholson & Robert Omohundro, Defining and Measuring the Digital Economy, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis Working Paper, 6-8 (2018), https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/papers/defining-and-measuring-the-digital-economy.pdf.
    4. Cabral, Luís, Big Tech Acquisitions, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 18272 (Jul. 4, 2023), http://luiscabral.net/economics/workingpapers/bigtech%202023%2006.pdf.
    5. Cartapanis, Marie, Killer Acquisitions in Digital Markets, Aix Marseille University Research paper (2023), https://competition-forum.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Rapport-A.-HUMEAU-PAYET.pdf.
    6. e Lemos, Thales de Melo & Guilherme Mendes Resende, Nascent Competition and Killer Acquisitions in Digital Markets: A Decade of Acquisitions by Big Tech, RESEARCH SQUARE (DEC. 28, 2023), https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3793931/v1.
    7. Gugler, Klaus, Florian Szücs & Ulrich Wohak, Start-up Acquisitions, Venture Capital and Innovation: A Comparative Study of Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft, Department of Economics Working Paper Series 340, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business (2023), https://research.wu.ac.at/ws/portalfiles/portal/44832243/WP340.pdf.
    8. Hoffmann, Jörg & Germán Johannsen, EU-Merger Control & Big Data on Data-specific Theories of Harm and Remedies (Apr. 9, 2019), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3364792.
    9. Kamepalli, Sai Krishna, Raghuram G. Rajan & Luigi Zingales, Kill Zone (2021), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3555915.
    10. Norbäck, Pehr-Johan & Lars Persson, Why Big Data Can Make Creative Destruction More Creative – But Less Destructive, Research Institute of Industrial Economics Working Paper No. 1454 (2023), https://www.ifn.se/wfiles/wp/wp1454.pdf.
    11. Pradhan, Sadev & Arpit Bansal, Privacy as a Non-Price Competition Factor: Antitrust Perspectives from the EU and the US. (2023), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4559144.
    12. Stavroulaki, Theodosia, Unraveling Ariadne’s Thread: Antitrust and the Big Data Revolution in Healthcare (2023), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4465529#paper-citations-widget.
    13. von Ingersleben-Seip, Nora & Zlatina Georgieva, Old Tools for the New Economy? Counterfactual Causation in Foreclosure Assessment and Choice of Remedies on Data-driven Markets (May 15, 2021), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3861967.
    14. Yun, John M., Potential Competition, Nascent Competitors, and Killer Acquisitions, The Global Antitrust Institute Report on the Digital Economy 18 (Nov. 11, 2020), HTTPS://PAPERS.SSRN.COM/SOL3/PAPERS.CFM?ABSTRACT_ID=3733716.
    其他資料
    1. Alphabet, annual report 2023 (Jan. 31, 2024), https://abc.xyz/assets/4b/01/aae7bef55a59851b0a2d983ef18f/596de1b094c32cf0592a08edfe84ae74.pdf.
    2. Amazon, Form 10-K (Feb. 2, 2024), https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001018724/c7c14359-36fa-40c3-b3ca-5bf7f3fa0b96.pdf.
    3. American Booksellers Association Advocacy Division, American Monopoly:Amazon’s Anti-Competitive Behavior is in Violation of Antitrust Laws (Oct. 30, 2020), https://www.bookweb.org/sites/default/files/diy/American%20Booksellers%20Association%202020%20Amazon%20White%20Paper_0.pdf.
    4. American Booksellers Association Advocacy Division, American Monopoly:Amazon’s Anti-Competitive Behavior is in Violation of Antitrust Laws (2020), https://www.bookweb.org/sites/default/files/diy/American%20Booksellers%20Association%202020%20Amazon%20White%20Paper_0.pdf.
    5. Apple, Form 10-K (Nov. 3, 2023), https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0000320193/a4b40e13-bf4b-47bc-b2fe-e5ccd72f5815.pdf.
    6. Baribeau, Simone, How Tony Hsieh Pivoted Zappos Into A $1.2 Billion Amazon Acquisition, FAST COMPANY (Sept. 4, 2012), https://www.fastcompany.com/3000591/how-tony-hsieh-pivoted-zappos-12-billion-amazon-acquisition.
    7. Bay Atlantic University, Characteristics of Big Data: Types & Examples, BAY ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY (Nov. 7, 2023), https://bau.edu/blog/characteristics-of-big-data/.
    8. Carlson, Julie, The Platform Competition and Opportunity Act Is a Solution in Search of a Problem, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOUNDATION (Jan. 31, 2022), https://itif.org/publications/2022/01/31/platform-competition-and-opportunity-act-solution-search-problem/.
    9. Cutler, Kim-Mai, From 0 to $1 billion in two years: Instagram’s rose-tinted ride to glory, TECHCRUNCH (Apr. 9, 2012), https://techcrunch.com/2012/04/09/instagram-story-facebook-acquisition/.
    10. Daisyme, Peter, Data is the New Currency. Don’t Let It Slip Through Your Fingers, DUE (Apr. 26, 2023), https://due.com/data-new-currency/#The_Importance_of_Data.
    11. De Crombrugghe, Alexandre & Shelley Moore OECD, Investment Promotion and the Digital Economy: A Comparative Analysis of Investment Promotion Practices across the OECD, OECD Investment Insights (2021), https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/Investment-Insights-Investment-Promotion-Digital-Economy-OECD.pdf.
    12. Espinoza, Javier & Sam Fleming, Margrethe Vestager eyes toughening ‘burden of proof’ for Big Tech, FINANCIAL TIMES (Oct. 30, 2019), https://www.ft.com/content/24635a5c-fa4f-11e9-a354-36acbbb0d9b6.
    13. European Free Trade Association, European Economic Area (EEA) / Relations with the EU, https://www.efta.int/eea (last visited Apr. 15, 2024).
    14. Ezrielev, Jay, Uncertainty and Two Theories of Harm in Nascent Competitor Acquisitions, CPI A PYMNTS COMPANY (Feb. 10, 2022), https://www.pymnts.com/cpi_posts/uncertainty-and-two-theories-of-harm-in-nascent-competitor-acquisitions/.
    15. Facebook, Form 10-K, https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/annual_reports/FB_2012_10K.pdf. (last visited May 13, 2024)
    16. Filistrucchi, Lapo, Market definition in multi-sided markets, OECD Rethinking Antitrust Tools for Multi-Sided Platforms (2018), www.oecd.org/competition/rethinking-antitrust-tools-for-multi-sided-platforms.htm.
    17. Furman, Jason, Prepared Testimony for the Hearing “Online Platforms and Market Power, Part 3: The Role of Data and Privacy in Competition” (Oct.18, 2019), https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/documents/furman2019-10-18.pdf.
    18. Glaser, April, Marc Benioff says companies buy each other for the data, and the government isn’t doing anything about it: The FTC has never challenged a merger based on the anticompetitive acquisition of data, VOX (Nov.15, 2016), https://www.vox.com/2016/11/15/13631938/benioff-salesforce-data-government-federal-trade-commission-ftc-linkedin-microsoft.
    19. Harbour, Pamela Jones, Dissenting statement of Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour in the matter of Google/DoubleClick, F.T.C. File No. 071-0170 (2007), https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_statements/statement-matter-google/doubleclick/071220harbour_0.pdf.
    20. Harty, Ronan P, Nathan Kiratzis & Anna M Kozlowski, Merger Remedies Guide Overview, GLOBAL COMPETITION REVIEW (Dec. 1, 2023), https://globalcompetitionreview.com/guide/the-guide-merger-remedies/fifth-edition/article/overview.
    21. Humphries, Conor, WhatsApp fined a record 225 mln euro by Ireland over privacy, REUTERS (Sept. 2, 2021), https://www.reuters.com/technology/irish-data-privacy-watchdog-fines-whatsapp-225-mln-euros-2021-09-02/.
    22. Jia, Xiao, Michael A. Cusumano & Jin Chen, An Analysis of Multi-Sided Platform Research Over the Past Three Decades: Framework and Discussion, QUESTROM WORLD (Jul. 15, 2019), https://questromworld.bu.edu/platformstrategy/wp-content/uploads/sites/49/2019/07/Platform-Review-Article-and-supplemental-material-2019-07-15-BU-Conference.pdf.
    23. Jony, Rabiul Islam, Rakibul Islam Rony, Musfiqur Rahman & Abiduzzaman Rahat, Big Data Characteristics, Value Chain and Challenges, Bangladesh Proceedings of the 1st international conference on advanced information and communication technology (2016), https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Musfiqur-Rahman/publication/311323742_Big_Data_Characteristics_Value_Chain_and_Challenges/links/5841ae8308ae8e63e6219215/Big-Data-Characteristics-Value-Chain-and-Challenges.pdf.
    24. Lamadrid, Alfonso & Sam Villers, Big data, Privacy and Competition Law: Do Competition Authorities Know How To Do It?, CPI Antitrust Chronicle (Jan. 6, 2012), https://antitrustlair.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/cpi-lamadrid-villiers.pdf.
    25. Majure, W Robert, Nathaniel E Hipsman & Jessica Liu, Evaluating innovation theories of harm in merger review: economic frameworks and difficulties, CORNERSTONE RESEARCH (Aug.9, 2021), https://www.cornerstone.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Evaluating-innovation-theories-of-harm-in-merger-review.pdf.
    26. Meta, Form 10-K (Feb. 2, 2024), https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001326801/c7318154-f6ae-4866-89fa-f0c589f2ee3d.pdf.
    27. Microsoft News Center, Microsoft to acquire LinkedIn, MICROSOFT (Jun. 13, 2016), https://news.microsoft.com/2016/06/13/microsoft-to-acquire-linkedin/.
    28. Microsoft, Form 10-K (Jul. 27, 2023), https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/789019/000095017023035122/msft-20230630.htm#item_15_exhibits_financial_statement_sch.
    29. OECD, The Impact of Disruptive Innovations on Competition Law Enforcement, DAF/COMP/GF(2015)15/FINAL (2017), https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/GF(2015)15/FINAL/en/pdf.
    30. Olanoff, Drew, Mark Zuckerberg: Our Biggest Mistake Was Betting Too Much on HTML5, TECHCRUNCH (Sept. 11, 2012), https://techcrunch.com/2012/09/11/mark-zuckerberg-our-biggest-mistake-with-mobile-was-betting-too-much-on-html5/.
    31. Price, Rob, Zuckerberg viewed Instagram as a threat that could hurt Facebook's business before buying it, internal emails show, BUSINESS INSIDER (Jul. 30, 2020), https://www.businessinsider.com/zuckerberg-2012-instagram-threat-to-facebook-harm-business-2020-7.
    32. Richter, Felix, Apple Services: A Decade of Growth, STATISTA (Nov. 3, 2023), https://www.statista.com/chart/14629/apple-services-revenue/.
    33. Riley, Alan, Killer Acquisitions and Article 22: A Step Too Far?, KLUWER COMPETITION LAW BLOG (Aug. 30, 2023), https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2023/08/30/killer-acquisitions-and-article-22-a-step-too-far/.
    34. Sarath, Berkus Valuation Method for Startups, EQVISTA (Jul. 22,2021), https://eqvista.com/berkus-valuation-method-for-startups/.
    35. Scrivens, Scott, WhatsApp to monetize by selling ads and charging business users, ANDROID POLICE (Aug. 2, 2018), https://www.androidpolice.com/2018/08/02/whatsapp-monetize-selling-ads-charging-business-users/.
    36. Sengupta, Somini, Why Would the Feds Investigate the Facebook-Instagram Deal?, THE NEW YORK TIMES May 10, 2012), https://archive.nytimes.com/bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/10/why-would-the-feds-be-probing-the-facebook-instagram-deal/.
    37. Shutterstock, Inc., Shutterstock to Acquire GIPHY, the World's Largest GIF Library and Search Engine, PR NEWSWIRE (May 23, 2023), https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/shutterstock-to-acquire-giphy-the-worlds-largest-gif-library-and-search-engine-301831611.html.
    38. Statcounter, Operating System Market Share Taiwan, STATCOUNTER, https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/all/taiwan (last visited Apr. 28, 2024).
    39. Statcounter, Search Engine Market Share Taiwan, STATCOUNTER, https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/taiwan (last visited Apr. 28, 2024).
    40. Statcounter, Social Media Stats Taiwan, STATCOUNTER, https://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/taiwan (last visited Apr. 28, 2024).
    41. Thanou, Marina, Killer Acquisitions: Challenges arising under Competition Law (2023), https://pergamos.lib.uoa.gr/uoa/dl/object/3387755/file.pdf.
    42. The Motley Fool, The Largest Companies by Market Cap in 2024 (Feb. 2, 2024), https://www.fool.com/research/largest-companies-by-market-cap/#toc_companies-1-5.
    43. The World Bank, Explanation of externalities on digital platforms, DIGITAL REGULATION PLATFORM (Oct. 28, 2020), https://digitalregulation.org/explanation-of-externalities-on-digital-platforms/.
    44. Thiemann, Ania & Pedro Gonzaga, Big Data: Bring Competition Policy to the Digital Era, OECD (Nov. 29, 2016), https://www.slideshare.net/OECD-DAF/big-data-bringing-competition-policy-to-the-digital-era-oecd-competition-division-november-2016-oecd-discussion.
    45. U.S. Federal Trade Commission, FTC to Examine Past Acquisitions by Large Technology Companies, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Feb. 11, 2020), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2020/02/ftc-examine-past-acquisitions-large-technology-companies.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法律科際整合研究所
    110652001
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110652001
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Law and Interdisciplinary Studies] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    200101.pdf2963KbAdobe PDF1View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback