Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152657
|
| Title: | 電腦品牌商的綠色供應鏈管理與策略研究
Green Supply Chain Management and Strategies of Computer Companies |
| Authors: | 曾羽澤
Tseng, Yu-Tze |
| Contributors: | 柯玉佳
Ko, Yu-Chia
曾羽澤
Tseng, Yu-Tze |
| Keywords: | 綠色供應鏈管理
綠色供應商
自然資源基礎觀點
關係自然資源基礎觀點
Green supply chain management
Green suppliers
Natural resource-based view
Relational natural resource-based view |
| Date: | 2024 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-08-05 13:06:55 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究探討了台灣電腦品牌商在綠色供應鏈管理中的策略與挑戰，隨著全球環境問題的加劇，各國政府和國際組織紛紛推出嚴格的環保法規，促使企業從傳統供應鏈管理轉向綠色供應鏈管理（GSCM），以達到可持續發展的目標。本研究以宏碁和微星為主要案例，深入分析他們在綠色供應鏈管理中的具體策略和實踐。文獻回顧探討了綠色供應鏈管理的相關理論，包括資源基礎觀點（Resource-Based View, RBV）、自然資源基礎觀點（Natural Resource-Based View, NRBV）和關係自然資源基礎觀點（Relational Natural Resource-Based View, RNRBV）。RBV強調企業內部資源和能力是持續競爭優勢的來源，而NRBV則將環境資源納入討論範疇，強調企業應在環境限制下尋求競爭優勢。RNRBV進一步結合了RBV和NRBV，強調企業與供應鏈夥伴的合作和協同作用，以增強企業環境績效和市場競爭力。在研究方法上，本研究採用了個案分析法，選擇了宏碁和微星兩家公司，通過訪談、實地觀察和次級資料分析等方式，深入了解他們在綠色供應鏈管理中的實踐和挑戰。在個案分析中，宏碁和微星展示了各自在綠色供應鏈管理中的創新與挑戰。他們在綠色產品設計中，不僅考量市場需求和消費者心理，還特別注重材料的環保性，例如使用消費後回收塑膠（PCR）和其他可回收材料來降低碳足跡。企業更與供應商合作，開發環保材料和技術，以實現可持續發展目標。本研究發現兩間企業在綠色供應鏈管理中各自採取了積極的策略和創新舉措，有助於提升企業的環保形象和市場競爭力，未來台灣電腦品牌商需繼續強化內部資源的整合與外部合作，以推動更多環保創新，應對不斷變化的市場需求和更嚴格的環保法規。基於三大觀點，可以理解企業是否在綠色供應鏈管理上有效實施，幫助企業提升內部資源利用效率與供應鏈夥伴的協同作用及環保創新的能力，從而在市場上獲得競爭優勢，提高產品差異化並增強品牌形象。
This study explores the strategies and challenges of Taiwanese computer brands in green supply chain management (GSCM). As global environmental issues intensify, stringent environmental regulations have prompted companies to shift from traditional supply chain management to GSCM to achieve sustainable development goals. This research focuses on Acer and MSI as primary cases, analyzing their specific strategies and practices in GSCM.The literature review examines theories related to GSCM, including the Resource-Based View (RBV), Natural Resource-Based View (NRBV), and Relational Natural Resource-Based View (RNRBV). RBV emphasizes internal resources and capabilities as sources of sustained competitive advantage, while NRBV incorporates environmental resources, and RNRBV highlights collaboration with supply chain partners to enhance environmental performance and market competitiveness.Using case analysis, this study investigates Acer and MSI through interviews, field observations, and secondary data analysis. Both companies have shown innovation and faced challenges in green product design by considering market demand and focusing on environmentally friendly materials, such as post-consumer recycled plastics (PCR). They collaborate with suppliers to develop eco-friendly materials and technologies.The conclusion is that both companies' proactive strategies and innovations in GSCM help enhance their environmental image and market competitiveness. Taiwanese computer brands must strengthen internal resource integration and external collaboration to drive further environmental innovation, adapting to market demands and stricter regulations. Effective GSCM implementation, based on the three theoretical perspectives, can improve resource utilization efficiency, collaboration with partners, and environmental innovation, thus gaining a competitive edge, increasing product differentiation, and enhancing brand image. |
| Reference: | 英文文獻
Abbas, J., Mahmood, S., Ali, S., Ali, R., & Ali, G. (2022). Green supply chain management: Practices, challenges, and futuredirections. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131096.
Abukhader, S. M., & Jonson, G. (2004). Logistics and the environment: Is it an established subject? International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 7(2), 137-149.
Akben, A. (2021). Exploring the impact of green supply chain management on company performance: Evidence from the manufacturing industry. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, 106518.
Aragón-Correa, J. A., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88-103.
Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., & Baah, C. (2023). Green corporate reputation and innovation: The role of non-supply chain learning and green supply chain knowledge. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(11), 4884-4906.
Andersén, J. (2021). A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms. Technovation, 104, 102254.
Asif, M., Searcy, C., Garvare, R., & Ahmad, N. (2020). Including sustainability in business excellence models. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(7), 773-786.
Ballou, R. H., Gilbert, S. M., & Mukherjee, A. (2000). New managerial challenges from supply chain opportunities. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 7-18.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299-1315.
Bell, J. (2013). Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: A study of the Australian and Chinese markets. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 23-35.
Blome, C., Paulraj, A., & Schuetz, K. (2014). Supply chain collaboration and sustainability: A profile deviation analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(5), 639-663.
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320.
Bowen, F. E. (2014). Greenwashing: Corporate environmentalism, rhetoric, and reality. Organization & Environment, 27(2), 107-129.
Brones, F. A., & Carvalho, M. M. (2015). From 50 to 1: Integrating literature toward a systemic ecodesign framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 44-57.
Cavdar, Z., Oktan, M. A., Ural, C., Calisir, M., Kocak, A., Heybeli, C., ... & Cavdar, C. (2020). Renoprotective effects of alpha lipoic acid on iron overload-induced kidney injury in rats by suppressing NADPH oxidase 4 and p38 MAPK
signaling. Biological Trace Element Research, 193, 483-493.
Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822-836.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic management journal, 35(1), 1-23.
Circular Taiwan (2023). The rise of circular electronics: A new pathway for sustainability. Circular Taiwan Journal.
Dangelico, R. M. (2016). Green product innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 560-576.
Dangelico, R. M., Pontrandolfo, P., & Pujari, D. (2017). Developing sustainable new products in the textile and upholstered furniture industries: Role of external integrative capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 287-298.
Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091-1112.
Durand, R., & Vergne, J. P. (2015). Asset divestment as a response to media attacks in stigmatized industries. Strategic Management Journal, 36(8), 1205-1223.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
European Commission (2003). Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Official Journal of the European Union, L 37, 24-38.
European Commission (2003). Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Official Journal of the European Union, L 37, 19-23.
European Commission (2006). Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS). Official Journal of the European Union.
European Commission (2011). Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS). Official Journal of the European Union.
Fiksel, J. (2012). Design for environment: A guide to sustainable product development. McGraw Hill Professional.
Formentini, M., & Taticchi, P. (2016). Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 659-672.
Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 149-159.
Gliedt, T., Berkhout, T., & Parker, P. (2018). The dynamics of sustainable supply chain management and economic innovation: The role of eco-industrial parks. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 14, 265-277.
Green Electronics Council (2021). EPEAT criteria.
Greer, J., & Bruno, K. (1996). Greenwash: The reality behind corporate environmentalism. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.
Gualandris, J., Klassen, R. D., Vachon, S., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2014). Sustainable evaluation and verification in supply chains: Aligning and leveraging accountability to stakeholders. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 192-214.
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768.
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3-43.
Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., & Kannan, D. (2015). Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 603-626.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2010). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464-1479.
Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 69-82.
Hervani, A. A., Helms, M. M., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(4), 330-353.
Henard, D. H., & McFadyen, M. A. (2012). Resource dedication and new product performance: A resource‐based view. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 193-204.
IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Kabir, S. M. S. (2016). Methods of Data Collection. Basic Guidelines for Research: An Introductory Approach for All Disciplines.
Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658.
Lee, S. Y., & Kim, Y. H. (2011). Analyzing the determinants of green supply chain management adoption in the Korean manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(13), 1495-1503.
Lockett, A., Thompson, S., & Morgenstern, U. (2009). The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 9-28.
Luttropp, C., & Lagerstedt, J. (2006). EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of cleaner production, 14(15-16), 1396-1408.
Luiz, O. J., Woods, R. M., Madin, E. M., & Madin, J. S. (2016). Predicting IUCN extinction risk categories for the world's data deficient groupers (Teleostei: Epinephelidae). Conservation Letters, 9(5), 342-350.
Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223-249.
Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., Heavey, C., & McGrath, P. (2015). Environmental and social supply chain management sustainability practices: Construct development and measurement. Production Planning & Control, 26(8), 673-690.
Melander, L. (2017). Achieving sustainable development by collaborating in green product innovation. Business strategy and the environment, 26(8), 1095-1109.
Melander, L., & Pazirandeh, A. (2019). Collaborating for sustainable procurement: Delivering social and environmental outcomes through supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(3), 100536.
Ministry of Finance, Taiwan. (2021). Industrial production statistics.
Murphy, P. R., & Poist, R. F. (2003). Green perspectives and practices: A "comparative logistics" study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8(2), 122-131.
Özdemir, A. I. (2004). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminin Gelişimi, Süreçleri ve Yararları. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 87-96.
Östlin, J., Sundin, E., & Björkman, M. (2009). Product life-cycle implications for remanufacturing strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(11), 999-1009.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
Pigosso, D. C., Rozenfeld, H., & McAloone, T. C. (2013). Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 160-173.
Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76-85.
Ray, G., Barney, J. B., & Muhanna, W. A. (2004). Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 23-37.
Romiguer, A. (2011). Supply Chain Management: The Logic of Supply Chains and Networks. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(1), 11-26. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Saglam, M. (2008). Fundamentals of Supply Chain Management: Twelve Drivers of Competitive Advantage. Archive.org.
Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2010). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 1-15.
Scarpellini, S., Valero-Gil, J., & Moneva, J. M. (2020). Sustainable financing through the integration of environmental, social and governance criteria: An exploratory study using corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120626.
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710.
Shang, K. C., & Marlow, P. B. (2005). Logistics capability and performance in Taiwan's major manufacturing firms. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41(3), 217-234.
Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53-80.
Szabo, S., & Webster, J. (2019). Perceived greenwashing: the effects of green
marketing on environmental and product perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(4), 719-739.
TerraChoice. (2010). The sins of greenwashing, home and family edition.
Tseng, M. L., & Chiu, A. S. (2013). Evaluating firm's green supply chain
management in linguistic preferences. Journal of cleaner production, 40, 22-31.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Emissions Gap Report 2021.
Verona, G. (1999). A resource-based view of product development. Academy of management review, 24(1), 132-142.
Walker, H., Di Sisto, L., & McBain, D. (2008). Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(1), 69-85.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Wong, K. V., & Hernandez, A. (2012). A review of additive manufacturing.
International scholarly research notices, 2012(1), 208760.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.
Zaman, R., Atawnah, N., Haseeb, M., Nadeem, M., & Irfan, S. (2021). Does corporate
eco-innovation affect stock price crash risk?. The British Accounting Review, 53(5), 101031.
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265-289.
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4333-4355.
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Geng, Y. (2005). Green supply chain management in China: Pressures, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(5), 449-468.
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2008a). Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 261-273.
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2008b). Green supply chain management implications for “closing the loop”. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(1), 1-18.
Zsidisin, G. A., & Siferd, S. P. (2001). Environmental purchasing: A framework for theory development. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(1), 61-73.
中文文獻
台灣機電工會(2021)。網路資訊取自：https://www.teema.org.tw/member-service.aspx?unitid=5
黃聯海、王建業、陳海玉、梁文和（2006）。台灣電子產業綠色供應鏈管理實證研究。產業研究季刊，2(3)，1-20。
畢馬威（2023）。ESG保險：戰略與轉型。取自 https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/cn/pdf/zh/2023/09/esg-in-insurance-strategy-and-transformation.pdf
宏碁公司 (2022)。2022 年永續報告書。取自https://www.acer.com/sustainability/uploads/files/shares/sustainability-report/2022_Acer_Sustainability_Report_zh.pdf
微星科技（2023）。2023年永續報告書。取自https://storage-asset.msi.com/file/pdf/2023_msi_csr_ch.pdf
華碩（2023）。2023年永續報告書。取自https://esg.asus.com/files/reports/ASUS_Detailed_2023_CHN.pd
宏碁劉靜靜（2023）。【永續長來了】EP4 宏碁劉靜靜｜永續利害關係人多 如何讓所有人都認同？[音頻播客]。取自 https://podcasts.apple.com/tw/podcast/%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E9%95%B7%E4%BE%86%E4%BA%86-ep4-%E5%AE%8F%E7%A2%81%E5%8A%89%E9%9D%9C%E9%9D%9C-%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E5%88%A9%E5%AE%B3%E9%97%9C%E4%BF%82%E4%BA%BA%E5%A4%9A-%E5%A6%82%E4%BD%95%E8%AE%93%E6%89%80%E6%9C%89%E4%BA%BA%E9%83%BD%E8%AA%8D%E5%90%8C/id1609012116?i=1000653849968 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
111364126 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111364126 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 412601.pdf | | 1755Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
