Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152087
|
| Title: | ESG對公司績效的影響：高學歷員工的調節效果
The Impact of ESG on Corporate Performance: The Moderating Effect of Employees with Higher Education |
| Authors: | 張鈞奕
Zhang, Jun-Yi |
| Contributors: | 譚丹琪
張鈞奕
Zhang, Jun-Yi |
| Keywords: | ESG
公司績效
高學歷員工
調節效果
台灣製造業
ESG
Corporate performance
Higher education employees |
| Date: | 2024 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-07-01 12:44:10 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在探討環境、社會與治理（ESG）對公司績效的影響，並分析高學歷員工比例在此關係中的調節作用。隨著全球對於可持續發展的關注日益增加，企業在實施ESG策略時面臨著各種挑戰，而高學歷員工被認為能夠更有效地推動這些策略的執行。
本研究以台灣上市的製造業公司為樣本，數據來源取自台灣經濟新報（TEJ）資料庫，涵蓋2016年至2022年的資料，共計643家公司4501個觀察值。研究方法採用Panel Data Regression模型，將公司績效（以資產回報率ROA衡量）作為應變數，ESG總分及其各構面分數（環境、社會、治理）作為自變數，高學歷員工比例作為調節變數，並控制公司規模和產業類別的影響。
研究結果顯示，ESG表現對公司績效有顯著的正向影響，且各構面（環境、社會、治理）分數對公司績效的影響亦為正向。此外，高學歷員工比例對ESG與公司績效之間的關係具有顯著的調節效果，特別是在整體表現和社會構面上，高學歷員工的存在能夠強化ESG對公司績效的正向影響。
本研究的發現強調了ESG策略對企業績效的重要性，並指出高學歷員工在推動ESG策略實施中的關鍵角色。這些結果為企業在制定ESG策略和人力資源政策時提供了實證依據，並為政策制定者提供了有價值的建議，促進企業可持續發展。
This study investigates the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices on corporate performance, specifically examining how the proportion of employees with higher education moderates this relationship. With a growing focus on sustainable development, companies face challenges in implementing ESG strategies, and higher-education employees are believed to be key in driving these initiatives.
Using a sample of 643 listed manufacturing companies in Taiwan from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) database, covering 2016 to 2022 and totaling 4501 observations, the study employs a Panel Data Regression model. Corporate performance is measured by Return on Assets (ROA), with ESG scores and their components (environmental, social, governance) as independent variables, the proportion of higher-education employees as the moderating variable, and company size and industry category as control variables.
Results indicate that ESG performance positively impacts corporate performance, with each ESG component also showing positive effects. The proportion of higher-education employees significantly moderates this relationship, particularly in the Overall performance and social dimension, enhancing the positive impact of ESG on corporate performance.
These findings highlight the importance of ESG strategies for corporate performance and the crucial role of highly educated employees in implementing these strategies. The study provides empirical evidence to guide companies in formulating ESG and HR policies and offers valuable recommendations for policymakers to promote sustainable development in businesses. |
| Reference: | 參考文獻
內政部統計處 (2023)。民國113年第18周，《內政統計周報》，內政部。
台灣經濟新報，永續報告書為何？有何參考準則？永續報告書內容一覽，上網日期113年4月13日，檢自 https://www.tejwin.com/insight/sustainability-report/
林木興、施怡君、周桂田 (2023)。臺灣永續治理法制建構初探：永續資訊揭露及其法律轉型。全國律師月刊，第27卷第8期，ESG專題，頁5-15。
Albertini, E. (2013). Does environmental management improve financial performance? A meta-analytical review. Organization & Environment, 26(4), 431-457.
Andrews, J., & Higson, H. (2008). Graduate employability,‘soft skills’ versus ‘hard’business knowledge: A European study. Higher education in Europe, 33(4), 411-422.
Asrar-ul-Haq, M., Kuchinke, K. P., & Iqbal, A. (2017). The relationship between corporate social responsibility, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: Case of Pakistani higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2352-2363.
Awaysheh, A., Heron, R. A., Perry, T., & Wilson, J. I. (2020). On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 41(6), 965-987.
Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S119-S127.
Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of management review, 32(3), 794-816.
Barrymore, N., & Sampson, R. C. (2021, February). ESG performance and labor productivity: Exploring whether and when ESG affects firm performance. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1, p. 13997). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
Benlemlih, M., & Bitar, M. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 647-671.
Berglund, T. (2014). Corporate governance and optimal transparency. The Oxford handbook of economic and institutional transparency, 359-371.
Bloom, N., Genakos, C., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2012). Management practices across firms and countries. Academy of management perspectives, 26(1), 12-33.
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic management journal, 35(1), 1-23
Chen, S. H., Yang, C. C., Shiau, J. Y., & Wang, H. H. (2006). The development of an employee satisfaction model for higher education. The TQM Magazine, 18(5), 484-500.
Cook, K. A., Romi, A. M., Sánchez, D., & Sánchez, J. M. (2019). The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(3-4), 494-537.
Dang, C., Li, Z. F., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159-176.
Dixon-Fowler, H. R., Slater, D. J., Johnson, J. L., Ellstrand, A. E., & Romi, A. M. (2013). Beyond “does it pay to be green?” A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 353-366.
D'Antonio, L., Johnsen, T., & Hutton, R. B. (1997). Expanding socially screened portfolios. The Journal of Investing, 6(4), 79-86.
Eccles, R. G., Lee, L. E., & Stroehle, J. C. (2020). The social origins of ESG: An analysis of Innovest and KLD. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 575-596.
Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2010). Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2492-2509.
Endrikat, J., Guenther, E., & Hoppe, H. (2014). Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. European Management Journal, 32(5), 735-751.
Frank, B., & Schulze, G. G. (2000). Does economics make citizens corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(1), 101-113.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
Ghardallou, W. (2022). Corporate sustainability and firm performance: The moderating role of CEO education and tenure. Sustainability, 14(6), 3513.
Goldin, C. (2024). Human capital. In Handbook of cliometrics (pp. 353-383). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254-280.
Harvey, L. (2000). New realities: The relationship between higher education and employment. Tertiary Education & Management, 6(1), 3-17.
Jo, H., Kim, H., & Park, K. (2015). Corporate environmental responsibility and firm performance in the financial services sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 257-284.
Jorge, M. L., Madueño, J. H., Martínez-Martínez, D., & Sancho, M. P. L. (2015). Competitiveness and environmental performance in Spanish small and medium enterprises: Is there a direct link? Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 26-37.
Lee, C. C., Lim, H. S., Seo, D. J., & Kwak, D. H. A. (2022, April). Examining employee retention and motivation: The moderating effect of employee generation. In Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship (Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 385-402). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Liu, L., & Nemoto, N. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) evaluation and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 21(4).
Liu, Y., Saleem, S., Shabbir, R., Shabbir, M. S., Irshad, A., & Khan, S. (2021). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A moderate role of fintech technology. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 20174-20187.
Luo, X., Wang, H., Raithel, S., & Zheng, Q. (2015). Corporate social performance, analyst stock recommendations, and firm future returns. Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), 123-136.
Makridou, G., Doumpos, M., & Lemonakis, C. (2024). Relationship between ESG and corporate financial performance in the energy sector: Empirical evidence from European companies. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 18(4), 873-895.
Minor, D., & Morgan, J. (2011). CSR as reputation insurance: Primum non nocere. California Management Review, 53(3), 40-59.
Montero, M. J., Araque, R. A., & Rey, J. M. (2009). Occupational health and safety in the framework of corporate social responsibility. Safety Science, 47(10), 1440-1445.
Montiel, I., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Park, J., Antolín-López, R., & Husted, B. W. (2021). Implementing the United Nations’ sustainable development goals in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(5), 999-1030.
Naeem, M., Ullah, H., & Jan, S. (2021). The impact of ESG practices on firm performance: Evidence from emerging countries. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 20(1), 731-750.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
Piao, X., Xie, J., & Managi, S. (2022). Environmental, social, and corporate governance activities with employee psychological well-being improvement. BMC Public Health, 22, 1-12.
Rivera, J., & De Leon, P. (2005). Chief executive officers and voluntary environmental performance: Costa Rica's certification for sustainable tourism. Policy Sciences, 38(2), 107-127.
Tunio, R. A., Jamali, R. H., Mirani, A. A., Das, G., Laghari, M. A., & Xiao, J. (2021). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosures and financial performance: A mediating role of employee productivity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 10661-10677.
UN Global Compact. (2005, August 25-26). Who Cares Wins [Conference report]. Investing for long-term: integrating environmental, social and governance value drivers in asset management and financial research, Zurich, Switzerland.
Van Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008). The worth of values–a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407-424.
You, L. (2024). The impact of social norms of responsibility on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 190(2), 309-326.
Zhang, T., Zhang, J., & Tu, S. (2024). An empirical study on corporate ESG behavior and employee satisfaction: A moderating mediation model. Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 274. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易學系
111351043 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111351043 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 104301.pdf | | 1011Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
