Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152018
|
| Title: | 晝夜節律與學習活力之關連：僕人領導的調節效果
The Impacts of Morning Lark Chronotype Tendency and Servant Leadership on Students’ Thriving at School |
| Authors: | 顏涵
Yen, Han |
| Contributors: | 胡昌亞
Hu, Chang-Ya
顏涵
Yen, Han |
| Keywords: | 晝夜節律
生活作息
活力與學習
僕人式領導
Circadian rhythms
Chronotype
Thriving
Servant leadership |
| Date: | 2024 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-07-01 12:25:16 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以工作旺盛感之社會鑲嵌模型(A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work)為基礎，探討學生早鳥生活作息傾向及師長僕人式領導與學生在校活力與學習之關係。本研究以便利抽樣方式，共收集113份某國立大學商學研究所全職碩士生之資料，並以多元階層迴歸分析進行假設考驗。分析結果顯示，學生早鳥生活作息傾向與其活力與學習皆有顯著的正向關係，但師長僕人式領導並未調節上述的正向關係。本研究增進我們對學生生活作息型態與其學習活力間關係的了解，並針對研究結果之理論與實務的意涵、研究限制、及未來研究方向進行討論。
This study aims to apply the socially embedded model of thriving at work in the context of higher education. Specifically, I investigated the influence of students' morning lark chronotype tendency, the impact of servant leadership experienced by students, and the potential interaction between the chronotype tendency and servant leadership on students' thriving (vitality and learning) at school. I employed a convenience sampling method and collected data from full-time second-year MBA students enrolled in a public university located in northern Taiwan. Results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses on 113 valid observations revealed that both the morning lark chronotype tendency and the servant leadership perception positively related to students' thriving (vitality and learning) at school. However, I did not find a significant interaction effect between the morning lark chronotype tendency and servant leadership on students' thriving (vitality and learning). Findings of the current study underscore the important role of morning lark tendencies in facilitating student thriving at school. Lastly, I discuss the potential theoretical and practical implications of my findings, acknowledge the limitations of my research, and propose directions for future research in this area. |
| Reference: | Adan, A., & Almirall, H. (1991). Horne & Östberg morningness-eveningness questionnaire: A reduced scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 241-253.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt brace Jovanovich college publishers.
Enright, T., & Refinetti, R. (2017). Chronotype, class times, and academic achievement of university students. Chronobiology International, 34, 445-450.
Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 78-91.
Hasanuddin, B., Mustainah, M., & Buntuang, P. C. D. (2021). The influence of servant leadership on job satisfaction with individual character as a moderating variable. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19, 445-455.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50, 337-421.
Hobfoll, S. E., Freedy, J., Lane, C., & Geller, P. (1990). Conservation of social resources: Social support resource theory. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 465-478.
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 5, 103-128.
Jang, S., Yoo, S., Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2023). Serving for thriving: a moderated mediation analysis of the relationship between servant leadership and thriving at work. Personnel Review, 52, 1345-1361.
Kühnel, J., Bledow, R., & Kiefer, M. (2022). There is a time to be creative: The alignment between chronotype and time of day. Academy of Management Journal, 65, 218-247.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 161-177.
Original Version: Horne JA, Ostberg O. 1976. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of Chronobiology, 4, 97–110.
Patterson, K. (2010). Servant leadership and love. In Servant Leadership: Developments in Theory and Research (pp. 67-76). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Patterson, K. A. (2003). Servant leadership: A Theoretical Model. Regent University.
Peus, C. (2011). Money over man versus caring and compassion? Challenges for today's organizations and their leaders. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 955-960.
Preckel, F., Lipnevich, A. A., Schneider, S., & Roberts, R. D. (2011). Chronotype, cognitive abilities, and academic achievement: A meta-analytic investigation. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 483-492.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319-338.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
Shirom, A. (1989). Burnout in work organizations.
Sonenshein, S., Dutton, J., Grant, A., Spreitzer, G., & Sutcliffe, K. (2005). Narratives of growth at work: Learning from employees' stories. Ann Arbor, MI: Ross School of Business of Business, University of Michigan.
Spreitzer, G. M., & Porath, C. (2014). Self-determination as nutriment for thriving: Building an integrative model of human growth at work. The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-determination Theory, 90, 245-258.
Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16, 537-549.
Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. American Psychologist, 67, 545-556.
Zerbe, E., Sallai, G., & Berdanier, C. G. (2023). Surviving, thriving, departing, and the hidden competencies of engineering graduate school. Journal of Engineering Education, 112, 147-169. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
111363066 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111363066 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程）] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 306601.pdf | | 1848Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
