政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/151952
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造访人次 : 51833251      在线人数 : 532
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/151952


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/151952


    题名: 以財務績效之角度探討ESG評級之分歧性
    Exploring Divergence in ESG Ratings-A Financial Performance Perspective
    作者: 張郡升
    Chang, Chun-Sheng
    贡献者: 徐愛恩
    Tsui, Ai-En
    張郡升
    Chang, Chun-Sheng
    关键词: ESG評級機構
    分歧性
    財務績效
    負面事件
    ESG rating agencies
    Divergence
    Financial performance
    Negative events
    日期: 2024
    上传时间: 2024-07-01 12:07:58 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨ESG議題興起，國際上具指標性之ESG評級機構已達數十間，然而礙於目前對ESG表現之衡量方法並無統一之標準，不同評級機構之ESG評分存在嚴重之分歧性。本研究挑選TEJ、S&P Global及Sustainalytcis三間評級機構作為研究對象，並以混合研究法探討三間評級機構之分歧性。
    質性分析之部分，本研究分析三間評級機構之評分方法學差異，結果顯示三間評級機構所側重之要點、考量之關鍵議題、取得之資料來源、更新之頻率均有所不同。量化分析之部分，本研究先以評分者信度分析，探討三間機構之ESG評分分歧性。接著以迴歸分析，探討三間機構之ESG評分對財務績效之影響及是否能有效抵禦負面事件對財務績效造成之衝擊。評分者信度分析之結果顯示，ESG評級機構之評級結果確實存在分歧性，且未隨著時間經過而有收斂之趨勢。迴歸分析之結果顯示，TEJ、S&P Global及Sustainalytcis之ESG評分均對財務績效呈正向影響。此外當發生負面事件時，S&P Global之ESG評分能有效抵禦負面事件對財務績效造成之衝擊，而TEJ僅於受評公司之國際可見度較高且於公司規模、財務績效及ESG表現較出色之情況下，其ESG評分才能有效抵禦負面事件對財務績效造成之衝擊。
    With the emergence of ESG issues, there are dozens of internationally renowned ESG rating agencies; however, due to the lack of unified standards for measuring ESG performance at present, there is significant divergence in ESG scores among different rating agencies. This study selects TEJ, S&P Global, and Sustainalytics as the research subjects and employs a mixed-methods research to explore the divergence among these three rating agencies.
    In terms of qualitative analysis, this study examines the methodological differences in scoring among the three rating agencies. The results reveal differences in the emphasis, key issues considered, data sources utilized, and updating frequency among the three rating agencies. Regarding quantitative analysis, this study initially conducts an inter-rater reliability analysis to investigate the divergence in ESG scores among the three agencies. Subsequently, through regression analysis, it examines the impact of ESG scores from the three agencies on financial performance and whether they can effectively withstand the impact of negative events on financial performance. The results of the inter-rater reliability analysis indicate that there is indeed divergence in the ESG rating results among the rating agencies, and there is no trend of convergence over time. The results of the regression analysis show that the ESG scores from TEJ, S&P Global, and Sustainalytics all have a positive impact on financial performance. Additionally, when negative events occur, the ESG scores from S&P Global can effectively mitigate the impact of these events on financial performance. However, TEJ's ESG scores only effectively mitigate the impact of negative events on financial performance for companies with higher international visibility, and superior financial performance.
    參考文獻: 一、 中文文獻
    台灣經濟新報文化事業(股)公司，2023，TESG永續發展指標技術手冊。
    TESG永續發展指標介紹，2021，檢自https://www.tejwin.com/news/tesg-%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95%E6%8C%87%E6%A8%99%E4%BB%8B%E7%B4%B9/。
    TESG事件雷達，2023，檢自https://www.tejwin.com/news/tesg-event-radar/。
    二、 英文文獻
    Aggarwal, R., I. Erel, R. Stulz, and R. Williamson. 2008. Differences in Governance Practices between U.S. and Foreign Firms: Measurement, Causes, and Consequences. The Review of Financial Studies 22 (8):3131-3169.
    Aiken, L. S., S. G. West, and R. R. Reno. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions: sage.
    Albuquerque, R., Y. Koskinen, and C. Zhang. 2019. Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Management Science 65 (10):4451-4469.
    Asimakopoulos, P., S. Asimakopoulos, and X. Li. 2023. The role of environmental, social, and governance rating on corporate debt structure. Journal of Corporate Finance 83:102488.
    Aupperle, K., A. Carroll, and J. Hatfield. 1985. An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal 28:446-463.
    Avramov, D., S. Cheng, A. Lioui, and A. Tarelli. 2022. Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics 145 (2, Part B):642-664.
    Aydoğmuş, M., G. Gülay, and K. Ergun. 2022. Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review 22:S119-S127.
    Barnett, M. L. 2007. Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility. The Academy of Management Review 32 (3):794-816.
    Berg, F., J. F. Kolbel, and R. Rigobon. 2022. Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings*. Review of Finance 26 (6):1315-1344.
    Brammer, S., C. Brooks, and S. Pavelin. 2006. Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures. Financial Management 35 (3):97-116.
    Broadstock, D. C., K. L. Chan, L. T. W. Cheng, and X. W. Wang. 2021. The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters 38:11.
    Chairani, C., and S. V. Siregar. 2021. The effect of enterprise risk management on financial performance and firm value: the role of environmental, social and governance performance. Meditari Accountancy Research 29 (3):647-670.
    Chatterji, A. K., R. Durand, D. I. Levine, and S. Touboul. 2016. Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal 37 (8):1597-1614.
    Chen, Z. F., and G. X. Xie. 2022. ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis 83:16.
    Christensen, D. M., G. Serafeim, and A. Sikochi. 2022. Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings. The Accounting Review 97 (1):147-175.
    Dang, C., Z. Li, and C. Yang. 2018. Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance 86:159-176.
    Duque-Grisales, E., and J. Aguilera-Caracuel. 2021. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack. Journal of Business Ethics 168 (2):315-334.
    Friede, G., T. Busch, and A. Bassen. 2015. ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 5:210-233.
    Galant, A., and S. Cadez. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 30:676-693.
    Garcia, A. S., and R. J. Orsato. 2020. Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 29 (8):3261-3272.
    Gibson Brandon, R., P. Krueger, and P. S. Schmidt. 2021. ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns. Financial Analysts Journal 77 (4):104-127.
    Gray, R. 2010. Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability…and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35 (1):47-62.
    Huang, D. Z. X. 2021. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: a review and consolidation. Accounting & Finance 61 (1):335-360.
    Kim, Y., H. Li, and S. Li. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance 43:1-13.
    Krippendorff, K. 2018. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology: Sage publications.
    Liang, Y., M. J. Lee, and J. S. Jung. 2022. Dynamic capabilities and an ESG strategy for sustainable management performance. Frontiers in psychology 13:887776.
    Lins, K. V., H. Servaes, and A. Tamayo. 2017. Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance 72 (4):1785-1823.
    Nollet, J., G. Filis, and E. Mitrokostas. 2016. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling 52:400-407.
    Orlitzky, M., F. L. Schmidt, and S. L. Rynes. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24 (3):403-441.
    Preston, L. E., and D. P. O'Bannon. 1997. The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis. Business & Society 36 (4):419-429.
    Xie, J., W. Nozawa, M. Yagi, H. Fujii, and S. Managi. 2019. Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment 28 (2):286-300.
    Zaremba, U. 2023. Strong ESG Risk Management as a Way to Improve Organisational Resilience in Times of Crisis: An Analysis of WIG-ESG Index Constituents. Financial Sciences. Nauki o Finansach 28 (1).
    Zhang, D. Y., C. Wang, and Y. Dong. 2023. How Does Firm ESG Performance Impact Financial Constraints? An Experimental Exploration of the COVID-19 Pandemic. European Journal of Development Research 35 (1):219-239.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    111353026
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353026
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    302601.pdf2604KbAdobe PDF0检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈