English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51611742      Online Users : 125
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150821


    Title: 美中貿易戰後的國際結構:政治兩極化會造成貿易關係兩極化嗎?
    International Structure of the Post US-China Trade War: Political Bipolarization Leads to Bipolarization in International Trade?
    Authors: 林偉修
    Lin, Wei-hsiu
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 美中關係;新冷戰;政治兩極化;貿易多元化;有效貿易國數
    The U.S.-China Relation;Political Polarization;Economic Multipolarization;Effective Number of Trading Countries
    Date: 2024-03
    Issue Date: 2024-04-11 14:43:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 美中貿易戰宣告了兩國在國際政治的競爭局勢正式展開,2019年後的疫情更形加劇了兩國彼此的競爭關係。然而,美中對立下新冷戰的政治兩極化一定會造成國際貿易關係的兩極化嗎?世界各國真的會各自歸隊,在美國與中國之間擇一而處,形成兩極對立的局勢嗎?還是口頭上與行為上有差異,仍然依照國家自身的利益分別和美國和中國進行實質上的往來。本文即探討這個問題,比較疫情前後,國際貿易局勢的變化到底是趨向兩極化還是非兩極化。本文認為,新冷戰的局勢下,美中對立造成的政治兩極化無法避免,但政治兩極化不等於貿易關係兩極化,本文透過威脅平衡論的觀點,說明在缺乏安全議題誘因與貿易結構的兩大因素影響下,後疫情時代的國際結構將呈現政治兩極化,但貿易多元化的局面。
    The U.S.-China trade war indicates a confrontation between the U.S. and China, and the pandemic problem since 2019 deteriorates the confrontation. However, will political polarization due to the new cold war between the U.S. and China lead to economic polarization? Do countries in the whole world choose their own sides between the U.S. and China, establishing two blocs and competing? Or countries in the whole world behave inconsistently in terms of verbal promises and practical actions. National interest is still their benchmark to have substantial interaction with the U.S. and China accordingly. This paper tries to answer the questions and compares the change in an international structure before and after the post US-China Trade War, whether economic polarization or not. This paper argues that the new cold war will ineluctably lead to political polarization, but political polarization doesn’t mean economic polarization. With the balance of threat theory, the manifestation of international structure in the post US-China Trade War will be political polarization but multi-polarization in international trade, when countries except for the U.S. have no security struggle with China and the trade patterns and structures remain the same.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 63(1), 147-185
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.202403_63(1).0004
    DOI: 10.30390/ISC.202403_63(1).0004
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    63-1-4.pdf6655KbAdobe PDF105View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback