政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/150296
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51688713      Online Users : 610
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150296


    Title: 潮之間：ANT的展演與虛擬實境實作
    Intertidal zone：a performance of ANT and a VR practice
    Authors: 戴時與
    Tai, Shi-Yu
    Contributors: 陳宗文
    Chen, Tzung- Wen
    戴時與
    Tai, Shi-Yu
    Keywords: 藝術本位研究
    行動者網絡理論
    虛擬實境
    實作展演
    Arts-Based Research
    Actor-Network Theory
    Virtual Reality
    practice and performance
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-03-01 14:25:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 位處板塊交界、強權之間，要如何認識及描繪台灣這座海島？本文以拉圖（Bruno Latour）提出的關鍵區（critical zone），呈現這個力量交會、如潮間帶的區域。此概念強調以一個實際的點開始思考並行動，而非抽離、客觀地認知現實。除了文字，拉圖也經由展覽、劇場傳播理念，本文從中提取四個實作原則，說明如何以藝術進行思維實驗。
    經由感官體驗，能使抽象概念可視化、具體地呈現；本研究以虛擬實境技術（virtual reality, VR）展現何謂關鍵區，以此演譯現實如何組成。研究實作《潮之間》以十年前銅藻遍佈東北海岸的事件出發，呈現其間行動者的關係變化及行動，從衝突、合作和選擇的過程重現事件。在多條支線同時進行之下，觀看者無法掌握全局，需要不斷選擇視線方向，在不同立場之間捕捉事件發展。
    作為藝術本位研究（Arts based research，ABR），仍要回到文字紀錄才能延續影響力，也能以此檢視實作與目標是否對準。經過三次展演，會發現即便是相同事件，每位觀看者拼組出的事件樣態都不盡相同。這是VR暈眩體感及寰景特性產生的效果，以此能跨越時空地呈現行動者間混亂的牽動關係。
    Taiwan, situated at the intersection of tectonic plates and geopolitical influences, poses the question of how to understand and portray this island. Drawing inspiration from Bruno Latour's concept of the "critical zone," this paper presents the region as a convergence of forces, akin to a tidal zone. The concept underscores the importance of initiating thought and action from a specific point rather than detached and objectively perceiving reality. In addition to textual approaches, Latour utilizes exhibitions and theatrical communication of ideas. This paper extracts four practical principles from Latour's work to illustrate how artistic practices can be employed for thought experiments.
    Through sensory experiences, abstract concepts become visualized and concretely presented. This study utilizes virtual reality technology to showcase the concept of the critical zone, offering an interpretation of how reality is composed. The research practice <Intertidal zone>, focusing on an event a decade ago when red algae covered the northeast coast, depicting changes in relationships and actions among actors during the event. The process of conflict, cooperation, and choices is reenacted. With multiple storylines occurring simultaneously, viewers cannot grasp the entire picture and must continually choose their perspective, capturing the unfolding events from different standpoints.
    As an Arts-Based Research (ABR), the study must return to textual documentation to sustain its impact and evaluate whether the implementation aligns with the objectives. After three exhibitions, it is observed that even for the same event, each viewer constructs a unique pattern of events. This divergence is attributed to the disorienting sensations and immersive characteristics of VR, enabling the portrayal of the chaotic dynamic relationships among actors to transcend spatial constraints.
    Reference: 柯金源，2018，《我們的島：臺灣三十年環境變遷全紀錄》。新北市：衛城出版社。
    洪文玲編，2023，《「協商劇場」在北美館：藝術、科技與公眾參與的五場教學實驗》。新竹市：國立陽明交通大學出版社。
    Pierre .B著、蔣梓驊譯，2003《實踐感》。南京：譯林出版。
    Aït-Touati, F, 2017, “For a Speculative Policy. Bruno Latour
    and Nanterre Amandier’s Theatre of Negotiations / Make it
    Work (2015).” Pp.152-157 in Performing Urgency #4., edited
    by Florian Malzacher. Berlin: Empty Stages, Crowded Flats.
    Bijker, W. E., & Latour, B., 1988, “Science in Action: How
    to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society.”
    Technology and Culture, 29(4).
    Casper, M. J., & Latour, B., 2000, Pandora's Hope: Essays on
    the Reality of Science Studies. Contemporary Sociology,
    29(5). https://doi.org/10.2307/2655272
    Coppola, A., 2020, “Latour and balloons: Gaïa Global Circus
    and the Theater of Climate Change.” Configurations, 28(1),
    29–49. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2020.0001
    Halsall, F., 2016, “Actor-Network Aesthetics: The Conceptual
    Rhymes of Bruno Latour and Contemporary Art.” New Literary
    History, 47(2/3), 439–461.
    Hennion, A., 2016, “From ANT to Pragmatism: A Journey with Bruno Latour at the CSI”. New Literary History, 47, 289-308.
    Hermanns, M., Greer, D., & Cooper, C. 2015. “Visions of
    living with parkinson’s disease: A Photovoice study”. The
    Qualitative Report.
    Elkins, J., 2003,  “Review of Iconoclash: Beyond the Image
    Wars in Science, Religion, and Art, by
    B. Latour & P. Weibel”, Art Journal, 62(3), 104–107.
    Gad, C., & Jensen, C. B., 2010, “On the Consequences of
    Post-ANT.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(1), 55–
    80.
    Gergen.M, 2018, “The Performative Movement In Social
    Science.” in Handbook of Arts-Based Research.
    Gray, R., & Sinding, C. 2002. “Standing ovation: Performing
    social science research about cancer.” Walnut Creek, CA:
    AltaMira Press.
    Latour, B., & Porter, C.
    -2009, Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy.  Harvard University Press.
    -2017, Facing gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic
    regime. Polity Press.
    -2018, An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology
    of the Moderns. Harvard University Press.
    Latour, B.
    -1983, “Give Me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World.”
    Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of
    Science, edited by Cetina Karin Knorr, Mulkay Michael, 141–
    70. London, UK: Sage.
    - 1994, &quot;Where are the Missing Masses? the Sociology of a
    few Mundane Artifacts.” Shaping Technology / Building
    Society: Studies in Sociotechnical, edited by Change.B. Wiebe and L. John. Chicago, MIT Press.
     - 1996, “On actor-network theory: A few clarifications.”
    Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369–381.         
    -2004, “How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension
    of Science Studies.” Body & Society, 10(2-3).
    -2005, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-
    Network-Theory. London: Oxford University Press.
     -2010, “An Attempt at a “Compositionist Manifesto”.”  New
    Literary History, 41: 471–490. 
    - 2011, “Waiting for Gaia. Composing the common world through arts and politics.”   
     -2017a, “For David Bloor⋯ and beyond: A reply to David
    Bloor's &quot;anti-Latour&quot;.” Logos Russian Federation, 27(1).
    -2018, “Down to earth: Politics in the new climatic
    regime.” Polity Press.
    Latour, B.& Woolgar, S, 1986, Laboratory life: The
    construction of scientific facts.Princeton University Press
    Latour, B., Schaffer, S., & Gagliardi, P, 2020, A book of
    the body politic: Connecting biology, politics and social
    theory. Fondazione Giorgio Cini.
    Leavy, P. 2019. Handbook of Arts-Based Research. The
    Guilford Press.
    Mannay, D. 2010. Making the familiar strange: Can visual
    research methods render the familiar setting more
    perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10(1), 91–111.
    Neufeldt, A, 2003, “What does it take to transform mental
    health knowledge into workplace practice? towards a theory of action.” HealthcarePapers, 5(2), 118–132.
    Nimmo, R, 2011, “Actor-Network Theory and Methodology:
    Social Research in a More-Than-Human World.” Methodological
    Innovations Online, 6(3), 108-119.
    Praude, C., 2018, ”Computer Art and Actor-Network Theory:
    Actants and Intersubjective Associations in Scene.” The MIT
    Press.51(5):529
    Shibata, T., Kim, J., Hoffman, D. M., & Banks, M. S, 2011.
    “The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with
    stereo displays.” Journal of Vision, 11(8), 11–11.
    Tinius, J, 2015. &quot;All the world is a stage? A review of Bruno Latour’s Gaïa Global Circus.” ALLEGRA - A Virtual Lab
    of Legal Anthropology.
    Waller, L, 2017, “Curating actor-network theory: testing
    object-oriented sociology in the Science Museum” Museum and
    Society, 14(1), 193-206.
     
    報章網站

    張玉音，2022，〈 說服觀者「沉浸」的技術，專訪陳芯宜：VR的語言─攸關「身
    體」〉。典藏，2月27日。
    侯伯彥.，2021，〈 創作者論VR：召喚體感的世界――專訪《留給未來的殘影》導
    演陳芯宜〉。CLABO實驗波，5月19日。
    呂樾，2023，〈 姿勢／知識生產--《肉身風景》中的「觀眾」位置 〉。表演藝
    術評論台.，2月27日。
    毛雅芬，2022，〈 提煉初始的情感──專訪《留給未來的殘影》導演陳芯宜〉。
    放映週報，9月11日。
    龔卓軍 ，2018，〈那團火，那縷煙，反沉浸的沉浸：《留給未來的殘影》與VR
    電影的本體感操演〉。典藏，10月29日。
    Collins-hughes, L, 2014, “A potential disaster in any
    language.” In The New York Times. (September 25).
    Guardian, 2020, “Bruno Latour: 'Trump and Thunberg inhabit
    different planets'.” in The Guardian.( February 4).
    Latour, B. , 2011, “Some experiments in art and politics” in
    e-flux (March
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    社會學系
    110254010
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110254010
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Sociology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    401001.pdf41787KbAdobe PDF3View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback