English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51732483      在线人数 : 653
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/148574


    题名: 犯罪嫌疑人之特定與追訴權時效之進行--以最高法院大法庭110年度臺上大字第5954號刑事裁定為素材
    Identification of the Suspect and the Progress of the Statute of Limitations
    作者: 黃士軒
    Huang, Shih-hsuan
    贡献者: 政大法學評論
    关键词: 追訴權時效;時效停止;偵查;起訴;審判;減少誤判危險;偵查資源的合理分配
    The statute of limitations;Ceases-to-run of the statute of limitations;Investigation;Prosecution;Trial;To avoid the risk of misjudgment;Reasonable distribution of the investigative resources
    日期: 2023-06
    上传时间: 2023-12-04 16:33:51 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文以最高法院大法庭110年度臺上大字第5954號刑事裁定為素材，探討在犯罪行為人未被特定前，偵查機關所為的偵查行為是否發生對被告之犯行停止追訴權時效進行效果的問題。此一問題看似僅屬108年刑法修正前的追訴權時效規定解釋問題，然而其結論，也可能牽動較為早期的案件是否有修法後追訴權時效制度適用的結論，因此在今日也有值得探討的重要性。然而，對此問題在我國少有深入討論。本文以下將依序介紹本件裁定的背景、相對立的法律見解及最高法院所採之見解與理由（貳），並就最高法院相關實務脈絡掌握本件在實務理論上的定位（參），再從沿革的觀點嘗試推認本件所涉規定的立法者設置追訴權時效規定之目的（肆），再考察設置時效制度可能的理論根據，最後再檢討本件裁定所採取的基本立場及法院所採基準是否妥當（伍）。
    Whether the investigating acts made by investigating authority to specify the person who committed a crime, have the effect to stop the statute of limitations from running out is an important question of the Taiwanese criminal law interpretative theory. Recently a decision of the Taiwanese supreme court has been made concerning this question. In the decision, the court took an affirmative position. However, not only is the authority concerning the legislative history of the Criminal Code of the Republic of China tun clear, but whether the court’s opinion is consistent with the court’s judicial practices in tradition remains a question. To clarify these questions and examine the propriety of the court’s decision, this article first introduces the background and the theoretical reason for the decision. Secondly, this article scrutinizes the traditional judicial practices of the Taiwanese supreme court to perceive the meaning of this decision in the development of the practical interpretative theory. In the following parts, this article reconfirms the legislative history to perceive the meaning and the grounds of the statute of limitations expressed by the legislator. Based on the results, this article makes a critical remark on the court decision mentioned above.
    關聯: 政大法學評論, 173, 305-373
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/102398202023060173005
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202023060173005
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文
    [法學院] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    173-5.pdf2110KbAdobe PDF169检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈