English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51801488      Online Users : 241
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/148517


    Title: 府際治理下跨專業協力運作效能之研究:以COVID-19期間北區某集中檢疫所為例
    A Study of Interdisciplinary Collaboration Performance under Intergovernmental Governance: A Case Study of a Quarantine Site in Northern Taiwan during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Authors: 王偉良
    Wang, Wei-Liang
    Contributors: 陳敦源
    Chen, Dun-Yuan
    王偉良
    Wang, Wei-Liang
    Keywords: 嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎
    集中檢疫所
    府際治理
    跨專業協力
    COVID-19
    Quarantine Site
    intergovernmental governance
    interdisciplinary collaboration
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-12-01 11:51:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎(COVID-19)於2020年起席捲全球,確診死亡人數不計其數,為防範COVID-19進入國門,保障國人安全,我國首次設置集中檢疫所,專責處理入境人民進行隔離、檢疫等措施。集中檢疫所制度本適用跨域治理理論探討之,藉由各單位之跨部門、跨專業等方式共同執行之,形成跨域治理之態樣,然而政府在防疫視同作戰之情況下,單純之跨域治理已難以因應,故此時需從跨域治理回歸至府際治理,藉由政府的介入讓各單位協同合作,共同執行防疫政策,以集中檢疫所為研究核心,透過文獻分析、參與觀察、深度訪談等方式討論之,其中包含集中檢疫所之沿革、法令、措施、功能及建構過程等,讓讀者充分了解集中檢疫所存在之理由、目的與成效,並探討府際治理及跨專業協力下,對集中檢疫所內之垂直與水平互動關係之運作成效如何。
    本研究發現防疫政策之推動仰賴政府與公務員之特別權力關係,並在跨專業協力中摸索出相關執行技術。在府際治理中的垂直互動關係效能涉及法令、制度、人力、資源;水平互動關係則涉及經驗分享與人民移動,其餘之互動關係有賴政府平日與各網絡單位之培養。此外跨專業協力的垂直互動關係效能涉及中央的支持、鼓勵、宣導與推廣,工作人員才能順遂執行政策,惟法令授權不足之處常讓工作人員執勤時陷於兩難之困境;水平互動關係效能則需確立好任務目標,透過共商協議、運用法令模糊空間以解決法令授權不足之障礙,並由領導行為強化組織認同,惟後續因政策調整、考量勤務公平等,造成工作人員難以久任,使跨專業協力易產生摩擦,影響運作效能。
    COVID-19 has swept across the globe since 2020, with countless confirmed cases and fatalities. To prevent the entry of COVID-19 and safeguard the safety of our citizens, our country established centralized quarantine facilities for the first time. These facilities are responsible for isolation, quarantine, and other measures for incoming individuals. The system of centralized quarantine facilities aligns with the theory of cross-domain governance, implemented through various units collaborating across departments and professions, forming a cross-domain governance framework.
    However, in the context of the government treating epidemic prevention as a form of warfare, a simplistic approach to cross-domain governance may no longer suffice. At such times, it becomes necessary to shift from cross-domain governance to intergovernmental governance. This involves government intervention to facilitate cooperation among various units in the execution of epidemic prevention policies. This research centers on centralized quarantine facilities and is discussed through literature analysis, participant observation, in-depth interviews, and other methods. It encompasses the historical development, legal regulations, measures, functions, and construction processes of centralized quarantine facilities.
    The study aims to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of the rationale, purpose, and effectiveness of centralized quarantine facilities. It also explores the operational effectiveness of vertical and horizontal interactions within centralized quarantine facilities under intergovernmental governance and cross-professional collaboration.
    The research findings indicate that the implementation of epidemic prevention policies relies on the unique power relationships between the government and civil servants. Relevant execution techniques are developed through cross-professional collaboration. In intergovernmental governance, the efficiency of vertical interaction relationships involves laws, regulations, personnel, and resources. The efficiency of horizontal interaction relationships includes experience sharing and population movement. Other interaction relationships depend on the government's cultivation of relationships with various network units.
    Furthermore, the efficiency of vertical interaction relationships in cross-professional collaboration involves central support, encouragement, advocacy, and promotion for staff to effectively execute policies. However, the lack of sufficient legal authorization often places staff on the horns of a dilemma during duty. The efficiency of horizontal interaction relationships necessitates the establishment of clear task objectives. This can be achieved through negotiation and the use of legal ambiguity to overcome obstacles caused by insufficient legal authorization. Leadership behavior strengthens organizational identity. However, subsequent policy adjustments, concerns about fairness in duty allocation, and the resulting difficulty in staff retention may lead to friction within cross-professional collaboration, affecting operational efficiency.
    Reference: 王彥程(2000)。臺灣企業員工人際溝通能力之衡量及其量表發展之研究。私立長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。
    王秋慶(2003)。員工的溝通滿足與組織氣候對其工作壓力、組織承諾與離職傾向的影響之研究─以嘉義縣市地政事務所為例。私立南華大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
    江大樹(2004)。府際關係的憲法解釋。中國地方自治,57(6),25-47。
    江大樹、梁鎧麟(2011)。長期照顧體系組織改造策略分析:全觀型治理觀點。文官制度季刊,3(1),1-25。
    江明修(2002)。公務人員各官等核心能力與訓練體系建力之研究。公務人員保障暨培訓委員會。
    汪明生、朱斌妤(1999)。衝突管理。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    吳定(2003)。政策管理。台北:聯經。
    吳庚(2003)。行政法之理論與實用。台北:三民。
    吳庚、盛子龍(2020)。行政法之理論與實用。台北:三民。
    吳盈萱(2022)。職權命令之分析及審查。東吳大學法學院法律系碩士在職專班公法組碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    吳清山(1991)。學校行政。台北:心理。
    吳清山、林天祐(2002)。願景領導。教育研究月刊,101,130。
    吳濟華、柯志昌、葉晉嘉(2007)。區域治理與治理機制探討:高高屏地區個案分析。地方自治與民主發展:臺灣經驗的省思學術研討會,臺中。
    吳濟華、柯志昌(2013)。高雄市發展成為區域產業營運總部策略研究。城市學學刊,4(1),1-43。
    李允傑(2011)。政策管理與執行力:跨域治理觀點。T&D飛訊季刊,17,45-53。
    李元墩(1999)。組織溝通研究之回顧與展望。中華管理評論,2(5),121-131。
    李長晏(2008)。府際治理:概念演化與趨勢挑戰。
    李長晏(2012)。從空間夥伴治理觀點探析金門縣地方區域發展的提升策略。空大行政學報,23,124-152。
    李芸蘋、陳以亨、陳先郡、陳啟文 (2014)。台灣警務人員之工作使命感研究。公共行政學報,(46),29-58。
    李美華等(譯)(1998)。社會科學研究方法。(Babbie, Earl 原著)。台北市:時英出版社。
    李佳穗(2000)。主管領導風格對部屬工作投入影響之研究----以高雄地區國立大學為例。國立高雄師範大學,未出版,高雄市。
    李惠宗(2020)。行政法要義。元照。
    李嘉奇(2001)。國民小學教職員工採用的溝通媒介類型與組織溝通滿足關係之研究。國立臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。
    何英奇(2011)。紮根理論的編碼方法。質性研究法研討會,長庚護理學院。
    林水吉(2009)。跨域治理:理論與個案研析。五南圖書出版有限公司。
    林水波、李長晏(2005)。跨域治理。臺北:五南。
    林高瑩(2015)。美國傳染病患隔離與結核病患隔離程序之研究。國立雲林科技大學科技法律研究所碩士論文,未出版,雲林。
    林欽榮(2002)。組織行為。臺北:揚智文化。
    胡龍騰、曾冠球、張智凱、黃榮志(2013)。電子化跨域治理影響因素之研究:多個案之探索。公共行政學報,45,1-39。
    孫本初(1997)。公共管理。台北:時英出版社。
    秦夢群(1997)。教育行政。台北:五南。
    張金鑑(1990)。行政學新論。臺北市:三民書局。
    張其祿、黃榮護(2002)。全球化下的地方政府[治理]--理論挑戰與策略展望。空大行政學報,12,147-168。
    張春興(1995)。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華書局。
    陳立剛 (2001)。府際關係研究區域洽理問題及其策略。中國地方自治,54(1), 20-29。
    陳立剛、李長晏(2003)。全球化治理:台灣都會治理的困境與體制建構─地方政府跨區域合作探究。中國地方自治,,56(2),4-19。
    陳玉娟(2000)。企業內網路運用於組織溝通之研究。國立東華大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。
    陳敏(2009)。行政法總論。新學林出版有限公司。
    陳敏(2019)。行政法總論。新學林出版有限公司。
    陳慶源(2001)。企業購併與組織變革研究。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    許士軍 (1990)。管理學。台北:東華書局。
    許宗力(2000)。職權命令是否還有明天?—論職權命令的合憲性及其適用範圍,收於行政法爭議問題研究(上)。台北,五南。
    梁雙蓮(1984)。中央行政機關公務員組織認同之研究,國立台灣大學政治研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。
    黃士齊(2014)。信任關係、知識分享意圖及知識分享行為關聯性研究-以創新組織氣候為調節變數。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
    黃榮護(2000)。公共管理。臺北市。商鼎。
    黃敏萍(2000)。跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能-任務特性與社會系絡之影響。國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。
    詹立煒(2005)。台灣跨域治理之研究:理論、策略與個案。中華大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
    廖嘉展、江大樹、張力亞 ( 2016)。從社區總體營造到社群跨域治理:埔里生態城鎮轉型案例分析。台灣文獻,67(3),86-128。
    潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究-理論與運用。台北:心理出版社。
    蕭肇君(2004)。置入性行銷對新聞專業的影響:市場新聞學下的專業性考察。中華傳播學會年會,澳門旅遊學院。
    謝文全(1997)。教育行政─理論與實務。台北:文景。
    Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1984). A Model of the Distributor's Perspective of Distributor-Manufacturer Working Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 48(4), 62-74.
    Anderson, J. C. and J. A. Narus (1990). A Model of Distributor Firm andManufacturer Firm Working Partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42-58.
    Antonioni, D. (1998). Relationship Between the Big Five Personality Factors and Conflict Management Styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(4), 336-355
    Ashforth, B.E., & Humphrey, R.H. (1997). The Ubiquity and Potency of Labeling in Organizations. Organization Science, 8(1), 43-58.
    Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
    Barr, H. (1998). Competent to Collaborate: Towards a Competency-Based Model for Interprofessional Education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 12(2), 181-187.
    Barnard, C. I.(1968). The functions of the Executive. Harvard University Press.
    Baumeister, R. F. (1991) Meanings of Life. Guilford Press.
    Bell, C., & Song, F. (2005). Emotions in the Conflict Process: An Application of the Cognitive Appraisal Model of Emotions to Conflict Management. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(1), 30-54.
    Bellah, R. N., & Madsen, R., & Sullivan, W. M., & Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. The Social Science Journal, 24(2), 229-231.
    Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The Managerial Grid: The Key to Leadership Excellence. Gulf Publishing Co.
    Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley.
    Blau, P. M. (1968). Social Exchange. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 7(4), 452-457.
    Bronstein, L. R. (2002). Index of Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Social Work Research, 26(2), 113-123.
    Brugue, Q., & Valles, J. M. (2005). New-Style Councils, New-Style Councillors: From Local Government to Local Governance. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 18(2), 197-226.
    Bunderson, J. S., & Thompson, J. A. (2009). The Call of the Wild: Zookeepers, Callings, and the Double-Edged Sword of Deeply Meaningful Work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 32-57.
    Chadwick-Jones, J. K. (1976). Social Exchange Theory: Its Structure and Influence in Social Psychology. Academic Press.
    Chance, E. W. (1992). Visionary Leadership in Schools: Successful Stategies for Developing and Implementing an Education Vision.
    Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social Network, Social Trust and Shared Goals in Organizational Knowledge Sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465.
    Cole, M. S., & Bruch, H. (2006). Organizational Identity Strength, Identification, and Commitment and Their Relationships to Turnover Intention: Does Organizational Hierarchy Matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 585-605.
    Conley, D. T. (1996). Are You Ready to Restructure: A Guidebook for Educators, Parents, and Community Members. Corwin Press.
    Dalton, J. C. (2001). Career and Calling: Finding a Place for the Spirit in Work and Community. New Directions for Student Services, 95, 17-25.
    Daubert, M. A. (2006). Pandemic Fears and Contemporary Quarantine: Protecting Liberty Through a Continuum of Due Process Rights. Buff. L. Rev., 54, 1299.
    Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: Managing What Your Organization Knows. Harvard Business School Press.
    Davies, S. Jonathan (2005). Local Governance and the Dialectics of Hierarchy, Market, and Network. Policy Studies, 26(3/4), 311-335.
    Deaux, K., Dane, F. C., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1993). Social Psychology in the '90s. Brooks Cole Publishing Company.
    Dedreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S., & Nauta, A. (2001). A Theory-Based Measure of Conflict Management Strategies in the Workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(6), 645-668.
    Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage.
    Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2009). Calling and Vocation at Work: Definitions and Prospects for Research and Practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(3), 424-450.
    Dik, B. J., Eldridge, B. M., Steger, M. F., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Development and Validation of the Calling and Vocation Questionnaire (CVQ) and Brief Calling Scale (BCS). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 242-263.
    Dixon, N. M. (2000). Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know. Harvard Business Press.
    Dobrow, S. R., & Tosti-Kharas, J. (2011). Calling: The development of a scale measure. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 1001-1049.
    Duffy, R. D., & Sedlacek, W. E. (2007). The Presence of and Search for a Calling: Connections to Career Development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(3), 590-601.
    Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational Images and Member Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 239-263.
    Dwyer, F. R., Schurr. P. H., & Oh. S, (1987). Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27.
    Edwards, M. R., & Peccei, R. (2007). Organizational Identification: Development and Testing of a Conceptually Grounded Measure. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(1), 25-57.
    Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review,27(1), 31-41.
    Follett, M. P. (1940). Constructive Conflict. Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, 30-49.
    Fritz, M. B. W., Narasimhan, S., & Rhee, H. S. (1998). Communication and Coordination in the Virtual Office. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 7-28.
    Frost, N. (2005). Professionalism, Partnership, and Joined-Up Thinking: A Research Review of Front-Line Working with Children and Families. Totnes: Research in Practice.
    Gefen, D. & Ridings, C. M. (2002). Implementation Team Responsiveness and User Evaluation of Customer Relationship Management: A Quasi-Experimental Design Study of Social Exchange Theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 47-69.
    Greenbaum, H. H.(1982).The Audit of Organizational Communication: Contemporary Perspectives in Organizational Behavior. Allyn & Bacon.
    Hall, D. T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal Factors in Organizational Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 176-190.
    Hall, D. T., & Chandler, D. E. (2005). Psychological Success: When the Career Is a Calling. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 155-176.
    Hendriks, P. (1999). Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
    Holtshouse, D. (1998). Knowledge Research Issues. California Management Review, 40(3).
    Homans, G. C. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. The American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
    Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1966). The Social Psychology of Organizations. Wiley.
    Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. Wiley.
    Kettl, D. F. (2006). Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative. Public Administration Review, 66, 10-19.
    Kettl, F. Donald (2002). The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Kooiman, J. (2003). Societal Governance. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
    Koskinen, K. U., Pihlanto, P., & Vanharanta, H. (2003). Tacit Knowledge Acquisition and Sharing in a Project Work Context. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 281-290.
    Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167-195.
    Lee, A. Y. P., Wang, Y. H., Chen, I. H., & Yeh, Y. T. (2019). Calling and Organizational Commitment: A Moderated Mediation Model of Career Commitment and Person-Organization Fit. Journal of Management & Business Research, 36(4).
    Lewis, P. V. (1975). Organizational Communication; The Essence of Effective Management. Grid.
    Loxley, A. (1997). Collaboration in health and welfare: Working with difference. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
    Luo, Y. (2002). Contract, Cooperation, and Performance in International Joint Ventures.Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 903-919.
    March, J.G., & Simon, H.A. (1958). Theories of Bureaucracy. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
    Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
    Manasse, A. L. (1982). Effective Principals: Effective at What? Principal, 61(4), 10-15.
    Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering the Organizational Identification Questionnaire. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(4), 626-658.
    Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
    Newman, J. (2005). Enter the Transformational Leader: Network Governance and the Micro-Politics of Modernization. Sociology, 39(4), 717-734.
    Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
    Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating.
    Payne, M. (2000). Teamwork in Multiprofessional Care. Palgrave.
    Pratt, M.G. (1998). Central Questions in Organizational Identification. Identity in Organizations, 171-207.
    Pecukonis, E., Doyle, O., & Bliss, D. L. (2008). Reducing Barriers to Interprofessional Training: Promoting Interprofessional Cultural Competence. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(4), 417-428.
    Pierre, Jon (ed.) (2000). Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy. Oxford University Press。
    Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. Anchor.
    Purser, R., & Pasmore, W. (1992). Organizing for Learning. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 6(3), 7-114.
    Rahim, M. A. (1983). A Measure of Styles of Handling Interpersonal Conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376.
    Rahim,M.A.(2002).Toward a Theory of Managing Organizational. Praeger.
    Rahim, M. A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing Organizational Conflict: A Model for Diagnosis and Intervention. Psychological Reports, 44, 1323-1344
    Reich, S. M., & Reich, J. A. (2006). Cultural Competence in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: A Method for Respecting Diversity in Research Partnerships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38(1-2), 51-62.
    Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability. Open University.
    Robbins,S.P.(1991). Organizational behavior. Prentice Hall.
    Robbins, S. P., Coulter, M. A. R. Y., & De Cenzo, D. A. (2002). Organizational structure and design. Management. Prentice Hall.
    Seeley, D. (1992). Visionary Leaders for Reforming Public Education. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
    Senge, P. M. (1997). Communities of Leaders and Learners. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 30-32.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral Leadership: Getting to the Heart of School Improvement. Jossey Bass.
    Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative Behavior. The free presss.
    Stevens, E., Jackson, S., & Milligan, S. (Eds.). (2009). Palliative Nursing: Across the Spectrum of Care. John Wiley & Sons.
    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded Theory in Practice. Sage.
    Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2003). Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services.
    Tannenbaum.(1961). Leadership and Organization: A Behavioral Science Approach. McGraw- Hill Book Co.
    Tead, O.(1935). The art of Leadership. McGraw-Hill Book Co.
    Thibaut, J. W. (1959). Kelley. HH (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups.
    Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and Conflict Management. Handbook of Industrial and Nrganiyational Psychology.
    Tohidinia, Z. and Mosakhani, M. (2010). Knowledge Sharing Behaviour and Its Predictors. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(4): 611-631.
    Tolman, E.C. (1943). Identification and the Postwar World. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(2), 141.
    Tregoe, B. J., Zimmerman, R. S., & Tobin, P.(1989). Vision in action. Kepner-Tregoe, Inc.
    Turner, J.C. (1985). Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior. Advances in Group Processes, 2, 77-122.
    Vigil-King, D. C. (2000). Team Conflict, Integrative Conflict-Management Strategies, and Team Effectiveness: A Field Study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
    Wallace, R. C., Engel, D. E.&Mooney, J. E.(1997). The learning school. Crowin Press.
    Weiss, J., & Skelley, M., & Haughey, J., & Hall, D. (2003). Calling, New Careers and Spirituality a Reflective Perspective for Organizational Leaders and Professionals. Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, 5, 175-201.
    Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, Careers, and Callings: People's Relations to Their Work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 21-33.
    Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41(3).
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    110921066
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110921066
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    106601.pdf13177KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback