政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147265
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51658137      Online Users : 243
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147265


    Title: 論漢娜鄂蘭的正義觀：追溯她對正義的否定與肯定的表述之後
    On Hannah Arendt`s view of justice: After her negative and positive articulation of justice
    Authors: 吳宇哲
    Wu, Yu-Che
    Contributors: 汪文聖
    Wang, Wen-Sheng
    吳宇哲
    Wu, Yu-Che
    Keywords: 鄂蘭
    正義
    法律
    羞恥
    敬畏
    社會領域
    自由
    平等
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-09-01 16:20:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 　　本論文討論當代政治思想家漢娜鄂蘭的正義觀。鄂蘭在其政治思想中展現其洞見並對後世政治思想研究有著深遠影響，然而在其政治思想中卻唯獨缺少了對於正義較為完整的論述，而形成一種不自然的文獻空白。本論文旨在為鄂蘭的正義觀提供一個較為完整且具一致性的說明。透過對於其著作的不同版本的比較，以及對其較少被研究的手稿資料《思想日記》進行整理與分析，並從中尋找鄂蘭的正義觀的思想脈絡。
    　　本論文主張鄂蘭的「正義」存在著兩種意涵，分別為具否定意涵的「正義作為反標準性的理想」與具肯定意涵的「正義顯現每個人的空間」。並進一步說明在現代對於恢復正義可能的思考方向，便是從「羞恥」與「敬畏」兩種情感出發。在第一章說明鄂蘭的正式著作的不同語言版本中，對於「正義」一詞的理解與使用上的不一致與可能的原因。在第二章進一步從《思想日記》中找到對於「正義作為反標準性的理想」的進一步例證。在第三章則討論「正義顯現每個人的空間」實際上仍需要透過法律確立這種空間。在第四章則說明社會領域的崛起對於正義的影響與當今可能透過「羞恥」與「敬畏」恢復正義。
    Reference: （一）中文文獻
    書籍
    汪文聖（2019），《現象學作為一種實踐哲學：胡塞爾．海德格．鄂蘭的倫理、政治與宗教哲學》，聯經出版。
    汪文聖（2022），《「讓出空間」與「敬畏」作為公共領域價值的基礎》，時報出版。
    傅偉勳（2017），《西洋哲學史》，三民書局。
    蔡英文（2002），《政治實踐與公共空間─漢娜鄂蘭的政治思想》，聯經出版。

    翻譯書籍
    Arendt, H.（著），李雨鍾（譯）（2022），《極權主義的起源》，商周出版。
    Arendt, H.（著），李雨鍾、李威撰、黃雯君（譯）（2021），《過去與未來之間》，商周出版。
    Arendt, H.（著），林宏濤（譯）（2017），《人的條件》，商周出版。
    Arendt, H.（著），施奕如（譯）（2014），《平凡的邪惡─艾希曼耶路撒冷大審紀實》，左岸文化。
    Arendt, H.（著），蔡佩君（譯）（1996），《共和危機》，時報文化。
    Arendt, H.（著），蔡佩君（譯）（2017），《政治的承諾》，左岸文化。
    Arendt, H.（著），蔡佩君（譯）（2017），《責任與判斷》，左岸文化。
    Arendt, H.（著），蘇友貞（譯）（2007），《心智生命》，立緒文化。
    Young-Bruhl E. （著），江先聲（譯）（2017），《愛這個世界：漢娜鄂蘭傳》，商周出版。

    （二）英文文獻
    書籍
    Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press. (HC)
    Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic. Harcourt Brace. (CR)
    Arendt, H. (1977). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Penguin Books. (First Published by The Viking Press 1963) (EIJ)
    Arendt, H. (1978). The Life of the Mind. Harcourt (Thinking : LMT ; Willing : LMW)
    Arendt, H. (1994). Essay in Understanding 1930-1954. Schocken Books. (EU)
    Arendt, H. (2003). Responsibility and Judgment. Schocken Books. (EU)
    Arendt, H. (2005). The Promise of Politics. Schocken Books. (PP)
    Arendt, H. (2006). Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. Penguin Books. (First Published by The Viking Press 1961) (BPF)
    Arendt, H. (2006). On Revolution. Penguin Books. (OR)
    Arendt, H. (2017). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Penguin Classics. (First Published by Harcourt 1951) (OT)

    期刊論文
    Balmer, T. (2013). What`s a Judge to Do? Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 18, 139-153.
    Benhabib, S. (1988). I. Judgment and the moral foundations of politics in Arendt`s thought. Political theory, 16(1), 29-51.
    Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: Aliens, residents, and citizens. Cambridge University Press.
    Bernstein, R. (2000). Arendt on thinking. In D. Villa (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press, 277-292
    Bernstein, R. J. (1986). Philosophical profiles: Essays in a pragmatic mode. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Bilsky, L. Y. (1996). When actor and spectator meet in the courtroom: Reflections on Hannah Arendt`s concept of judgment. History and Memory, 8(2), 137-173.
    Clarke, J. P. (1993). Social Justice and political freedom: revisiting Hannah Arendt’s conception of need. Philosophy & social criticism, 19(3-4), 333-347.
    D’entrèves, M. P. (2000). Arendt’s theory of judgment. In D. Villa (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press, 245-260.
    D’Entrèves, M. P. (2002). The political philosophy of Hannah Arendt. Routledge.
    Deutscher, M. (2016). Judgment After Arendt. Routledge.
    Dew, R. (2020). Arendt Reading Aristotle. In Hannah Arendt, Springer Nature, 35-51.
    Disch, L. J. (1994). Hannah Arendt and the limits of philosophy. Cornell University Press.
    Felman, S. (2001). Theaters of justice: Arendt in Jerusalem, the Eichmann Trial, and the redefinition of legal meaning in the wake of the Holocaust. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 1(2).
    Fry, K. (2001). The role of aesthetics in the politics of Hannah Arendt. Philosophy Today, 45(Supplement), 46-52.
    Gottlieb, S. Y. A. (2011). Beyond tragedy: Arendt, Rogat, and the judges in Jerusalem. College Literature, 45-56.
    Hauff, L. (2012). Die Richter im Eichmann-Prozess. In Interessen um Eichmann: israelische Justiz, deutsche Strafverfolgung und alte Kameradschaften. Campus Verlag, 119-146.
    Horsman, Y. (2020). Theaters of Justice. Stanford University Press.
    Jager, C. (2016). Transitional Justice in Prometheus Unbound. In The Workshop, 26-31.
    Klusmeyer, D. (2005). Hannah Arendt’s critical realism: Power, justice, and responsibility. In Hannah Arendt and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, 113-178.
    Lederman, S. (2016). The actor does not judge: Hannah Arendt’s theory of judgment. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 42(7), 727-741.
    Lee, S. (2021). The lex of the earth? Arendt’s critique of Roman law. Journal of International Political Theory, 17(3), 394-411.
    Marshall, D. L. (2010). The Origin and Character of Hannah Arendt’s Theory of Judgment. Political Theory, 38(3), 367-393.
    Parekh, S. (2008). Hannah Arendt and the challenge of modernity: a phenomenology of human rights. Routledge.
    Parekh, S. (2013). Hannah Arendt and Global Justice. Philosophy Compass, 8(9), 771-780.
    Parvikko, T. (1998). Hannah Arendt as judge. A conscious pariah in Jerusalem, Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, 37-57.
    Pendas, D. O. (2007). “Eichmann in Jerusalem", Arendt in Frankfurt: The Eichmann Trial, the Auschwitz Trial, and the Banality of Justice. New German Critique, (100), 77-109.
    Pitkin, H. F. (1981). Justice: On relating private and public. Political theory, 9(3), 327-352.
    Sari, Y. (2020). Towards an Arendtian Conception of Justice. Research in Phenomenology, 50(2), 216-239.
    Schaap, A. (2005). Forgiveness, Reconciliation, Transitional Justice. In Hannah Arendt and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, 67-94.
    Shaked, M. (2015). The Unknown Eichmann Trial: The Story of the Judge. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 29(1), 1-38.
    Steinberger, P. J. (1990). Hannah Arendt on judgment. American Journal of Political Science, 803-821.
    Stonebridge, L. (2009). Hannah Arendt`s testimony: Judging in a lawless world. New Formations, 67(67), 78-90.
    Taminiaux, J. (2000). Athens and Rome. In D. Villa (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press, 165-177
    Ucnik, L. (2022). Hannah Arendt`s action and contemplation: Two sides of the same coin. Journal of Social Philosophy, 53(1), 76-92.
    Volk, C. (2010). From nomos to lex: Hannah Arendt on law, politics, and order. Leiden Journal of International Law, 23(4), 759-779.
    Wilkinson, M. A. (2011). Between freedom and law: Hannah Arendt on the promise of modern revolution and the burden of ‘the tradition’. https://web.archive.org/web/20170922040214id_/http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/38066/1/WPS2011-05_Wilkinson.pdf
    Yar, M. (2000). From actor to spectator: Hannah Arendt’s ‘two theories’ of political judgment. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 26(2), 1-27.

    （三）德文文獻
    Arendt, H. (2002). Denktagebuch. Piper. (DT)
    Arendt, H. (2003). Was ist Politik? Fragmente aus dem Nachlass. Piper. (WP)
    Arendt, H. (2017) Es gibt nur einziges Menschenrecht. In Menke C. & Ramondi F. (Eds.), Die Revolution der Menschenrechte (pp. 394-410). Suhrkamp.
    Arendt, H. (2020). Eichmann in Jerusalem: Ein Bericht von der Banalität des Bösen. Piper. (EIJD)
    Arendt, H. (2020). Über die Revolution. Piper. (RD)
    Arendt, H. (2020). Vita activa oder Vom tätigen Leben. Piper. (VA)
    Arendt, H. (2021). Elemente und Ursprünge totaler Herrschaft: Antisemitismus, Imperialismus, Totalitarismus. Piper. (EUH)
    Arendt, H. (2021). Fragwürdige Traditionsbestände im politischen Denken der Gegenwart. Piper. (FT)
    Arendt, H. (2021). Menschen in finsteren Zeiten. Piper. (MZ)
    Arendt, H. (2022). Ich will verstehen: Selbstauskünfte zu Leben und Werk. Piper. (IWV)
    Höffe, O. (2021). Gerechtigkeit: Eine philosophische Einführung. Verlag C.H. Beck.
    Scarano N. (2018). Einleitung. In Horn C. & Scarano N. (Eds.), Philosophie der Gerechtigkeit (pp. 335-354.) Berlin, Suhrkamp.
    Nussbaum M. (2021). The Monarchy of Fear. Oxford University Press.

    （四）網路資料
    Gerechtigkeit. (n.d.) In DWDS. Retrieved from https://www.dwds.de/wb/Gerechtigkeit
    injustice. (n.d.) In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/96117?redirectedFrom=injustice#eid
    iustitia (n.d.) In An Elementary Latin Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0060%3Aentry%3Diustitia
    justice. (n.d.) In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/102198?rskey=ewyxjh&result=1&isAdvanced=false#eid
    Ungerechtigkeit. (n.d.) In DWDS. Retrieved from https://www.dwds.de/wb/Ungerechtigkeit
    δικαιοσύνη (n.d.) In Biblissima. Retrieved from https://outils.biblissima.fr/en/eulexis-web/index.php
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學系
    108154003
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108154003
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Philosophy] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    400301.pdf3183KbAdobe PDF233View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback