政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147213

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147213

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51694212 線上人數 : 578

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 財政學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/147213

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147213

題名:	臺灣消費稅改革之動態隨機一般均衡模型分析 A Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Analysis of Taiwan Consumption Tax Reform
作者:	蔡婷羽 Tsai, Ting-Yu
貢獻者:	朱琇妍 Chu, Shiou-Yen 蔡婷羽 Tsai, Ting-Yu
關鍵詞:	耐久財及非耐久財消費稅所得稅動態隨機一般均衡模型所得分配福利 Consumption tax on durable and non-durable goods Income tax Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium model Income distribution Welfare
日期:	2023
上傳時間:	2023-09-01 16:07:47 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本文以動態隨機一般均衡模型(Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium, DSGE)，分析調升消費稅稅率，及調降所得稅稅率時，對臺灣總體經濟、所得分配及社會福利之影響。本文針對耐久財與非耐久財，建立不同之消費稅稅率，所得稅則區分為勞動所得稅與利潤稅。本文模擬四種財政政策調整工具對兩種家計單位之消費、勞動、所得、消費稅負擔率及福利的影響，模擬結果發現，總體經濟衝擊反應方面，調升非耐久財及耐久財消費稅稅率將減少產出，提高物價上漲率;調降勞動所得稅及利潤稅稅率將增加產出，降低物價上漲率;政府支出增加則產生乘數效果，提高產出，降低物價上漲率。所得分配方面，調升耐久財消費稅稅率，比起調升非耐久財消費稅稅率，更能縮小所得差距，亦更能降低低所得者之消費稅負擔率。福利方面，在暫時性衝擊下，調升耐久財消費稅稅率，並調降勞動所得稅稅率之財政政策調整工具，為本文四種財政政策工具中最佳之政策工具。此政策工具在調升消費稅稅率的同時，以僅調升耐久財消費稅稅率，並搭配調降勞動所得稅稅率的方式，減緩了消費稅調升對低所得者所造成的負擔。另外，勞動所得稅稅率調降，使勞動供給增加，帶動經濟成長。 This paper analyzes the impact of increasing the consumption tax rate and decreasing the income tax rate on Taiwan`s macroeconomic, income distribution, and social welfare using the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model. This study establishes the different consumption tax rates for durable and non-durable goods, while income taxes are divided into labor income tax and profit tax. The research simulates four fiscal policy adjustment instruments to assess their effects on consumption, labor, income, consumption tax burden, and welfare for two types of households. The simulation results reveal that in terms of macroeconomic impacts, raising the consumption tax rates for both durable and non-durable goods will reduce output and increase inflation rates. On the other hand, reducing labor income tax and profit tax rates will boost output and lower inflation rates. Increased government expenditure will produce a multiplier effect, raising output and lowering inflation rates. Regarding income distribution, raising the consumption tax rate for durable goods, compared to non-durable goods, can narrow income gaps and reduce the consumption tax burden on low-income households. In terms of welfare, under temporary shocks, the best fiscal policy instrument among the four is the combination of raising the consumption tax rate for durable goods and reducing the labor income tax rate. Through increasing the consumption tax rate specifically for durable goods while simultaneously decreasing the labor income tax rate, this policy instrument alleviates the burden imposed on low-income households caused by the consumption tax increase. Additionally, the decrease in labor income tax rate leads to increased labor supply, driving economic growth.
參考文獻:	中文部分： [1] 中央研究院(2014)。賦稅改革政策建議書。中央研究院報告。 [2]中央銀行(2023)。「五大銀行平均存款利率」與「五大銀行平均基準利率」。民 112 年 2 月 16 日，取自:https://www.cbc.gov.tw/tw/cp-371-1040-5C7A0-1.html [3] 內政部戶政司(2023)。人口統計資料。民 112 年 5 月 22 日，取自:https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346 [4] 行政院主計總處(2023)。112 年 1 月人力資源調查統計。民 112 年 5 月 22 日，取自:https://www.stat.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=4000&s=230938 [5] 行政院主計總處(2022)。110 年家庭收支調查報告。行政院主計總處。 [6] 財政部財政資訊中心(2023)。109 年度綜合所得稅申報核定統計專冊。民 112 年 5 月23 日，取自:https://www.fia.gov.tw/singlehtml/43?cntId=17dcd598b9fd41939cf98c2e4ae162fd [7] 國家發展委員會(2023)。人口推估查詢系統—總生育率。民 112 年 5 月 31 日，取自:https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/dataSearch2.aspx?r=2&uid=2104&pid=59 [8] 張富翔(2018)。探討台灣耐久財及非耐久財訂價模式。國立中央大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。 [9] 張漪軒(2016)。透過消費稅的稅制改革:以台灣為例。國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。 [10] 傅敬堯、林雪瑜、楊淑珺(2018)。稅制調整與地下經濟—臺灣動態隨機一般均衡模型分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，49(1)，1-45。 [11] 勞動部(2023)。112 年 1 月底勞工保險投保人數統計。民 112 年 5 月 22 日，取自:https://statfy.mol.gov.tw/index08.aspx [12] 黃俞寧(2013)。動態隨機一般均衡架構在台灣貨幣政策制定上之應用。中央銀行季刊，35(1)，3-33。 [13] 管中閔、印永翔、姚睿、黃朝熙、徐之強、陳宜廷(2010)。台灣動態隨機一般均衡模型 (DSGE) 建立與政策評估。行政院經濟建設委員會。 [14] 蘇顯揚、呂慧敏(2014)。日本調漲消費稅率的影響。國際經濟情勢雙週報，1801， 5-10。英文部分： [1] Altig, D., Auerbach, A. J., Kotlikoff, L. J., Smetters, K. A., &Walliser, J. (2001). Simulating Fundamental Tax Reform in the United States. American Economic Review, 91(3), 574-595. [2] Arnold, J. M. (2008). Do Tax Structures Affect Aggregate Economic Growth?: Empirical Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries (No. 643). OECD Economics Department Working Papers,未出版 [3] Auerbach, A. J., Kotlikoff, L. J., & Skinner, J. S. (1981). The Efficiency Gains from Dynamic Tax Reform (No. w819). NBER Working Paper Series,未出版 [4] Azar, J. A., Berry, S. T., & Marinescu, I. (2022). Estimating Labor Market Power (No. w30365). NBER Working Paper Series,未出版 [5] Bhattarai, K., & Trzeciakiewicz, D. (2017). Macroeconomic Impacts of Fiscal Policy Shocks in the UK: A DSGE Analysis. Economic Modelling, 61, 321-338. [6] Bi, H., Shen, W., & Yang, S. C. S. (2016). Fiscal Limits in Developing Countries: A DSGE Approach. Journal of Macroeconomics, 49, 119-130. [7] Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered Prices in a Utility-maximizing Framework. Journal of monetary Economics, 12(3), 383-398. [8] Cantelmo, A., & Melina, G. (2018). Monetary Policy and the Relative Price of Durable Goods. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 86, 1-48. [9] Cantore, C., & Freund, L. B. (2021). Workers, Capitalists, and the Government: Fiscal Policy and Income (Re) Distribution. Journal of Monetary Economics, 119, 58-74. [10] Chen, B. L., & Liao, S. Y. (2014). Capital, Credit Constraints and the Comovement Between Consumer Durables and Nondurables. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 39, 127-139. [11] Chu, S. Y. (2018). Macroeconomic Policies and Housing Market in Taiwan. International Review of Economics & Finance, 58, 404-421. [12] Fauvel, Y., & Samson, L. (1991). Intertemporal Substitution and Durable Goods: An Empirical Analysis. Canadian Journal of Economics, 192-205. [13] Furceri, D., & Mourougane, A. (2010). The Effects of Fiscal Policy on Output: A DSGE Analysis (No. 770). OECD Economics Department Working Papers,未出版 [14] Hayashida, M., Namba, R., Ono, SH., & Yasuoka, M. (2022). Consumption Tax and Productive Government Expenditure in DSGE Model.The Japanese Political Economy, 48(1), 67-86. [15] Heer, B., & Trede, M. (2003). Efficiency and Distribution Effects of a Revenue-neutral Income Tax Reform. Journal of Macroeconomics, 25(1), 87-107. [16] Jokisch, S., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (2007). Simulating the Dynamic Macroeconomic and Microeconomic Effects of the FairTax. National Tax Journal, 60(2), 225-252. [17] Kang, K. H., Keen, M., Pradhan, M., & de Mooij, R. A. (2011). Raising the Consumption Tax in Japan: Why, When, How?. IMF Staff Discussion Notes, 2011(013). [18] Koehne, S. (2018). On the Taxation of Durable Goods. International Economic Review, 59(2), 825-857. [19] Lehmus, M. (2011). Labor or Consumption Taxes? An Application with a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model with Heterogeneous Agents. Economic Modelling, 28(4), 1984-1992. [20] Lin, Y. C. (2021). Business Cycle Fluctuations in Taiwan—A Bayesian DSGE Analysis. Journal of Macroeconomics, 70, 103349. [21] Liu, C. Y., & Wu, C. H. (2015). Income-cum-consumption Tax Schedules as Stabilization Policy. Taiwan Economic Review, 43(2), 243-268. [22] Lu, C. H., Ueng, K. G., & Chang, J. J. (2022). Consumption Indivisibility and the Optimal Tax Mix. Economic Modelling, 112, 105845. [23] Monacelli, T. (2009). New Keynesian Models, Durable Goods, and Collateral Constraints. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(2), 242-254. [24] Nandi, A. (2020). Indian Fiscal Policy: A DSGE Primer. The Journal of Developing Areas, 54(2). [25] Pakoš, M. (2011). Estimating Intertemporal and Intratemporal Substitutions When Both Income and Substitution Effects are Present: The Role of Durable Goods. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 29(3), 439-454. [26] Tellis, G. J. (1988). The Price Elasticity of Selective Demand: A Meta-analysis of Econometric Models of Sales. Journal of marketing research, 25(4), 331-341. [27] Teo, W. L. (2009). Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Taiwanese Economy. Pacific Economic Review, 14(2), 194-231. [28] Wang, P. Y. (2021). Does Taiwan Need a Macro-prudential Policy? How to Do It? How to Coordinate with Monetary Policy?. Academia Economic Papers, 49(1), 1-40. [29] Yang, S. C. S. (2007). Do Capital Income Tax Cuts Trickle Down?. National Tax Journal, 60(3), 551-567. [30] Zubairy, S. (2014). On Fiscal Multipliers: Estimates from a Medium Scale DSGE Model. International Economic Review, 55(1), 169-195.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學財政學系 110255002
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110255002
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[財政學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
500201.pdf		2675Kb	Adobe PDF2	115	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋