政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147116
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114420/145447 (79%)
Visitors : 53245275      Online Users : 383
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147116


    Title: 臺灣的平臺與新聞政策之制定過程與政府角色分析
    Analysis of Taiwan`s Platform and News Policy Formulation Process and Government Roles
    Authors: 蔡郁筠
    Tsai
    Contributors: 劉昌德
    Liu, Chang-De
    蔡郁筠
    Tsai
    Keywords: 傳播政策
    政策過程
    新聞分潤
    平臺與新聞
    平臺政策
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-09-01 15:44:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究的研究標的為自2021年2月澳洲通過新聞議價法後，臺灣平臺與新聞政策的推動過程及其脈絡。其中，本研究主要探討行政部門之行動與論述，並將各方行動者之行動作為對照，試圖梳理現今平臺灣平臺與新聞政策下的關鍵行動者與其作為，以及，進一步分析臺灣的平臺與新聞政策背後所隱含的社會理念及制度。

    本研究的研究框架主要採用Peters (2002)的「5I構面」框架作為研究視角，依循不同面向分析臺灣平臺與新聞政策的政策推動過程與特色，並以Terry Flew (2021)對於網際網路政策之詮釋作為補充。研究方法部分，本研究深度訪談參與平臺與新聞議題的相關產業、政府各部會以及學界的參與人員，探詢其中的行動作為、倡議策略、利益主張、組織慣性與困境。並結合論述分析，透過官方報告與報導，分析各部會間的組織邏輯。

    本研究發現，現今的平臺與新聞政策鑲嵌於平臺化社會的影響，在新自由主義的主流論述與意識形態籠罩下，行政部門、立法部門與專家學者、新聞業者間呈現去中心化的互動模式。在社會信念上，政府部會承襲過往由新自由主義影響的市場主導意識，並在論述上將數位轉型與共榮發展相互結合。
    Reference: Ananny, M., & Gillespie, T. (2017). Public platforms: Beyond the cycle of shocks and exceptions. Interventions: Communication Research and Practice.
    Anderson, C. (2009). Free: The Future of a Radical Price. London: Random House.
    Andrejevic, M. (2013). Public service media utilities: Rethinking search engines and social networking as public goods. Media International Australia, 146(1), 123–32.
    Assouline, D. (2019). Proposition de loi tendant à créer un droit voisin au profit des agences de presse et des éditeurs de presse (No. 243). http://www.senat.fr/
    Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) (2018a) ACCC Digital Platforms Inquiry (Preliminary Report). Canberra, ACT, Australia: ACCC.
    Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) (2018b) Digital platforms inquiry issues paper.
    Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) (2019). Digital platforms inquiry - final report.
    Autorité de la concurrence. (2020). Décision n° 20-MC-01 du 9 avril 2020. Autorité de la concurrence. https://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/sites/gle-creates-60m-digital-publishing/.
    Baines R. (2017, September 13). Media industry facing major shake-up as Government strikes Senate deal with support of Nick Xenophon. ABC News. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-13/media-reforms-set-to-pass-senate/8943266
    Balkin, J. M. (2017). Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation. UCDL rev., 51, 1149.
    Banks, B. & Hesmondhalgh, D. (2009). Looking for work in creative industries policy. Routledge.
    Barlow, J. P. (2019). A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. Duke L. & Tech. Rev., 18, 5.
    Bemelmans-Videc, M. L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. (2017). Choosing the right policy instrument at the right time: the contextual challenges of selection and implementation. In Carrots, Sticks & Sermons (pp. 149-164). Routledge.
    Black, J. (2002). Critical reflections on regulation. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27, 1–35.
    Bobrow, D. B., & Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Policy analysis by design. University of Pittsburgh Pre.
    Bossio, D., Flew, T., Meese, J., Leaver, T., & Barnet, B. (2022). Australia`s News Media Bargaining Code and the global turn towards platform regulation. Policy & Internet, 14(1), 136-150.
    Carson, A. (2021). The grand bargain: Australia’s news media bargaining code.
    Cox, K. (2021, 13 March). US lawmakers propose Australia‐style bill for media, tech negotiations. Ars Technica. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/03/uslawmakerspropose-australia-style-bill-for-media-tech-negotiations
    Crowe D. & Samios Z. (2021, February 27). Why Facebook accepted Australia’s request. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/why-facebook-accepted-australia-s-request-20210226-p5763t.html
    David C. (2021, February 27). Why Facebook accepted Australia’s request. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/why-facebook-accepted-australia-s-request-20210226-p5763t.html
    de Sola Pool, I. (1983). Technologies of Freedom. Harvard University Press.
    European Commission. (2021, June 4) Antitrust: Commission opens investigation into possible anticompetitive conduct of Facebook. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_2848
    Feld, H. (2019). The Case for the Digital Platform Act: Market Structure and Regulation of Digital Platforms. Roosevelt Institute.
    Fernández-Ballesteros, R., Vedung, E., & Seyfried, E. (1998). Psychology in program evaluation. European Psychologist, 3(2), 143
    Flew, T. (2016). Convergent media policy: Reflections based upon the Australian case. In European Media Policy for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 219-237). Routledge.
    Flew, T. (2021a). Willingness to pay: News media. Intermedia, 49(3), 22–25.
    Flew, T. (2021b). Regulating platforms. Polity Press.
    Flew, T., & Wilding, D. (2021c). The turn to regulation in digital communication: the ACCC’s digital platforms inquiry and Australian media policy. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1), 48–65.
    Flew, T., Martin, F., & Suzor, N. (2019). Internet regulation as media policy: Rethinking the question of digital communication platform governance. Journal of Digital Media and Policy, 10(1), 33–50.
    Frugal, E. (2021). The EU Press publishers right: Where do member states stand? Journal of Intellectual Property. Law and Practice, 16(8), 887–893.
    Gorwa, R. (2019). The platform governance triangle: Conceptualising the informal regulation of online content. Internet Policy Review, 8(2).
    Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford university press.
    Isbell, K. A. (2010). The rise of the news aggregator: Legal implications and best practices. Berkman Center Research Publication, (2010-10).
    Kingdon, J. W., & Stano, E. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Vol. 45, pp. 165-169). Boston: Little, Brown.
    Kleis Nielsen, R., & Ganter, S. A. (2018). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New media & society, 20(4), 1600-1617.
    Kleis, N. R., & Ganter, S. A. (2018). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New media & society, 20(4), 1600-1617.
    Krugman, D.M, & Reid, L.R. (1980). The `` public interest `` as defined by FCC policy makers. Journal of Broadcasting (3rd ed.). 24(3), 311-325.
    Maher B. (2022, April 6). Canada reveals its Australia-style big tech news media bargaining code. Press Gazette.
    March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. Simon and Schuster.
    Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and society, 19(1), 1-31.
    Missoffe, S. (2020, November 19). Un point sur nos avancées avec les éditeurs de presse en France.
    Mosco, V. (2018). A critical perspective on the post-internet world. Javnost: The Public, 25(1–2), 201–27.
    Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government. Public administration, 76(2), 295-311.
    Peters, B. G. (2002). The politics of tool choice. The tools of government: A guide to the new governance, 552-564.
    Pfanner, E. (2013, January 21). France proposes an Internet tax. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/21/business/global/21iht-datatax21.html.
    Pickard, V. (2019). Democracy without journalism? Confronting the misinformation society. Oxford University Press.
    Pickard, V. (2021). A new social contract for platforms. Regulating Big Tech: Policy responses to digital dominance, 323-337
    Plantin, J.-C., & Punathambekar, A. (2019). Digital media infrastructures: pipes, platforms, and politics. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2), 163–174.
    Puppis, M., and Winseck, D. (2020). Platform regulation inquiries, reviews and proceedings worldwide. Google Docs, 29 July. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AZdh9sECGfTQEROQjo5f YeiY_gezdf_11B8mQFsuMfs/edit#heading=h.drjg9uyede6x.
    Royal, A., & Napoli, P. M. (2022). Platforms and the Press: Regulatory Interventions to Address an Imbalance of Power. In Digital Platform Regulation: Global Perspectives on Internet Governance (pp. 43-67). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    Schlesinger, P. (2020). After the post‐public sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7–8), 1545–1563.
    Schmidt, E. (2013, February 1). Google creates €60m Digital Publishing Innovation Fund to support transformative French digital publishing initiatives. https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/google-news-initiative/google-creates-60m-digital-publishing/
    Solon, O. (2018, 16 February). As Peter Thiel ditches Silicon Valley for LA, locals tout ‘conservative renaissance’. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/16/peter-thiel- silicon-valley-move-la-conservatives-welcome.
    Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Polity Press.
    Streeter, T. (2011). The Net Effect: Romanticism, Capitalism and the Internet. New York: NYU Press.
    The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (2019). The Cairncross Review: A Sustainable Future for Journalism.
    The Economist. (2012, November 10). Taxing times. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/international/2012/11/10/taxing-times.
    van Dijck, J., Poell, T., and de Wall, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Vedung, E., Rist, R. C., & Bemelmans-Videc, M. L. (Eds.). (1998). Carrots, sticks & sermons: policy instruments and their evaluation. Transaction publishers.
    Waisbord, S. (2018). The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics. Communication Research and Practice, 4(1), 17–34.
    Winseck, D. (2020). Vampire squids, ‘the broken internet’, and platform regulation. Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 11(3), 241–82.
    Woodside, K. (1986). Policy instruments and the study of public policy. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 19(4), 775-794.
    Zoe, S. and Lisa, V. (2021, February 17). ‘Historic moment’: Treasurer Josh Frydenberg hails Google’s news content deals. The Sydney Morning Herald
    https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/historic-moment-treasurer-josh-frydenberg-hails-google-s-news-content-deals-20210217-p573eu.html.


    《傳播、文化與政治》編輯委員會（2016）。〈編輯室報告：「文化與媒體政策」的回顧與前瞻〉。《傳播文化與政治》，3，i-vi。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=P20150616002-201606-201606230016-201606230016-i-vi
    ETTODAY（2021年4月21日）。媒體議價座談大拜拜？林楚茵：公平會找免費使用業者無法聽到答案。https://www.ettoday.net/news/20210421/1965019.htm
    三立新聞網政治中心（2021年10月12日）。跟進澳洲設媒體議價法？NCC：正起草數位通訊傳播服務法。https://www.setn.com/news.aspx?newsid=1011114
    中央社（2022年12月16日）。媒體與數位巨擘對話 Google提共榮、新聞業盼增分潤。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/202212160161.aspx
    文化部（2020）。《文化科技政策施政綱領》。
    王柏偉、蔡淳任（2022）。〈臺灣數位與科技藝術相關政策梳理－從「科技藝術」到「文化科技」〉。《表演藝術年鑑》，308-324。
    王揚宇（2023年5月5日）。綠委關注媒體議價 提數位新聞發展與民主韌性法草案。中央社。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202305050123.aspx
    立法院（2021）。數位平臺之新聞付費制度問題研析。取自：https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=210310.
    立法院（2022），第10屆第6會期第10次會議議案關係文書。
    立法院（2022）。立法院第10屆第6會期交通委員會會議紀錄，2022年10月27日。立法院公報第111卷第99期。
    朱正庭（民 110 年 2 月 18 日)。【新聞有價】現有法規管不到網路！澳洲政府戰平臺 NCC只能持續關注。蘋果新聞網。取自 https://tw.appledaily.com/life/20210218/F6EOVTF3ZZBJRKUMYVXIZHVDPA/
    自由時報（2021年3月22日）。數位平臺與媒體議價法制 管碧玲要求公平會研議。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/3479263
    自由時報（2021年3月23日）。管制跨國網路平臺 立委促公平會、NCC研擬法案。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3476801
    余弦妙（2022年12月2日）。媒體議價有共識 Google將提出具體方案。經濟日報。https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/6810935?from=edn_related_storybottom
    余弦妙（2022年8月28日）。數位部掛牌 不做極權老大哥。經濟日報。https://money.udn.com/money/story/12926/6569700
    余弦妙（2023年3月28日）。展開第二輪媒體議價對話 Meta與新聞業沒共識。經濟日報。https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/7062544?from=edn_related_storybottom
    余弦妙（2023年4月10日）。媒體議價再開跨部會小組會議 預計最快本月召開。經濟日報。https://udn.com/news/story/7238/7087409?from=udn-referralnews_ch2artbottom
    李欣芳（2022年10月6日）。政院：媒體議價機制由數位部主責協調將研議是否提專法。自由時報。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/4080678
    邱新博（2022年12月6日）。Meta與電子媒體對話 達成兩共識。https://tw.news.yahoo.com/meta%E8%88%87%E9%9B%BB%E5%AD%90%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94%E5%B0%8D%E8%A9%B1-%E9%81%94%E6%88%90%E5%85%A9%E5%85%B1%E8%AD%98-124228574.html
    邱新博（2022年9月2日）。民間版議價法 數位平臺使用新聞須付費。中國時報。https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20220902000424-260110?chdtv
    邱新博（2023年2月2日）。新聞媒體議價法 將進入立法程序。https://tw.sports.yahoo.com/news/%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94%E8%AD%B0%E5%83%B9%E6%B3%95-%E5%B0%87%E9%80%B2%E5%85%A5%E7%AB%8B%E6%B3%95%E7%A8%8B%E5%BA%8F-001647411.html
    洪貞玲、劉昌德、唐士哲（2012）。〈商業媒體內容管制：從國家威權到社會共管〉。在劉昌德（主編），《豐盛中的匱乏：傳播政策的反思與重構》（頁113-146）。
    馬瑞璿、余弦妙（2022年12月21日）。唐鳳：建構媒體議價分潤制。經濟日報。https://money.udn.com/money/story/12926/6853658
    國家通訊傳播委員會（2023）。111年通訊傳播市場報告。
    曹悅華（2022年11月29日）。數位平臺與新聞業首場對話 延期。工商時報。https://ctee.com.tw/news/policy/763583.html
    曹悅華（2022年12月9日）。新聞業與數位平臺第3場對話 籲Meta提出雙贏方案。工商時報。https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20221209004391-260410?chdtv
    曹悅華（2023年3月27日）。媒體與數位平臺第2輪對話，「4主張」盼正面回應訴求：應重視產業困境，籲設分潤機制。工商時報。https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183027/post/202303270042/
    陳世昌（2023年4月10日）。立委要求4月底再對話 唐鳳：平臺共榮案跟媒體議價是兩回事。ETtoday。https://finance.ettoday.net/news/2476158
    陳柔蓁（2022年10月6日）。新聞有價！數位廣告市場遭壟斷 立委要求公平會積極處置。中時新聞網。https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E%E6%9C%89%E5%83%B9-%E6%95%B8%E4%BD%8D%E5%BB%A3%E5%91%8A%E5%B8%82%E5%A0%B4%E9%81%AD%E5%A3%9F%E6%96%B7-%E7%AB%8B%E5%A7%94%E8%A6%81%E6%B1%82%E5%85%AC%E5%B9%B3%E6%9C%83%E7%A9%8D%E6%A5%B5%E8%99%95%E7%BD%AE-032004263.html
    曾國峰（2022）。〈通傳會「法規影響評估」的運作與限制〉。《中華傳播學刊》，41，119-164。
    馮建三（2003）。〈傳播政治經濟學在臺灣的發展〉。《新聞學研究》， 75，103-140。
    黃順祥（2022年9月27日）。《數位中介法》NCC放棄了！言論自由、網路犯罪拿捏「重新來過」 律師4舉例秒懂：草案問題非常多。新頭殼。https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183027/post/202208210001/
    臺灣事實查核基金會（2022）。2022假訊息大調查。
    趙月枝（2011）。《傳播與社會：政治經濟與文化分析》。中國傳媒大學出版社。
    劉昌德（2012）。《豐盛中的匱乏：傳播政策的反思與重構》。巨流圖書股份公司。
    數位發展部 數位產業署（2023），國內產業與大型數位平臺共榮發展現況與規劃。2023年2年15日 新聞有價！數位平臺和新聞媒體議價政策建議及法案展望公聽會。
    鄭雅心（2021）。〈澳洲《新聞媒體和數位平臺強制性議價法案》施行現況與面臨挑戰〉，《臺灣經濟研究月刊》，44(11)，55-61。
    謝宗學（2003）。〈政策工具選擇的政治經濟學：以經發會基本工資的爭議為例〉。《公共行政學報》，9，89-121。
    羅世宏（譯）（民111）。《新聞崩壞，何以民主？》 （原作者：Victor Pickard）。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    邊明道, 陳心懿, & Napoli, P. M. (2005)。《傳播政策基本原理: 電子媒體管制的原則與過程》。臺北: 揚智文化，譯自 Philip M. Napoli (2001), Foundations of Communications Policy: Principles and Process in the Regulation of Electronic Media. Hampton Press.
    願景工程基金會（2022）。【問卷回饋】怎樣的數位部 最符合臺灣民眾的期待？ 取自https://visionproject.org.tw/story/6254
    蘇思雲（2022年9月16日）。媒體與數位平臺議價 李永得表態支持新聞付費。中央社。取自：https://academy.cna.com.tw/NewsWorldCont/Index/20220918a001
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    109464049
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109464049
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Master`s Program in Communication] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    404901.pdf4190KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback