政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147019

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147019

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51820588 Online Users : 523

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of International Business > Theses > Item 140.119/147019

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147019

Title:	公司治理組合在對CSR的影響中，是替代還是互補關係？ What is the interaction within the corporate governance combination when it comes to influencing CSR? Substitute or complement?
Authors:	林芷儀 Lin, Chih-I
Contributors:	譚丹琪 Tan, Dan-Chi 林芷儀 Lin, Chih-I
Keywords:	ESG 公司治理新興市場 ESG Corporate Governance Emerging Markets
Date:	2023
Issue Date:	2023-09-01 15:21:25 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	摘要 CSR作為近十年管理學界的顯學，對企業成長與市場擴張極具重要影響，不僅能提升企業的商譽減少國際客戶與陌生市場的顧慮，亦有助於為企業建立良好的體質在動盪的大環境生存，故CSR表現已成為投資客納入選擇考量的指標之一。台灣作為新興市場出口型國家，勢必得跟上這波國際潮流。在政府近年的推動下，公司越來越須重視企業社會責任的實踐。在過去，已有許多學者研究公司治理對CSR表現的影響，Oh, Chang & Cheng (2018) 進一步指出公司治理應考量多制度並行時所造成的影響，與制度間的交互作用。本研究以大股東持股比例、獨立董事席次比例、經理人持股比例為公司治理制度變數，仿效其做法加入不同制度的交乘項，並以環境分數與社會分數為依變數，最後得出制度間均為替代效果。建議企業若有意推行CSR應注意內部資源的調配，避免資源浪費，徒然增加管理成本。 Abstract As a famous school of the management academia in the past decade, CSR has a great impact on the growth and market expansion of enterprises. It can not only enhance the goodwill of enterprises, reduce the concerns of international customers and unfamiliar markets, but help enterprises survive in the volatile environment more easily. Therefore, CSR performance has become one of the indicators for investors to consider in their selection. As an emerging market export-oriented country, Taiwan is bound to keep up with this international trend. With the promotion of the Government in recent years, companies must pay more attention to the practice of corporate social responsibility. In the past, many scholars have studied the impact of corporate governance on CSR performance. Oh, Chang & Cheng (2018) pointed out that corporate governance should consider the impact caused by multiple systems at the same time and the interaction between them. In this study, block holder ownership, proportion of outside directors, and the shareholding ratio of executives are the independent variables of corporate governance, and the cross-multiplicative terms of different systems are added. And the environmental score and social score are the dependent variables. It is suggested that if enterprises intend to implement CSR, they should pay attention to the allocation of internal resources to avoid resource waste and increase management costs in vain.
Reference:	Adel, Christine, Mohamed A.K. Basuony, Hussain, Mostaq M, Mohamed, Ehab K.A., (2019). Is corporate governance relevant to the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in large European companies?. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, Vol.27 (2), p.301-332 Aguilera, R. V., Crespi, R., Desender, K. A., García-Cestona, M. A. (2013). When does ownership matter? Board characteristics and behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 823-842. Ai-Lin Kuo. (2007). An Analysis of the Substitution and Complement Effects of Internal Corporate Governance Mechanisms: Evidence from an Emerging Country. Unpublished working paper Barnea, A., Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict between Shareholders, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 97, No. 1, 71-86. Berrone, Pascual, Phan, Phillip H., Walls, Judith L. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.33 (8), p.885-913 Cancela, Beatriz Lopes, Gomes Dias, António Carlos, Neves, Maria Elisabete Duarte, Rodrigues, Lúcia Lima. (2020). The influence of corporate governance on corporate sustainability: new evidence using panel data in the Iberian macroeconomic environment. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, Vol.28 (4), p.785-806 Castleton, M. W., Hoskisson, R. E., Withers, M. C. (2009). Complementarity in monitoring and bonding: More intense monitoring leads to higher executive compensation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23: 57-74. Chandrakant, Raut, Rajesh, R. (2023). Social sustainability, corporate governance, and sustainability performances: an empirical study of the effects. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, Vol.14 (7), p.9131-9143 Chang, Y. K., Jung, J. C., Lee, J. Y., Oh, W. Y. (2012). Firm size and corporate social performance: The mediating role of outside director representation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19: 486-500. Chang, Young Kyun, Kim, Tae-Yeol, Oh, Won-Yong. (2018). Complementary or Substitutive Effects? Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management, Vol.44 (7), p.2716-2739 Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23. Crifo, P., Rebérioux, A. (2016). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: A typology of OECD countries. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 5(2), 14-27. Crifo, Patricia, Escrig-Olmedo, Elena, Mottis, Nicolas. (2019). Corporate Governance as a Key Driver of Corporate Sustainability in France: The Role of Board Members and Investor Relations. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.159 (4), p.1127-1146 Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A., Johnson, J. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 674-686. ElMassah, Suzanna, Garas, Samy. (2018). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: The case of GCC countries. Critical Perspectives on International Business, Vol.14 (1), p.2-26 Fahad, P., Nidheesh, K. B. (2021). Determinants of CSR disclosure: an evidence from India. Journal of Indian Business Research., Vol.13 (1), p.110-133 Goel, S., Randøya, T. (2003). Ownership structure, founder leadership, and performance in Norwegian SMEs: Implications for financing entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18: 619-637. Graves, S. B., Waddock, S. A. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 303-319. Hoang, Hien Thi Thu, Tran, Ngoc Phu., Van, Loan Thi Hong, Vo, Duc Hong. (2022). The interrelationship between intellectual capital, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. Social Responsibility Journal Hussain, Nazim, Orij, René P. , Rigoni, Ugo. (2018). Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.149 (2), p.411-432 Huynh, Q. L. (2019). Intervention of Corporate Social Responsibility between Financial Effectiveness and Corporate Governance. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 12(13), 1-9. Jain, Tanusree, Jamali, Dima, Rashid, Zaman, Samara, Georges. (2022). Corporate Governance Meets Corporate Social Responsibility: Mapping the Interface. Business & Society, Vol.61 (3), p.690-752 Jamil, Amira, Mohd Ghazali, Nazli Anum, Puat Nelson, Sherliza. (2021). The influence of corporate governance structure on sustainability reporting in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, Vol.17 (8), p.1251-1278 Jensen, William H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior,. Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.3 (4), p.305-360. Lu, Lucy W. (2021). The moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Vol.18 (3), p.193-206 Oh, W. Y., Schepker, D. J. (2013). Complementary or substitutive effects? Corporate governance mechanisms and poison pill repeal. Journal of Management, 39: 1729-1759. Orazalin, Nurlan. (2019). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in an emerging economy: evidence from commercial banks of Kazakhstan. Corporate Governance (Bradford), Vol.19 (3), p.490-507 R. Edward Freeman. (1984).《Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach》 Rediker, K. J., Seth, A. (1995). Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 85-99. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137-151 Sar, Ashok Kumar. (2018). Impact of corporate governance on sustainability: a study of the Indian FMCG industry. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17 (1), p.1-10 Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, Vol.29 (3), p.562-585 Stuebs, M., & Sun, L. (2015). Corporate governance and social responsibility. International Journal of Law and Management, 57(1), 38-52 Westphal, J. D., Zajac, E. J. (1994). The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large US corporations: When is more not better? Strategic Management Journal, 15: 121-142. Yi Ju Sung. (2020). The Relevance of Family Business Board Structure and Corporate Social Responsibility, Unpublished working paper Yoshikawa, Toru, Wang, Peng Ji, Zhu, Hong Jin. (2014). National Governance System, Corporate Ownership, and Roles of Outside Directors: A Corporate Governance Bundle Perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol.22 (3), p.252-265 Zhou, Chao. (2019). Effects of corporate governance on the decision to voluntarily disclose corporate social responsibility reports: evidence from China. Applied Economics, Vol.51 (55), p.5900-5910 王健聰,洪世偉,陳振遠. (2017). 公司治理對於企業社會責任、公司價值之影響. 中山管理評論, Vol.25 (1), p.135-176 邱慈觀,黃啟瑞. (2019). 治理結構對企業社會責任的影響. 中山管理評論, Vol.27 (3), p.511-550 Jason Fernando, (2023/04/23), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Explained With Examples, Investopedia, 擷取自2023年6月，URL: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corp-social-responsibility.asp TESG永續發展指標技術手冊, (2023). 陳瑋鴻, 陳禹蓁.(2023/05/09), ESG永續發展》給企業看的永續指南，一篇搞懂ESG要做什麼, 商業週刊, 擷取自2023年7月, URL: https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/carbon-reduction/blog/3010720 楊雅智,(2015). 淺談企業社會責任之國際發展趨勢與國內推動現況. 證券暨期貨月刊, 第33卷第1期, 第5-15 頁, URL: https://reurl.cc/eDVEKR 2023永續大未來！永續智庫盤點18項ESG關鍵趨勢, (2023/01/07), ESG遠見,擷取自2023年6月，URL: https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/20753
Description:	碩士國立政治大學國際經營與貿易學系 109351015
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109351015
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of International Business] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
101501.pdf		1777Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback