政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146891
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51696665      線上人數 : 544
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146891


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146891


    題名: 探索任務情境對人機互惠機制的影響
    Reciprocity Between Humans and Robots Affected by Task Contexts
    作者: 陳玟彤
    Chen, Wen-Tung
    貢獻者: 林怡伶
    簡士鎰
    Lin, Yi-Ling
    Chien, Shih-Yi
    陳玟彤
    Chen, Wen-Tung
    關鍵詞: 互惠
    人機互動
    幫助行為
    任務情境
    健康維度
    老年照護
    Reciprocity
    Human-robot interaction
    Helping behavior
    Task contexts
    Health dimensions
    Elderly care
    日期: 2023
    上傳時間: 2023-09-01 14:54:11 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨著老年照護逐漸成為社會不可忽視的議題，設計一個能夠協助長者獨立生活的機器人儼然成為可行的解決方案之一。為了提升長者對於機器人的接受程度，在人與機器人之間建立互惠機制是相當重要的。本研究進行了一個實驗，旨在了解在長者與機器人之間建立互惠關係的可能性。研究結果不僅確認了人機之間可建立互惠關係，還發現長者對機器人的互惠行為在不同的任務情境下會有所變化。然而，本研究並未發現長者的互惠程度與他們對機器人的接受度間有顯著關係；訪談結果闡明，另有其餘因素會影響長者對於機器人的接受程度。本實驗結果希望能拓展人機互惠領域的視野，並探索長者在不同健康維度的任務情境中，進行幫助行為時背後的考量。本研究結果將能為設計和使用老年照護機器人提供一些建議。
    As the care of the elderly has gradually become an issue that society cannot ignore, designing a robot that can assist the elderly to live independently has become one of the feasible solutions. Establishing a reciprocal mechanism between humans and robots is vital to promote the elderly’s acceptability of the robots. This study demonstrated an experiment to understand the possibility of establishing a reciprocal relationship between the robot and the elderly. The findings not only confirmed the establishment of a reciprocal relationship between humans and robots but also showed that the elderly’s reciprocity behaviors toward robots changed across task contexts. However, no significant relationship was found between the elderly’s degree of reciprocity and their level of acceptance of robots. Interview results elucidated that other factors influenced the elderly’s acceptance of robots. The experiment results were wished to bring a new vision to the field of reciprocity in HRI and explore the considerations underlying the helping behaviors among different health dimensions task contexts in the elderly. The findings would provide some recommendations for designing and using elderly care robots.
    參考文獻: Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70 (2), 737 753.
    Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation.science,211 (4489), 1390 1 396.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological review, 84 (2), 191.
    Baruah, J., & Buragohain, P. (2014). Helping Attitude of the secondary school students. Empyreal Institute of Higher Education , 70.
    Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic?Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65 122): Elsevier.
    Beer, J. M., Smarr, C.A., Chen, T. L., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2012). The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human Robot Interaction.
    Breslow, L. (1972). A quantitative approach to the World Health Organization definition of health: physical, mental and social well being. International journal of Epidemiology, 1 (4), 347 355.
    Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., Troyer, D., Switzer, G., & Speer, A. L. (1991). The altruistic personality: In what contexts is it apparent? Journal of personality and social psychology, 61 (3), 450.
    Carros, F., Meurer, J., Löffler, D., Unbehaun, D., Matthies, S., Koch, I., . . . Wulf, V.(2020). Exploring human robot interaction with the elderly: results from a ten week case study in a care home. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
    Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Giuliani, M. V., Pecora, F., Scopelliti, M., & Tiberio, L.(2007). Psychological implications of domestic assistive technology for the elderly. PsychNology Journal, 5 (3).
    Chen, N., Zhai, Y., & Liu, X. (2022). The Effects of Robots’ Altruistic Behaviours and Reciprocity on Human robot Trust. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14 (8), 1913 1931.
    Cialdini, R. B., & James, L. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (Vol. 4): Pearson education Boston.
    Clark, R. D., & Word, L. E. (1974). Where is the apathetic bystander? Situational characteristics of the emergency. Journal of personality and social psychology, 29 (3), 279.
    Daly, J., Leonards, U., & Bremner, P. (2020). Robots in need: How patterns of
    emotional behavior influence willingness to help. Paper presented at the Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction.
    De Graaf, M. M., Ben Allouch, S., & van Dijk, J. A. (2016). Long term evaluation of a social robot in real homes. Interaction studies, 17 (3), 462 491.
    Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and economic behavior, 54 (2), 293 315.
    Fink, J., Bauwens, V., Kaplan, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Living with a vacuum cleaning robot: A 6 month ethnographic study. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5 , 389 408.
    Fogg, B., & Nass, C. (1997). How users reciprocate to computers: an experiment that demonstrates behavior change CHI`97 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 331 332).
    Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C., & Gemperle, F. (2004). Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Human Computer Interaction, 19(1 2), 25 59.
    Foster, M. (2018). Aging Japan: Robots may have role in future of elder care. Reuters [Internet], 28 .
    Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American sociological review , 161 178.
    Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: when romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of personality and social psychology, 93 (1), 85.
    Hart, S. G. (1986). NASA task load index (TLX).
    Hayley, A., & Zinkiewicz, L. (2013). Does moral cleansing moderate the effect of evolutionary altruism on helping intention? An exploratory study. Journal of social, evolutionary, and cultural psychology, 7 (1), 24.
    Hsieh, T.Y., Chaudhury, B., & Cross, E. S. (2020). Human robot cooperation in prisoner dilemma games: people behave more reciprocally than prosocially toward robots. Paper presented at the companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE
    international conference on human robot interaction.
    Ihamäki, P., & Heljakka, K. (2021). Robot pets as “Serious Toys” activating social and emotional experiences of elderly people. Information Systems Frontiers , 1 15.
    Imai, Y. (1991). Effects of influence strategies, perceived social power and cost on compliance with requests. Japanese Psychological Research, 33 (3), 134 144.
    Kahn Jr, P. H., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., Kanda, T., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., & Miller, J. (2007). What is a human?: Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human robot interaction. Interaction studies, 8 (3), 363 390.
    Khosla, R., Nguyen, K., & Chu, M. T. (2017). Human robot engagement and acceptability in residential aged care.
    International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 33 (6), 510 522.
    King, E. B., George, J. M., & Hebl, M. R. (2005). Linking personality to helping behaviors at work: An interactional perspective. Journal of personality, 73 (3), 585 608.
    Kälviäinen, M. (2012). Elderly as content providers in their everyday life supporting services. Paper presented at the Cumulus Conference (Helsinki, Finland,2012). Available at: http://cumulushelsinki2012 . org/cumulushelsinki2012.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/05/Elderly as content providers intheir
    everyday life supporting services. pdf.
    Lammer, L., Huber, A., Weiss, A., & Vincze, M. (2014).Mutual care: How older adults react when they should help their care robot. Paper presented at the AISB2014: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on new frontiers
    in human robot interaction.
    Lammer, L., Huber, A., Zagler, W., & Vincze, M. (2011). Mutual Care: Users will love their imperfect social assistive robots. Paper presented at the Work in progress Proceedings of the international conference on social robotics.
    Lee, S. A., & Liang, Y. (2016). The role of reciprocity in verbally persuasive robots. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19 (8), 524 527.
    Longo, L., & Barrett, S. (2010). A computational analysis of cognitive effort. Paper presented at the Intelligent Information and Database Systems: Second International Conference, ACIIDS, Hue City, Vietnam, March 24 26, 2010.
    Proceedings, Part II 2.
    Lorenz, T., Weiss, A., & Hirche, S. (2016). Synchrony and reciprocity: Key mechanisms for social companion robots in therapy and care. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8 (1), 125 143.
    Louie, W. Y. G., McColl, D., & Nejat, G. (2014). Acceptance and attitudes toward a human like socially assistive robot by older adults. Assistive Technology, 26 (3), 140 150.
    Luria, M. (2018). Designing robot personality based on fictional sidekick characters. Paper presented at the Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction.
    Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Multidimensional health locus of control: comments on the construct and its measurement. Journal of health psychology, 10 (5), 633 642.
    Müller, S. S., Fries, A. J., & Gedenk, K. (2014). How much to give? The effect of donation size on tactical and s trategic success in cause related marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31 (2), 178 191.
    Maton, K. I. (1988). Social support, organizational characteristics, psychological well‐being, and group appraisal in three self‐help group populations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16 (1), 53 77.
    Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self disclosure from consumers. Journal of consumer research, 26 (4), 323 339.
    Morris, M., Lundell, J., & Dishman, E. (2004). Cat alyzing social interaction with ubiquitous computing: a needs assessment of elders coping with cognitive decline. Paper presented at the CHI`04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems.
    Morrow Howell, N., & Mui, A. C. (1989). Elderly volunteers: Reasons for initiating and terminating service. Journal of gerontological social work, 13 (3 4), 21 34.
    Nickell, G. (1998). The helping attitudes scale [Paper presentation]. Paper presented at the 106th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association at San Francisco.
    Nomura, T., Kanda, T., & Suzuki, T. (2006). Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human robot interaction. AI & SOCIETY, 20 , 138 150. Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution o
    f indirect reciprocity. Nature,437 (7063), 1291 1298.
    Oh, S., Oh, Y. H., & Ju, D. Y. (2020). Understanding the preference of the elderly for companion robot design. Paper presented at the Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems: Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, July 24 28, 2019, Washington DC, USA 10.
    Pareek, S., & Jain, M. (2012). Subjective well being in relation to altruism and forgiveness among school going adolescents. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (5), 138 141.
    Piliavin, J. A., & Piliavin, I. M. (1972). Effect of blood on reactions to a victim. Riessman, F. (1965). The" helper" therapy principle. Social work , 27 32.
    Roberts, L. J., Salem, D., Rappaport, J., Toro, P. A., Luke, D. A., & Seidman, E. (1999). Giving and receiving help: Interpersonal transactions in mutual help meetings and psychosocial adjustment of members. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27 , 841 868.
    Sandoval, E. B., Brandstatter, J., Yalcin, U., & Bartneck, C. (2021). Robot likeability and reciprocity in human robot interaction: Using ultimatum game to determinate reciprocal likeable robot strategies. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13 , 851 862.
    Sandoval, E. B., Brandstetter, J., & Bartneck, C. (2016). Can a robot bribe a human? The measurement of the negative side of reciprocity in human robot interaction. Paper presented at the 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI).
    Sandoval, E. B., Brandstetter, J., Obaid, M., & Bartneck, C. (2016). Reciprocity in
    human robot interaction: a quantitative approach through the prisoner’s
    dilemma and the ultimatum game. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8 , 303 317.
    Seah, B., Kowitlawakul, Y., Jiang, Y., Ang, E., Chokkanathan, S., & Wang, W. (2019).A review on healthy ageing interventions addressing physical, mental and social health of independent community dwelling older adults. Geriatric Nursing, 40 (1), 37 50.
    Shearman, S. M., & Yoo, J. H. (2007). “Even a penny will help!”: Legitimization of paltry donation and social proof in soliciting donation to a charitable organization. Communication Research Reports, 24 (4), 271 282.
    Smith, B. M., & Nelson, L. (1975). Personality correlates of helping behavior.Psychological reports, 37 (1), 307 310.
    Smith, J. R., & McSweeney, A. (2007). Charitable giving: The effectiveness of a revised theory of planned behaviour model in predicting donating intentions and behaviour. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17 (5), 363 386.
    Stock Homburg, R. (2022). Survey of emotions in human robot interactions: Perspectives from robotic psychology on 20 years of research. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14 (2), 389 411.
    Sutton, S. (1987). Social‐psychological Approaches to Understanding Addictive Behaviours: attitude‐behaviour and decision‐making models. British Journal of Addiction, 82 (4), 355 370.
    Takayanagi, K., Kirita, T., & Shibata, T. (2014). Comparison of verbal and emotional responses of elderly people with mild/moderate dementia and those with severe dementia in responses to seal robot, PARO. Frontiers in Aging
    Neuroscience, 6 , 257.
    Tan, S. Y., & Taeihagh, A. (2021). Governing the adoption of robotics and autonomous systems in long term care in Singapore. Policy and society, 40 (2), 211 231.
    Trovato, G., Kishi, T., Kawai, M., Zhong, T., Lin, J. Y., Gu, Z., . . . Takanishi, A.(2019). The creation of DarumaTO: a social companion robot for Buddhist/Shinto elderlies. Paper presented at the 2019 IEEE/ASME
    International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM).
    Ventre Dominey, J., Gibert, G., Bosse Platiere, M., Farne, A., Dominey, P. F., & Pavani, F. (2019). Embodiment into a robot increases its acceptability. Scientific reports, 9 (1), 1 10.
    Wessels, R., Dijcks, B., Soede, M., Gelderblom, G., & De Witte, L. (2003). Nonuse of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technology and disability, 15 (4), 231 238.
    Whelan, S., Murphy, K., Barrett, E., Krusche, C., Santorelli, A., & Casey, D. (2018). Factors affecting the acceptability of social robots by older adults including people with dementia or cognitive impairment: a literature review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10 ( 5), 643 668.
    Wiepking, P., & Breeze, B. (2012). Feeling poor, acting stingy: The effect of money perceptions on charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 17 (1), 13 24.
    Xiao, W., Lin, X., Li, X., Xu, X., Guo, H., Sun, B., & Jiang, H. (2021). The influence of emotion and empathy on decisions to help others. SAGE Open, 11 (2), 21582440211014513.
    Zhou, S., & Tian, L. (2020). Would you help a sad robot? Influence of robots’ emotional expressions on human
    multi robot collaboration. Paper presented at the 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO MAN).
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理學系
    110356034
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110356034
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    603401.pdf2050KbAdobe PDF20檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋