政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146660
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51695675      Online Users : 613
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146660


    Title: 交流板與佈告欄: 即時通訊軟體下親師溝通的階級差異
    Online Platforms or Bulletin Boards: Class-based Differences in Parent-Teacher Communication Using Instant Messaging.
    Authors: 鄭詞云
    Cheng, Tzu-Yun
    Contributors: 姜以琳
    Chiang, Yi-Lin
    鄭詞云
    Cheng, Tzu-Yun
    Keywords: 教師
    親師溝通
    社會經濟地位
    數位落差
    不平等
    Teachers
    Parent-teacher communication
    Class
    Digital divide
    Inequality
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 14:24:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在親師互動越發頻繁、電子交流媒介崛起的現今社會,教師透過即時通訊軟體與家長進行聯繫已經是親師溝通的主流形式。為了解教師眼中其與不同社經階級家長利用即時通訊軟體進行親師溝通下存在何種差異,並進一步探討互動差異帶來的影響為何?本研究與16位具有使用即時通訊軟體進行親師溝通經驗的現役國小教師進行訪談。研究結果發現,即時通訊軟體的使用對教師與中產階級家長和勞工階級家長進行親師溝通皆有所提升,但根據教師接收到的家長聯繫內容、頻率的差異,筆者認為即時通訊軟體在教師與不同社經階級家長進時親師溝通時扮演著不同屬性的平台角色-教師收到中產階級家長的積極回應使其成為了親師互動頻繁的交流版、教師也因為勞工階級家長傾向被動接收公告資訊而將之視為佈告欄。即便即時通訊軟體在不同階級間的親師溝通鮮少存在設備使用上的物質差異,但使用形式與態度的不同,仍在交流中形塑了數位落差。本研究為教師端的親師溝通策略提供新的詮釋角度,其有望促進教師與家長的互動協作,並協助提升親師溝通效率之相關政策的制定。
    In an era when parent-teacher interactions are increasingly frequent and especially commonly done through electronic communication platforms, teachers contacting parents through instant messaging apps has become a mainstream form of parent-teacher communications. To understand the differences in parent-teacher communication using instant messaging apps from the perspective of teachers, and further explore the impact of these interaction differences, this study conducted interviews with 16 elementary school teachers who are experienced in communicating with parents through instant messaging apps. This study found that the use of instant messaging apps improved parent-teacher communication for both middle-class and working-class parents. However, based on the differences in the content and frequency of parent-teacher contact, the study believes that instant messaging apps play different roles in facilitating parent-teacher communication with parents from different social-economic backgrounds. It serves as an active communication platform for teachers to interact with middle-class parents, while teachers perceive it as being similar to a bulletin board for passive reception of information by working-class parents. Despite the tone down of material differences in the use of instant messaging apps for parent-teacher communication across different social classes, the variations in use patterns still contribute to class-based digital divide in communication. This study provides an interpretative perspective for teachers in developing parent-teacher communication strategies, with the potential to facilitate a cooperative interaction between teachers and parents. The findings in this paper will assist policy makers to enhance the efficiency of parent-teacher communication.
    Reference: 內政部戶政司,(2022a),鄉鎮戶數及人口數-111年6月。中華民國內政部戶政司全球資訊網,https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346,取用日期:2023年 1 月 15 日。
    ----------,(2022b),戶籍人口統計速報。中華民國內政部戶政司全球資訊網,https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346,取用日期:2023年 1 月 25 日。
    內政部移民署,(2022)。外籍配偶人數與大陸(含港澳)配偶人數按證件分11111。中華民國內政部移民署全球資訊網,https://www.immigration.gov.tw/5385/7344/7350/8887/?alias=settledown,取用日期:2023年 1 月 25 日。
    王麗雲,(2019年10月17日),〈王麗雲:教育M型化嚴重 包班制該改了〉。蘋果新聞網,https://tw.appledaily.com/forum/20191017/CPJKBXHMLVF4KVEJMXNJWOXQQE/,取用日期:2022年3月10日。
    丘昌泰,(2015),〈親師社群媒體症候群〉。《師友月刊》581:0-4。
    台北市教師會,(2011),〈台北市教師會「台北市教師憂鬱傾向調查」新聞稿〉。台北市:台北市教師會。
    江民瑜,(2006),〈國小學生家長參與學校教育行為之影響機制探討:以高雄縣市為例〉。《臺灣教育社會學研究》6(1):41-81。
    何瑞珠,(2002),《家庭學校與社區協作:從理念研究到實踐》。香港:香港中文大學。
    余明仁,(2020),〈勞動階級國小家長參與學校教育之研究〉。美和學報 38(2):67-82。
    吳迅榮,(2013),〈社會階級與家長參與:一個香港的個案研究〉。Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly 21(3):41-81。
    吳宗立,(2002),〈親師溝通的障礙與突破〉。《臺灣教育》616:48-54。
    吳璧如,(2001),〈家長參與學校教育:實務工作者與學者看法之分析〉。《教育研究集刊》47:185-214。
    ----------,(2006),〈生對於家長參與學校教育的態度之研究〉。《當代教育研究》14(1):55-92。
    ----------,(2013),〈落實家長的教育參與〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》2(10):77-79。
    吳麗君,(2015),〈請問你用哪一個LINE溝通親師-睞/徠/賴/籟/瀨/癩〉。《台灣教育評論月刊》4(5):200-201。
    李靜芳,(2019),〈導師的難題-親師衝突之原因及處理策略〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》8(8):100-105。
    林玉婷,(2007),〈電腦中介的新人際溝通型態:MSN Messenger 暱稱之呈現與溝通策略〉。《傳播與社會學刊》4:103-135。
    林宗弘,(2013),〈非關上網:數位落差與網路使用的後果〉。《台灣社會學》24:55-97。
    林俊瑩,(2006),〈國小家長對子女的教育期望、參與學校教育態度及參與行為之關聯性〉。《教育政策論壇》9(1):177-210。
    施又瑀、施喩琁,(2021),〈幼兒園親師溝通問題與因應策略〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》10(11):135-139。
    洪欣慈,(2014年9月11日),〈教師幸福調查 2成9不願再當老師〉。中國時報, https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20140911003869-260405?chdtv,取用日期:2021年12月2日。
    涂怡如,(2000),〈論親師溝通的理論與實務〉。《國教之友》51(4):14-22。
    財團法人網路資訊中心,(2022)。《2022台灣網路報告》。https://report.twnic.tw/2022/assets/download/TWNIC_TaiwanInternetReport_2022_CH.pdf,取用日期:2022年 10 月 28 日。
    國家通訊傳播委員會,(2021),《109年通訊市場調查》。臺北:國家通訊傳播委員會。
    張芳華,(2013),〈家長背景、家長參與學校教育與子女學業成就之關聯性:以北北宜三縣市國中學生為例〉。《教育研究與發展期刊》9(2):117-144。
    教育部統計處,(2022),〈國小教師數-按設立與性別分〉。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/cp.aspx?n=C1EE66D2D9BD36A5,取用日期:2022年 10 月 27 日。
    許芳菊,(2011年11月1日),〈當怪獸家長遇上刺蝟老師⋯⋯親師大戰為何一觸即發?〉。親子天下, https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5027512,取用日期:2021 年 12 月 3 日。
    陳盈宏,(2014),〈我國小學教育階段不同社經地位家長參與學校教育情形之初探〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》3(9):90-95。
    陳慧華,(2021),〈淺談LINE於班級親師溝通的運用〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》10(1):217-222。
    陶蓓麗、林詩雅、廖則竣,(2018),〈瞭解行動通訊之群體溝通:以社會資本及群體感覺為基礎之研究〉。《資訊管理學報》25(4):423-446。
    楊嫊薰,(2008),〈質性研究田野練習實錄-訪談國中導師之親師溝通情形〉。《臺灣教育》650:40-46。
    楊蕓,(2017年12月11日),〈國小滿意度最高 調查:家長較關注〉。台灣醒報,https://anntw.com/articles/20171211-ieig,取用日期:2021年11月30日。
    楊麗櫻、陳棟樑、陳俐文,(2019),〈國小學童家長運用即時通訊軟體 LINE 進行親師溝通行為意圖與滿意度之研究〉。《兩岸職業教育論叢》3(1):44-57。
    趙品灃、莊梅裙,(2019),〈Line進行親師溝通、家長參與與班級經營效能之研究〉。《工業科技教育學刊》12:115-132。
    趙振國,(2012),〈國民小學家長參與學校教育對班級經營效能影響之研究摘要〉。國立東華大學教育行政與管理學系,https://eam.ndhu.edu.tw/ezfiles/54/1054/img/1259/2012120104.pdf,取用日期:2021年 04 月 30 日。
    蔡育民,(2015),〈親師溝通最需要提醒家長的六件事〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》4(9):74-77。
    衛生福利部統計處,(2022),〈社會福利公務統計一覽表-中低收入戶戶數及人數按鄉鎮市區別分〉。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-5337-62357-113.html,取用日期:2023年 1 月 15 日。
    蕭玉佳,(2009),〈從小學教師的觀點談親師互動間的微妙關係〉。《教師天地》162:71-79。
    蕭仲廷,(2012),〈論家長參與類型與親師溝通〉。《休閒與社會研究》5:63-75。
    賴明政、陳佳君,(2016),〈行動通訊應用軟體的溝通特質對親子關係維持與家庭滿意之影響〉。《東吳經濟商學學報》(93):53-91。
    薛芳,(2010),〈家長參與學校教育事務初探〉。南華大學,https://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/87/A26.htm,取用日期:2021年11月22日。
    薛承泰、黃碧霞、李璧如,(2011),〈重修「貧窮線」的意義〉。《社區發展季刊》45:381-399。
    薛逸珊,(2019),〈教師面對親師溝通的困境及因應之道〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》8(4):111-114。
    謝孟穎,(2003),〈家長社經背景與學生學業成就關聯性之研究〉。《教育研究集刊》49(2):255-287。
    藍佩嘉,(2014),〈做父母,做階級:親職敘事,教養實作與階級不平等〉。《台灣社會學》27:97-140。
    ----------,(2019),《拚教養:全球化,親職焦慮與不平等童年》。臺北市:春山出版。
    Addi-Raccah, Audrey and Miri Yemini, 2018, “What is Up? Parental Whats App Discussion Groups in Diverse Educational Settings in Israel.” Multicultural Education Review 10(4): 310-326.
    Bakker, Joep, Eddie Denessen, and Mariël Brus‐Laeven, 2007, “Socio‐economic Background, Parental Involvement and Teacher Perceptions of these in Relation to Pupil Achievement.” Educational Studies 33(2): 177-192.
    Barge, J. Kevin, and William E. Loges, 2003, “Parent, Student, and Teacher Perceptions of Parental Involvement.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 31(2): 140-163.
    Chena, Zhi Xuan and Ching Chung Chena, 2015, “The Intention of Using Smart Device Messages as Parent-Teacher Communication from the View of Parents.” Procedia Manufacturing 3: 5617-5623.
    Cheng, Yung-hsun and Yu-chi Chen, 2018, “Enhancing Classroom Management through Parental Involvement by Using Social Networking Apps.” South African Journal of Education 38(2): 1-14.
    Daft, Richard L., Robert H. Lengel and Linda Klebe Trevino, 1987, “Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 11(3): 355-366.
    Eberly, Jody L., Arti Joshi, Jean Konzal, 2007, “Communicating with Families across Cultures: An Investigation of Teacher Perceptions and Practices. School Community Journal 17(2): 7-26.
    Epstein, Joyce L., 1983. “Effect on Parents of Teacher Practices of Parent Involvement. Report No. 346.” Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
    ----------, 1986, “Parents` Reactions to Teacher Practices of Parent Involvement.” The Elementary School Journal 86(3): 277-294.
    ----------,1992, School and Family Partnerships. Report No. 6. Center on Families, Communities, Schools & Childrens’ Learning. Johns Hopkins University. Baltimore, MD.
    Fang, Rong-Jyue, Wen-Jiuh Chiung, Sheng-Jen Yang, Hua- Lin Tsai, Kuo-Cheng Wu, Shue-Tien Juang, 2007, “The Effects and Limits of Teacher-Parents Communication by Mobile Device—The View of Teachers.” In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer Science.
    Henderson, Anne T. and Karen L. Mapp, 2002, A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family, and Community Connections on Student Achievement. Annual Synthesis, 2002. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
    Ho, Phoebe, and Hua-Yu Sebastian Cherng, 2018, “How Far can the Apple Fall? Differences in Teacher Perceptions of Minority and Immigrant Parents and Their Impact on Academic Outcomes.” Social Science Research 74: 132-145.
    Juniu, Susana, 2009, “Computer Mediated Parent-teacher Communication.” Actualidades Investigativas en Educación 9(3): 1-19.
    Kelly, Lynne and James A. Keaten, 2007, “Development of the Affect for Communication Channels Scale.” Journal of Communication 57(2): 349-365.
    Kuusimäki, Anne-Mari, Lotta Uusitalo-Malmivaara, and Kirsi Tirri. (2019a). “Parents’ and Teachers’ Views on Digital Communication in Finland.” Education Research International (2019): 7:8236786. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8236786
    ----------, (2019b), “The Role of Digital School-Home Communication in Teacher Well-Being.” Frontiers in Psychology 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02257
    Lareau, Anntte, 1987, “Social Class Differences in Family-School Relationships: The Importance of Cultural Capital.” Sociology of Education 56: 73-85.
    ----------, 1989, “Family-School Relationships: A View from the Classroom.” Educational Policy 3(3): 245-259.
    ----------, 2000, Home Advantage: Social Class and Parental Intervention in Elementary Education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Lareau, Annette, and Erin McNamara Horvat,1999, “Moments of Social Inclusion and Exclusion Race, Class, and Cultural Capital in Family-School Relationships.” Sociology of Education 72(1): 37-53.
    Lee, Jung-Sook and Natasha K. Bowen, 2006, “Parent Involvement, Cultural Capital, and the Achievement Gap Among Elementary School Children.” American Educational Research Journal 43(2): 193-218.
    Lin, Luc Chia-Shin, 2019, “Fostering Teacher-Parent Communication: Line Plays a Significant Role in Taiwan.” SAGE Open 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019862667
    Lunts, Ellen, 2003, “Parental Involvement in Children`s Education: Connecting Family and School by Using Telecommunication Technologies.” Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal 6(1): 1-8.
    Mayangsari, Ira Dwi and Agus Aprianti, 2017, “Understanding Communication Among Parents and Teachers in WhatsApp. Case Study in Bandung, Indonesia.” Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 2(2): 18-23.
    Makgopa, Masiye, and Matseliso Mokhele, 2013, “Teachers’ Perceptions on Parental Involvement: A Case Study of Two South African Schools. Journal of Educational and Social Research 3(3): 219.
    Nelms, Elizabeth L., 2002, “The Effects of a Teacher-Created Web Page on Parent Communication: An Action Research Study.” Action Research Exchange 1: 2. Retrieved from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/vol1no2/PDF%20article%20manuscript/nelms.pdf. (Date visited: November 17, 2022).
    Nitza, Davidivitch and Yavich Roman, 2017, “Who Needs Parent-Teacher Meetings in the Technological Era?” International Journal of Higher Education 6(1): 153-162.
    Olmstead, Christine, 2013, “Using Technology to Increase Parent Involvement in Schools.” TechTrends 57(6): 28-37.
    Palts, Karmen and Veronika Kalmus, 2015, “Digital Channels in Teacher-Parent Communication: The Case of Estonia.” International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology 11(3): 65-81.
    Ramirez, Fred, 2001, “Technology and Parental Involvement.” The Clearing House 75(1): 30-31.
    Shumow, Lee and William Harris, 2000, “Teachers` Thinking about Home-School Relations in Low-Income Urban Communities.” The School Community Journal 10(1): 9-24.
    Sirvani, Hosin, 2007, “The Effect of Teacher Communication with Parents on Students` Mathematics Achievement.” American Secondary Education 36(1): 31-46.
    Thompson, Blair Christopher, Joseph P. Mazer, and Elizabeth Flood Grady, 2015, “The Changing Nature of Parent–Teacher Communication: Mode Selection in the Smartphone Era.” Communication Education 64(2): 187-207.
    Theodorou, Eleni, 2008. “Just how involved is ‘Involved’? Re-Thinking Parental Involvement through Exploring Teachers` Perceptions of Immigrant Families` School Involvement in Cyprus.” Ethnography and Education 3(3): 253-269.
    Wu, Pi-Ju, 2015, “Teacher-Parent Interactions in Taiwan: A Qualitative Investigation of Teachers` Perspectives.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 3(5): 307-316.
    Zelizer, Viviana A., 1994, Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Ziden, Azidah Abu, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Muhammad Abdul Rahman and Too Woon Ching, 2020, “Exploring the Use of Mobile Instant Messaging for Parent-Teacher Communication.” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 14(4): 152-165.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    社會學系
    108254001
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108254001
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Sociology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    400101.pdf2626KbAdobe PDF2157View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback