Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146538
|
| Title: | 高中經濟學學業成績表現及對升學之影響
A Study of Academic Performance in High School Economics and Its Influence on the Pursuit of a Higher Education |
| Authors: | 丁年初
Ting, Nien-Chu |
| Contributors: | 吳文傑
Wu, Wen-Chieh
丁年初
Ting, Nien-Chu |
| Keywords: | 高中經濟學
經濟教育
公民與社會科
大學學測
升學表現
Senior high school economics
Economics education
Civics and Society
General Scholastic Ability Test (GSAT)
Enrollment outcomes |
| Date: | 2023 |
| Issue Date: | 2023-08-02 13:56:22 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究主要在探討高中經濟教育受到哪些因素影響，並分析高中經濟教育如何影響高中生大學學科能力測驗之表現，以及與學生就讀大學學校排名與經濟商管相關科系的選擇是否具有關聯。教育作為一項具有潛移默化作用的長期工程，本文研究目的即在呈現高中階段經濟教育的重要性及影響力，作為教育相關單位部門對於經濟教育經費預算與政策規畫之參考。本研究首先針對近百年來高中公民與社會科中的經濟教育課程標準內容或課綱進行綜合整理，再來分析國內外學者對於經濟教育之定義及重要性，並整理高中經濟學學習表現與大學升學表現之文獻。透過整理眾多國內外文獻發現，高中階段的經濟教育課程對於大學經濟課程具有顯著正向的影響，更在培養社會大眾經濟認知及素養過程中扮演重要的角色。
在實證研究部分，本研究使用資料來自新北市立某公立高中2018年入學的學生，蒐集其高一至高二國文、英文、數學及公民與社會科之成績，以及大學學測成績、最終進入的大學與校系等資料進行迴歸分析。首先在研究高中生經濟學學習表現影響因素的部分，發現與過往國內外研究結果不同之處：女性學生經濟學學習表現較男性好，以及數學基礎程度對高中經濟學並無特別顯著的影響。另外，本研究顯示第一類組的學生在經濟學的表現較第二、第三類組好，則是與過往文獻研究結論一致，說明不同的主修、類組及專業課程，對於經濟學學習表現有一定程度的影響。
此研究發現經濟學學習表現對於學測成績及大學科系之選擇亦具有關聯性。在控制學生國文及數學的在校成績後，經濟學學習表現愈好的學生，在大學學測國文及數學科的成績也愈好，此結論說明經濟學中「獨特的分析方式」，對於部分學科的學習表現也起了關鍵作用。本研究也發現高中經濟學學習表現，與學生是否能進入排名較好的大學，及有較高機會進入經濟商管相關科系就讀之間，具有部分的正向關聯性：高中經濟學表現愈好的學生，進入前十名大學的可能性愈高，但在前五名大學時就沒有如此地顯著；而在未控制學生類組變數的情形下，則是發現經濟學表現愈好的學生，愈容易進入經濟商管科系就讀。
本研究為首篇針對臺灣高中學生經濟學成績影響因素及對其升學表現進行分析的研究，研究結論說明高中生經濟學學習表現與其大學學測部分科目、就讀大學之排名與經濟商管科系之選擇，均有正向顯著之關聯性，顯示經濟學學習表現對於臺灣高中學生的未來發展或選擇具有相當的影響力，經濟教育亦能達成對於個人理性決策及國家政策發展的「雙重效益」。最後，研究者建議教育單位應多挹注經濟相關議題課程規畫的經費或補助，尤須更積極地加強宣導相關計畫，有利於教學現場公民與社會科教師申請，在不分類組學生皆為必修的高中經濟學課程中進行延伸或補充，以期增進我國公民經濟素養與知能，進一步有效解決現今日益複雜的經濟問題與困境。
This study aims to examine the influencing factors on economics education in senior high school, as well as how economics education affects student performance in the General Scholastic Ability Test (GSAT), whether it correlates with students’ accepted university ranking, and their decision on majoring in economics or business-related fields. This study aims to demonstrate the importance and impact of economics education, serving as a reference for educational authorities in budgeting and policy planning for economics education. The study first comprehensively reviews the curriculum and syllabi for economics education in the subject of Civics and Society from the past century. Next, the definition and importance of economics education are analyzed. Additionally, the study examines the existing literature on senior high school economics performance and university enrollment outcomes.
In the empirical research section, regression analysis based on data collected from students enrolled in a public senior high school in New Taipei City in 2018 was performed. The data included their grades in Chinese, English, Mathematics, and Civics and Society, their GSAT scores, and information regarding the university and major they ultimately enrolled in. The study first examines the factors influencing their economics performance and identifies some differences from previous research. It was found that female students performed better in economics than male students and that the level of prior mathematics education does not have a significant impact on senior high school economics performance. Additionally, the study shows that students in the social science track performed better than those majoring in either the natural sciences or medical sciences tracks.
The study found a correlation between economics performance with GSAT and the choice of major. After controlling for students` grades in Chinese and Mathematics, it is found students with better economics performance also achieved higher scores in Chinese and Mathematics in GSAT. This finding suggests that the “unique analytical approach” in economics plays a crucial role in the performance of certain subjects. The study also found that students who performed better in economics have a higher chance of entering the top 10 universities, although this is significantly less pronounced when narrowing to only the top 5 universities. Furthermore, without controlling for students` tracks, it is found that students with better economics scores are more likely to be admitted to economics or business-related majors.
This study is the first to analyze the factors influencing the performance of senior high school students in Economics and its impact on their university enrollment in Taiwan. The findings demonstrates the considerable influence of economics performance on the future development and options for Taiwanese senior high school students. Economics education can achieve the “dual benefits” in terms of personal rational decision-making and national policy development. Lastly, the researchers suggest that educational authorities allocate more funding or subsidies to curriculum planning related to economics, and especially promote relevant programs more actively to improve awareness and applications from Civics and Society teachers, enhancing economic literacy and competence among Taiwanese citizens and effectively addressing the increasingly complex economic issues and challenges of today. |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
1. 方詠菁（2000）。高中公民科教師對經濟學教材內涵需求之研究—以臺灣中部地區為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所，臺北市。
2. 方詠菁、黃美筠（2002）。高中公民科教師對經濟學教材內涵需求之研究—以臺灣中部地區為例。公民訓育學報，12，143-185。
3. 王若文（1993）。臺北市國中生經濟認知與態度之研究。公民訓育學報，3，307-352。
4. 王畹鳳（2007）。性向測驗與學測成績之相關分析（未出版之碩士論文）。中華大學應用數學學系，新竹市。
5. 李佳玲（2002）。大學入學考試中心學科能力測驗與高中在校成績關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所，臺北市。
6. 宋珮怡（2007）。我國大學學科能力測驗成績之預測建模研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學應用統計研究所，臺北縣。
7. 沈暉智、林明仁（2019）。論家戶所得與資產對子女教育之影響─以1993-1995出生世代及其父母稅務資料為例。經濟論文叢刊，47（3），393-453。
8. 周威同（2018）。公民領域課綱裡的「疑問句」，行不行？公民行動影音資料庫。檢自：https://www.civilmedia.tw/archives/78872。
9. 林沁雄（2009）。「公民與社會」之課綱—經濟篇。「公民與社會」國際學術研討會。臺北市：臺北市立教育大學社會暨公共事務學系。
10. 林佩君（2018）。十二年國民基本教育社會學習領域經濟教育新課程綱要之層級分析－以雙北地區國中公民科教師為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導研究所，臺北市。
11. 林麗婷（2001）。國中公民與道德科教師經濟教育專業能力之研究－以高雄地區為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所，臺北市。
12. 林麗婷、黃美筠（2002）。國中公民與道德科教師對經濟教育專業能力之研究－以高雄地區為例。公民訓育學報，12，187-221。
13. 姚霞玲（2002）。推薦甄選與申請入學相關評量研究。臺北市：大學入學考試中心。
14. 高希均（1977）。教育經濟學論文集。臺北市：聯經。
15. 張明偉（2011）。現職高中公民與社會科教師經濟教育專業知能之研究－以臺北地區為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導研究所，臺北市。
16. 張秀雄（1996）。公民教育的理論與實施。臺北：師大書苑。
17. 張茂桂（2008）。高中「公民與社會」新課綱的訂定。教育研究月刊，166，44-53。
18. 張茂桂（2009）。再探公民：反思高中《公民與社會》新課綱之訂定。公民訓育學報，20，1-31。
19. 張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏（2010）。經濟學：理論與實際（六版）。臺北市：翰蘆。
20. 陸民仁（1985）。公民教育的經濟學基礎，公民教育之問題與對策（上）。臺北市：臺灣省教育會，133-141。
21. 陸炳杉（2003）。多元入學學生學業成就之研究—以高雄市立中正高級中學為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育系，高雄縣。
22. 陳光輝（2000）。近百年來我國高級中學公民課程的發展。人文及社會學科教學通訊，11（4），109-170。
23. 陳玟曦（2019）。美國經濟教育協會(CEE)經濟教育課程綱要層級分析─以雙北地區高中公民教師為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導研究所，臺北市。
24. 陳禹仁（2018）。為什麼我們需要疑問句式的公民課綱。公民行動影音資料庫。檢自：https://www.civilmedia.tw/archives/79145。
25. 陳建成（2010）。利用重複測度探討高中學生升學及在校學業表現之影響因素－某高中案例研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北大學統計研究所，臺北縣。
26. 徐采薇（2018）。九年一貫社會學習領域經濟教育課程綱要層級分析－以桃園市國中公民教師為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導研究所，臺北市。
27. 徐新逸、賴淑齡（2006）。臺北地區國小社會科教師的經濟教育專業知能之研究。國立臺南大學教育研究學報，40（1），75-97。
28. 教育部（1995）。高級中學課程標準（84年版，88學年度至94學年度高一新生適用）。檢自：https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/Common/SinglePage?filter。
29. 教育部（2004）。普通高級中學課程暫行綱要（95學年度高一新生適用）。檢自：https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/Common/SinglePage?filter。
30. 教育部（2010）。普通高級中學課程綱要（99學年度高一新生適用）。檢自：https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/Common/SinglePage?filter。
31. 教育部（2014）。公民與社會科103微調版本。檢自：https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/Common/SinglePage?filter。
32. 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。檢自：https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52。
33. 教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要－國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校－社會領域。檢自：https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52。
34. 莊郁芳（2011）。高中學生公民與社會科學習成就影響因素之研究：2007年TASA資料庫分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導研究所，臺北市。
35. 許竣皓（2013）。高中生背景資料、在學表現與成績對學測成績的影響－以新北市某公立高中為例（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學統計資訊學系應用統計碩士在職專班，新北市。
36. 黃丹鈺（2002）。國中公民與道德科經濟學教科書之內容分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所，臺北市。
37. 黃丹鈺（2003）。國中公民與道德科經濟學教科書之內容分析。公民訓育學報，14，143-181。
38. 黃美筠（1996）。經濟教育理論的評介。公民訓育學報，5，193-222。
39. 黃美筠（1998）。從經濟教育的立論基礎探討中學經濟學教學的內涵。公民訓育學報，7，201-220。
40. 黃美筠（2000）。臺灣地區公立高中三年級學生經濟認知之評量。公民訓育學報，9，129-160。
41. 黃美筠（2002）。國三學生對公民與道德科經濟教材經濟認知成效之評估－以附加價值法探討。公民訓育學報，12，59-109。
42. 黃美筠（2006）。中小學經濟教育理論與教材教法。臺北市：水牛。
43. 黃劍華（1992）。臺北地區國民小學高年級學生經濟知識之評量。公民訓育學報，8，311-341。
44. 傅說道（2010）。國中基測與高中在校成績對於大學學測成績關係之研究－以南部某高中為例（未出版之碩士論文）。南臺科技大學資訊管理研究所，臺南縣。
45. 溫明忠（1999）。國中經濟教育的理論與實施。臺北市：水牛。
46. 溫騰光（1992）。國民中小學經濟教育課程內涵之研究（未出版之博士論文）。中國文化大學中山學術研究所，臺北市。
47. 楊宜勳（2005）。影響高中生選組及其學業表現之相關因素探討－以某高中為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北大學統計研究所，臺北縣。
48. 楊朝祥（1984）。技術職業教育辭典。臺北市：三民。
49. 廖進發、鄒浮安（1999）。多元入學的高中學生之大學聯考成績與高中學業成績之追蹤研究—以高雄中學為例。雄中學報，高雄中學，365-405。
50. 劉玉春、王澤玲、林益三、陳清平（1990）。高中學生在學三年成績與大學入學考試成績相關性之研究。臺北市：大學入學考試中心。
51. 劉怡婷（2012）。高中師生對公民與社會科經濟課程觀點之研究—以單元四「經濟與永續發展」為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導研究所，臺北市。
52. 賴柷宏（2018）。高中公民與社會108課綱草案之評析。公民行動影音資料庫。檢自：https://www.civilmedia.tw/archives/75201。
53. 蔡宜璇（2019）。十二年國民基本教育社會領域高中經濟教育課程綱要之層級分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導研究所，臺北市。
54. 蕭行易（1983）。經濟學與公民教育。載於國立臺灣師範大學學術委員會編著，明日的公民教育，97-112，臺北市：幼獅。
55. 蕭碧惠（1999）。國中公民與道德科教師基本經濟認知之研究－以臺北地區為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所，臺北市。
英文文獻
1. Allgood, S., Bosshardt, W., Klaauw, W., and Watts, M. (2004), “What Students Remember and Say about College Economics Years Later.” The American Economic Review, 94(2), 259-265, Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association.
2. Altonji, J. (1995), “The Effects of High School Curriculum on Education and Labor Market Outcomes.” The Journal of Human Resources, 30(3), 409-438.
3. Anderson, G., Benjamin, D., and Fuss, M. (1994), “The Determinants of Success in University Introductory Economics Courses.” The Journal of Economic Education, 25 (2), 99-119.
4. Arnold, I., and Straten, J. (2012), “Motivation and Math Skills as Determinants of First-Year Performance in Economics.” The Journal of Economic Education, 43(1), 33-47.
5. Bach, G.L., and Saunders, P. (1965), “Economic Education: Aspirations and Achievements.” American Economic Review, 55, 329-56.
6. Baumol, W. J. (1994), “Economics Education for a Half-Century of Radical Chance.” In W. Walstad (Eds.), “An International Perspective on Economic Education.” 19-36, New York: LLC.
7. Banaszak, R. A. (1987), “The Nature of Economic Literacy.” ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) Digest, 41, 1-4.
8. Becker, W., Greene, W., and Rosen, S. (1990), “Research on High School Economic Education.” The Journal of Economic Education, 21(3), 231-245.
9. Brasfield, D. W., McCoy, J. P., and Milkman, M. (1992), “The Effect of University Math on Student Performance in Principles of Economics.” The Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25(4), 240-247.
10. Brasfield, D. W., Harrison, D. E., and McCoy, J. P. (1993), “The Impact of High School Economics on the College Principles of Economics Course.” The Journal of Economic Education, 24(2), 99-111.
11. Buckles, S., and Freeman, V. (1983), “Male-Female Differences in the Stock and Flow of Economic Knowledge.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 355-358.
12. Buckles, S. (1991), “Guidelines for Economic Content in School Programs.” In W. Walstad and J. Soper (Eds.), “Effective Economic Education in the Schools.” 24-34. Washington D.C., NEA and Joint Council in Economic Education.
13. CEE. (2010), “Voluntary National Content Standards in Economics, 2nd Edition.” New York: National Council on Economic Education.
14. Crowley, R. W., and D. A. Wilton. (1974), “An Analysis of “Learning” in Introductory Economics.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 7(4), 665-673.
15. Dawson, G. G., and Bernstein, I. (1967), “The Effectiveness of Introductory Economics Courses in High Schools and Colleges.” NYU Center for Economic Education.
16. Durden, G. C., and Ellis, L. V. (1995), “The Effects of Attendance on Student Learning in Principles of Economics.” American Economic Review, 85(2), 343-346.
17. Ferber, M. A., Birnbaum, B. G., and Green, C. A. (1983), “Gender Differences in Economic Knowledge: A Reevaluation of the Evidence.” The Journal of Economic Education, 14(2), 4-10.
18. Gavian, R.W. (1942), “Education for Economic Competence in Grades I to VI.” New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
19. Gilliard, J. V., Caldwell, J., Dalgaard, B. R., Highsmith, R. J., Reinke, R., and Watts, M. (1988), “Economics, What and When: Scope and Sequence Guidelines, K-12.” New York: Joint Council on Economic Education.
20. Hanushek. E. (1979), “Conceptual and Empirical Issues in the Estimation of Educational Production Functions.” Journal of Human Resources, 14(3), 351-388.
21. Heath, J. A. (1989), “An Econometric Model of the Role of Gender in Economic Education.” American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 226-230.
22. Helburn, S. W. (1985), “Economics and Economic Education: The Selective Use of Discipline Structures in Economics Curricula.” In S. Hodkinson and D. Whitehead (Eds.), “Economics Education: Research and Development Issues.” 6-32. Harlow: Longman.
23. Hirschfeld, M., Moore, R.L. and Brown, E. (1995), “Exploring the Gender Gap on the GRE Subject Test in Economics.” The Journal of Economic Education, 26, 3-16.
24. Ikenberry, J. (2007), “Globalization as American Hegemony.” In D. Held and A. McGrew (Eds.), “Understanding Globalization: Theories and Controversies.” London: Polity Press.
25. Kimmitt, M. C., and Burnett, K. M. (2006), “Determinants of Success in High School Economics: Lessons from the Field.” The Journal of Economic Education, 30(2), 1-46.
26. Kotte, D., and Witt, R. (1995), “Chance and Challenge: Assessing Economic Literacy.” Reflection on Educational Achievement: Papers in Honor of Neville Postlethwaite, 159-168.
27. Lopus, J. S. (1997), “Effects of the High School Economics Curriculum on Learning in the College Principles Class.” The Journal of Economic Education, 28(2), 143-153.
28. Lopus, J. S., and Maxwell, N. L. (1994), “Beyond High School: Does the High School Economics Curriculum Make a Difference?” The American Economist, 38(1), 62-69.
29. Louis Harris and Associates, Inc. (1999), “The Standards in Economic Survey.” New York: Louis Harris & Associates, Inc.
30. Lumsden, K. G., and A. Scott. (1987), “The Economics Student Reexamined: Male-Female Differences in Comprehension.” The Journal of Economic Education, 18(4), 365-375.
31. Mallik, G., and Basu, P. (2009), “Does High School Mathematics Improve Student Learning in Economics in the University?” The International Journal of Learning, 16(4), 515-520.
32. Miller, S. (1991), “The Case for Economic Education in the School Curriculum.” In W. Walstad and J. Soper (Eds.), “Effective Economic Education in the Schools.” 35-48. Washington D.C., NEA.
33. Moyer, M. E., and Paden, D. W. (1968), “On the Efficiency of the High School Economics Course.” The American Economic Review, 58(4), 870-877.
34. Myatt, A., and C. Waddell. (1990), “An Approach to Testing the Effectiveness of the Teaching and Learning of Economics in High School.” The Journal of Economic Education, 21(3), 355-363.
35. NCEE. (1997), “Voluntary National Content Standards in Economics.” New York: National Council on Economic Educaiton.
36. Nourse, E. (1966), “Current Aspects of Our Persistent Economic Problems.” Social Education, 30(4), 235.
37. NTFEE. (1961), “Economic Education in the Schools: Report of the National Task Force on Economic Education.” New York: Committee for Economic Development.
38. Park, Kang H., and Peter M. Kerr. (1990), “Determinants of Academic Performance: A Multinomial Logit Approach.” The Journal of Economic Education, 21(2), 101-111.
39. Parker, W., and Jarolimek, J. (1984), “Citizenship and the Critical Role of the Social Studies.” Boulder, CO: Social Science Education Consortium.
40. Robb, R. E., and Robb, L. (1999), “Gender and the Study of Economics: The Role of Gender of the Instructor.” The Journal of Economic Education, 30(1), 3-19.
41. Rose, H. and Betts, J.R. (2004), “The Effect of High School Courses on Earnings.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 497-513.
42. Santomero, A. M. (2003), “Knowledge Is Power: The Importance of Economic Education.” Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Q4: 1-5.
43. Saunders, P. (1970), “Does High School Economics Have a Lasting Impact?” The Journal of Economic Education, 2(1), 39-55.
44. Saunders, P. (1973), “The Lasting Effects of Elementary Economics Courses.” Final Report, NSF Grant GY-7208.
45. Saunders, P., Bach, G. L., Calderwood, J. D., and Hansen, W. L. (1984), “A Framework for Teaching the Basic Concepts (2nd ed.).” New York: Joint Council on Economic Education.
46. Schug, M. C. (1983), “The Development of Economic Thinking in Children and Adolescents.” Social Education, 47(2), 141-145.
47. Siegfried, J. J. (1979), “Male-Female Differences in Economic Education: A Survey.” The Journal of Economic Education, 10, 1-11.
48. Soper, J. C., and Walstad, W.B. (1983), “On Measuring Economic Attitudes.” The Journal of Economic Education, 14(4), 4-17.
49. Soper, J. C., and Walstad, W.B. (1988), “What Is High School Economics? Posttest Knowledge, Attitudes, and Course Content.” The Journal of Economic Education, 19, 37-51.
50. Stigler, G. J. (1963), “Elementary Economic Education.” American Economic Review, 53(2), 653-659.
51. Stigler, G. J. (1970), “The Case, if Any, for Economic Literacy.” The Journal of Economic Education, 1(2), 77-84.
52. Trujillo, G. (1977), “Consumer and Economic Education, K-12: A Comparative Analysis.” Washington, D.C.: Office of Consumer’s Education.
53. VanFossen, P. J. (1999), “The National Voluntary Content Standards in Economics.”
54. Walstad, W. B., and Soper, J. C. (1988), “What Is High School Economics? TEL Revision and Pretest Findings.” The Journal of Economic Education, 19, 24-36.
55. Walstad, W. B., and Soper, J. C. (1989), “What Is High School Economics? Factors Contributing to Student Achievement and Attitudes.” The Journal of Economic Education, 20(1), 23-38.
56. Walstad, W. B., and Robson, D. (1997), “Differential Item Functioning and Male-Female Differences on Multiple-Choice Tests in Economics.” The Journal of Economic Education, 28(2), 155-171.
57. Walstad, W. B., and Ken Rebeck. (2001), “Assessing the Economic Understanding of U.S. High School Students.” American Economic Review, 91:2, 452–457.
58. Walstad, W. B. (1992), “Economics Instruction in High Schools.” The Journal of Economic Literature, 30(4), 2019-2051.
59. Walstad, W. B. (1994), “An Assessment of Economics Instruction in American High Schools. In W. Walstad (Ed.), An International Perspective on Economic Education, 109-136. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
60. Walstad, W. B. (2001), “Economic Education in U.S. High Schools”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 195-210.
61. Wentworth, D., and Schug, M. C. (1994), “How to Use an Economic Mystery in Your History Course.” Social Education, 58(1), 10-12. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
財政學系
102255502 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102255502 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [財政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 550201.pdf | | 4906Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 109 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
