政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145705
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51683702      Online Users : 635
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145705


    Title: 《摩登怪怪紀》當代媒介科技文化之虛擬怪物創作- NFT圖文作品論述
    Contemporary Monsters Art & Exhibition as Non-Fungible Tokens
    Authors: 曾新容
    Tseng, Hsin-Jung
    Contributors: 陶亞倫
    Tao, Ya-Lun
    曾新容
    Tseng, Hsin-Jung
    Keywords: 怪物
    妖怪
    媒介科技
    文化技術
    棄卻/賤斥
    非同質化代幣
    Monster
    Yokai
    Media technology
    Cultural techniques
    Abjection
    NFT
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-07-06 15:16:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 怪物不怪,他們來自我們的文化。《摩登怪怪紀》是一個以媒介科技使用文化作為主題的當代怪物創作作品,並且以NFT的形式於akaSwap作為最終公開展演。透過閱讀怪物理論,了解怪物如何在我們文化脈絡中怪物化,以怪物作為出發點進行創作。在這個創作中,將會有兩個系列作品。

    第一個系列《摩登怪怪紀:怪物篇》是本篇主要作品,以文化技術作為題材選擇方向,透過仿生設計的概念,選取數個媒介科技使用行為作為主題,創作出十三隻當代怪物角色。首先會先在社群網站介紹研究者創作的怪物提供觀者認識,再進行重新繪製,製成展演的怪物角色系列作品NFT。第二個系列《摩登怪怪紀:故事篇》為圖文故事作品,是利用三個觀察者角色做成十三篇圖文故事NFT,以觀察者面向,探討以十三隻怪物角色為主的怪物世界中,怪物與觀察者的關係。其中,會將Julia Kristeva的「棄卻/賤斥(abjection)」概念,應用在主角與怪物的關係當中,說明主角如何透過棄卻/賤斥的行為,創造怪物。

    整體而言,這個作品中將以怪物為主,故事為輔。關於作品理念,怪物角色系列透過解構媒介科技使用的日常生活,重構成怪物的身體,欲引觀者重新思考自己如何使用媒介科技。觀察者面向的圖文故事,則是帶觀者進入怪物世界,引導觀者重新思考如何觀其為怪。透過了解怪物如何從我們身上出現,並和怪物一同回到我們習以為常的生活,可以讓我們思考文化如何使我們創造怪物。此外,這個創作也將提供後進怪物創作者利用既存怪物以外的主題作為創作可能,更可以提供後進怪物創作者,有關怪物的認知、怪物創作過程以及作品是否需要鑄造成NFT的參考。
    Monsters are not all creepy and horrible because they are from our cultures. “Modernmonmon’s Century” was monsters’ artwork which was about contemporary monsters, especially the use of media technologies. The artwork was eventually displayed as non-fungible tokens for exhibition on akaSwap. The artwork was totally made from the point of view of the monsters and based on the monsters theories. In this artwork, there were two pieces, and both of them talked about the monsters.

    The main one, “Modernmonmon’s Century: Monsters”, is a series, and it was about 13 contemporary monsters’ characters of media technologies which was made with the framework of cultural techniques and the concept of bionics. The monsters would be introduced on a social media fan’s page in portrait form first, and then would be drawn in a different style with related elements as non-fungible tokens. The other one, “Modernmonmon’s Century: Story”, is a story with 13 pictures which was led by three observers. Additionally, the story was told from the point of view of the observers to express the relationship between the monsters and the observers. With regard to the main character, who is one of the observers, the concept of Julia Kristeva’s “abjection” was applied to explain the relation between the main character and the birth of the monsters.

    All in all, the former one mentioned would be the main piece of this artwork, and the later one would be the assistance. For the core value of this artwork, the monsters’ characters were telling people to rethink how they use media technologies, and the story was telling people to rethink how they consider others or others’ behaviors weird. Understanding how monsters were born from human could make people think how the culture drives the creation of monsters. Finally, the paper provided monster artists doing monster art with various possibilities besides known creatures. Moreover, the paper also offered the monster’s artists the organized cognition of a monster, the process of creating an unknown creature, and the idea of transferring the artwork into NFT form.
    Reference: 王慧萍(2012)。《怪物考--西方中世紀的怪物世界》臺北市:如果.大雁出版。
    《妖氣都市:從人類之城到異怪結界》(2019)。取自 https://yaochi.clab.org.tw/
    林思平(2020)。〈人工智慧與媒介理論:基德勒、克拉瑪與亞馬遜Echo/Alexa〉。《新聞學研究》,142:155-199。
    唐士哲(2017)。〈作為文化技術的媒介:基德勒的媒介理論初探〉。《傳播研究與實踐》,7(2):5-32。
    袁柯注 (1983)。《山海經校注》,臺北市:里仁書局。
    許汝紘編(2017)。《百鬼夜行:妖魔起源》。新北市:信實文化行銷。
    黃開譯(2021)。《數位監控:我們如何拿回均衡的科技生活》,臺北市:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司(原書Rob Kitchin, Alistair Fraser [2020]. Slow computing: why we need balanced digital lives. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press.)
    葉妍伶、羅亞琪譯(2021)。《被操弄的真實:演算法中隱藏的政治與權力》,新北市:臺灣商務印書館股份有限公司(原書Taina Bucher[2018]. IF…THEN: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.)
    臺北地方異聞工作室(2019)。《臺灣妖怪學就醬》臺北市:奇異果文創事業有限公司。
    臺灣傳播調查資料庫(2022年7月5日)。〈你又網購了嗎?-台灣民眾網路購物之情形〉,《科技部傳播調查資料庫電子報》。取自https://crctaiwan.dcat.nycu.edu.tw/epaper/%E7%AC%AC283%E6%9C%9F20220630.htm 
    臺灣傳播調查資料庫(2022年9月30日)。〈「哪個媒體是你的心頭好?」-台灣民眾使用各媒體之情形〉,《科技部傳播調查資料庫電子報》。取自https://crctaiwan.dcat.nycu.edu.tw/epaper/%E7%AC%AC290%E6%9C%9F20220930.htm 
    蔡元培譯(2015)。《妖怪學講義錄(總論)》,香港:香港中和出版(原書井上円了 [明治26年(1893)]. 妖怪学講義, 日本東京: 哲学館.)
    Atkinson, P., & Barker, R. (2021). ‘Hey Alexa, what did I forget?’: Networked devices, Internet search and the delegation of human memory. Convergence, 27(1), 52–65.
    Chalmers, D., Fisch, C., Matthews, R., Quinn, W., & Recker, J. (2022). Beyond the bubble: Will NFTs and digital proof of ownership empower creative industry entrepreneurs?. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 17, e00309.
    Cohen, J. J. (1996). Monster Culture (Seven Theses). In J. J.Cohen (Eds.), Monster Theory: Reading Culture (pp. 3-25). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    Figal, G. (2007). Civilization and Monsters: Spirits of Modernity in Meiji Japan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    Figeac, J., & Favre, G. (2021). How behavioral homophily on social media influences the perception of tie-strengthening within young adults’ personal networks. New Media & Society, 0(0).
    Foster, M. D. (2008). Pandemonium and Parade: Japanese Monsters and the Culture of Yokai, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
    Foster, M. D. (2021, March 31). Supernatural Beings: Yōkai Past & Present with Michael Dylan Foster and Zack Davisson. [Youtube]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3lpA83gKjU
    Hunter, K. M. B. (2018). Shopaholic stories: Tales of therapeutic addiction, governance, and political economy. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(4), 497–519.
    Jenaro, C., Flores, N., & Frías, C. P. (2021). Anxiety and Depression in Cyberbullied College Students: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), 579–602.
    Kim, H. M. (2021). What do others’ reactions to body posting on Instagram tell us? The effects of social media comments on viewers’ body image perception. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3448–3465.
    Kittler, F. (1999). Gramophone, film, typewriter (G. Winthrop-Young & M. Wutz, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1986)
    Kreling, R., Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2022). Feeling Authentic on Social Media: Subjective Authenticity Across Instagram Stories and Posts. Social Media + Society, 8(1).
    Kristeva, J. (1982). Approaching Abjection. In J. Kristeva, The Powers of Horror (pp. 1-17) ( L. S. Roudiez Trans). New York: Columbia University Press.
    Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. N. (2012). Impact of Internet Literacy, Internet Addiction Symptoms, and Internet Activities on Academic Performance. Social Science Computer Review, 30(4), 403–418.
    Peter, I.-K., & Petermann, F. (2018). Cyberbullying: A concept analysis of defining attributes and additional influencing factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 350–366.
    Theivendran, K. (2021). Does social media addiction exist? InnovAiT, 14(8), 512-518.
    Vasan, K., Janosov, M., &Barabási, A. -L. (2022).Quantifying NFT-driven networks in crypto art. Sci Rep, 12, 2769.
    Villaespesa, E., & Wowkowych, S. (2020). Ephemeral Storytelling With Social Media: Snapchat and Instagram Stories at the Brooklyn Museum. Social Media + Society, 6(1).
    Weinstock, J. A. (2020). Introduction. In J.A. Weinstock (Ed), The Monster Theory Reader (pp. 1-31). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    Young, K. S. (2004). Internet Addiction: A New Clinical Phenomenon and Its Consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 402–415.
    Zhang, Y., Trusov, M., Stephen, A. T., & Jamal, Z. (2017). Online Shopping and Social Media: Friends or Foes? Journal of Marketing, 81(6), 24–41.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    108464019
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108464019
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Master`s Program in Communication] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    401901.pdf13717KbAdobe PDF278View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback