政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/143819

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/143819

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51775407 Online Users : 452

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Graduate Institute of TIPM > Theses > Item 140.119/143819

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143819

Title:	行動通訊產業IC設計廠的動態競爭─以高通及聯發科為例 The analysis of competitive dynamics in IC design house of mobile communication industry: Case studies of Qualcomm and MediaTek
Authors:	江秉修 Chiang, Ping-Hsiu
Contributors:	吳豐祥 Wu, Feng-Shang 江秉修 Chiang, Ping-Hsiu
Keywords:	行動通訊 IC設計動態競爭 AMC分析外部環境分析高通聯發科技術研發創新產品專利分析市場分析 Mobile communication IC design Competitive dynamics AMC model General environment analysis Qualcomm MediaTek Research and development Innovative products Patent analysis Market analysis
Date:	2022
Issue Date:	2023-03-09 18:33:45 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	行動通訊技術，約莫十年為一個技術更迭的週期，而隨著2019年韓國電信業者率先啟動5G服務，也意味著全球正式進入了第五代行動通訊技術的時代。而在這個行動通訊技術自4G轉換至5G的分水嶺，IC設計廠間的競爭也隨之越趨激烈。其中，在智慧型手機處理器晶片市場中穩居龍頭十餘年的高通，在2020年第三季市占表現卻被市場中長期居於劣勢的聯發科反超並一路延續至今，截至2021年第四季，聯發科已連續六季居於全球手機晶片的市占龍頭寶座。因此本研究欲探究，究竟是哪些影響因素導致在行動通訊業IC設計領域中長期宰制的領導者失了江山，同時領導者與挑戰者在各階段的策略布局又有怎麼樣的不同，而領導者跟挑戰者又該如何奪回失去的龍頭寶座或者維持自己目前的市場地位。本研究採取個案分析法，利用次級資料分析法進行研究所需資料之蒐集，採用具公信力之次級資料作為研究資料來源，以動態競爭理論為基礎，基於原始AMC分析模型進行修改加入外部環境分析以得出本研究之研究架構，並依循此研究架構進行研究分析以探究雙方各階段所擁有的市場共同性及資源相似程度，了解雙方各階段所採取的競爭行為與回應，同時探究外部環境如何影響行動通訊產業IC設計廠之決策以及是否採取競爭行動或回應。本研究最後得出之研究結論如下：結論一：具有市場優勢的行動通訊產業IC設計領導廠商，相較於挑戰者而言，其產品布局上通常會比較完整，且在技術布局上也會做比較長期性的策略考量。而就市場中相對弱勢的挑戰者而言，其在資源及能力落後的情況下，通常會傾向於將有限的資源挹注於門檻較低之單一產品線或技術上結論二：行動通訊產業IC設計廠商中的挑戰者，在面臨到技術轉換的轉捩點或者外部環境的大幅度變動時，通常會視此一時機點為逆轉市場態勢的大好機會，並把握此一產業動態的轉變來扭轉情勢，而由於行動通訊技術大約十年會面臨此一技術轉換之情形，挑戰者可提前布局以逆轉態勢。同時挑戰者也會透過借鏡產業標竿企業之策略作為來提升與維持其所建立之競爭優勢結論三：行動通訊產業IC設計廠商中失去市場地位之領導者，通常會繼續執行其原先所規劃之策略布局，並等待產業波動期的過去，以奪回相對穩定市場狀態下的龍頭寶座，而不必然會受短期之市場失利而大動作回應逆轉態勢之挑戰者本論文最後並提出本研究的理論貢獻、實務建議與後續研究建議。 Mobile networks undergo technology transformation about every decade, and with the telecommunication companies of Korea taking the lead in launching 5G services in 2019. It also means that the world has officially entered the 5G era. In this watershed moment from 4G to 5G, the competition among IC design houses has become more and more intense. Among them, Qualcomm, which has been the leader in the smartphone processor chip market for decades, was overtaken by MediaTek in the third quarter of 2020, and this situation has continued to this day. By the fourth quarter of 2021, MediaTek has been the market leader in smartphone processor chip market for six consecutive quarters. Therefore, this study aims to explore what are the influencing factors that lead to the loss of leaders who have dominated the IC design field in the mobile communication industry for a long time, and what are the differences between them in the strategic arrangement they formulate and challengers they encounter at various stages? How do leaders and challengers regain lost leadership positions or maintain their current market positions? This research adopts a Case Analysis Method, by collecting the secondary data for analysis. The study modifies the original AMC model based on the Competitive Dynamics Theory by adding General Environmental Analysis to it to obtain the conceptual framework for this research. With this framework as basis, we then analyze the Market Commonality and Resource Similarity of the two companies i.e., Qualcomm and MediaTek, and explore the competitive actions and responses adopted by them at each stage. At the same time, we explore how the General Environment affects the decision-making of IC design houses, and check whether they take a competitive action or response. The final conclusions of this study are as follows: 1. Compared with challengers, leaders with market advantages tend to have a more complete product arrangement and make long-term strategic considerations in terms of technology arrangement. As for challengers, they tend to invest limited resources in a single product line or technology with a lower threshold when their resources and capabilities are weak. 2. When challengers face a watershed moment in technological transformation or a substantial change in the environment, they tend to regard this as a great opportunity to reverse the market situation, and to seize this transformation to reverse the situation. Since the mobile networks undergo technology transformation about every ten years, the challengers can make arrangements in advance to reverse the situation. At the same time, they will enhance and maintain their established competitive advantages by borrowing the strategies of industry benchmarking companies. 3. Leaders who have lost their market advantages will continue to implement their original strategic arrangement and wait for the period of industry volatility to pass, and then regain the leading position in a relatively stable market state, and will not necessarily actively respond to challengers due to short-term market losses. At the end of this thesis, the theoretical contributions, practical suggestions and follow-up research suggestions of this research are put forward.
Reference:	Aguilar, F. J. (1967). Scanning the Business Environment. Macmillan. Analytics, S. (2016). Strategy Analytics: Smartphone Apps Processor Revenue Declined 4 Percent in 2015 to Reach $20.1 Billion. Cision PR Newswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/strategy-analytics-smartphone-apps-processor-revenue-declined-4-percent-in-2015-to-reach-201-billion-300221407.html Apple. (2013). iPhone 5s - Technical Specifications. Apple. https://support.apple.com/kb/SP685 Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241. Chen, M.-J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 100-134. Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 135-210. Daft, R. L., & Marcic, D. (2016). Understanding Management. Cengage Learning. Darmody, J. (2021). What’s going on with the global chip shortage? SiliconRepublic. https://www.siliconrepublic.com/machines/global-chip-shortage-eu-apple Day, G. S. (1981). Strategic market analysis and definition: An integrated approach. Strategic Management Journal, 2(3), 281-299. Gawas, A. U. (2015). An overview on evolution of mobile wireless communication networks: 1G-6G. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 3(5), 3130-3133. Greenhalgh, C., & Rogers, M. (2010). Innovation, intellectual property, and economic growth. In Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth. Princeton University Press. GSMA. (2015). 4g networks to cover more than a third of the global population this year, according to new gsma intelligence data. GSMA. https://www.gsma.com/newsroom/press-release/4g-networks-to-cover-more-third-of-global-pop-this-year/ Gulati, R., Mayo, A. J., & Nohria, N. (2013). Management. Cengage Learning. Gupta, P. (2013). Evolvement of mobile generations: 1G to 5G. International Journal for Technological Research in Engineering, 1, 152-157. Guthrie, R. A., & Austin, L. D. (1996). Competitive implications of the Internet. Information Systems Management, 13(3), 90-92. Halfacree, G. (2021). Qualcomm`s bumper Q3 growth comes with supply constraints warning, but Intel may ride to the rescue. The Register. https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/29/qualcomm_q3_2021/ Harrigan, K. R. (1979). Strategies for declining businesses George F. Baker Foundation. Hsu, M.-Y., & Chen, M.-J. (2006). Competitor analysis and inter-firm rivalry -by integrating market commonality and resource similarity. Working Paper, Darden Graduate School of Business, University of Virginia. Ismail, M. (2014). ASUS ZenFone 4, ZenFone 5 and ZenFone 6 announced at CES 2014. TechNave. https://technave.com/gadget/ASUS-ZenFone-4-ZenFone-5-and-ZenFone-6-announced-at-CES-2014-3126.html Jacobson, R. (1992). The “Austrian” school of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 17(4), 782-807. Kano, S. (2000). Technical innovations, standardization and regional comparison—A case study in mobile communications. Telecommunications Policy, 24(4), 305-321. Kim, J. (2021). Winter storm forces Samsung to halt Texas chip plant operations. Nikkei. https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Technology/Winter-storm-forces-Samsung-to-halt-Texas-chip-plant-operations Klaehne, M. (2022). US Smartphone Sales Decline 6% YoY in Q1 2022 as Pandemic Demand Cools. Counterpoint. https://www.counterpointresearch.com/us-smartphone-sales-decline-6-yoy-q1-2022-pandemic-demand-cools/ Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363-380. Malhotra, A. (2020). MediaTek Becomes Biggest Smartphone Chipset Vendor for First Time in Q3 2020. Counterpoint. https://www.counterpointresearch.com/mediatek-biggest-smartphone-chipset-vendor-q3-2020/ Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. McKelvey, B. (1997). Perspective—Quasi-natural organization science. Organization Science, 8(4), 351-380. Osterloh, R. (2021). Google Tensor debuts on the new Pixel 6 this fall. Blog.Google. https://blog.google/products/pixel/google-tensor-debuts-new-pixel-6-fall/ Pearce, J., & Robinson, J. (2005). Strategic Management: Formulation, Implementation and Control, Richard D. Irwin lnc., Boston. Porac, J. F., & Thomas, H. (1990). Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 224-240. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57, 137-145. Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 25-40. Rimol, M. (2022). Gartner Says Worldwide Semiconductor Revenue Grew 26% in 2021. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2022-04-14-gartner-says-worldwide-semiconductor-revenue-grew-26-percent-in-2021 Robbins, S., & Coulter, M. (2004). Management with CC OneKey. Prentice Hall PTR. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper Perennial. Shah, N. (2013). Top Mobile Devices Trends in 2014. Counterpoint. https://www.counterpointresearch.com/top-mobile-devices-trends-in-2014/ Stigler, G. J. (1982). The economists and the problem of monopoly. Occasional Papers L. Sch. U. Chi., 19, 1. Tummala, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2011). Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 474-483. Voas, J., Kshetri, N., & DeFranco, J. F. (2021). Scarcity and global insecurity: The semiconductor shortage. IT Professional, 23(5), 78-82. 尹慧中（2022）。台積明年起晶圓代工全面漲價6%。聯合新聞網。 https://udn.com/news/story/7240/6303682 方俊德（2021）。美中科技冷戰對於台灣產業在全球供應鏈之影響。臺灣經濟研究月刊，44(1)，28-34。https://doi.org/10.29656/term.202101_44(1).0005 王聖閔（2020）。日韓貿易戰之影響分析及其對產業鏈的衝擊。臺灣經濟研究月刊，43(1)，50-56。https://doi.org/10.29656/term.202001_43(1).0008 曲威光（2014）。雲端通訊與多媒體產業。全華圖書。曲建仲（2020）。【認識5G專題報導5-2】什麼是毫米波(mmWave)與太赫茲(THz)？。Digitimes。https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=158&cat1=20&cat2=10&id=0000599796_T1V6PE52LRMO8I51QFZN5 朱怡穎（2007）。手機領導廠商品牌權益提升之策略探討--以Nokia為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中央大學產業經濟研究所。何易霖、何佩儒、呂安涔、鐘惠玲、張瑞益、陳昱翔、吳凱中、張家瑋、蕭君暉（2020）。美國封殺華為你不能不知道的影響。經濟日報。 https://money.udn.com/SSI/topic/2020/huawei/index.html 吳中傑、黃靖萱（2021）。「山寨」起家的聯發科，如何逆襲超越高通、稱霸全球手機晶片？。商業周刊。https://reurl.cc/Dyz0pj 李孟珊（2021）。聯發科布局5G全系列晶片尬高通。聯合新聞網。https://udn.com/news/story/7240/5737909 李挺彰（2011）。第三代行動通信業者行動上網服務定價模式探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)。李雯琪（2022）。半導體晶圓代工廠商與封測廠商競合關係之探討─以台積電與日月光為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所。周康玉（2021）。2022手機晶片雙雄之戰：聯發科火併高通，背後是台積電對決三星！兩條路線誰將勝出？。風傳媒。https://www.storm.mg/article/4116794 唐子晴（2019）。累積投入千億！聯發科首款5G重量級產品天璣1000晶片終於問世，背後透露的野心是？。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/55651 孫瑞隆（2021）。平台領先者及後進者之競爭策略與覆蓋策略研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所。耿筠（2001）。行銷管理理論與架構。華泰文化。財經新報（2020）。聯發科 2019 年營收創近來新高，5G 將為 2020 年成長動能。財經新報。https://finance.technews.tw/2020/01/10/mediatek-2019/ 高兆麟（2021）。高通5G攜手中華電信、廣達　「毫米波」助上演即時互動舞台神劇。ETtoday。https://finance.ettoday.net/news/2156675 張奇（2022）。通訊產業發展暨關鍵議題（PPT1110627-1）。資策會產業情報研究所。https://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/ChartS?docid=PPT1110627-1 張明輝（2019）。大會計師教你從財報數字看懂經營本質。商業周刊。張建中（2016）。高通驍龍820接單告捷多新機用。中央社。https://technews.tw/2016/02/26/qualcomm-snapdragon-820-mwc-2016/ 曹凱閔（2014）。手機晶片產業之成長經營策略探討：以聯發科公司為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣大學商學研究所。陳玉娟（2021）。英特爾有望成台積電獲利主力　2023年躍升前三大客戶。Digitimes。https://www.digitimes.com.tw/tech/dt/n/shwnws.asp?cnlid=1&id=0000625425_L8Z3RFTC3NA4WG4CGJ2BL 陳良榕（2017）。一顆晶片的失誤　為何讓聯發科市值蒸發近三千億？。天下雜誌。 https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5083227 陳明哲（2009）。預測競爭對手的回應：AMC 三環透視法。未出版原始資料。陳明哲（2012）。 “贏”在動態競爭“四部曲”。清華管理評論，2，74-80。陳苓（2014）。韓媒：聯發科急起直追！高通心慌、砍價鞏固市佔率。鉅亨網。https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/1259576 陳曉莉（2013）。高通為低階手機發表64位元 4G LTE 晶片組。iThome。https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/84214 喬友慶、黃俊儒、鄭耿翔、丁瑞彥（2017）。追隨廠商如何回應領導廠商之競爭性行動？多重市場接觸的調節效果。管理學報，34(4)，659-682。https://doi.org/10.6504/jmbr.201712_34(4).0008 經濟部智慧財產局（2021）。發明公開與公告有何區別？。經濟部智慧財產局專利主題網。https://topic.tipo.gov.tw/patents-tw/cp-783-872267-a0309-101.html 廖彥宜（2021）。展望2022全球智慧型手機市場發展趨勢暨關鍵議題剖析（ppt1101009-1）。資策會產業情報研究所。https://mic.iii.org.tw/AISP/charts?docid=ppt1101009-1 劉建宏（2012）。中低階智慧機市場潛力大，高通狂推QRD公板搶晶片市佔。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/24259/ 鍾榮峰（2021）。台積電：供應鏈混亂加劇晶片荒加速擴產腳步。中央通訊社。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202111100091.aspx 鍾銘泰（2019）。5G時代下無線連結帶動產業數位轉型。臺灣經濟研究月刊，42(12)，61-69。https://doi.org/10.29656/term.201912_42(12).0008 蘇偉綱（2020）。手機晶片大廠毫米波技術專利分析（CDOC20200618001）。資策會產業情報研究所。https://mic.iii.org.tw/AISP/ReportS?docid=CDOC20200618001 蘇嘉維（2019）。高通秀毫米波技術 2020推新品。中時新聞網。https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20190926000222-260202 顧瑩華、丁心嵐（2021）。韌性供應鏈下臺灣半導體產業的發展策略。經濟前瞻，(198)，30-35。
Description:	碩士國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所 109364121
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109364121
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of TIPM] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
412101.pdf		5590Kb	Adobe PDF2	176	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback