English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51759071      Online Users : 593
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/143807


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143807


    Title: 我國密碼資產洗錢防制法制之研究
    A Study on the Anti-Money Laundering of Crypto-assets in Taiwan
    Authors: 劉曜暉
    Contributors: 臧正運
    劉曜暉
    Keywords: 密碼資產
    加密貨幣
    虛擬通貨
    虛擬資產
    洗錢防制
    反洗錢
    旅行規則
    Crypto-asset
    Cryptocurrency
    Virtual asset
    Virtual currency
    Anti-money laundering
    AML
    Travel rule
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-03-09 18:30:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 2008年，一名自稱中本聰（Satoshi Nakamoto）之人發表「比特幣：一種對等式的電子現金系統（Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System）」之論文，比特幣運用分散式帳本技術與密碼學，利用公開帳本中各節點間之信任機制，打造無須中介信任機構之點對點交易系統，開創以分散式帳本技術為基礎之密碼資產時代，降低對中介信任機構之依賴，以實現成本低廉且快速之支付模式，此後以分散式帳本技術為基礎之以太幣、泰達幣等密碼資產亦逐漸興起。然而，基於密碼資產之底層技術，打破既有資金流通之限制，亦即，密碼資產得不經由金融機構等中介機構，以假名方式將資金於全球流通，因此，密碼資產具有去中心化特性、假名性與跨域性，使得非法資金得以密碼資產作為載體，不著痕跡地流竄於全球，突破既有洗錢之框架，成為新興之洗錢手段。
    我國於2018年於洗錢防制法第5條第2項增訂「虛擬通貨平台及交易業務之事業」作為洗錢防制義務主體，適用金融機構之洗錢防制規定，嗣金融監督管理委員會於2021年6月30日發布「虛擬通貨平台及交易業務事業防制洗錢及打擊資恐辦法」詳細規範我國虛擬通貨應踐行之洗錢防制措施，為求完善我國密碼資產之洗錢防制，本文遂參諸FATF、美國與歐盟所提出對密碼資產洗錢防制之立法例，再觀察我國前揭立法例，我國應考慮擴張虛擬通貨之範圍至NFT等表彰特定物品或權利之類型，以及對「虛擬通貨平台及交易業務事業」之定義應更為明確，盡速建立註冊登記制度以及Travel Rule規定相關資料傳輸格式，並須隨虛擬通貨之特性細緻化確認客戶身分措施、可疑交易申報等洗錢防制義務。整體而言，我國對虛擬通貨相關事業之立法仍採行中心化機構為主之立法模式，應考量虛擬通貨相關事業不同之商業模式細緻化所規範之義務主體及洗錢防制措施，以完善我國密碼資產之洗錢防制法制，接軌FATF所定之國際標準。
    A person named Satoshi Nakamoto published an essay titled “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System” in 2008. Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer trading system based on distributed ledger technology（DLT）and cryptography to immediately and inexpensively execute transactions without intermediary institutions. Other crypto-assets such as Ether or USDT have been emerging gradually since then. Because of the characteristics of decentralization, pseudonym and cross-border crypto-assets, crypto-assets have been a means of money laundering and terrorist financing. The anti-money laundering（AML） laws in Taiwan have been revised the obliged entity to include “Enterprises Handling Virtual Currency Platform or Transaction” in 2018, and the Financial Supervisory Commission ROC (Taiwan) promulgated “Regulations Governing Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism for Enterprises Handling Virtual Currency Platform or Transaction” on June 30, 2021. To improve the aforementioned legislation, This thesis referred to the standard FATF established and the legislative of the AML of the crypto-assets in the US and the EU. This thesis concludes that the definition of virtual currencies should include NFT, and the definition of the Enterprises Handling Virtual Currency Platforms or Transactions should be clearer. Moreover, the AML obligation such as CDD, STR and Travel Rule should be more precisely in accordance with the characteristics and the business model of the crypto-assets, as such to improve the legislative of the AML of the crypto-assets in Taiwan and to meet the FATF’s AML standard.
    Reference: 一、 英文文獻
    （一） 專書
    1. 　A. Ferreira, P. G. Sandner and T. Dünser, Cryptocurrencies, DLT and crypto assets–the road to regulatory recognition in Europe, Forthcoming in: Handbook on Blockchain, Editors: My Thai (University of Florida), Duc A. Tran (University of Massachusetts), Bhaskar Krishnamachari (University of Southern California), Publisher: Springer Nature (Spinger Series on Optimization and Its Applications: https://www. springer. com/series/73 (2021).
    2. A. Narayanan, J. Bonneau, E. Felten, A. Miller and S. Goldfeder (2016), Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction: Princeton University Press.
    3. A. P. S. E. R. Committee (2015), Digital currency - game changer or bit player.
    4. G. Stessens (2000), Money laundering : a new international law enforcement model,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    5. M. Simpson, N. Smith and A. Srivastava (2010), International guide to money laundering law and practice (3rd ed.),Haywards Heath, West Sussex [England: Bloomsbury Professional.
    6. P. Reuter (2005), Chasing dirty money: The fight against money laundering: Peterson Institute.
    7. V. Morabito (2017), Business Innovation Through Blockchain The B³ Perspective.
    （二） 期刊論文
    1. A. Jordanoska, The exciting world of NFTs: a consideration of regulatory and financial crime risks, 10 BUTTERWORTHS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BANKING AND FINANCIAL LAW (2021).
    2. A. Ogunbadewa, The Bitcoin Virtual Currency: A Safe Haven for Money Launderers?, Available at SSRN 2402632 (2013).
    3. A. Simonova, The risk‐based approach to anti‐money laundering: problems and solutions, 144 Journal of Money Laundering Control 346 (2011).
    4. B. Buchanan, Money laundering—a global obstacle, 181 Research in International Business and Finance 115 (2004).
    5. B. Cao, Z. Zhang, D. Feng, S. Zhang, L. Zhang, M. Peng and Y. Li, Performance analysis and comparison of PoW, PoS and DAG based blockchains, 64 Digital Communications and Networks (2020).
    6. B. Villányi, (2021), Money Laundering: History, Regulations, and Techniques. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice.
    7. C. Albrecht, K. M. K. Duffin, S. Hawkins and V. M. Morales Rocha, The use of cryptocurrencies in the money laundering process, 222 Journal of Money Laundering Control 210 (2019).
    8. D. A. Chaikin, Risk-based approaches to combating financial crime, 82 Journal of Law and Financial Management 20 (2009).
    9. D. A. Zetzsche, R. P. Buckley and D. W. Arner, The distributed liability of distributed ledgers: Legal risks of blockchain, U. Ill. L. Rev. 1361 (2018).
    10. D. Riegelnig and B. Suisse, OpenVASP: An Open Protocol to Implement FATF’s Travel Rule for Virtual Assets, OpenVASP Association: Zug, Switzerland (2019).
    11. F. Teichmann and M.-C. Falker. (2020). Money laundering through cryptocurrencies. Paper presented at the 13th International Scientific and Practical Conference-Artificial Intelligence Anthropogenic nature Vs. Social Origin.
    12. Ferreira, Agata and Sandner, Philipp and Dünser, Thomas, Cryptocurrencies, DLT and Crypto Assets – the Road to Regulatory Recognition in Europe (April 1, 2021). Forthcoming in: Handbook on Blockchain, Editors: My Thai (University of Florida), Duc A. Tran (University of Massachusetts), Bhaskar Krishnamachari (University of Southern California), Publisher: Springer Nature (Spinger Series on Optimization and Its Applications: https://www.springer.com/series/73, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3891401 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891401.
    13. G. Y. Liao and J. Caramichael. (2022). Stablecoins: Growth Potential and Impact on Banking. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/ifdp/stablecoins-growth-potential-and-impact-on-banking.htm.
    14. H. Halpin, Holistic Privacy and Usability of a Cryptocurrency Wallet, arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.02793 (2021).
    15. H. Mai. (2022). Stablecoins DeFi, Libra and beyond. Retrieved from https://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/RPS_EN-PROD/PROD0000000000522496/Stablecoins%3A_DeFi%2C_Libra_and_beyond.PDF?undefined&realload=8Yu2T75fb1MBGUNd2ZB~2uDg4Yu~1wRUocBgBUQQ7nbykxroNGafw4vvfj/4KQV3
    16. Houser, Kimberly and Holden, John, Navigating the Non-Fungible Token (March 11, 2022). Utah Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4055535.
    17. I. Salami, Challenges and Approaches to Regulating Decentralized Finance, 115American Journal of International Law 425 (2021).
    18. J. Fairfield, Tokenized: The law of non-fungible tokens and unique digital property, Indiana Law Journal, Forthcoming (2021).
    19. J. J. Bambara, P. R. Allen, K. Iyer, R. Madsen, S. Lederer and M. Wuehler (2018), Blockchain: A practical guide to developing business, law, and technology solutions: McGraw Hill Professional.
    20. J. McDowell and G. Novis, The consequences of money laundering and financial crime, 62 Economic Perspectives (2001).
    21. J.-F. Thony, Money laundering and terrorism financing: an overview, 3Current Developments in Monetary and Financial Law, Vol. 3 (2002).
    22. K. Alexander, The international anti‐money‐laundering regime: the role of the financial action task force, 43 Journal of Money Laundering Control 231 (2001).
    23. K. J. O`Dwyer and D. Malone. (2014). Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint. Paper presented at the 5th IET Irish Signals & Systems Conference 2014 and 2014 China-Ireland International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies.
    24. K. Werbach and N. Cornell, Contracts ex machina, 67 Duke Law Journal 313 (2017).
    25. L. Haffke, M. Fromberger and P. Zimmermann, Virtual Currencies and anti-money laundering: the shortcomings of the fifth AML Directive (EU) and how to address them, 212 Journal of Banking Regulation 125 (2020).
    26. M. A. Naheem, Exploring the links between AML, digital currencies and blockchain technology, 223 Journal of Money Laundering Control 515 (2019).
    27. M. C. Van Hout and T. Bingham, ‘Silk Road’, the virtual drug marketplace: A single case study of user experiences, 245 International Journal of Drug Policy 385 (2013).
    28. M. Campbell-Verduyn, Bitcoin, crypto-coins, and global anti-money laundering governance, 692 Crime, Law and Social Change 283 (2018).
    29. M. J. Barratt, Silk Road: Ebay for drugs: The journal publishes both invited and unsolicited letters, 1073 Addiction 683 (2012).
    30. M. Levi and P. Reuter, Money laundering, 341 Crime and justice (2006).
    31. M. Levi, Money laundering and its regulation, 5821 The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2002).
    32. M. R. Hall, An emerging duty to report criminal conduct: banks, money laundering, and the suspicious activity report, 84 Ky. LJ 643 (1995).
    33. M. Raskin, The Law and Legally of Smart Contracts, 1 Georgetown Law Technology Review 305 (2017).
    34. Malone, David & O`Dwyer, K.J.. (2014). Bitcoin Mining and its Energy Footprint. 280-285. 10.1049/cp.2014.0699.
    35. P. Alldridge, Money laundering and globalization, 354 Journal of law and society (2008).
    36. P. J. Ruce, Anti-money laundering: The challenges of know your customer legislation for private bankers and the hidden benefits for relationship management (the bright side of knowing your customer), 128 Banking L J. 548 (2011).
    37. Q. Wang, R. Li, Q. Wang and S. Chen, Non-fungible token (NFT): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges, arXiv:2105.07447 (2021).
    38. R. Davidian, Anti-money laundering laws for Bitcoin exchanges, 36 American Criminal Law Review (2017).
    39. R. Gordon and A. P. Morriss, Moving money: international financial flows, taxes, and money laundering, 37 Hastings Int`l & Comp. L. Rev. 1 (2014).
    40. R. K. Gordon, Losing the war against dirty money: Rethinking global standards on preventing money laundering and terrorism financing, 21 Duke J. Comp. & Int`l L. 503 (2010).
    41. R. K. Gordon, Trysts or Terrorists-Financial Institutions and the Search for Bad Guys, 43 Wake Forest L. Rev. 101 (2008).
    42. S. B. Neagu, European Union Law Working Papers, (2022).
    43. S. Foley, J. R. Karlsen and T. J. Putniņš, Sex, drugs, and bitcoin: How much illegal activity is financed through cryptocurrencies?, 325 The Review of Financial Studies (2019).
    44. S. Hufnagel and C. King, Anti-money laundering regulation and the art market, 401 Legal Studies (2020).
    45. S. Kang, Rethinking the global anti-money laundering regulations to deter corruption, 673 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 695 (2018).
    46. S. Kethineni, Y. Cao and C. Dodge, Use of Bitcoin in Darknet Markets: Examining Facilitative Factors on Bitcoin-Related Crimes, 432 American Journal of Criminal Justice 141 (2018).
    47. S. Mabunda, Cryptocurrency: The new face of cyber money laundering, 2018 International Conference on Advances in Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (icABCD) (2018).
    48. S. N. Welling, Smurfs, money laundering, and the federal criminal law: the crime of structuring transactions, 41Fla. L. Rev. 287 (1989).
    49. S. T. Middlebrook and S. J. Hughes, Regulating cryptocurrencies in the United States: current issues and future directions, 40Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. (2013).
    50. S. Wang, L. Ouyang, Y. Yuan, X. Ni, X. Han and F.-Y. Wang, Blockchain-enabled smart contracts: architecture, applications, and future trends, 4911 IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 2266 (2019).
    51. T. A. Frick, Virtual and cryptocurrencies—regulatory and anti-money laundering approaches in the European Union and in Switzerland, 201 ERA Forum (2019).
    52. T. C. Lin, Financial weapons of war, 100Minn. L. Rev. 1377 (2015).
    53. T. Hardjono, A. Lipton and A. Pentland, Wallet Attestations for Virtual Asset Service Providers and Crypto-Assets Insurance, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14689 (2020).
    54. U. W. Chohan, Non-fungible tokens: Blockchains, scarcity, and value, Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Papers (2021).
    55. V. Buterin. (2014). Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. Retrieved from https://ethereum.org/669c9e2e2027310b6b3cdce6e1c52962/Ethereum_White_Paper_-_Buterin_2014.pdf.
    56. V. G. Comizio, Virtual currencies: Growing regulatory framework and challenges in the emerging Fintech ecosystem, 21NC Banking Inst. 131 (2017).
    57. X. Wang, Y. Chen and Q. Zhang, Incentivizing cooperative relay in UTXO-based blockchain network, 185 Computer Networks (2021).
    58. Y. M. Isa, Z. M. Sanusi, M. N. Haniff and P. A. Barnes, Money laundering risk: from the bankers’ and regulators perspectives, 28 Procedia Economics and Finance (2015).
    59. Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H. Dai, X. Chen and H. Wang. (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. Paper presented at the 2017 IEEE international congress on big data (BigData congress).
    （三） 國際組織或政府資料
    1. BIS. (2001). Customer Due Diligence for Banks. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs85.pdf.
    2. BIS. (2019). Investigating the impact of global stablecoins. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/cpmi/publ/d187.pdf.
    3. EBA. (2019). Report with advice for the European Commission. Retrieved from https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/documents/10180/2545547/67493daa-85a8-4429-aa91-e9a5ed880684/EBA%20Report%20on%20crypto%20assets.pdf?retry=1.
    4. European Banking Authority. (July 4, 2014). EBA Opinion on `Virtual Currencies`. Retrieved from https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/documents/10180/657547/81409b94-4222-45d7-ba3b-7deb5863ab57/EBA-Op-2014-08%20Opinion%20on%20Virtual%20Currencies.pdf?retry=1.
    5. European Commision. (2016). Fact and SheetAction Plan to Strengthen the Fight Against Terrorist. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:e6e0de37-ca7c-11e5-a4b5-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format=PDF.
    6. European Commision. (May 5,2022). Study on Embedded Supervision of Decentralised Finance. Retrieved from https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:542418-2022:TEXT:EN:HTML&tabId=1.
    7. European Commission. (Sep. 24, 2020). Digital financial package. Retrieve from https://finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/digital-finance-package_en.
    8. European Parliament. (Jul. 20, 2021). Report on proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets (recast). Retrieve from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0422.
    9. European Parliament. (July 20, 2021). Report on proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets (recast). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0422.
    10. F. F. I. E. C. (FFIEC). (2005). Bank secrecy act anti-money laundering examination manual. Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Retrieved from https://www.ffiec.gov/press/pdf/FFIEC%20BSA-AML%20Exam%20Manual.pdf.
    11. FATF. (2007). Guidance on the Risk-Based Approach to Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing - High Level Principles and Procedures. Retrieved from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/fatfrecommendations/documents/fatfguidanceontherisk-basedapproachtocombatingmoneylaunderingandterroristfinancing-highlevelprinciplesandprocedures.html.
    12. FATF. (2013). National Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risk Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/content/images/National_ML_TF_Risk_Assessment.pdf.
    13. FATF. (2014). Virtual Currencies Key Definitions and Potential AML/CFT Risks. Retrieved from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/Virtual-currency-key-definitions-and-potential-aml-cft-risks.pdf.
    14. FATF. (2015). Guidance for a risk-based approach to virtual currencies. Retrieved from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/Guidance-RBA-Virtual-Currencies.pdf.
    15. FATF. (2020). FATF Report to the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors on So-called Stablecoins. Retrieved from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/Virtual-Assets-FATF-Report-G20-So-Called-Stablecoins.pdf.
    16. FATF. (2020). Second 2-Month Review Of The Revised FATF Standards On Virtual Assets And Virtual Asset Service Providers. Retrieved from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/Second-12-Month-Review-Revised-FATF-Standards-Virtual-Assets-VASPS.pdf.
    17. FATF. (2020). Virtual Assets Red Flag Indicators of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing. Retrieved from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/Virtual-Assets-Red-Flag-Indicators.pdf.
    18. FATF. (2021). International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation. Retrieved from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/pdfs/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.
    19. FATF. (2021). Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers. Retrieved from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/Updated-Guidance-VA-VASP.pdf.
    20. FATF. (2022). Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on Virtual Assets/VASPs. Retrieved from https://www.amlo.moj.gov.tw/media/20211776/targeted-update-implementation-fatf-standards-virtual-assets-vasps.pdf?mediaDL=true.
    21. FATF. (March 2020). Digital identity. Retrieved from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/Guidance-on-Digital-Identity.pdf.
    22. FinCEN. (December 3, 2007). Application of the Definition of Money Services Business to Certain Owner-Operators of Automated Teller Machines Offering Limited Services. Retrieved from https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/guidance/application-definition-money-services-business-certain.
    23. FinCEN. (July 21, 2011). Bank Secrecy Act Regulations – Definitions and Other Regulations Relating to Money Services Businesses. (76 FR 43585). Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2011/07/21/2011-18309/bank-secrecy-act-regulations-definitions-and-other-regulations-relating-to-money-services-businesses.
    24. FinCEN. (March 18, 2013). Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to Persons Administering, Exchanging, or Using Virtual Currencies. (FIN-2013-G001). Retrieved from https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/FIN-2013-G001.pdf.
    25. FinCEN. (March 9, 2021). FinCEN Informs Financial Institutions of Efforts Related to Trade in Antiquities and Art. Retrieved from https://www.skadden.com/-/media/files/publications/2021/04/are-nonfungible-tokens-subject/fn6_fincen-notice-on-antiquities-and-art_508c.pdf.
    26. FinCEN. (May 09, 2019). Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to Certain Business Models Involving Convertible Virtual Currencies. (FIN-2019-G001). Retrieved from https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/guidance/application-fincens-regulations-certain-business-models.
    27. FinCEN. (Oct. 27, 2014). Request for Administrative Ruling on the Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to a Virtual Currency Trading Platform. Retrieved from https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/administrative-rulings/request-administrative-ruling-application-0.
    28. FinCEN. History of Anti-Money Laundering Laws. Retrieve from https://www.fincen.gov/history-anti-money-laundering-laws.
    29. FINMA. (2018). Guidelines for enquiries regarding the regulatory framework for initial coin offerings (ICOs). Retrieved from https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/1bewilligung/fintech/wegleitung-ico.pdf?la=en.
    30. FSB. (2020). regulation, supervision and oversight of global Stablecoin arrangement. Financial Stability Board Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/work905.pdf.
    31. R. Houben and A. Snyers (2018), CRYPTOCURRENCIES AND BLOCKCHAIN. Retrieved from https://blog.elitex.ir/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Cryptocurrencies-and-Blockchain.pdf.
    32. R. Houben and A. Snyers. (2020). Crypto-assets: Key developments, regulatory concerns and responses. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/648779/IPOL_STU(2020)648779_EN.pdf
    33. S. Aramonte, W. Huang and A. Schrimpf. (2021). DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion. BIS Quarterly Review (pp. 21-36).
    34. The White House. (2022). Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/03/09/executive-order-on-ensuring-responsible-development-of-digital-assets/.
    35. U. S. Department of Justice. (2020). 2020 NATIONAL DRUG THREAT ASSESSMENT. Retrieved from https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/2021-02/DIR-008-21%202020%20National%20Drug%20Threat%20Assessment_WEB.pdf.
    36. U. S. Department of State. (2022). Trafficking in Persons Report. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/22-00757-TIP-REPORT_072822-inaccessible.pdf.
    37. U. S. Department of Treasury. (2022). Study of the Facilitation of Money Laundering and Terror Finance Through the Trade in Works of Art. Retrieved from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/Treasury_Study_WoA.pdf.
    38. U. S. Department of Treasury. (October 30, 2020). Advisory and Guidance on Potential Sanctions Risks Arising from Dealings in High-Value Artwork. Retrieved from https://www.skadden.com/-/media/files/publications/2021/04/are-nonfungible-tokens-subject/fn7_ofac_art_advisory_10302020.pdf.
    39. U.S. Department of Jsutice. (September 16, 2022). How To Strengthen International Law Enforcement Cooperation For Detecting, Investigating, And Prosecuting Criminal Activity Related To Digital Assets. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-report-digital-assets-and-launches-nationwide-network.
    40. U.S. Department of Justice. (2020). 2020 National Drug Threat Assessment. Retrieve from https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/2021-02/DIR-008-21%202020%20National%20Drug%20Threat%20Assessment_WEB.pdf.
    41. U.S. Department of Justice. (Aug. 18, 2021). Ohio Resident Pleads Guilty to Operating Darknet-Based Bitcoin ‘Mixer’ That Laundered Over $300 Million. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ohio-resident-pleads-guilty-operating-darknet-based-bitcoin-mixer-laundered-over-300-million.
    42. U.S. Department of Justice. (Feb. 4, 2014). Manhattan U.S. Attorney Announces The Indictment Of Ross Ulbricht, The Creator And Owner Of The “Silk Road” Website. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/manhattan-us-attorney-announces-indictment-ross-ulbricht-creator-and-owner-silk-road.
    43. U.S. Department of Justice. (Feb. 8, 2022). Two Arrested for Alleged Conspiracy to Launder $4.5 Billion in Stolen Cryptocurrency. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/two-arrested-alleged-conspiracy-launder-45-billion-stolen-cryptocurrency.
    44. U.S. Department of Justice. (Nov. 5, 2020). United States Files A Civil Action To Forfeit Cryptocurrency Valued At Over One Billion U.S. Dollars Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndca/pr/united-states-files-civil-action-forfeit-cryptocurrency-valued-over-one-billion-us.
    45. U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2022). Study of the Facilitation of Money Laundering and Terror Finance Through the Trade in Works of Art. Retrieve from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/Treasury_Study_WoA.pdf.
    46. U.S. Department Of The Treasury. (Jul. 7, 2022). Fact Sheet: Framework for International Engagement on Digital Assets. Retrieved from https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0854.
    47. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2021). Additional Information Could Improve Federal Agency Efforts to Counter Human and Drug Trafficking. (GAO-22-105462). Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22-105462.pdf.
    48. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2022.02). Use of Online Marketplaces and Virtual Currencies in Drug and Human Trafficking. (GAO-22-105101). Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22-105101.pdf.
    （四） 網路資源
    1. Amazon, What are Amazon Coins?. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=GWSH56DBKXBNGC8E.
    2. American Bar Association, Derivatives, F. L. Committee, I. D. Products, P. Subcommittee and J. W. Group. (2020). Digital and Digitized Assets: Federal and State Jurisdictional Issues. Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/business_law/buslaw/committees/CL620000pub/digital_assets.pdf.
    3. Andrew Lisa. (May 31, 2022). 10 Major Companies That Accept Bitcoin. Yahoo!finance. Retrieved from https://finance.yahoo.com/news/10-major-companies-accept-bitcoin-160009563.html.
    4. Andy Greenberg. (April 29, 2014). `Dark Wallet` Is About to Make Bitcoin Money Laundering Easier Than Ever, WIRED. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2014/04/dark-wallet/.
    5. Angus Berwick & Tom Wilson. (Jun. 6, 2022). A Reuters Special Report: How crypto giant Binance became a hub for hackers, fraudsters and drug traffickers. Reuter. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/fintech-crypto-binance-dirtymoney.
    6. Binance Research. (Sep. 29, 2020). Spartan Protocol (SPARTA). Retrieve from https://research.binance.com/en/projects/spartan-protocol.
    7. Binance. (Feb. 2, 2022). Introducing BNB Chain: The Evolution of Binance Smart Chain. Retrieve from https://www.binance.com/en/blog/ecosystem/introducing-bnb-chain-the-evolution-of-binance-smart-chain-421499824684903436.
    8. Chainalysis. (2022). The 2022 Crypto Crime Report Original data and research into cryptocurrency-based crime. Retrieved from https://go.chainalysis.com/rs/503-FAP-074/images/Crypto-Crime-Report-2022.pdf.
    9. Cheyenne Ligon, et al. (Nov. 12, 2022). `FTX Has Been Hacked`: Crypto Disaster Worsens as Exchange Sees Mysterious Outflows Exceeding $600M. OINDESK. Retrieved from https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/11/12/ftx-crypto-wallets-see-mysterious-late-night-outflows-totalling-more-than-380m/.
    10. D. Schwartz, N. Youngs and A. Britto. (2018). The Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm. Retrieved from https://ripple.com/files/ripple_consensus_whitepaper.pdf
    11. E. Kim. (2021, September 7). Bitcoin mining consumes 0.5% of all electricity used globally and 7 times Google`s total usage, new report says. Business Insider. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-mining-electricity-usage-more-than-google-2021-9
    12. Eugene Kim.(Sep. 7, 2021). Bitcoin mining consumes 0.5% of all electricity used globally and 7 times Google`s total usage, new report says. BUSINESS INSIDER. Retrieve from https://www.businessinsider.in/investment/news/bitcoin-mining-consumes-0-5-of-all-electricity-used-globally-and-7-times-googles-total-usage-new-report-says/articleshow/85995150.cms.
    13. Guardian staff and agencies. (Oct. 7, 2022). World’s largest crypto exchange hacked with possible losses of $500m. THE GUARDIAN. Retrieve from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/oct/07/binance-crypto-hack-suspended-operations.
    14. Guravais Grigg. (April 12, 2022). Combatting Trafficking With Blockchain Analysis. CHAINALYSIS. Retrieve from https://blog.chainalysis.com/reports/combatting-trafficking-with-blockchain-analysis/.
    15. ISO. (2013). ISO/IEC 29115:2013 Information technology — Security techniques — Entity authentication assurance framework. Retrieve from https://www.iso.org/standard/45138.html.
    16. ISO. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines. Retrieve from https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html.
    17. ISO. (2018). ISO/IEC TS 29003:2018 Information technology — Security techniques — Identity proofing. Retrieve from https://www.iso.org/standard/62290.html.
    18. ISO. (2021). ISO 24366:2021(en) Financial services — Natural person identifier (NPI). Retrieve from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:24366:ed-1:v1:en.
    19. Jack Schickler. (Jul. 5, 2022). NFT Platforms Should Be Subject to Money-Laundering Regulation, EU Lawmakers Say. COINDESK. Retrieve from https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/07/04/nft-platforms-should-be-caught-by-eu-money-laundering-overhaul-lawmakers-say/.
    20. KPMG. Blockchain analytics tools offer new ways to ‘follow the money’ in ransomware cases. Retrieve from https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2021/08/blockchain-analytics-tools-offer-new-ways-to-follow-the-money-in-ransomware-cases.html.
    21. Ledger Insights. (Jul. 5, 2021). Aave to launch KYC-enabled permissioned DeFi for institutions. LEDGER INSIGHT. Retrieve from https://www.ledgerinsights.com/liquidshare-bnp-paribas-euroclear-in-cbdc-trial-for-securities-settlement/.
    22. M. Rauchs, A. Glidden, B. Gordon, G. Pieters, M. Recanatini, F. Rostand, K. Vagneur and B. Zhang. (2018). Distributed Ledger Technology systems: A Conceptual Framework. University of Cambridge. Retrieved from https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2018-10-26-conceptualising-dlt-systems.pdf.
    23. M. Shen. (2021, May 3). Binance Smart Chain`s Spartan Protocol Loses $30M+ in Exploit. CoinDesk. Retrieved from https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2021/05/02/binance-smart-chains-spartan-protocol-loses-30m-in-exploit/
    24. Mikołaj Barczentewicz. (Jul. 26,2022). Why the EU’s Rushed ‘Travel Rule’ for Crypto Should Be Struck Down. COINDESK. Retrieve from https://www.coindesk.com/layer2/2022/07/25/why-the-eus-rushed-travel-rule-for-crypto-should-be-struck-down/.
    25. Nick Szabo. (1994). Smart Contracts. Retrieve from https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart.contracts.html.
    26. Nick Szabo. (1996). Smart Contracts: Building Blocks for Digital Markets. Retrieve from https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart_contracts_2.html.
    27. Notabene. (2022). The State of Crypto Travel Rule Compliance Report. Retrieved from https://notabene.id/state-of-crypto-travel-rule-compliance-report.
    28. Paul Grewal. (Mar. 27, 2022). Making your voice heard ahead of Thursday’s critical EU vote. COINBASE. Retrieve from https://www.coinbase.com/blog/making-your-voice-heard-ahead-of-thursdays-critical-eu-vote.
    29. PWG. (2021). Report on Stablecoins. Retrieved from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/StableCoinReport_Nov1_508.pdf.
    30. S. Nakamoto. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
    31. The Wolfsberg Group. (2022). Wolfsberg Financial Crime Principles for Correspondent Banking. Retrieve from https://www.wolfsberg-principles.com/sites/default/files/wb/Wolfsberg%20Correspondent%20Banking%20Principles%202022.pdf.
    32. The Wolfsberg Group. (May 5, 2021). Wolfs- berg Correspondent Banking Due Diligence Questionnaire. Retrieve from https://www.wolfsberg-principles.com/wolfsbergcb.
    33. Vitalik Buterin (2014), Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. Retrieved from https://ethereum.org/669c9e2e2027310b6b3cdce6e1c52962/Ethereum_White_Paper_-_Buterin_2014.pdf.
    （五） 法院判決
    1. Securities And Exchange Commission (SEC) v. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946).
    2. United States v. Ulbricht, 31 F. Supp. 3d 540, 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).
    二、 中文文獻
    （一） 專書
    1. P. D. Filippi & A. Wright（著），王延川、徐珮菱（譯）（2019），區塊鏈與法律：程式碼之治，元照。
    2. 李傑清，洗錢防制的課題與展望，初版，2006年2月年2月。
    3. 林順益、邱錦添，最新洗錢防制法實用，初版，2019年。
    4. 謝雪妮，〈銀行業防制洗錢及打擊資恐機制實務〉，收於：新洗錢防制法──法令遵循實務分析，頁381-421，台北：元照。
    （二） 期刊論文
    1. 王文宇，虛擬貨幣與智能合約的應用與法律問題，會計研究月刊，第397期，頁95-101，2018年12月。
    2. 王志誠，洗錢防制法之發展趨勢－金融機構執行洗錢防制之實務問題，月旦法學雜誌，第267期，頁5-18，2017年7月。
    3. 王湘衡，近期我國洗錢防制及打擊資恐之進展及趨勢，期貨人，第80期，頁35-37，2021年
    4. 吳盈德，創新金融科技與洗錢防制區是，月旦法學雜誌，第267期，頁19-29，2017年8月。
    5. 林仁光，由兆豐銀案談銀行監理－由銀行治理及銀行保密法之遵循出發，月旦法學雜誌，第259期，頁19-33，2016年12月。
    6. 林盟翔，數位通貨與普惠金融之監理變革──兼論洗錢防制之因應策略，月旦法學雜誌，第267期，頁30-75，2017年8月。
    7. 林漢堂，論金融機構及其從業人員防制洗錢之法律責任──以洗錢防制法第七條、第八條罰則規定之探討為主，成大法學，第18期，頁193-241，2009年12月。
    8. 林繼恆、楊岳平、李鎧如，新興金融科技遭濫用於犯罪之研究，刑事政策與犯罪防治研究，第30期，頁141-202，2021年12月。
    9. 徐珮菱，洗錢防制法治之研究──以區塊鏈及加密數位貨幣為中心，月旦法學雜誌，第288期，頁73-99，2019年5月。
    10. 徐珮菱、高培勛，去中心化金融之法律規範研究──以Defi借貸為核心，高大法學論叢，第16卷第1期，頁185-231，2020年9月。
    11. 郭戎晉，美國區塊鏈與智能契約技術立法之發展與重要問題，月旦法學雜誌，第310期，頁146-163，2021年9月。
    12. 陳家駿，「元宇宙」科技之法律議題初探，Metaverse美麗新世界的來臨？，月旦法學雜誌，第322期，209-223，2022年3月。
    13. 陳麗娟，歐盟洗錢防制法規發展現況之研究，萬國法律，第234期，89-111，2020年12月。
    14. 楊岳平，區塊鏈時代下的證券監管思維挑戰：評金管會最新證券型虛擬通貨監管方案，臺大法學論叢，第48卷，頁1279-1374，2019年11月。
    15. 楊岳平，虛擬通貨的洗錢防制監管疆域與國際標準—評我國「虛擬通貨平台及交易業務事業防制洗錢及打擊資恐辦法」，法律扶助與社會，第9期，頁93-140，2022年9月。
    16. 楊岳平，論非同質化代幣的基本法律關係與消費者保護，台灣法律人，第3期，頁48-62，2021年9月。
    17. 楊岳平，論虛擬通貨之法律定性──以民事法與金融法為中心，月旦法學雜誌，第301期，頁46-63，2020年6月。
    18. 臧正運，區塊鏈運用對金融監理之啟示與挑戰，月旦法學雜誌，第267期，頁136-152，2017年8月。
    19. 臧正運，論密碼資產的興起與金融監理機關之職能變革，月旦法學雜誌，第301期，頁64-85，2020年6月。
    20. 蔡佩玲，國際洗錢防制發展趨勢與我國洗錢防制新法——兼論刑事政策變革，刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊，第14期，頁3-12，2017年10月。
    21. 蔡佩玲，虛擬貨幣與洗錢防制──未知之金流世界交易規則，月旦法學雜誌，第324期，頁132-142，2022年5月。
    22. 蔡佩玲，錢的秩序與遊戲──洗錢防制新法解析，月旦刑事法評論，第4期，頁109-116，2017年3月。
    23. 鄭婷嫻，區塊鏈技術應用於我國公司治理法制之研究，東吳法律學報，第30卷第3期，頁1-43，2019年1月。
    （三） 學位論文
    1. 鄭學豐，我國虛擬通貨事業辦理防制洗錢業務之研究，國立臺灣大學碩士論文，2021。
    （四） 政府資料
    1. 立法院第107卷第95期(4619)上冊公報。
    2. 行政院民國110年4月7日院臺法字第 1100167722 號，行政院公報第27卷第64期。
    3. 行政院洗錢防制辦公室，2021年國家洗錢資恐及資武擴風險評估報告，2022年10月19日。
    4. 金融監督管理委員會，新聞稿，金管會「數位身分認證及授權」主題式監理沙盒及業務試辦之辦理近況，2022年01月18日， https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202207220001&dtable=News，最後瀏覽日：2022年11月15日。
    5. 金融監督管理委員會民國110年9月30日金管銀法字第11002729181號令，行政院公報第27卷第185期。
    6. 劉燕玲，參加防制洗錢金融行動工作組織(FATF)舉辦之「虛擬資產服務提供者(VASP)監理論壇」等會議出國報告，2021年。
    （五） 網路資料
    1. Binance—Academy，什麼是打包代幣？，2021年1月20日，https://academy.binance.com/zt/articles/what-are-wrapped-tokens。
    2. 桑幣筆記，使用混幣器就一定能隱匿蹤跡嗎？開源工具 Tutela 如何破解 Tornado cash 的匿名性，2021年12月30日，https://zombit.info/how-to-crack-tornado-cash-by-open-source-tool-tutela/。
    3. BTM成詐騙轉帳供具 台灣無主管機關，大紀元，2022年3月20日，https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/22/3/20/n13660024.htm。
    4. 蔣永佑，防制虛擬資產犯罪，行政院洗防辦與金管會合辦研討會，中時新聞網，2022年3月23日，https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20220323001470-260402?chdtv。
    5. 陳美君，25台BTM街頭現身 央行示警加密資產詐騙，自由時報，2022年3月27日，https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/3873651。
    6. 李隆揆，詐團買虛擬貨幣洗錢 8人收押，聯合新聞網，2022年3月31日，https://udn.com/news/story/7315/6204469。
    7. 廖珮君，NFT、加密貨幣為何不納管？金管會曝關鍵原因，聯合新聞網，2022年4月11日，https://udn.com/news/story/7239/6231697。
    8. 洪綾襄，幣圈大屠殺 5天蒸發5000億美元市值...全球第三大穩定幣UST崩盤 與LUNA身陷死亡螺旋，2022年5月25日，財訊，https://www.wealth.com.tw/articles/327d3a98-b48b-4430-a354-25e9a19b087a。
    9. 鏈新聞，買「嘟嘟房永恆王NFT」終身停車免煩惱？購買功能型NFT前必知的那些事，2022年7月8日，https://abmedia.io/20220707-things-to-know-before-buying-utility-nft。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法律學系
    108651033
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108651033
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    103301.pdf5144KbAdobe PDF2141View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback