English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114014/145046 (79%)
Visitors : 52062827      Online Users : 768
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143699


    Title: 多元共融對職場平等及經營績效之影響分析—以董事會之性別配額為例
    Gender Quota of Board and Its Impact on Workplace Equality and Management Performance
    Authors: 柯貞羽
    Ke, Jen-Yu
    Contributors: 劉梅君
    柯貞羽
    Ke, Jen-Yu
    Keywords: 多元共融
    董事性別配額
    關鍵多數
    Diversity
    Gender quotas of board
    Critical mass
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-03-09 18:08:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 企業面對日益艱困的經營環境,善用長期被忽略的女性人力資源,更是不容忽視的解決方法之一,雖然女性勞動參與率提升了,但是女性長期職涯發展卻屢屢受到玻璃天花板等影響。北歐諸國已用其自身實證董事會及經營階層性別多元共融可結合各族群生命經驗,達成決策和影響力的平等,更有助於公司治理,可藉由他國經驗反思我國上市公司女性董事比例長期在12%~14%之間,對職場平等和經營成效之關係。
    多元共融職場已是普世價值,從公司治理、關鍵多數和玻璃天花板探討,我國上市公司在讓企業永續經營和企業社會責任之外,董事會之董事性別比例是否具關鍵多數之決策影響力。世界各國透過立法配額制和資訊揭露制,搭配罰鍰、解釋或遵守及建議性質等相關法律效果,已有相當執行成效,我國可以現有規範下,參考他國成效而為未來優化執行之參考。
    透過董事會成員多元共融程度和職場平等及經營成效之間的分析,顯示多元共融的董事會亦有助於職場平等及提升經營成效。為有效提升我國董事會性別多元共融程度,可以透過立法規範及道德勸說,同時提供懲罰及獎勵措施,以促進企業公司治理的成效,進而提升勞工之職場平等。
    Making good use of female human resource is one of solutions to cope with worsening business environment. Although female labor force participation rate has increased, the female career development is still negatively impacted by glass ceiling and so on. Nordic countries provide the evidence that the diversity board help enhance equality in decision-making and bring benefit for corporate governance. This study aims to discuss the relationship between workplace equality and business performance in Taiwan where the percentage of female board director of listed companies has been remained between12% to 14%.
    The diversity workplace has become universal value in which corporate governance、critical mass and glass ceiling gain global attention other than the corporate social responsibility. Literature shows that when female board ratio reaches critical mass, corporate decision-making and performance will be better together with quota system, information disclosure system and legal regulations.
    Through the analysis of listed companies required by the government, this study found that diversity board tends to get better performance. This paper thus suggests legislation and moral persuasion measures be adopted in order to promote the effectiveness of corporate governance and improve workplace equality for workers.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    1.王元章、張眾卓、黃莉盈(2020)。財務報表分析。新陸書局。
    2.Barker, R. (2013)。有效能的董事會 :邁向董事與董事會成功之路 (社團法人中華公司治理協會譯)。中華公司治理協會。(原著出版於2010年)
    3.吳曉江、戴生雷、史予英(2018). 財務報表分析。崧博出版.。
    4.李耀魁.(2019)。財務報表分析寶典。台灣金融研訓院。
    5.張元、王筱瑩(2016)。董事會及高階管理階層的性別多樣性與企業社會責任的關聯。亞太經濟管理評論,20(1),1~44。
    6.張雅安(2021)。董事會性別多元化制度之研究—效益與平等之兼容性,國立政治大學法律學系。
    7.曹淑琳(2019)。 財務報表分析。新文京開發出版。

    二、英文文獻
    1.Adams, & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
    2.Abdul-Jabbar, K. (2020, May 30). Op-Ed: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: Don’t understand the protests? What you’re seeing is people pushed to the edge. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-05-30/dont-understand-the-protests-what-youre-seeing-is-people-pushed-to-the-edge
    3.Bowen, H.R.(1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York: Haper
    4.Carroll, A.B.(1991), The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34, 39-42。
    5.Catalyst. (2007), The Double-Bind Dilemma for Women in Leadership: Damned if You Do, Doomed if You Don’t.
    6.International Labour Office. (2019), Women in Business and Management: The business case, for change. ILO Publishing. https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_700953/lang--en/index.htm
    7.Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a "Critical Mass?". Journal of business ethics, 118(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
    8.Kanter, R. M. (1993). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
    9.Nili, Y. (2019). Beyond The Numbers: Substantive Gender Diversity In Boardrooms. Indiana law journal (Bloomington), 94(1), 145-202.
    10.Nygaard, K. (2011). Forced board changes : evidence from Norway. In: Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration. Department of Economics.
    11.Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2015), G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD Publishing. Paris
    12.Palá-Laguna, R., & Esteban-Salvador, L. (2016). Gender Quota for Boards of Corporations in Spain. European Business Organization Law Review, 17(3), 379-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-016-0047-x
    13.Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Green, J. L. (2006). The International Women`s Movement and Women`s Political Representation, 1893-2003. American sociological review, 71(6), 898-920. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100602
    14.Saxena, A. (2014).Workforce Diversity: A Key to Improve Productivity, Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 76~85.
    15.Schein, V.E. & Davidson, M.J. (1993), "THINK MANAGER, THINK MALE", Management Development Review, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000000738
    16.Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior / Thomas C. Schelling (1st ed.). Norton.
    17.Singh, V., & Vinnicombe, S. (2004). Why So Few Women Directors in Top UK Boardrooms? Evidence and Theoretical Explanations. Corporate governance : an international review, 12(4), 479-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00388.x
    18.Williams,J. (2004), Hitting the Maternal Wall, DOI:110.2307/40252700
    19.Williams, N. (2022). Making Mandates Last: Increasing Female Representation on Corporate Boards in the U.S. Michigan journal of gender & law, 29(29.2), 211-241. https://doi.org/10.36641/mjgl.29.2.making
    20.Wirth, L. (2001), Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Women in Management, International Labor Office, Geneva
    21.World Economic Forum, (2018), The Global Gender Gap Report, https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-gender-gap-report-2018

    三、網路文獻
    1.30% Club, https://30percentclub.org/ (Last Visit 2023/2/15)
    2.California Legislative Information, S. B. No.826, https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB826
    3.Catalyst, https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-on-corporate-boards/, (Last Visit 2022/12/21)
    4.Cranfield University, The Female FTSE Board Report 2022, https://www.cranfield.ac.uk/femaleftseboardreport, (Last Visit 2023/2/15)
    5.Fournier, C. (2017, Septermber, 22). 6 arguments for more gender equality at work. Youmatter. https://youmatter.world/en/equality-men-women-work-performances/
    6.FRC, Corporate Governance Code, https://www.frc.org.uk/directors/corporate-governance/uk-corporate-governance-code#current-edition (Last Visit 2023/2/15)
    7.Hinchliffe, E. (2022, August 3), Female CEOs run just 4.8% of the world’s largest businesses on the Global 500. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2022/08/03/female-ceos-global-500-thyssenkrupp-martina-merz-cvs-karen-lynch/ (Last Visit 2022/12/21)
    8.Mondaq, Germany: Statutory Quotas For Female Board And Management Representation In Germany: What`s The Current Status?, https://www.mondaq.com/germany/corporate-and-company-law/962910/statutory-quotas-for-female-board-and-management-representation-in-germany-what39s-the-current-status
    9.Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act, https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1997-06-13-45?q=lov%20om%20allmennaksjeselskaper
    10.Security Exchange Committee, Proxy Disclosure Enhancements, https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2009/33-9089.pdf
    11.Tan, S.A.(2020/3/17), More women on boards of listed companies in Singapore, The Straits Times, https://www.straitstimes.com/business/companies-markets/more-women-on-boards-of-listed-companies-in-singapore
    12.中華公司治理協會,https://www.cga.org.tw/main/default.aspx
    13.行政院性別平等會,性別平等政策綱領,https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/FD420B6572C922EA (最後瀏覽日:2022/11/8)
    14.吳思華(2009)。不確定時代的經營策略。EMBA世界經理文摘。https://web.archive.org/web/20081009170019/http://www.emba.com.tw/emba/speech/142-1.htm
    15.金融監督管理委員會。金融監督管理委員會性別平等推動計畫(111至114年)。https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=674&parentpath=0,7,446 (最後瀏覽日:2023/2/10)
    16.財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會公司治理評鑑資料專區。https://webline.sfi.org.tw/CGE/index.asp (最後瀏覽日:22023/2/11)
    17.教育部統計處,學校名錄及相關資訊/學校基本統計資/歷年度資料(81至90學年度), https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96&s=AFE143A7065D4F3C, (最後瀏覽日:2022/6/15)
    18.臺灣證券交易所公司治理中心, https://cgc.twse.com.tw/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    勞工研究所
    106262017
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106262017
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[勞工研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    201701.pdf2724KbAdobe PDF2246View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback