English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51718028      Online Users : 603
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143236


    Title: 文化哲學的模型--論文化類型學差異的語言世界觀相對性基礎
    A Model of Cultural Philosophy - On the Basis of Linguistic Worldview Relativity in Cultural Typological Differences
    Authors: 林遠澤
    Lin, Yuan-Tse
    Contributors: 政治大學哲學學報
    Keywords: 文化哲學;民族心理學;符號形式哲學;內在語言形式;語言相對性原則
    philosophy of culture;ethnopsychology;philosophy of symbolic forms;intrinsic linguistic form;principle of linguistic relativity
    Date: 2023-01
    Issue Date: 2023-02-06 09:11:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 世界各民族的文化表現千差萬別，各種文化的表現型態對於人類自身發展的意義何在，應是一個非常值得哲學加以關注的議題。但很可惜的是，在目前有關文化哲學的研究領域、研究方法與理論基礎，卻都還缺乏明確的界定與奠基。本文雖沒有意圖要為此提出一種文化哲學的理論建構，但卻主張至少應先能為具有文化類型學差異的文化哲學研究，提出可能的理論研究模型與類型學差異之可區分性的基礎。為此之故，本文將以洪堡特的語言哲學為基礎，首先透過馮特的「民族心理學」與卡西勒的「符號形式哲學」，探討文化哲學至少應當包含有的三個問題層次及其相應的研究領域；其次，我將透過史坦塔爾對於「內在語言形式」與博厄斯等人對於「語言相對性原則」的研究，來說明吾人能對文化差異進行類型學區分的語言哲學基礎。以求最終能為中國文化的文化哲學研究，提供一個可能的開展方向。
    The cultural expressions of the world’s peoples vary greatly, and the significance of various cultural expressions for human development should be a topic worthy of philosophical attention. Unfortunately, the field of study, research methods, and theoretical foundations of cultural philosophy are not clearly defined and grounded. Although this paper does not attempt to propose a theoretical construct for cultural philosophy, it does argue that at least a possible theoretical research model and a basis for typological differentiation of cultural philosophical research should be proposed first. For this reason, this paper will use Humboldt’s philosophy of language as a basis, firstly, to explore at least three theoretical levels of cultural philosophy and their corresponding fields of study through Wundt’s “ethnopsychology” and Cassirer’s “philosophy of symbolic forms”; secondly, through Steinthal’s study of “intrinsic linguistic forms” and Boasian study of “the principle of linguistic relativity”, I will illustrate the linguistic-philosophical basis on which we can make typological distinctions between cultural differences. The aim is to provide a possible direction for the philosophical study of Chinese culture.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 49, 135-165
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202301_(49).0004
    DOI: 10.30393/TNCUP.202301_(49).0004
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文
    [哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    49-4.pdf841KbAdobe PDF2180View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback