政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142880

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142880

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51739299 在线人数 : 573

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 國際經營與貿易學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/142880

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142880

题名:	論以國際投資法保障虛擬資產之可行性 The Possibility of Safeguarding Cryptoassets Through International Investment Law
作者:	王郁婷 Wang, Yu-Ting
贡献者:	薛景文 Hsueh, Ching-Wen 王郁婷 Wang, Yu-Ting
关键词:	國際投資法虛擬資產區塊鏈涵蓋投資投資地主國 International Investment Law Cryptoassets Blockchain Covered Investment Host State
日期:	2022
上传时间:	2023-01-05 15:15:37 (UTC+8)
摘要:	虛擬資產於2008年中本聰發表區塊鏈論文後開始蓬勃發展，目前可被大致區分為支付型代幣、功能型代幣、證券型代幣及NFT，各型態具有其各自之特性。虛擬資產的蓬勃發展，加上其存在於無遠弗屆之網路上，進行投資相對容易，因此虛擬資產的跨國投資相繼出現。另一方面，虛擬資產的蓬勃發展也引起各國之關注，各國之監理機關近年來逐步對虛擬資產進行監管，雖監管規範尚在演進中，各國之監管力度及方式亦有所差異，然仍不排除對進行虛擬資產的投資人產生不利影響，造成其損害之可能性。此時對於進行跨國虛擬資產投資之投資人，即產生是否得以國際投資法主張相關保障之問題。惟虛擬資產係奠基於區塊鏈技術上，而區塊鏈技術之使用使虛擬資產產生不同於傳統投資資產，具備不具實體性、匿名性等特性，可能造成認定上的困難，且身為新型態之資產是否能被國際投資法下各國間所簽訂的投資保障協定所涵蓋亦產生疑問。一般而言，投資人若欲主張透過投資保障協定保障其投資，該投資必須是投資保障協定中所欲保障之涵蓋投資，且投資人必須證明其為該投資之投資人，及該投資發生於投資人所欲主張之投資地主國。然而，投資保障協定之涵蓋投資多未直接載明包含虛擬資產，且匿名並存在於網路上不具實體之虛擬資產，該如何認定投資人，及如何認定發生於何國境內皆產生疑問。本文認為，透過投資協定中對於涵蓋投資定義的用語，及仲裁庭過往對於投資之認定標準，虛擬資產可能被認為屬於投資類型之一。另一方面，投資人之身分則可透過所持有的公私鑰被清楚的判定。而在投資發生地認定上，雖虛擬資產不具實體性，但根據過往仲裁庭之認定，基於投資的不同類型，即使投資完全未發生實體於地主國內，仍可能透過投資資金之流向以認定投資發生國。本文透過採用資本最終用途之判斷標準，認為無實體呈現之虛擬資產應以其投資人所投資資本的最終用途認定投資發生地。最後本文根據通篇之論述，認為虛擬資產是可能落入投資協定之保障範圍內，投資人也可能主張透過投資協定各類的實體規範，尋求投資協定所給予之權益。惟僅限於功能型及證券型代幣類型之虛擬資產，支付型與NFT類型者則由於投資發生地的認定困難，投資人將較難以主張投資協定之保護。 Cryptoassets began to flourish after Satoshi Nakamoto published a blockchain paper in 2008. At present, they can be roughly divided into four categories, payment tokens, utility tokens, security tokens, and NFTs, each of which has their own characteristics. With the vigorous development of cryptoassets, coupled with their existence on the far-reaching network, it is relatively easy to invest, so cross-border investment in cryptoassets has emerged one after another. On the other hand, the vigorous development of cryptoassets has also attracted the attention of various countries. In recent years, supervisory agencies in various countries have gradually supervised cryptoassets. The development of all may have an adverse impact on investors who conduct cryptoassets and cause their damage. At this time, for investors who invest in cross-border cryptoassets, the question of whether they can claim relevant protection under international investment laws arises. However, cryptoassets are based on blockchain technology, and the use of blockchain technology makes cryptoassets different from traditional investment assets, with characteristics such as non-physical and anonymous, which may cause difficulties in identification, and as a new it is also questionable whether certain types of assets can be covered by investment agreements signed between countries under international investment law. Generally speaking, if an investor wants to claim protection of his investment through an investment protection agreement, the investment must be covered by the investment agreement, and the investor must prove that he is the investor of the investment, furthermore, the investment must take place in a host country that the investor wants to claim. In fact, most of the investments covered by the investment agreement do not directly specify that they include cryptoassets, and on the other hand that cryptoassets are anonymous and exist on the Internet without physical assets. As a result, how to identify the investor and the country in which it occurred are questions. This article believes that cryptoassets may be considered as one of the types of investment through the terms of the definition of investment in the investment agreement, and the arbitral tribunal’s past identification criteria for investment. On the other hand, the identity of investors can be clearly determined through the public and private keys they hold. In terms of the identification of the place where the investment occurred, although cryptoassets are non-physicial, according to previous arbitral tribunals’ determination, even if the investment has not occurred in the landlord of the country, it is still possible to identify that there is an investment occurring in the country through the flow of investment funds. By adopting the criteria for judging the end use of capital, this paper argues that the place of investment should be determined based on the end use of the capital invested by investors for cryptoassets. Finally, based on the discussion throughout the article, this article believes that cryptoassets may fall within the protection scope of international investment law, and investors may also advocate seeking the rights and interests granted by investment agreements through various substantive regulations in investment agreements. However, it is limited to cryptoassets of utility and security token types, and for payment and NFT types, they will be more difficult for investors to claim the protection of investment agreements due to the difficulty in identifying the place where the investment takes place.
參考文獻:	中文參考文獻書籍丘宏達，現代國際法，修訂三版，陳純一修訂，2012年9月。劉鐵錚、陳榮傳，國際私法論，修訂五版，2010年9月。期刊呂嘉穎，初探區塊鏈之不可竄改特性、匿名性所衍生的法律問題，交大法學評論，弟6期，頁41（2020）。李宜雯、黃曉瑩、周玉娟，我國對證券行代幣發行、交易即平台監理之規劃方向，證券暨期貨月刊，第37卷第11期（2019年11月6日）。李顯儀，探究虛擬貨幣即去中心化金融的發展演變，貨幣觀測與信用評等（2021年5月）。郭戎晉，從NFT藝術品探討非同質化代幣於著作權法之適用，科技法學論叢，第17期，2021年12月，頁126-127。黃齡玉，NFT 之著作權相關問題初探（上），司法周刊，第2079期，2021年。黃齡玉，NFT 之著作權相關問題初探（中），司法周刊，第2080期，2021年。黃齡玉，由歐盟委員會發布關於加密資產及歐盟2019/1937指令之立法提案及修正建議（MICA）談臺灣關於虛擬通貨之監管方向，全國律師法學論述，第26卷第2期，頁58-74，2022年。楊岳平，解密非同質化代幣—NFT熱潮的機制與風險，當代法律，4期，2022年4月，頁8-13。楊岳平，論虛擬通貨之法律定性－以民事法與金融法為中心，月旦法學雜誌，301期，頁43-63（2020年6月）。論文劉心國，加密貨幣區塊練管制措施於WTO協定之適法性分析—以中國法制為中心，國立政治大學，國際經營與貿易學系碩士學位論文，2020年。政府、機構報告中央銀行，虛擬通貨近期發展國際監管概況，存款保險資訊季刊，第34卷第2期。比特幣並非貨幣接受者務請注意風險承擔問題，中央銀行、金融監督管理委員會，2013年12月30日。具證券性質之虛擬通貨業務(STO)簡介，證券櫃檯買賣中心，https://www.tpex.org.tw/web/STO/index.php?l=zh-tw 金管會進一步放寬證券型虛擬通貨發行(Security Token Offering, STO)相關規範，金管會，https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202201200002&aplistdn=ou=news,ou=multisite,ou=chinese,ou=ap_root,o=fsc,c=tw&dtable=News，2022年1月2日。金管會對「證券型代幣發行(Security Token Offering, STO) 相關規範」之說明，金融監督管理委員會，https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=201906270004&aplistdn=ou=news,ou=multisite,ou=chinese,ou=ap_root,o=fsc,c=tw&dtable=News （2019年6月27日）。發布核定具證券性質之虛擬通貨為證券交易法所稱之有價證券之令。(金管證發字第1080321164號)，金管會，https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=128&parentpath=0,3&mcustomize=lawnew_view.jsp&dataserno=201907030002&aplistdn=ou=newlaw,ou=chlaw,ou=ap_root,o=fsc,c=tw&dtable=NewsLaw （2019年7月3日）。新聞稿，中央銀行、金融監督管理委員會，比特幣並非貨幣，接受者務請注意風險承擔問題，2013年12月30日穩定幣的發行原理與潛在影響結案報告書，財團法人台北外匯市場發展基金會（2021年12月20日）。網路資料 James，中國政府清整NFT！福建省發函：禁NFT交易、交易所開展相關業務，Blocktempo，https://www.blocktempo.com/fujian-takes-the-lead-in-banning-nft-transactions/ （2022年6月12）。人民银行：中国境内比特币交易量全球占比从90%以上下降至10%，人民網，http://finance.people.com.cn/n1/2022/0303/c1004-32365404.html （2022年3月3日）。人民银行等五部委发布关于防范比特币风险的通知，中华人民共和国中央人民政府，http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2013-12/05/content_2542751.htm （2013年12月5日）。中央銀行，DeFi及NFT之發展與風險議題，貨幣金融知識專區，https://knowledge.cbc.gov.tw/front/references/inpage/BA301D07-17ED-EC11-8153-2C44FD83FB49 （2022年6月16日）。中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会令，第49號，国家发展改革委关于修改《产业结构调整指导目录（2019 年本）》的决定，https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/fzggwl/202201/t20220110_1311640.html?code=&state=123，2021年12月30日中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会令第29號，产业结构调整指导目录（2019年本），http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2020/content_5467513.htm，2019年10月30日。中国人民银行、中央网信办、工业和信息化部、工商总局、银监会、证监会、保监会关于防范代币发行融资风险的公告，律商网，https://hk.lexiscn.com/law/content.php?content_type=T&origin_id=3135351&provider_id=1&isEnglish=N （2017年9月4日）。王國臣，中共積極整治虛擬貨幣之政經意涵，財團法人海峽交流基金會，https://www.sef.org.tw/article-1-129-13272 （2022年4月8日）。央行等七部委联合叫停ICO：涉嫌扰乱金融秩序应立即清退，中国网财经，http://finance.china.com.cn/news/20170904/4378185.shtml （2017年9月4日）。吳穎昌，證券型代幣公開發行(Security Token Offering, STO)於我國與國外之發展，月旦會計財稅網，http://www.angle.com.tw/accounting/current/post.aspx?ipost=3718（2019年6月24日）。英格蘭銀行行長：比特幣沒有內在價值，也不是一種實用的支付方式，鉅亨，https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/4877588（2022年5月24日）。范晏儒，何謂「證券型代幣發行（STO）」？，https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?no=64&tp=1&d=8176 （2019年1月）。陳美君，不能吃的魷魚幣暗藏詐騙風險央行：有人傾家蕩產，聯合新聞網，https://udn.com/news/story/7239/5866849（2021年11月4日）。漢克，為什麼各國央行都想發行數位貨幣（CBDC）？這跟存在銀行的現金有什麼不一樣？，關鍵評論，https://www.thenewslens.com/article/166734/fullpage （2022年5月16日）。蘇思云，楊金龍：央行數位貨幣與電子支付是互補關係，中央通訊社，https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/202206290390.aspx （2022年6月29日）。英文參考文獻書籍 Davies, Glyn, A History of Money: From Ancient Times to Modern Day (3d ed. 2002). Dolzer, Rudolf & Schreuer, Christoph, Principle of International Investment Law, Oxford University Press, 2nd eds, 2012. Mankiw, N. Gregory, Principles of Macroeconomics 643 (5th ed. 2008). 期刊 Agarwal, Aasbna & Bajpai, Ananya, Status of Cryptocurrencies under Investment Law: Not so Cryptic?, INDIAN JOURNAL OF ARBITRATION LAW (2019). Beck, Roman, Beyond Bitcoin: The Rise of Blockchain World, NBER WORKING PAPER NO. 19747 (2018). Bick. Jonathan, All Digital Assets are not Legally Equal, L.J. NEWSLETTERS (Nov., 2017). Chaisse, Julien & Bauer, Cristen, Cybersecurity and the Protection of Digital Assets: Assessing the Role of International Investment Law and Arbitration, 21(3) VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF ENTERTAINMENT & TECHNOLOGY LAW (2019). Chakravarty, Aveek, Challenges to the Assessment of Damages Claims Involving Crypto-Assets in Investment Arbitration, Global Jurist, July 2020. Collins, David, Applying the Full Protection and Security Standard of International Investment Law to Digital Assets, 12 J. WORLD INV. & TRADE 225. Douglas, Zachary, Property, Investment, and the Scope of Investment Protection Obligations (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014) 363. Engfeldt, Helena Jung, Should ICSID Go Gangnam Style in Light of Non-traditional Foreign Investments Including Those Spurred on by Social Media? Applying an Industry-Specific Lens to the Salini Test to Determine Article 25 Jurisdiction, 32 Berkeley J. Int`l L. 44 (2014). Engfeldt, Helena Jung, Should ICSID Go Gangnam Style in Light of Non-Traditional Foreign Investments Including Those Spurred on by Social Media? Applying an Industry-Specific Lens to the Salini Test to Determine Article 25 Jurisdiction, 32(1) BERKELEY JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW (BJIL), 2014. Ginsburg, Robert, Investor-State Dispute Settlement in The Digital Economy: The Case for Structured Proportionality, 39 NW. J. INT`L L. & BUS. 171 (2019). Grabowski, Alex, The Definition of Investment under the ICSID Convention: A Denfense of Salini, 15(9) CHICAGO JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. Howell, Sabrina T, Niessner, Marina & Yermack, DAVID, INITIAL COIN OFFERINGS: FINANCING GROWTH WITH CRYPTOCURRENCY TOKEN SALES, NBER WORKING PAPERS NO. 24774, Sept. 2020. Jean Bacon, Johan David Michels, Christopher Millard & Jatinder Singh, Blockchain Demystified: A Technical and Legal Introduction to Distributed and Centralised Ledgers, 268 QUEEN MARY SCHOOL OF LAW LEGAL STUDIES RESEARCH 4, 5 (2017). Knahr, Christina, Investments ‘In The Territory’ of the Host State, in International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Christina Binder, Ursula Kriebaum, August Reinisch & Stephan Wittich, Oxford University Press, May 21, 2009. Lipton, Alexander, Sardon, Aetienne, Fabian, Schär & Schüpbach, Christian, From Tether to Libra: Stablecoins, 2 DIGITAL CURRENCY, AND THE FUTURE OF MONEY (2020). Marchant, Gary, Jain, Jalaj, Muse, Oluwasegun & Chandra, Sayan, International Governance of Cryptoassets: Whether, Why, What and Who?, 53 Int`l Law. 417 (2020). Miller, Neil Q., Stebbing, Holly & Ibrahimov, Ayaz, Precedent in Investment Treaty Arbitration, in International Arbitration Report 10, 10-12 (2017). Monrat, Ahmed Afif, Schelén, Olov & Andersson, Karl, A Survey of Blockchain From the Perspectives of Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities, 7 IEEE ACCESS, 2019. Morelli, Alessandro & Pollicino, Oreste, Metaphors, Judicial Frames, And Fundamental Rights in Cyberspace, 68 AM. J. COMP. L. 616 (2020). Nakamoto, Satoshi, Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008). Oxman, Bernard H., Jurisdiction of States, 10 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (2007). ROSENFELD, MENI, OVERVIEW OF COLORED COINS (Dec. 4, 2012). Schefer, Krista Nadakavukaren, International Investment Law: Text, Cases and Materials 69 (2d ed. 2016). Shackelford, Scott J., Richards, Eric L., Raymond, Anjanette H., & Craig, Amanda N., Using BITs to Protect Bytes: Promoting Cyber Peace by Safeguarding Trade Secrets Through Bilateral Investment Treaties, American Business Law Journal 2015. Sornarajah, M., The International Law on Foreign Investment, Cambridge University Press 15 (4th ed. 2017). Stabile, Daniel T., Prior, Kimberly A., Hinkes, Andrew M., Digital Assets and Blockchain Technology: U.S. Law and Regulation, Edward Elgar Publishing (2020). Staker, Christopher, Jurisdiction, in Malcolm D Evans, ed, International Law, 2nd ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). Swan, Melanie, Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy, 2015. Waibel, Michael, Investment Arbitration: Jurisdiction and Admissibility, (University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 9, 2014). Yermack, David, Is Bitcoin a Real Currency?An Economic Appraisal, Handbook of Digital Currency (2015). Zheng, Christopher R., The Territoriality Requirement in Investment Treaties: A Constraint on Jurisdictional Expansionism, SINGAPORE LAW REVIEW 34: 139 (2016). Zheng, Zibin, Dai, Hong-Ning & Xie, Shaoan et al., 14(4) Blockchain Challenges and Opportunities: A Survey, INT. J. WEB AND GRID SERVICES, 2018. 政府、機構報告 Allen, Jason G, Wells, Henry & Mauer, Marco, Cryptoassets in Private Law: Emerging Trends and Open Questions from the First 10 Years, SMU Centre for AI & Data Governance Research Paper No. 06/2022 (Aug. 1, 2022). Annex1--Legal Qualification of Crypto-Assets – Survey to NCAs, European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA 50-157-1384, https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma50-157-1384_annex.pdf (2019). Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to Certain Business Models Involving Convertible Virtual Currencies, FIN-2019-G001 (May 9, 2019). Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to Persons Administering, Exchanger, or Using Virtual Currencies, FINCEN, FIN-2013-G001 (Mar. 18, 2013). Deloitte, Are Token Asset the Securities of Tomorrow?, Feb. 2019. EBA Report, Report with Advice for the European Commission on Crypto-Assets, https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/documents/10180/2545547/67493daa-85a8-4429-aa91-e9a5ed880684/EBA%20Report%20on%20crypto%20assets.pdf?retry=1 (Jan. 9, 2019). ESMA, Advice-Initial Coin Offerings and Crypto-Assets, ESMA50-157-1391 (Jan. 9, 2019) Her Majesty`s Treasury, Financial Conduct Authority & Bank of England, Cryptoassets Taskforce: Final Report (Oct. 2018). IMF, Virtual Currencies and Beyond: Initial Considerations, IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/16/03 (Jan. 2016). Irish Tax and Customs, Taxation of Crypto-Assets Transactions, Part 02-01-0, https://www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/tdm/income-tax-capital-gains-tax-corporation-tax/part-02/02-01-03.pdf (Apr. 2022). Monetary Authority of Singapore, A Guide to Digital Token Offerings (Nov. 30, 2018). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Information Accompanying Transfers of Funds and Certain Crypto-Assets (Recast), COM/2021/422 final, July 20, 2021. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937, COM/2020/593 final, Sept. 24, 2020. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority [FINMA], Guidelines for Enquiries Regarding the Regulatory Framework for initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) (Feb. 16, 2018). U.N. Conference on Trade and Dev. [UNCTAD], UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II: Scope and Definitions, at 24, U.N. Sales No. 11.II.D.9 (2011). Virtual Assets Red Flag Indicators of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing, FATF, https://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/methodsandtrends/documents/virtual-assets-red-flag-indicators.html (Sept. 14, 2021). World Investment Report 2022, UNCTAD Doc. UNCTAD/WIR/2022. 論文 Aljasim, Hesham Ali, Cryptocurrencies as Protected Investments under Bilateral Investment Treaties: Is There A BIT of Coin Protection?, Master Programme in Investment Treaty Arbitration Master’s Thesis 15 ECT, Spring 2021. Carter, Nic, A Cross-Sectional Overview of Cryptoasset Governance and Implications for Investors (2017) (unpulished MSc Thesis, University of Edinburch). Matsuura, Soma, Territorial Limitations of Investment-- What are the Relevant Considerations Involved in Setting out the Territorial Limitations to Investment in Investment Treaties?, Master Programme in Investment Treaty Arbitration Master’s Thesis 15 ECTS (2017). 判決文件 Abaclat and Others v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5 (formerly Giovanna a Beccara and Others v. The Argentine Republic), Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility. AES Corporation v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/17, Decision on Jurisdiction, Apr. 26, 2005. Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.S. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29. Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008. Ceskoslovenska Obchodni Banka, A.S. v. The Slovak Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/4, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, May 24, 1999. CFTC v. McDonnell and Cabbagetech, Corp., Memorandum & Order https://www.cftc.gov/sites/default/files/idc/groups/public/@lrenforcementactions/documents/legalpleading/enfcoindroporder030618.pdf (Mar. 6, 2018). Coinflip, Inc., d/b/a Derivabit, and Francisco Riordan, Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 6(C) And 6(D) of the Commodity Exchange Act, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions, CFTC Docket No. 15-29, https://www.cftc.gov/sites/default/files/idc/groups/public/@lrenforcementactions/documents/legalpleading/enfcoinfliprorder09172015.pdf. Consortium Groupement L.E.S.I.- DIPENTA v. République Algérienne Démocratique et Populaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/08, Award, Jan. 10, 2005. Fedax N.V. v. The Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3, 11, July, 37 ILM, Decision on Jurisdiction, (1998). In the Matter of Coburn, Order Instituting Cease-and0Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order, https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/34-84553.pdf (Nov. 8, 2018). In the Matter of TokenLot LLC, Kugel & LeWitt, Order Instituting Administrative Cease and Desist Proceedings, https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/33-10543.pdf (Sept. 11, 2018). Jan de Nul N.V. and Dredging International N.V. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, June 16, 2006. Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The DAO, No. 81207 July 25, 2017. Saba Fakes v. The Republic of Turkey; Victor Pey Casado and President Allan Fosk Kaplun v. The Public of Chile, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/2, Award, May 8, 2008. Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v. Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.,328 U.S. 293 [1946]. SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, Aug. 6, 2003. SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6, Decision on Jurisdiction, para. 102 (Jan. 29, 2004). 網路資料 Belsie, Laurent, El Salvador’s Experiment with Bitcoin as Legal Tender, NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC REASEARCH, https://www.nber.org/digest/202207/el-salvadors-experiment-bitcoin-legal-tender (July 2022). Brush, Kate, Rosencrance, Linda & Cobb, Michael, Asymmetric Cryptography (Public Key Cryptography), SEARCHSECURITY, https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/asymmetric-cryptography (Sept., 2021). Chakravarty, Aveek, Challenges to the Assessment of Damages Claims Involving Crypto-Assets in Investment Arbitration, GLOBAL JURIST, https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/gj-2019-0044/html (July 2020). Chojecki, Sarah, Lindmark, Fredrik, Rivas, Jose Antonio & Alonso, Munia El Harti, Washington Arbitration Week: Using BITs to Protect Cryptocurrency Investments?, KLUWER ARBITRATION BLOG, (Mar. 3, 2022) http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2022/03/03/washington-arbitration-week-using-bits-to-protect-cryptocurrency-investments/. Cryptocurrencies: Tracing the Evolution of Criminal Finances, EUROPOL, https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-events/publications/cryptocurrencies-tracing-evolution-of-criminal-finances (Jan. 27, 2022). Duffy, Clare, Facebook`s Dream of Creating Its Own Global Cryptocurrency Officially Comes to an End, CNN, https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/01/tech/facebook-diem-association-dissolving/index.html (Feb. 1, 2022). EU Opens Door for Cryptocurrency Exchanges to Apply AML Rules, LINKLATERS, https://www.linklaters.com/en/insights/blogs/fintechlinks/2018/june/eu-opens-door-for-cryptocurrency-exchanges-to-apply-aml-rules EU Parliament Drops Crypto Mining Ban from MiCA Draft, SYGNA, https://www.sygna.io/blog/eu-parliament-drops-mica-bitcoin-mining-ban/. EU’s Transfer of Funds Regulation (TFR) Brings Crypto Travel Rule for All CASP Transactions, https://www.sygna.io/zh-hant/blog/eu-transfer-of-funds-regulation-tfr-crypto-travel-rule/. FinTech Action Plan: For a More Competitive and Innovative European Financial Sector, European Commission, https://finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/fintech-action-plan-more-competitive-and-innovative-european-financial-sector_en (Mar. 8, 2018). Fyock, Claiton, Certain Duration, JUS MUNDI, https://jusmundi.com/en/document/publication/en-certain-duration (June 2, 2022). Hajjar, Alamira Jouman, Guide to MiCA & TFR: How Crypto Regulations Affect Businesses, MEDIUM, https://medium.com/frctls/guide-to-mica-tfr-how-crypto-regulations-affect-businesses-f5ca050f266 (Oct. 3, 2022). Hayes, Adam, Who Is Satoshi Nakamoto?, INVESTOPEDIA, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/satoshi-nakamoto.asp (Sept. 25, 2022). Hofmarcher, Dominik, Tokenized Copyrights: Linking an NFT to a Copyright Licence, SCHÖNHERR, https://www.schoenherr.eu/content/tokenizedcopyrights-linking-an-nft-to-a-copyright-licence/ (May 26, 2021). How to Work Out and Report CGT on Crypto, AUSTRALIA TAXATION OFFICE, https://www.ato.gov.au/individuals/Investments-and-assets/crypto-asset-investments/how-to-work-out-and-report-cgt-on-crypto/ (last visited Nov. 3, 2022). Kaur, Japsimran, Understanding the Pros and Cons of Crypto Mining, TECHGIG, https://content.techgig.com/technology-unplugged/understanding-the-pros-and-cons-of-crypto-mining/articleshow/89497097.cms (Feb. 12, 2022). Matt Robinson, SEC Scrutinizes NFT Market Over Illegal Crypto Token Offerings, BLOOMBERG, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-02/sec-scrutinizes-nft-market-over-illegal-crypto-token-offerings (Mar. 3, 2022). McCarthy, Sean & Nappert, Sophie, The Impending Binance Arbitration: a Primer on the World of Cryptocurrencies, Derivatives Trading and Decentralised Finance on the Blockchain, KLUWER ARBITRATION BLOG, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/10/13/the-impending-binance-arbitration-a-primer-on-the-world-of-cryptocurrencies-derivatives-trading-and-decentralised-finance-on-the-blockchain/. Monaco, Forbes, First African Country Adopts Bitcoin Currency, FORBES, https://forbes.mc/article/first-african-country-adopt-bitcoin-legal-currency-central-african-republic (Apr. 23, 2022). Pérez, Santiago & Ostroff, Caitlin, El Salvador Becomes First Country to Adopt Bitcoin as National Currency, WORLD STREET JOURNAL, https://www.wsj.com/articles/bitcoin-comes-to-el-salvador-first-country-to-adopt-crypto-as-national-currency-11631005200 (Sept. 7, 2021). Press Release, CFTC Wins Trial against Virtual Currency, Fraudsterhttps://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/7774-18 (Aug. 24, 2018). Press Release, Digital Finance: Agreement Reached on European Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), Council of the EU, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/06/30/digital-finance-agreement-reached-on-european-crypto-assets-regulation-mica/ (June 30, 2022). Public Statements & Remarks, Testimony of Chairman Timothy Massad before the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry, CFTC, https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/opamassad-6 (Dec. 10, 2014). Ray, Shaan, The Difference Between Blockchains & Distributed Ledger Technology, TOWARDS DATA SCIENCE, https://towardsdatascience.com/the-difference-between-blockchains-distributed-ledger-technology-42715a0fa92 (Feb. 20, 2018). Renteria, Nelson, Wilson, Tom & Strohecker, Karin, In A World First, El Salvador Makes Bitcoin Legal Tender, REUTERS, https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/el-salvador-approves-first-law-bitcoin-legal-tender-2021-06-09/ (June 10, 2021). Sebastian Sinclair, EU to Require Exchanges to Identify Most Crypto Transactions, BLOCKWORKS, https://blockworks.co/eu-to-require-exchanges-identify-most-crypto-transactions/ (June 30, 2022). The Bank Secrecy Act, FINCEN, https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-and-regulations/bank-secrecy-act. Thomas, Langston, The 20 Most Expensive NFT Sales of All Time, NFT NOW, https://nftnow.com/features/most-expensive-nft-sales/ (Aug. 4, 2022). Utility Token, MERRIAM-WEBSTER, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/utility%20token. Valinsky, Jordan, Squid Game Crypto Plunges to $0 After Scammers Steal Millions of Dollars From Investors, CNN, https://edition.cnn.com/2021/11/01/investing/squid-game-cryptocurrency-scam/index.html (Nov. 1, 2021). Vermaak, Werner, MiCA (Updated July 2022): A Guide to the EU’s Proposed Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, SYGNA, https://www.sygna.io/zh-hant/blog/what-is-mica-markets-in-crypto-assets-eu-regulation-guide/. What are Crypto Assets?, AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE, https://www.ato.gov.au/individuals/Investments-and-assets/crypto-asset-investments/what-are-crypto-assets-/. Wong, Joon Ian, Eight Years Ago Today, Someone Bought Two Pizzas with Bitcoins Now Worth $82 Million, QUARTZ, https://qz.com/1285209/bitcoin-pizza-day-2018-eight-years-ago-someone-bought-two-pizzas-with-bitcoins-now-worth-82-million/ (May 23, 2018).
描述:	碩士國立政治大學國際經營與貿易學系 109351041
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109351041
数据类型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202201752
显示于类别:	[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
104101.pdf		3204Kb	Adobe PDF2	1	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈