English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51610910      Online Users : 377
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 傳播博士班 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/142676
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142676


    Title: 數位平台中國用戶的勞動分析:以抖音和 Steam 創意工作坊為例
    An Analysis of Chinese Labor of Digital Platforms Users: cases study based on Douyin and Steam Creative Workshop
    Authors: 黃從嚴
    Congyan, Huang
    Contributors: 馮建三
    黃從嚴
    Huang Congyan
    Keywords: 用戶勞動
    平台經濟
    資本積累
    中國平台用戶
    User-generated labor
    Platform economy
    Capital accumulation
    Chinese platform users
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-12-02 15:25:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究從中國用戶勞動著手,探討UGC平台經濟的性質、運作機理及其產生的社會歷史條件。UGC平台與其他平台的最大區別是大量的用戶產制內容,因此,釐清用戶勞動的經濟意義,是回答上述問題的關鍵。
    依循馬克思勞動價值論,本文提出數位勞動研究的問題意識的轉向:即從本體論上的抽象思辯,轉向以現實經驗為基礎的歷史社會研究,不再孤立地討論用戶勞動是否產生「價值」,而是將「價值」視作資本主義社會的歷史發明。這樣,用戶勞動經濟意義的問題,與平台資本主義化的問題,實則同一問題的兩種表述而已。
    本文的重點有四。首先,平台經濟是什麽?平台經濟仍然是以佔有剩餘價值為核心的資本積累模式,不過,這種模式並非從來如此,而是剛剛建立或還在建立之中。在此進程中,資本以一些較不尋常的方式為自己開路。
    其次,如何看待用戶勞動的生產性?傳統上地租說與勞動價值說的二元式看法,並不適用於用戶勞動。在平台上,用戶勞動既能生產價值,其價值又能流動至廣告部門,以租的形式隱藏起來。在平台經濟中,「租與役」非不是兩相對立,二者之間的轉化與彼此遮掩,恰恰是資本主義剝削得以進行的機制。
    再者,數位平台之於資本主義的意義。平台並不是資本主義在空間上的簡單複製或橫移,平台本身是勞僱雙方經驗勞動關係的、現象學意義上的介面。
    最後,儘管我們所研究的平台日趨商業化,但我們仍然發現,一些平台勞動群體發展出了抗拒資本支配的另類意識。
    This study, focusing on Chinese user-generated labor, examines the features and mechanism of the UGC platform economy and the socio-historical conditions for its emergence. UGC platforms are distinguished from other platforms by the large amount of user-generated content, so clarifying the economic role of user labor is the key to answering these questions.
    Following Marx, we propose an alternate project in the field of digital labor research: historical social research instead of ontological debates. Instead of discussing whether user labor produces value in abstract, we regard value itself as a historical invention of capitalist society. In this way, the question of the economic significance of user-generated labor and the question of the capitalization of the platforms are in fact two formulations of the same question.
    This paper has four main arguments. First, what is the platform economy exactly? The platform economy is still a mode of capital accumulation centered on the possession of surplus value, but this mode was just established recently. Also, during its establishment, capital is making its way in some rather unusual ways.
    Second, the productivity of user labor. The traditional dualistic view of rent and labor does not fit user-generated labor. On the platforms, user-generated labor produces value, which transfers to the advertising department and is hidden in the form of rent immediately. In the platform economy, rent and labor are not two opposites. Rather, the transformation and concealment of the two is precisely the mechanism of capitalist exploitation.
    Third, the meaning of digital platforms for capitalism. The platform is not a simple spatial reproduction or traverse of capitalism, but a phenomenological interface between labor and employer which shapes their experience of labor relations.
    Reference: 英文部分
    Amin, S. (2014). Capitalism in the age of globalization: The management of contemporary society. Bloomsbury Publishing.
    Arvidsson, A., & Colleoni, E. (2012). Value in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet. The Information Society, 28(3), 135-150.
    Bankhurst, A. (2022). Elden Ring Has Already Sold 12 Million Copies Worldwide. [Online].Available:https://www.ign.com/articles/elden-ring-has-already-sold-12-million-copies-worldwide[Accessed 31 March 2022].
    Bearson, D., Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2019). Measuring the impacts of labor in the platform economy: new work created, old work reorganized, and value creation reconfigured. Industrial and Corporate Change.
    Berardi, F. (2005). What does cognitariat mean?: work, desire and depression.[Paper in: Italian Effects. Healy, Chris and Muecke, Stephen (eds.).]. Cultural Studies Review, 11(2), 57-63.
    Bermejo, F. (2009). Audience manufacture in historical perspective: from broadcasting to Google. New Media & Society, 11(1–2), 133–154.
    Bidet, J. (2009). Exploring Marx`s Capital: philosophical, economic and political dimensions.Leiden and Boston: Brill.
    Borland, J. (2006). Tomorrow`s Games, Designed by Players as they Play.[Online].Available:https://www.cnet.com/news/tomorrows-games-designed-by- players-as-they-play/. [Accessed 30 March 2022].
    Brown, F. (2019). Total War: Three Kingdoms sold a million copies in a week. [Online]. Available: https://www.pcgamer.com/total-war-three-kingdoms-sold-a-million-copies-in-a-week/[Accessed 20 March 2022].
    bvanevery. (28 Apirl 2015). Steam and Bethesda remove paid modding from Skyrim Workshop. [Nexus]. Available: https://www.nexusmods.com/eldenring/news/12464?BH=14
    calfurius. (28 Apirl 2015). Steam and Bethesda remove paid modding from Skyrim Workshop. [Nexus]. Available: https://www.nexusmods.com/eldenring/news/12464?BH=14
    Chakrabarty, D. (2009). Provincializing Europe. Princeton University Press.
    Chesko. (01 May 2015). Frostfall - Hypothermia Camping Survival. [Nexus]. Available: https://forums.nexusmods.com/index.php?/topic/581559-frostfall-hypothermia-camping-survival/page-1456#entry24861994
    Comor, E. (2015). Revisiting Marx`s value theory: A critical response to analyses of digital prosumption. The Information Society, 31(1), 13-19.
    Consalvo, M. (2006). Console video games and global corporations: Creating a hybrid culture. New Media & Society, 8(1), 117–137.
    CutterJohn. (February 2021). The debate on whether mods for games should be free or paid has been going on for a long time and honestly...i don`t know where i stand on that. [Reddit]. Available: https://www.reddit.com/r/truegaming/comments/onpiiw/the_debate_on_whether_mods_for_games_should_be/
    Deathoheaven731. (28 Apirl 2015). Steam and Bethesda remove paid modding from Skyrim Workshop. [Nexus]. Available: https://www.nexusmods.com/eldenring/news/12464?BH=14
    DiamondMind28. (28 Apirl 2015). Paid mods are coming whether we like it or not, and we need to be ready. [Reddit]. Available: https://www.reddit.com/r/skyrimmods/comments/343ym0/paid_mods_are_coming_whether_we_like_it_or_not/
    digitaltrucker. (28 Apirl 2015). Steam and Bethesda remove paid modding from Skyrim Workshop. [Nexus]. Available: https://www.nexusmods.com/eldenring/news/12464?BH=14
    Dring, C. (2019), How Total War conquered China to break franchise records. [Online]. Available: https://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2019-05-24-how-total-war-conquered-china-to-set-break-franchise-records[Accessed 4 April 2022 ].
    Du Gay, P. (1997). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. Sage.
    Dyer, A. (2016). PC Game Mods–From Smurfs to Counter-Strike and Beyond. 18 March 2016.[Online]. Available: https://www. nvidia. com/en-us/geforce/news/history-of-pc-game-mods/.[Accessed 30 March 2022].
    Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2007). Catalyst code: the strategies behind the world`s most dynamic companies. Harvard Business School Press.
    Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review Press.
    fgambler. (28 Apirl 2015). Steam and Bethesda remove paid modding from Skyrim Workshop. [Nexus]. Available: https://www.nexusmods.com/eldenring/news/12464?BH=14
    FrootLoop23. (28 Apirl 2015). Steam and Bethesda remove paid modding from Skyrim Workshop. [Nexus]. Available: https://www.nexusmods.com/eldenring/news/12464?BH=14
    Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. Routledge.
    Gandini, A. (2020). Digital labour: an empty signifier?. Media, Culture & Society, 43(2), 369–380.
    Grossman, L. (2006). You—Yes, You—Are TIME’s Person of the Year, Time Magazine. [Online].Available: https://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570810,00.htm[Accessed 31 March 2022].
    Haelrc. (28 Apirl 2015). Steam and Bethesda remove paid modding from Skyrim Workshop. [Nexus]. Available: https://www.nexusmods.com/eldenring/news/12464?BH=14
    Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., & Willis, P. (1972). Coding/decoding. Culture, Media, Language. Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 79, 128-138.
    Harwit, E. (2016). WeChat: Social and political development of China’s dominant messaging app. Chinese Journal of Communication, 10(3), 312-327.
    Hofman-Kohlmeyer, M. (2019). Players as a prosumer. Individual motives for engaging in game modding. World Scientific News, 133, 191-203.
    Huws, U. (2014). Labor in the global digital economy: The cybertariat comes of age. NYU Press.
    Huws, U. (2019). Labour in Contemporary Capitalism: What Next?. Springer.
    Ivanova, M. C. (2009). Limning the jianghu: Spaces of appearance and the performative politics of the Chinese cultural underground. Available from Political Science Database; ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (304851010). https://login.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/limning-i-jianghu-spaces-appearance-performative/docview/304851010/se-2?accountid=10067
    Jenkins, H. (2012). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. Routledge.
    John, R. R. (2010). Network nation. Harvard University Press.
    Joseph, D. J. (2018). The Discourse of Digital Dispossession: Paid Modifications and Community Crisis on Steam. Games and Culture, 13(7), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018756488
    Juul, J. (2013). The art of failure: An essay on the pain of playing video games. MIT press.
    Kangal, K. (2016). The Karl Marx problem in contemporary new media economy: A critique of Christian Fuchs’ account. Television & New Media, 17(5), 416-428.
    Kow, Y. M., & Nardi, B. (2010). Who owns the mods?. First Monday, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i5.2971
    Kücklich, J. (2005). Precarious playbour: Modders and the digital games industry.The Fibreculture Journal, 25 (5), https://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj--025-precarious--playbour--modders--and--the--digital--games--industry/
    Lazzarato, M. (1996)..Immaterial labour. In Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, edited by Paulo Virno and Michael Hardt, 133-150. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Lee, M. (2011). Google ads and the blindspot debate. Media, Culture & Society, 33(3), 433–447.
    Löwy, M.(2007). Marx and Weber: Critics of Capitalism, New Politics, 11(2): 146-52.
    Luchetta, G. (2012). Is the Google Platform a Two-Sided Market? . Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 10, 185-207.
    Luria, K. P. (1989). [Review of The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, by A. Appadurai]. Journal of Social History, 23(1), 187–190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3787575
    Luria, K. P. (1989). [Review of The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, by A. Appadurai]. Journal of Social History, 23(1), 187–190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3787575
    Luxemburg, R. (2003[1993]). The accumulation of capital. Routledge.
    Macgregor, J. M. (2020). Batman: Arkham City sold 12.5 million, generated over $600 million in revenue. [Online].Available:https://www.pcgamer.com/batman-arkham-city-sold-125-million-generated-over-dollar600-million-in-revenue/ [Accessed 20 March 2022].
    Manovich, L. (2002). The Language of New Media. MIT press.
    Marx, K. (2005[1976]). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy. Penguin UK.
    Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin, 1976.
    Matthiaswagg. (27 Apirl 2015). Untitled. [Pastebin]. Available: https://pastebin.com/WzqxtU5S
    Maxwell, R. (1991). The image is gold: Value, the audience commodity, and fetishism. Journal of Film and Video, 29-45.
    Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.
    Moglen, E. (2003). The dotcommunist manifesto. [Online]. Available: http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/publications/dcm.html[Accessed 3 May 2022].
    Moore, B. (2015). Valve Nixes Paid Skyrim Mods After Huge Backlash. [Online].Available: https://www.wired.com/2015/04/steam-skyrim-paid-mods/[Accessed 20 April 2022].
    Negri, A., Hardt, M., & Camfield, D. (2004). Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire. Labour, (56), 359.
    Nieborg, D. B., & van der Graaf, S. (2008). The mod industries? The industrial logic of non-market game production. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407088331
    Pandaily(2022). Sensor Tower: Douyin and TikTok Earned Over $296M in April. Retrieved from https://pandaily.com/sensor-tower-douyin-and-tiktok-earned-over-296m-in-april/
    Poretski, L., & Arazy, O. (2017). Placing Value on Community Co-creations: A Study of a Video Game Modding Community. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 480–491. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998301
    Pricewaterhouse Coopers. (2020). Global ranking of the top 100 public companies by market capitalisation:Update to 30 June 2020,Pricewaterhouse Coopers.
    Pridmore, J., & Trottier, D. (2014). Extending the audience: social media marketing, technologies and the construction of markets. Peter Lang.
    Promarket(2012). Stigler Conversation: How the Chinese Government Thinks About Big Tech. [Online]. Available: https://www.promarket.org/2022/03/23/stigler-panel-china-big-tech-antitrust/ [Accessed 3 July 2022].
    Reveley, J. (2013). The exploitative web: Misuses of Marx in critical social media studies. Science & Society, 512-535.
    Rigi J., & Prey R. (2015). Value, Rent, and the Political Economy of Social Media. The Information Society, 31:5, 392-406.
    Roberts, W. C. (2016). Marx`s inferno. Princeton University Press.
    Robertson, A.(2015). INSIDE PATREON, THE ECONOMIC ENGINE OF INTERNET CULTURE, Theverge, [Online]. Available: https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/3/16084248/patreon-profile-jack-conte-crowdfunding-art-politics-culture/15256[Accessed 20 April 2022]
    Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2004). Two-sided markets: an overview. Institut d’Economie Industrielle working paper.
    Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two‐sided markets: a progress report. The RAND journal of economics, 37(3), 645-667.
    Rosa, H., Lessenich, S., & Dörre, K. (2015). Sociology, capitalism, critique. Verso Books.
    Schiller, D. (2000). Digital capitalism: Networking the global market system. MIT press.
    Scholz, T. (Ed.). (2013). Digital labor: The Internet as playground and factory. New York: Routledge.
    scuffed_down. (28 Apirl 2015). Steam and Bethesda remove paid modding from Skyrim Workshop. [Nexus]. Available: https://www.nexusmods.com/eldenring/news/12464?BH=14
    Shinkle, E. (2012). Videogames and the digital sublime. In Digital Cultures and the Politics of Emotion (pp. 94-108). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
    Simmons, N. (2020). We Finally Know What Inspired the Steam Workshop? [Online].Available: https://www.svg.com/197696/we-finally-know-what-inspired-the-steam-workshop/ [Accessed 20 April 2022].
    Sotamaa, O. (2010). When the Game Is Not Enough: Motivations and Practices Among Computer Game Modding Culture. Games and Culture, 5(3), 239–255.
    Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. John Wiley & Sons.
    Streeter, T. (2012a). Steve Jobs: The Lost Interview:Steve Jobs—One Last Thing, Journal of American History, 99(3): 1015–1018.
    Streeter, T. (2012b). Why, Really, Do We Love Steve Jobs?[Online].Available: https://inthesetimes.com/article/why-really-do-we-love-steve-jobs[Accessed 21 April 2022].
    Tang, M. (2019). Tencent: The political economy of China’s surging internet giant. Routledge.
    Terranova, T. (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58.
    Thorhauge, A. M. (2020). The Steam Platform Economy: Capitalising From Player-driven Economies on the Internet. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11346
    TotalBiscuit. (1 May 2015). An in-depth conversation about the modding scene. [Youtube]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aavBAplp5A
    User_82156. (28 Apirl 2015). Steam and Bethesda remove paid modding from Skyrim Workshop. [Nexus]. Available: https://www.nexusmods.com/eldenring/news/12464?BH=14
    Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, culture & society, 31(1), 41-58.
    Vesucius. (28 Apirl 2015). Steam and Bethesda remove paid modding from Skyrim Workshop. [Nexus]. Available: https://www.nexusmods.com/eldenring/news/12464?BH=14
    Wang, W. Y., & Lobato, R. (2019). Chinese video streaming services in the context of global platform studies. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 356-371.
    Williams, Raymond. 2005. Culture and Materialism. London: Verso.
    Wittel, A. (2012). Digital Marx: Toward a political economy of distributed media. In Marx in the age of digital capitalism (pp. 68-104). Brill.
    Yang, G., & Wang, W. (Eds.). (2021). Engaging Social Media in China: Platforms, Publics, and Production. Michigan State University Press. https://doi.org/10.14321/j.ctv1h9dg1n
    Yong Jin, D. (2015). Digital platforms, imperialism and political culture. Routledge.
    Young, S. (2015). Charging for Skyrim Mods Was a Horrendous Idea. [Online]. Available: https://www.escapistmagazine.com/charging-for-skyrim-mods-was-a-horrendous-idea/[Accessed 20 April 2022]
    Yupei Zhao & Zhongxuan Lin (2021) Umbrella platform of Tencent eSports industry in China, Journal of Cultural Economy, 14:1, 9-25, DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2020.1788625
    Zhang, L. I. N. (2020). When platform capitalism meets petty capitalism in China: Alibaba and an integrated approach to platformization. International Journal of Communication, 14, 21.
    Zhongxuan, L. I. N. (2015). Internet Jianghu: Emergence of China Alternative Public Sphere. China Media Research, 11(3).
    Zimmerman, E., & Chaplin, H. (2013). Manifesto: The 21st Century Will Be Defined By Games. [Online]. Available: https://kotaku.com/manifesto-the-21st-century-will-be-defined-by-games-1275355204[Accessed 30 March 2022].
    Zou, S. (2018). Producing value out of the invaluable: A critical/cultural perspective on the live streaming industry in China. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 16(2), 805-819.

    Pridmore, J., & Trottier, D. (2014). Extending the audience: Social media marketing, technologies and the construction of markets. Peter Lang.
    中文部分
    〈2019主播職業報告發佈 11.8%的95後主播為父母買房〉(2020),《人民網》。取自 http://capital.people.com.cn/n1/2020/0108/c405954-31539738.html
    〈38%的主播從秀場轉戰賣貨,但賣不賣得動要看粉絲購買力〉(2020)。《今日網紅》。取自 https://www.cbndata.com/information/76252(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    〈直播主光靠鬥內就能月入10萬?公開4種收入來源,一支手機一個帳號就能開始賺錢〉(2021)。《風傳媒》,取自 https://www.storm.mg/lifestyle/3330334?page=1 (上網日期:2022年7月30日)
    〈近五成帶貨主播25歲以下 常態工作10小時以上〉(2022)。《中國青年報》。取自 http://m.cyol.com/content/2020-06/22/content_18671667.htm(上網日期:2022年7月3日)
    〈後「四大天王」時代 草根主播接不住流量〉(2022)。《IT時報》,取自 https://www.ittime.com.cn/news/news_58785.shtml(上網日期:2022年7月20日)
    〈流量是一種商品,是一切生意的本質〉(2021)。《騰訊網》,取自 https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20210420A01OU600(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    〈短視頻領域重燃戰火〉(2018)。《北京日報》,取自 http://www.xinhuanet.com/zgjx/2018-06/06/c_137233481.htm(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    〈圖解95後的謎之就業觀,你看懂了嗎〉(2017)。《21世紀財經》,取自 https://m.21jingji.com/article/20170524/herald/e5f1fa75b6315d33931a35872c8af6c2.html(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    〈網絡主播熱潮背後殘酷:薪資不穩定 離職率20%〉(2016)。《財經時報》,取自 https://www.3news.cn/News/2016/0701/151202.htm(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    <Patreon的故事>(2021)。Patreon,取自 https://www.patreon.com/zh-CN/about (上網日期:2022年4月20日).
    BB姬(2019)。<十幾年前就可匡扶漢室?皆因這群人的三國情懷>。《游民專欄》,取自 https://www.gamersky.com/zl/201906/1189527_4.shtml(上網日期2022年3月30日)
    SunsetForest(2021年12月16日)。<名將復興後續發展和情況>。【百度貼吧貼文】。取自 https://tieba.baidu.com/p/7259114383
    中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局譯(1985),《馬克思1844年經濟學哲學手稿》,北京:人民出版社。
    中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局譯(2018),《資本論》,北京:人民出版社。
    中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局譯(2019),《馬克思恩格斯全集第三十八卷:1863-1867經濟學手稿》,北京:人民出版社。
    中國市場監管總局(2021)。〈市場監管總局關於禁止虎牙公司與鬥魚國際控股有限公司合並案反壟斷審查決定的公告〉。取自 https://www.samr.gov.cn/xw/zj/202107/P020210710327201713322.pdf(上網日期:2022年8月3日)
    王志弘,王玥民譯(2010)。《資本的空間:批判地理學芻論》。臺北:群學。 (原書 Harvey, D. [2001]. Spaces of capital: Towards a critical georraphy. Routledge.)
    王志弘譯(2008),《新自由主義化的空間:邁向不均衡地理發展理論》, 台北:群學。 (原書 Harvey, D. [2005]. Spaces of neoliberalization: towards a theory of uneven geographical development. Franz Steiner Verlag.)
    北京知識產權法院(2022)。〈北京快手科技有限公司等侵害作品資訊網絡傳播權糾紛二審民事判決書〉。https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=f555a173e2404f0d82d1cd8e270408e2(上網日期:2022年7月16日)
    北京微播視界科技有限公司(2022)。〈直播主播入駐協議〉。取自 https://www.huoshan.com/inapp/agreement_and_privacy/(上網日期:2022年8月10日)
    卡思數據(2020)。〈2019年抖音KOL生態研究〉。取自 https://www.woshipm.com/it/4426941.html(上網日期:2022年7月2日)
    卡思數據(2021)。〈2020年抖音KOL生態研究〉。取自 https://www.woshipm.com/it/4426941.html(上網日期:2022年7月2日)
    巨量算數(2020)。〈2020抖音創作者生態報告〉。取自 https://www.cbndata.com/report/2472/detail?isReading=report&page=12(上網日期:2022年7月2日)
    成令方等譯(2003),《見樹又見林: 社會學作為一種生活, 實踐與承諾》, 台北: 群學。(原書 Allan, G. [1997]. The Forest and the Trees. Routledge.)
    朱巧鈴,楊劍剛(2022)。〈算法陷阱與規則跨越〉。《經濟學家》,1(1),頁104-114。
    江蘇省常州市中級人民法院(2021)。〈天津市薊縣夢想優歌文化傳播有限公司與常州市金壇九合文化傳媒有限公司合同糾紛二審判決書〉。取自 https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=7ad0b21413fe4877b978ada5016fb3ce(上網日期:2022年7月12日)
    江蘇省常州市中級人民法院(2022a)。〈天津市薊縣夢想優歌文化傳播有限公司、張靜合同糾紛民事一審民事判決書〉。取自 https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=a6cbab7105654b7ea125aebd0009858d(上網日期:2022年7月12日)
    江蘇省常州市中級人民法院(2022b)。〈天津市薊縣夢想優歌文化傳播有限公司、李文婷合同糾紛民事一審民事判決書〉。取自https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=1c1dca6f3c384bf393c4aebd0009879d(上網日期:2022年7月12日)
    艾媒報告(2020)。〈直播行業數據分析:2019年中國43.7%線上直播行業用戶觀看直播+電商節目〉。 《艾媒網》,取自https://www.iimedia.cn/c1061/69355.html(上網日期:2022年8月2日)
    艾瑞諮詢(2021)。《中國遊戲直播行業研究報告(2021年)》。《艾媒網》,取自 https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202109071514775852_1.pdf(上網日期:2022年8月2日)
    克勞鋭(2020)。《2020中國MCN行業發展研究白皮書》。取自 http://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202005081379467432_1.pdf(上網日期:2022年8月3日)
    吳子青(2022年3月3日)。〈為什麼這次[艾爾登法環]火得這麼出圈?〉。【知乎貼文】。取自 https://www.zhihu.com/question/519340029/answer/2371915502?utm_source=wechat_session&utm_medium=social&utm_oi=1350508716618403840&utm_content=group3_Answer&utm_campaign=shareopn
    吳志(2020)。〈閱文「霸王合同」引抗議 部分作者暫停更新作品〉。《證券時報》。取自 https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2020-05-06/doc-iirczymk0023080.shtml(上網日期:2022年7月22日)
    吳慧珍、曹嬿恆譯(2020)。《競爭之死: 高度壟斷的資本主義, 是延誤創新, 壓低工資, 拉大貧富差距的元兇》。(原書 Tepper, J. [2018]). The myth of capitalism: monopolies and the death of competition. John Wiley & Sons.)
    抖音(2022)。〈「抖音」用戶服務協議〉。取自 https://sf3-cdn-tos.douyinstatic.com/obj/ies-hotsoon-draft/douyin_agreement/agreements.html(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    抖音(2022)。《「引導私下交易」實施細則》。取自 https://school.jinritemai.com/doudian/web/article/102127?rank=0&fromPage=search_result&searchInfo=&query=%E7%A7%81%E4%B8%8B%E4%BA%A4%E6%98%93&resultType=%E8%A7%84%E5%88%99&from=buying_rules(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    李嘉澤(2022)。〈短視頻平台MCN化運營下的盈利模式:基於「抖音」平台的案例〉,《產業經濟評論》,(3),頁188-200。
    林日璇、林鶴玲、黃厚銘(2021)。〈遊戲研究〉。《中華傳播學刊》,(40),頁115-142。
    林宗弘等譯(2005)。《製造甘願——壟斷資本主義勞動過程的歷史變遷》。(原書 Buroway, M. [1979]. Manufacturing consent. Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism. The University of Chicago Press.)
    林應嘉(2014)。〈在個人、社群與產業三構面下之遊戲模組玩家的行為意義〉。《資訊社會研究》,(26),頁1-30。
    胡翼青(2020)。〈透視「種草帶貨」:基於傳播政治經濟學的視角〉。《西北師大學報:社會科學版》,57(5),頁8。
    風與天幕(2020年9月12日),個人部落格,取自 https://user.qzone.qq.com/544971557/infocenter
    孫妍(2017)。<3500萬 網絡視聽許可證「市價」幾近翻番」>。《IT時報》,取自 https://www.sohu.com/a/126146391_110683(上網日期:2022年7月10日)
    徐賁(2019)。《犬儒與玩笑》。香港:牛津大學出版社。
    國家新聞出版廣電總局(2016)。《專網及定向傳播視聽節目服務管理規定》。取自 http://www.nrta.gov.cn/art/2016/5/29/art_113_30905.html(上網日期:2022年8月4日)
    國務院反壟斷委員會(2021)。《國務院反壟斷委員會關於平台經濟領域的反壟斷指南(2021)》。取自 http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-02/07/content_5585758.htm(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    崔永鵬、朱傑(2020)。〈短視頻下半場:機遇與挑戰〉,單波、甘麗華、吳世界文編《中國媒體發展研究報告》(18輯),頁144-158。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
    康凌譯(2019)。《時間、勞動與社會統治:馬克思的批判理論再闡釋》。北京:北京大學出版社。(原書 Postone, M. [1993]. Time, labor, and social domination: A reinterpretation of Marx`s critical theory. Cambridge University Press.
    張玉佩(2012)。〈台灣線上遊戲的在地情境與全球化文化流動〉。《新聞學研究》,(113),頁77-122。
    張美惠譯(2021)。《抖音:短影音、演算法、年輕化,世界最有價值新創公司的成功秘密》。臺北:商業週刊。 (原書 Brennan, M. [2020]. Attention factory: The story of TikTok and China`s ByteDance. China Channel.)
    陳永偉(2018)。〈「剝削者」抑或「守望者」?對平台競爭和治理的再思考〉。《中國改革》,(2),頁88-94。
    陳冰(2021)。〈直播電商,不止帶貨〉。《新民週刊》,取自 http://www.xinminweekly.com.cn/lunbo/2021/11/10/16677.html(上網日期:2022年8月2日)
    陳志賢 (2018)。 <數位媒體與社群平台使用者之勞動分析>,《資訊社會研究》, (35),頁 13-50。
    曾鼐(2021)。〈中國短視頻廣告行銷中用戶使用動機分析——以抖音平台為例〉。《新聞研究導刊》,12(15),頁48-50。
    渡邊雅男、賈利軍、高晨曦(2019),<非生產資本範疇探源——非生產費用的資本化與資本職能的二重化>,《當代經濟研究》,(7),頁5-14、133。
    温婧(2022)。〈抖音發佈網路直播文藝生態報告,過去一年傳統文化主播收入增長101%〉。《北京青年報》。取自 https://app.bjtitle.com/8816/newshow.php?newsid=6209236&typeid=13&did=&mood=push(上網日期:2022年8月3日)
    湖北省高級人民法院(2021)。〈武漢鬥魚魚樂網路科技有限公司、廣州虎牙資訊科技有限公司等不正當競爭糾紛民事二審民事判決書〉。取自 https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=0329f4ea572f4e239b1bae7700dfc4c0(上午日期:2022年8月1日)
    馮建三(2010),<傳播、文化與勞動>,《台灣社會研究季刊》,(77),頁369-385。
    馮建三譯(1992a),<傳播:西方馬克思主義的盲點>,《島嶼邊緣》,(4),頁6-33。(原文Smythe, D. W. [1977]. Communications: blindspot of western Marxism. CTheory, [3], 1-27.)
    馮建三譯(1992b),《廣告的符碼傳播:消費社會的商品崇拜及意義的政治經濟學》,台北:遠流。 (原書 Jhally, S. [1990]. The codes of advertising: Fetishism and the political economy of meaning in the consumer society. Routledge.)
    新科數據(2022)。〈「新抖週報」55%的作品都在帶貨,頭部帶貨達人都在怎麼玩?〉,取自 https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/138461814(上網日期:2022年8月4日)
    楊晴安(2022)。〈全球瘋抖音、TikTok 4月吸金3億美元〉。雅虎新聞。取自https://tw.news.yahoo.com/news/%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E7%98%8B%E6%8A%96%E9%9F%B3-tiktok-4%E6%9C%88%E5%90%B8%E9%87%913%E5%84%84%E7%BE%8E%E5%85%83-201000877.html(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    遊戲角落(2019)。<評測/《全軍破敵:三國》系列20年集大成之作,有別光榮三國志的全新感受>。《聯合新聞網》,取自 https://game.udn.com/game/story/122087/382518(上網日期:2022年3月20日)。
    電商報(2020)。〈在她揭露平台層層盤剝作者的背後,是2000萬網文作者的心碎!〉,取自 https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1683027605356222124&wfr=spider&for=pc(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    網易CC語音平台(2022)。〈網易CC語音平台主播合作協議〉。取自http://cc.163.com/act/m/daily/user_agreement/anchor.html(上網日期:2022年8月5日)
    翟文婷(2019)。〈張一鳴的App工廠:流水線作業,批量生產App〉。《新浪專欄》,取自 http://tech.sina.com.cn/csj/2019-01-02/doc-ihqhqcis2319423.shtml(上網日期:2022年7月20日)
    趙磊(2017)。〈「不能量化」證偽了勞動價值論嗎?〉。《政治經濟學評論》,(4),頁3-17。
    趙燕菁(2020),<平台經濟與社會主義:兼論螞蟻集團事件的本質>,中國政治經濟學40人論壇,西安。
    劉皓琰(2019),<信息產品與平台經濟中的非雇傭剝削>,《馬克思主義研究》,(3),頁67-75。
    廣州虎牙信息科技有限公司(2022)。〈虎牙藝人經經協議〉。取自 https://hd.huya.com/web/icenterAnchorSign/(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    廣州歡聚傳媒有限公司(2022)。〈金牌藝人授權合作協議〉。取自 http://m.yy.com/file/shouquanxieyi.pdf(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    橘子貓(2021年3月13日)。<用名將和你說的一些製作組對比不太合適>。【steam工作坊貼文】。取自https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1843445119
    戴瑜慧(2020)。〈中共 [文化走出去] 政策的新推手: 中國私營資本家與海外媒體收購〉。 《中華傳播學刊》, (24),頁 3-41。
    謝怡靜,盧瀅西(2022)。〈我在「主播工廠」9個月,倒賠公司50萬〉。《新浪專欄》,取自http://tech.sina.com.cn/csj/2022-03-14/doc-imcwipih8332321.shtml(上網日期:2022年7月20日)
    謝國雄(1997)。《純勞動:台灣勞動體制諸論》。中央研究院社會學研究所。
    謝國雄(2013)。《港都百工圖:商品拜物教的實踐與逆轉》。中央研究院社會學研究所。
    簡宏安、李政忠(2019)。〈遊戲模組的類型、創作動機與互文挪用〉。《資訊社會研究》,(37),頁13-48。
    騰訊研究院(2017)。〈我們問卷調查了4500多位主播,發現了直播行業的五個真相〉。取自 https://www.huxiu.com/article/195288.html(上網日期:2022年8月1日)
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院博士班
    106463507
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106463507
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201700
    Appears in Collections:[傳播博士班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    350701.pdf7940KbAdobe PDF2165View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback