 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
全文筆數/總筆數 : 116028/147069 (79%)
造訪人次 : 58139951
線上人數 : 191
|
|
|
資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142664
|
| 題名: | Radical internalism meets radical externalism or: Smithies’ epistemology transcendentalised |
| 作者: | 鄭會穎
Cheng, Tony |
| 貢獻者: | 哲學系 |
| 日期: | 2022-02 |
| 上傳時間: | 2022-12-02 15:23:28 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | In The Epistemic Role of Consciousness (2019), Declan Smithies has carried out a thorough radical internalist programme. Along the way, he compares and contrasts many different views, including a group he calls “radical externalism”. From the labels, it might seem that radical internalism and radical externalism must be very different in their core commitments. In this short note, I will single out a version of radical externalism—factivism, more specifically John McDowell’s version (McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., McDowell, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55:877–893, 1995, McDowell, J. (2011). Perception as a capacity for knowledge. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.)—and argue that actually this version has many similarities with Smithies radical internalism. Where there are differences, they do not obviously lie at the internalist/externalist juncture. The main point of this comparison is that philosophical positions that seem very different can share much common ground, and in seeing this, one can be in a better position to understand the crucial points of disagreement. |
| 關聯: | Asian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.1, No.1, pp.1-10 |
| 資料類型: | article |
| DOI 連結: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-022-00013-7 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s44204-022-00013-7 |
| 顯示於類別: | [哲學系] 期刊論文
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| index.html | | 0Kb | HTML2 | 324 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
