Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141691
|
| Title: | 臺北市單一陳情系統陳情案件之空間分析
Spatial analysis on the calls or service requests in Taipei City simple petition system |
| Authors: | 楊沛育
Yang, Pai-Yu |
| Contributors: | 廖興中
Liao, Hsin-Chung
楊沛育
Yang, Pai-Yu |
| Keywords: | 臺北市單一陳情系統
空間分析
公民參與
地理資訊系統
Taipei city simple petition system
Spatial analysis
Citizen participation
Geographical information system |
| Date: | 2022 |
| Issue Date: | 2022-09-02 15:15:51 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 臺北市單一陳情系統是臺北市政府近年來致力推動的大型服務項目，該平台將過去1999市民熱線的服務升級，以簡易的介面和更方便的使用方式讓民眾主動提出生活中遇到的問題。當民眾主動陳情時，除了能幫助政府尋找問題，也在無形中增加了公民參與的機會。但過去與市民陳情服務相關的研究多探討該服務的民眾滿意度和執行效率，較少著重分析民眾陳情行為。因此本研究以臺北市單一陳情系統於2019至2020年蒐集的陳情案件資料和臺北市各地的人口特徵資料，以里為分析單位，將視覺化的地圖作為資料分析的呈現方式，瞭解民眾陳情行為和當地人口特徵的相關性。同時，也蒐集負責處理案件的相關同仁實務上的經驗。在三大案件類型違建占用、違規停車和市容整潔的分析結果和訪談內容中，都可以發現女性和65歲以上人口較多的地區都會有較高的陳情率，人口密度較高的地區也會有較高的陳情率。但資料分析結果和訪談內容也存在相異之處，表示仍可能存在會影響民眾陳情行為的其他因素。另外，本研究也將該資料的處理過程和步驟詳細記錄，也列出仍待解決的問題和建議，以利後續研究延伸發展。未來相關單位除了應持續維持資料的完整度外，也應提升民眾對於臺北市單一陳情系統的認知程度和使用的廣度，藉由民眾主動的公民參與改善更多的社區事務，共創互惠互助的社會。
Taipei city simple petition system is a service that Taipei has been promoting in recent years. The platform has upgraded the services of the previous 1999 Citizens` Hotline, with a more convenient way to allow people to ask for help. Also, it can increase the opportunities of citizen participation in the same time. This study uses the data collected by the Taipei city simple petition system from 2019 to 2020, with the visual maps as the presentation method of data analysis. It also collects the practical experience of government employees who are responsible for handling the cases of petition. In the results, it can be found that areas with a large population of women and people over 65 years old will have a higher rate of petition. Also, areas with a higher population density will also have higher rate of petition. However, there may still have other factors that may affect the people`s petitioning behavior. In addition, this study also lists the problems and suggestions that still need to be solved in Taipei city simple petition system. In the future, hope the local government can enhance the public`s awareness of the Taipei city simple petition system and improve more citizen participation in the society. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
大竹文雄（2021）。如何活用行為經濟學（陳正芬，譯）。台北：經濟新潮社。
內政部戶政司全球資訊網，人口統計資料，取自：https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346
王聖銘、陳富美、鄭智航、賴坤成、林峰田（2005）。鄉鎮市層級行政體系地理資訊系統發展的經驗分析—以台東市多目標地理資訊系統的發展為例。規劃學報，32，77-87。
石計生（2001）。地理資訊系統社會學。台北：儒林。
吳定（2003）。公共政策。台北：空大。
吳健生、李興志民（2015）。應用地理資訊系統於學童步行上下學安全路線之研究。都市交通，23-46。
呂芳懌、黃文鴻（2000）。協助查詢有地緣關係之前科犯資訊的地理資訊系統。大葉學報，9（1），1-9。
宋世祥（2016）。百工裡的人類家。臺北市：果力文化出版社。
巫珮蓉（2011）。電子化參與對地方政府之影響析探：臺北市1999市民當家熱線的個案研究。國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
周立生、林郁雯、沈哲緯、鄭錦桐、江陽聖、蔡世賢（2019）。政府防災公開資料與產業跨域整合應用初探—以天災保險為例。中興工程，（142），21-30。
林志銘、林文苑（2012）。台灣酒精性疾病死亡率之空間聚集分析。台灣公共衛生雜誌，31（2），195-204。
林祥偉（2011）。119急難救護資料探勘之研究—以花蓮縣為例。地圖，21，1-14。
林瓊珠（2016）。公民意識與政治參與。民主與治理，3（2），1-21。
俞振華、翁定暐（2017）。影響台灣民眾政治參與的因素：從公民規範認知的觀點出發。調查研究-方法與應用，（38），9-56。
洪千惠（2016）。重度視障者擔任話務人員的困難及因應策略之研究—以臺北市政府1999話務中心視障話務小組為例。國立臺灣師範大學復健諮商研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
孫同文、張懋（2004）。地方行政管理之永續發展：地理資訊系統（GIS）。之應用。中國行政評論，13（2），101-134。
徐明莉、莊文忠（2020）。臺灣民衆的公民意識與公民參與。人文及社會科學集刊，32（3），333-366。
徐瑞宏、陳育民、李富傑、蘇玉添、林琨智、谷中道（2012）。地理資訊系統應用於校園防救災管理平臺之建立—以健行科技大學為例，地理資訊系統季刊，31-35。
徐瑞宏、葉堂宇、徐華鴻（2011）。地理資訊系統應用於校園火災避難模擬。地理資訊系統季刊，25-30。
張平吾（2007）。城市犯罪被害風險與警政作為--犯罪地理資訊系統在都會區被害預防上之應用。中央警察大學犯罪防治學報，33-59。
章殷超、溫在弘、賴美淑民（2009）。利用地理資訊系統探討肝癌病患就醫地理可近性與醫院選擇間之相關性。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，517-529。
許嘉文、孫士峰、陳思穎、黃祥熙（2016）。地理資訊系統租借站配置之設計與營運方式研究—以P-Bike為例。地理資訊系統季刊，27-29。
陳立剛（2002）。地理資訊系統（GIS）與公共管理初探—以GIS在地方政府的應用為例，「政治學的發展—新議題與新挑戰」學術研討會論文。台北：東吳大學，2002年6月1日。
陳光輝（2010）台灣民眾的公民意識、藍綠政治支持與公民投票態度之關聯性。人文及社會科學集刊，22（2），247-274。
陳序廷（2011）。地方政府的政策趨同與政策學習—1999專線個案研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
陳忠遜（2017）。臺東縣1999縣民專線服務品質與滿意度研究。國立臺東大學公共與文化事務學系碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，臺東縣。
陳振宇、吳振佑（2020）。BigGIS—巨量空間資訊系統加值與開放服務。國土及公共治理，94-99。
陳章瑞（2013）。以地理加權迴歸模型之空間分析探討都是公園之寧適效益。造園景觀學報，19（1），17-46。
陳敦源（2009）。民主治理與電子化參與，T&D飛訊，（11），24-34。
陳慧文（2014）。1999萬事通之管理績效評估。國立高雄應用科技大學工業工程與管理系碩士班，未出版，高雄市。
傅仰止（2014）。公民意識的社會參與效應：志願結社及日常接觸。台灣社會學刊，55，179-226。
曾冠球、陳敦源、胡龍騰（2009）。推展公民導向的電子化政府：願景或幻想？，公共行政學報，（33），1-43。
曾健銓（2010）。從電子化政府到行動政府：臺北市里長使用市長信箱與1999市民熱線之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
黃東益、蕭乃沂、陳敦源（2003）。網際網路時代公民直接參與機制的機會與挑戰：臺北市政府「市長信箱」的個案研究。東吳政治學報，（17），121-152。
黃家玓（2010）。臺北市政府「1999市民熱線」之研究—顧客導向及全觀型治理的觀點。國立臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
黃舒郁、蕭釧瑛、謝銘智、林永青、謝昇航（2021）。開放式GIS API整合Open Data在手持裝置開發方式之初探。中興工程，（153），37-45。
楊立偉、蕭乃沂（2014）。1999萬事通巨量資料分析及深化運用之研究。高雄市政府研考會委託研究報告，未出版。
楊晶雲、劉秀嫚（2016）。臺灣八年級學生的公民參與意向：資料庫的應用。彰化師大教育學報，（30），1-29。
葉房蒲（譯）（2010）。311 電話看盡紐約事（上）及（下）。國立台灣大學科學教育發展中心，未出版。
葉美智、楊燿隆、劉秋良（2015）。Open Data在生態旅遊加值上之應用。台灣林業，41（3），71-76。
廖俊松（2014）。社區營造與社區參與：金鈴園與邵社的觀察與學習。社區發展季刊，107，133-145。
廖洲棚、陳敦源、廖興中（2013）。揭開地方文官回應民意的「秘箱」：台灣六都1999熱線的質化分析。文官制度季刊，5（1），49-84。
廖興中（2013）。臺灣小兒科醫療資源空間可接近性分析。公共行政學報，44，1-39。
廖興中（2014）。全球貪腐傳染之空間分析：以世界銀行貪腐控制指述為例。公共行政學報，（46），1-28。
廖興中（2014）。臺灣基層醫療缺乏區域界定之初探: 整合空間與非空間因素的分析。行政暨政策學報，（58），121-152。
廖興中（2018）。全球各國貪腐與電子治理發展之關係：空間異質性的初探。台灣政治學刊，22（1），89-141。
廖興中（2018）。全球各國貪腐與電子治理發展之關係：空間異質性的初探。臺灣政治學刊，22（1）：89-141。
廖興中（2018）。地理資訊系統與空間分析在公共行政的應用與展望。主計月刊，753：26-30。
廖興中（2020）。地理資訊系統與空間分析應用對公共行政的啟發。國土及公共治理季刊，8（3），38-47。
廖興中、呂佩安（2013）。臺灣縣市政府貪腐現象之空間自相關分析。臺灣民主季刊，10（2），39-72。
廖興中、徐明莉（2017）。台灣地方政府貪腐現象之時空掃描。公共行政學報，（53），1-23。
廖興中、廖洲棚、陳敦源（2015）。1999臺北市民當家熱線受理違規停車處理之空間資料探勘：以核密度分析為工具。行政暨政策學報，（61），51-77。
練冠葶（2021）。以CORPS模式探討台灣事實查核中心經營管理之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
蔡元芳、蘇文瑞、鄭于綸（2009）。導入公眾參與式地理資訊系統於互動式社區防災資訊網建置之研發。華岡地理學報，39-49。
蔡在宗、謝正倫、邱奕承、張伯瑋（2016）。防災地理資訊系統的發展與未來。中華防災學刊，229-238。
蔡育璟（2008）。公民意識與公民參與行為對組織公民行為影響之研究。國立中正大學勞工所碩士論文。
鄭宇君（2014）。災難傳播中的群體力量：社交媒體促成新型態的公民參與。傳播與社會學刊，（27），179-205。
蕭乃沂、陳敦源、廖洲棚（2014）。政府應用巨量資料精進公共服務與政策分析之可行性研究。國家發展委員會（編號：NDC-MIS-103-003），未出版。
蕭乃沂、項靖、黃朝盟、羅晉、林綉雯、曾詠嵐、鐘子能、李佳縈（2007）。政府網站功能民主化。行政院研考會委託研究報告，未出版。
蕭揚基（2000）。台灣中部地區高中生公民意識及相關因素之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
鍾雨軒（2015）。「1999市民熱線」投訴管道對教師工作倦怠的影響之研究—以臺北市國小教師為例。臺北市立大學人文藝術學院國民小學教師在職進修公民與社會教學碩士學位班碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
簡裕隆（2016）。1999市民諮詢服務熱線個案研究—以T市為例。開南大學觀光運輸學院碩士在職專班物流航運組碩士論文，未出版，桃園市。
羅凱揚、蘇宇暉（2019）。機器學習系列一：學習機器學習必知的程序—資料庫知識探索，2022年3月12日，取自：https://reurl.cc/2DAonn。
顧雅文、Ku, Ya-wen（2012）。日治時期臺灣的衛生調查與疾病統計：兼論以GIS輔助疾病史研究。白沙歷史地理學報，203-253。
二、英文部分
Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement”? Journal of transformative education, 3(3), 236-253.
Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management review, 37(3), 355-375.
Ahn, M. J., & Bretschneider, S. (2011). Politics of e‐government: E‐government and the political control of bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 414-424.
Alex-Assensoh, Y. M. (2005). Democracy at risk: How political choices undermine citizen participation and what we can do about it. Brookings Institution Press.
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93-115.
Anselin, L. (1999). The future of spatial analysis in the social sciences. Geographic information sciences, 5(2), 67-76.
Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management science, 59(1), 226-244.
Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & T. Seidel (2009). Common political culture: Evidence on regional corruption contagion. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(3), 300-310.
Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of Internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27(2), 183-216.
Bimber, B. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53-67.
Bowman, Adrian W. (1984). “An Alternative Method of Crossvalidation for the Smoothing of Density Estimates.” Biometrika, 71(2), 353-360.
Brabham, D. C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence, 14(1), 75-90.
Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242-262.
Brabham, D. C. (2013). The four urban governance problem types suitable for crowdsourcing citizen participation. In Citizen E-participation in urban governance: Crowdsourcing and collaborative creativity (pp. 50-68). IGI Global,
Brachman, R. J., & Anand, T. (1996). The process of knowledge discovery in databases. In Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining.
Brown, G. (2012). Public participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: Reflections on a decade of empirical research. Journal Of The Urban & Regional Information Systems Association, 24(2).
Brunsdon, C., A. Stewart Fotheringham, and M. E. Charlton. (1998). “Geographically Weighted Regression - Modelling Spatial Non-Stationarity.” The Statistician, 47(3), 431-443.
Chen, Y. C., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2006). Electronic government and online engagement: citizen interaction with government via web portals. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 2(1), 54-76.
Cho, W. K. T., & J. G. Gimpel (2012). Geographic information systems and the spatial dimensions of American politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 443-460.
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., ... & Scholl, H. J. (2012, January). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In 2012 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 2289-2297). IEEE.
Clark, B. Y., Brudney, J. L., & S. G. Jang (2013). Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: Investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 687-701
Cleveland, William S. (1979). “Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74: 829-836.
Cliff, A., & J. K. Ord (1981). Spatial processes: Models and applications. London: Pion.
Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., & Meek, J. W. (2006). Citizen‐centered collaborative public management. Public administration review, 66, 76-88.
Delli Carpini, M. X. (2000). Gen. com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political communication, 17(4), 341-349.
DeLorenzo, L. (2001). Stars aren`t stupid, but our methodological training is: A commentary on Jeff Gill and Ken Meier`s article “public administration research and practice: A methodological manifesto”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(1), 139-145.
Desai, A., Greenbaum, R. T., & Y. Kim (2009). Incorporating policy criteria in spatial analysis. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(1), 23-42.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual review of sociology, 27(1), 307-336.
Dye, T. R. (2013). Understanding public policy. Pearson.
Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human affairs, 22(3), 283-300.
Estellés-Arolas, E., & González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F. (2012). Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information science, 38(2), 189-200.
Ester, M., Kriegel, H. P., & Sander, J. (1997, July). Spatial data mining: A database approach. In International symposium on spatial databases. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Evans, M., and J. Davies. (1999). Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-Level, Multi-Disciplinary Perspective. Public Administration, 77(2), 361-385.
Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996). From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI magazine, 17(3), 37-54.
Foresman, T. W. (1998). The history of geographic information systems: perspectives from the pioneers. Prentice Hall.
Fotheringham, A. Stewart, Chris Brunsdon, and Martin Charlton. (2003). Geographically Weighted Regression: the Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Frawley, W. J., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Matheus, C. J. (1992). Knowledge discovery in databases: An overview. AI magazine, 13(3), 213-228.
Fritz, S., See, L., Carlson, T., Haklay, M. M., Oliver, J. L., Fraisl, D., ... & West, S. (2019). Citizen science and the United Nations sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(10), 922-930.
Ganapati, S. (2011). Uses of public participation geographic information systems applications in e government. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 425-434.
Getis A., & J. K. Ord (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(3), 189-206.
Halpern, A., & Troupp, M. (Eds). (2013). Federal geospatial information: Management and coordination. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Hand, D. J. (2007). Principles of data mining. Drug safety, 30(7), 621-622.
Haque, A. (2001). GIS, public service, and the issue of democratic governance. Public Administration Review, 61(3), 259-265.
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American economic review, 35(4), 519-530.
HOWE, J. (2006) Crowdsourcing: A Definition. Crowdsourcing.com. Retrieved March 13, 2022, from http://crowdsourcing.typepad.com/cs/2006/06/crowdsourcing_a.html
Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine, 14(6), 1-4.
Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing: How the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. Random House.
Hurvich, Clifford M., Jeffrey S. Simonoff, and Chih Ling Tsai. (1998). “Smoothing Parameter Selection in Nonparametric Regression Using an Improved Akaike Information Criterion.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 60(2): 271-293.
Jackson, P., & Klobas, J. (2015). Deciding to use an enterprise wiki: the role of social institutions and scripts. In The Essentials of Knowledge Management (pp. 311-332). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Joassart-Marcelli, P., & A. Giordano (2006). Does local access to employment services reduce unemployment? A GIS analysis of one-stop career centers. Policy Sciences, 39(4), 335-359.
Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. MIT press.
Kavanaugh, A. L. (2002). Community networks and civic engagement: A social network approach. The Good Society, 11(3), 17-24.
Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business horizons, 54(3), 241-251.
Kiltz, L., & R. Smith (2011). Experimenting with GIS in doing damage assessments: a trial run at disaster city. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(1).
Kingston, R. (2007). Public Participation in Local Policy Decision-making: The Role of Webbased Mapping. The Cartographic Journal, 44(2), 138-144.
Krueger, B. S. (2002). Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: A resource approach. American politics research, 30(5), 476-498.
Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2005). Geographic information systems and science. John Wiley & Sons.
Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big data & society, 1(2), 1-13.
Macedo, S. (2006). Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What We Can Do About It. Brookings Institution Press.
Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International journal of geographical information science, 20(7), 703-726.
Matheus, C. J., Chan, P. K., & Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. (1993). Systems for knowledge discovery in databases. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 5(6), 903-913.
Minkoff, S. L. (2016). NYC 311: A tract-level analysis of citizen–government contacting in New York City. Urban Affairs Review, 52(2), 211-246.
Morgan, J., & Wang, R. (2010). Tournaments for ideas. California management review, 52(2), 77-97.
Morgeson III, F. V., VanAmburg, D., & Mithas, S. (2011). Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 257-283.
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011a, June). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 282-291).
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011b, September). Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (pp. 185-194).
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2013). Identifying success factors and challenges of 311-driven service integration: a comparative case study of NYC311 and Philly311. In Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
Nash, A. (2009, November). Web 2.0 applications for improving public participation in transport planning. In Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting.
Norris, D. F. (2010). E-Government 2020: Plus ça change, plus c`est la meme chose. Public Administration Review, 70(S1), S180.
Obermeyer, N. J., Ramasubramanian, L., & Warnecke, L. (2016). GIS education in US public administration programs: Preparing the next generation of public servants. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(2), 249-266.
O`Looney, J. (2006). Simulation and Decision Support Technologoes for Enhancing Citizen Understanding and Engagement. In T. F. Buss, S. Redburn & K. Guo (Eds.), Modernizing Democracy: Innovations in Citizen Participation. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharp, Inc.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World development, 24(6), 1073-1087.
Pattie, C., Seyd, P., & Whiteley, P. (2003). Citizenship and civic engagement: Attitudes and behaviour in Britain. Political studies, 51(3), 443-468.
Pirog, M. A. (2014). Data will drive innovation in public policy and management research in the next decade. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 537-543.
Prieur, C., Cardon, D., Beuscart, J. S., Pissard, N., & Pons, P. (2008). The stength of weak cooperation: A case study on flickr. arXiv preprint arXiv:0802.2317.
Prpic, J., & Shukla, P. (2013, January). The theory of crowd capital. In 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3505-3514). IEEE.
Prpić, J., & Shukla, P. (2014, January). The contours of crowd capability. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3461-3470). IEEE.
Prpic, J., Jackson, P., & Nguyen, T. (2014). A computational model of crowds for collective intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.0325.
Prpic, J., Taeihagh, A., & Melton, J. (2017). A framework for policy crowdsourcing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.04213.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and schuster.
Redburn, F. S. (Ed.). (2006). Modernizing democracy: Innovations in citizen participation. ME Sharpe.
Roddick, J. F., & Spiliopoulou, M. (1999). A bibliography of temporal, spatial and spatio-temporal data mining research. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 1(1), 34-38.
Sawhney, M., Prandelli, E., & Verona, G. (2003). The power of innomediation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(2), 77.
Schlossberg, M., & Shuford, E. (2005). Delineating" public" and" participation" in PPGIS.
Schmitt, C. (2014). The diffusion of privatization in Europe: Political affinity or economic competition?. Public Administration, 92(3), 615-635.
Schreurs, W., Kerstholt, J. H., de Vries, P. W., & Giebels, E. (2018). Citizen participation in the police domain: The role of citizens’ attitude and morality. Journal of community psychology, 46(6), 775-789.
Schwester, R. W., Carrizales, T., & Holzer, M. (2009). An examination of the municipal 311 system. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 12(2), 218-236.
Seltzer, E., & Mahmoudi, D. (2013). Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: Challenges and opportunities for planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), 3-18.
Sharp, E. B. (2012). Citizen participation at the local level. The state of citizen participation in America, 101-130.
Shekhar, S., & Chawla, S. (2003). A tour of spatial databases. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Sieber, R. E. (2003). Public Participation Geographic Information Systems Across Borders. The Canadian Geographer, 47(1), 50-61.
Sieber, R. E. (2006). Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491-507.
Sun, M. T. W., Tsai, Y. T., Shih, M. C., & J. Y. W. Lin (2009). Public participation and the concept of space in environmental governance: An application of PPGIS. Public Administration and Development, 29(3), 250-261.
Sutton, J. N., Spiro, E. S., Fitzhugh, S. M., Johnson, B., Gibson, C. B., & Butts, C. T. (2014, May). Terse message amplification in the Boston bombing response. In ISCRAM.
Taylor, S E., Peplau, L. A. & Sears, D. O. (2000). Social Psychology. 7th. NY: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Thomas, C., & Ospina, M. (2004). Measuring Up: the business case for GIS (Vol. 1). ESRI, Inc.
Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e‐government on trust and confidence in government. Public administration review, 66(3), 354-369.
Tomlinson, R. F. (2012). Origins of the Canada geographic information system. ArcNews, Redlands: ESRI.
Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1987). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. University of Chicago Press.
Vreede, T. D., Nguyen, C., Vreede, G. J. D., Boughzala, I., Oh, O., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013, October). A theoretical model of user engagement in crowdsourcing. In International conference on collaboration and technology (pp. 94-109). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Ward, S., Gibson, R., & Lusoli, W. (2003). Online participation and mobilisation in Britain: Hype, hope and reality. Parliamentary affairs, 56(4), 652-668.
Warnecke, L. (1998). State and local GIS initiatives. In T. W. Foresman (Ed.), The history of geographic infor- mation systems: Perspectives from the pioneers (pp. 265–289). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Weber, L. M., Loumakis, A., & Bergman, J. (2003). Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public. Social science computer review, 21(1), 26-42.
West, D. M. (2004). E‐government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public administration review, 64(1), 15-27.
Whittle, P. (1954). On stationary processes in the plane. Biometrika, 434-449.
Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes? Public administration review, 71(6), 880-892.
Zarcadoolas, C., Boyer, J., Krishnaswami, A., & A. Rothenberg (2007). GIS maps to communicate emergency preparedness: How useable are they for inner city residents? Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 4(3).
Zhang, X., Fan, S., & Cai, X. (2002). The path of technology diffusion: Which neighbors to learn from? Contemporary Economic Policy, 20(4), 470-478. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政學系
109256010 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109256010 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202201299 |
| Appears in Collections: | [公共行政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 601001.pdf | | 14022Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 113 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
