English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51717835      Online Users : 566
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/141523
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141523


    Title: 目標導向、示弱價值及成本認知與示弱: 示弱概念建構與量表發展
    Relationships among Goal Orientation, Perceived Benefit and Cost of Showing Vulnerability, and Showing Vulnerability: Construct Development and Validation of Showing Vulnerability
    Authors: 吳恬妤
    Wu, Tien-Yu
    Contributors: 黃家齊
    Huang, Jia-Chi
    吳恬妤
    Wu, Tien-Yu
    Keywords: 示弱行為
    示弱的價值認知
    示弱的成本認知
    目標導向
    Showing Vulnerability
    Perceptions Benefit of Showing Vulnerability
    Perceptions Cost of Showing Vulnerability
    Goal Orientation
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-09-02 14:40:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來隨著探討脆弱的議題興起,在團隊或是企業中逐漸重視此展現脆弱的行為,本研究根據過往文獻之探討,發展出示弱行為、示弱價值與成本認知之量表,來探討各體中不同目標導向特質,對示弱的價值與成本認知,是否會影響到個體的示弱行為。本研究透過焦點訪談與問卷調查之方式,擬定出示弱的價值與成本認知,以及示弱行為量表,經過量表編制歷程後,發展出示弱的價值認知三個構面,分別為示弱的學習價值認知、示弱的關係聯繫認知以及示弱的自我呈現價值認知。在示弱的成本認知方面,則發展出兩個構面,為示弱的自尊成本認知以及示弱的生涯發展成本認知,最後,在示弱行為上區分為兩構面,一為情緒示弱以及另一示弱行為,爾後再透過問卷調查進行研究架構之驗證。
    本研究之研究假設驗證則採用兩個時間點的方式進行資料蒐集,問卷發放對象為高科技產業之員工與主管,採用配對之方式,有效配對問卷為449份。研究結果顯示出學習目標導向與證明目標導向會認知到示弱的學習價值、關係聯繫價值,而有示弱行為產生;而示弱的自我呈現價值則會中介證明目標導向對示弱行為之影響。在示弱的成本認知方面,示弱的生涯發展成本會中介學習目標導向與示弱行為間的關係,且證明目標導向與迴避目標導向皆會認知到示弱的自尊成本與生涯發展成本而影響到示弱行為。最後,本研究會根據實證分析的結果提出相關學術意涵、管理建議以及後續研究建議。
    In recent years, with the vulnerable issues escalating, in a team or in the enterprise progressively pay attention to the vulnerable behavior, according to the study of the previous literature, this study developed showing vulnerability, the perceptions of the benefit and cost of showing vulnerability scale. Exploring the individual of different goal orientations will influence the perceptions of the benefit and cost of showing vulnerability and affect the individual`s showing vulnerability.
    We have developed the perceptions of the benefit and cost of showing vulnerability scale as well as showing vulnerability through focus groups. After the process of developing the scale, we developed three dimensions of the perceptions of the benefit and cost of showing vulnerability, namely, perceived learning benefit of showing vulnerability, perceived relational connection benefit of showing vulnerability, and self-presentation benefit of showing vulnerability. We have developed two dimensions of the perceived cost of showing vulnerability, namely the perceived self-esteem cost of showing vulnerability and the perceived career development cost of showing vulnerability. Lastly, the showing vulnerability is divided into two dimensions, one is emotionally of showing vulnerability and the other is showing vulnerability, and then the research structure is verified through a questionnaire survey.
    The hypothesis test of this study uses two time points to collect data. The research objects are employees and supervisors in the high-tech industry. The matching method is used, and there are 449 valid matching questionnaires. The research results have indicated that learning goal orientation will perceive the learning and relational connection benefit of showing vulnerability and will influence the showing vulnerability. The self-presentation benefit of showing vulnerability will mediate the relationship between performance goal orientation and showing vulnerability.
    In terms of the perceived cost of showing vulnerability, the career development cost of showing vulnerability will mediate the relationship between learning goal orientation and showing vulnerability, and it is performance goal orientation that the avoidance goal orientation both will perceived the self-esteem and career development cost of showing vulnerability and affect showing vulnerability. Finally, this study puts forward academic implications and recommendations for future research.
    Reference: 陳嵩、李佩芬、陳光偉,(2008)。上司家長式領導對銷售人員目標取向及績效之影響--以銀行理財專員為例。企業管理學報, 77,1-46。
    黃家齊,(2002)。組織公正與組織公民行為--認知型與情感型信任的中介效果。臺大管理論叢,12(2),107-141。
    Alexander, L., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2014). Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective. Academy of management review, 39(4), 423-438.
    Anderson, & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
    Anderson, & Williams, L. J. (1996). Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. Journal of applied psychology, 81(3), 282.
    Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management journal, 29(3), 465-487.
    Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & VandeWalle, D. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of management, 29(6), 773-799.
    Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational behavior and human performance, 32(3), 370-398.
    Bachman, G. F., & Guerrero, L. K. (2006). Forgiveness, apology, and communicative responses to hurtful events. Communication Reports, 19(1), 45-56.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
    Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: testing multiple goal models. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(5), 706.
    Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.
    Bochner, A. P. (1984). The functions of communication in interpersonal bonding.
    Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and instruction, 7(2), 161-186.
    Brett, J. F., & VandeWalle, D. (1999). Goal orientation and goal content as predictors of performance in a training program. Journal of applied psychology, 84(6), 863.
    Brooks, A. W., Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2015). Smart people ask for (my) advice: Seeking advice boosts perceptions of competence. Management Science, 61(6), 1421-1435.
    Brown. (2015). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead: Penguin.
    Bruk, A., Scholl, S. G., & Bless, H. (2018). Beautiful mess effect: Self–other differences in evaluation of showing vulnerability. Journal of personality and social psychology, 115(2), 192.
    Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26-48.
    Callister, R. R., Kramer, M. W., & Turban, D. B. (1999). Feedback seeking following career transitions. Academy of Management journal, 42(4), 429-438.
    Cayanus, J. L., & Martin, M. M. (2004). An instructor self‐disclosure scale. Communication Research Reports, 21(3), 252-263.
    Cherry, K. (1991). Hide and Speak: How to Free Ourselves from our Secrets: Harper San Francisco.
    Cianci, A. M., Klein, H. J., & Seijts, G. H. (2010). The effect of negative feedback on tension and subsequent performance: The main and interactive effects of goal content and conscientiousness. Journal of applied psychology, 95(4), 618.
    Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 116(3), 457.
    Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational research methods, 6(2), 147-168.
    Cron, W. L., Slocum, J., John W, VandeWalle, D., & Fu, Q. (2005). The role of goal orientation on negative emotions and goal setting when initial performance falls short of one`s performance goal. Human Performance, 18(1), 55-80.
    Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure: Sage Publications, Inc.
    DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of applied psychology, 90(6), 1096.
    DeVito, J. A. (2001). The interpersonal communication book: Longman Publishing Group.
    DeVito, J. A. (2006). Essentials of human communication: Allyn & Bacon.
    DeVito, J. A. (2019). The interpersonal communication book. Instructor, 1, 18.
    Dillon, W. R., & Goldstein, M. (1984). Multivariate analysis: Methods and applications: New York (NY): Wiley, 1984.
    Dindia, & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 106.
    Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American psychologist, 41(10), 1040.
    Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological review, 95(2), 256.
    Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2× 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(3), 501.
    Fang, H., Fu, H., Li, X., & Meng, L. (2019). Trapped in the woods: high performance goal orientation impedes competence restoration. Personality and Individual Differences, 150, 109479.
    George, T. R. (1994). Self-confidence and baseball performance: A causal examination of self-efficacy theory. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 16(4), 381-399.
    Gong, Y., Wang, M., Huang, J.-C., & Cheung, S. Y. (2017). Toward a goal orientation–based feedback-seeking typology: Implications for employee performance outcomes. Journal of management, 43(4), 1234-1260.
    Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(3), 541.
    Hair, Tatham, R., Anderson, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis Prentice-Hall London. In: UK.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1984). Multivariate data analysis with readings, 1995. Tulsa, OK: Petroleum Publishing.
    Hargie, O., Saunders, C., & Dickson, D. (1994). Social skills in interpersonal communication: Psychology Press.
    Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
    Islam, T., Ahmad, S., Kaleem, A., & Mahmood, K. (2020). Abusive supervision and knowledge sharing: moderating roles of Islamic work ethic and learning goal orientation. Management Decision.
    Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees` goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management journal, 47(3), 368-384.
    Jourard, S. M. (1971). Self-disclosure. An experimental analysis of the transparent self.
    Kim, S. L., Lee, S., & Yun, S. (2016). Abusive supervision, knowledge sharing, and individual factors: A conservation-of-resources perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
    King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). Competitiveness is not that bad… at least in the East: Testing the hierarchical model of achievement motivation in the Asian setting. International journal of intercultural relations, 36(3), 446-457.
    Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(5), 1238.
    Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping: Springer publishing company.
    Leenknecht, M., Hompus, P., & van der Schaaf, M. (2019). Feedback seeking behaviour in higher education: the association with students’ goal orientation and deep learning approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1069-1078.
    Lemay, E. P., & Clark, M. S. (2008). " Walking on eggshells": how expressing relationship insecurities perpetuates them. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(2), 420.
    Ma, J., Peng, Y., & Wu, B. (2021). Challenging or hindering? The roles of goal orientation and cognitive appraisal in stressor‐performance relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(3), 388-406.
    MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological methods, 7(1), 83.
    Marijn Poortvliet, P., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2007). Achievement goals and interpersonal behavior: How mastery and performance goals shape information exchange. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1435-1447.
    McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 381.
    Miller, L. C., Berg, J. H., & Archer, R. L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 44(6), 1234.
    Oc, B., Daniels, M. A., Diefendorff, J. M., Bashshur, M. R., & Greguras, G. J. (2020). Humility breeds authenticity: How authentic leader humility shapes follower vulnerability and felt authenticity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 158, 112-125.
    Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of applied psychology, 92(1), 128.
    Pearce, W. B., & Sharp, S. M. (1973). Self-disclosing communication. Journal of Communication, 23(4), 409-425.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502): Elsevier.
    Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.
    Robinson, J. P., & Shaver, P. R. (1973). Measures of social psychological attitudes.
    Ryan, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., & Midgley, C. (2001). Avoiding seeking help in the classroom: Who and why? Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 93-114.
    Snell, W. E., Miller, R. S., & Belk, S. S. (1988). Development of the emotional self-disclosure scale. Sex Roles, 18(1), 59-73.
    Steel, J. L. (1991). Interpersonal correlates of trust and self-disclosure. Psychological Reports, 68(3_suppl), 1319-1320.
    Tuckey, M., Brewer, N., & Williamson, P. (2002). The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback seeking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(2), 195-216.
    Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138.
    VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and psychological measurement, 57(6), 995-1015.
    VandeWalle, D. (2003). A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 581-604.
    VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of applied psychology, 82(3), 390.
    Vogel, D. L., & Wester, S. R. (2003). To seek help or not to seek help: The risks of self-disclosure. Journal of counseling psychology, 50(3), 351.
    Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1977). The measurement of trust and its relationship to self‐disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 250-257.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理學系
    104355505
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104355505
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201158
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2190View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback