政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/140979
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51727027      Online Users : 601
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140979


    Title: ESG 和員工效率之關聯性研究-兼論員工搭便車風險與企業國際化程度之調節效果
    The Relationship between ESG and Labor Efficiency: Moderating Effects of Labor Free Rider Risk and International Diversification
    Authors: 邱美如
    CHIU, MEI-JU
    Contributors: 李佳玲
    Lee, Chia-Ling
    邱美如
    CHIU, MEI-JU
    Keywords: ESG
    員工效率
    員工生產力
    員工成本
    ESG
    Labor efficiency
    Labor productivity
    Labor cost
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-08-01 17:06:19 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討企業 ESG 績效與員工效率、生產力及成本之關聯性,並以員工搭便車風險和企業國際化程度作為調節因子,探討其影響。本研究使用 2010- 2019 間,臺灣 116 家上市公司,共 1,212 筆年有效樣本進行實證研究,並得出以下研究結果:ESG 和員工效率、生產力呈顯著負向關係、和員工成本呈顯著正向關係,另外於員工搭便車風險高的狀況下,可以調節 ESG 和員工生產力、成本之關聯性;企業國際化程度愈高,也具有調節 ESG 和員工效率、生產力關聯性的效果。
    This study aims to understand the relationship among firm’s ESG performance and labor efficiency, labor productivity, labor cost. Also, we examine the moderating effect of labor free rider risk and international diversification. Using the sample of 116 Taiwan public firms during 2010 to 2019, and in total with 1,212 firm-year samples, the results indicate that the relationship between ESG performance and labor efficiency, labor productivity is significantly negative, and the relationship between ESG performance and labor cost is significantly positive. Further, the firms with high labor free rider risk strengthen the negative relationship between ESG performance and labor productivity, labor cost. The firms with high international diversification weaken the negative relationship between ESG performance and labor efficiency, labor productivity.
    Reference: Albinger, H. S. and Freeman, S. J. 2000. Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations. Journal of Business Ethics 28: 243-253.

    Barnea, A. and A. Rubin. 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97(1): 71-86.

    Basu, S., J. Vitanza, W. Wang. and X. Zhu. 2022. Walking the Walk? Bank ESG Disclosures and Home Mortgage Lending. Review of Accounting Studies Forthcoming.

    Bhattacharya, C. B. and S. Sen. 2003. Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies. Journal of Marketing 67: 76-88.

    Bonner, S. E. and G. B. Sprinkle. 2002. The Effects of Monetary Incentives on Effort and Task Performance: Theories, Evidence, and a Framework for Research. Accounting, Organizations & Society 27: 303–345.

    Brammer, S. J., Pavelin, S. and Porter, L. A. 2009. Corporate Charitable Giving, Multinational Companies and Countries of Concern. Journal of Management Studies 46(4): 575-596.

    Chang, X., Fu, K., Low, A., and Zhang, W. 2015. Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial Economics 115(1): 168-188.

    Chatterji, M. and C. J. Tilley. 2002. Sickness, Absenteeism, Presenteeism, and Sick Pay. Oxford Economic Papers 54: 669–687.

    Chiaramonte, L., A. Dreassi, C. Girardone and S. Piserà. 2021. Do ESG strategies enhance bank stability during financial turmoil? Evidence from Europe. The European Journal of Finance: 1-39.

    Christmann, P. 2004. Multinational Companies and the Natural Environment: Determinants of Global Environmental Policy. Academy of Management Journal 47: 747–760.

    Greening, D. W. and Turban, D. B. 2000. Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business and Society 39: 254-280.

    McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21: 603–609.

    Montgomery, D. B. and C. A. Ramus. 2003. Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation Effects on MBA Job Choice. Stanford Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 1805.

    Delmas, M. A. and S. Pekovic. 2013. Environmental standards and labor productivity: Understanding the mechanisms that sustain sustainability. Journal of Organizational Behavior 34(2): 230-252.

    Edmans, A. 2011. Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics 101(3): 621-640.

    Fombrun, C. J. 1996. Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. (Harvard Business School Press, Bos- ton, MA).

    Godfrey, P. C., C. B. Merrill and J. Hansen. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30(4): 425-445.

    Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L. and Hayes, T.L. 2002.Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(2): 268-279.

    Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E. and Kim, H. 1997. International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product- Diversified Firms. The Academy of Management Journal 40: 767-798.

    Husted, B. W. 2005. Risk Management, Real Options, Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 60(2): 175-183.

    Hwang, J., H. Kim. and D. Jung. 2021. The Effect of ESG Activities on Financial Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Evidence from Korea. Sustainability 13(20).

    Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B. and Hatfield, J. D. 1985. An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. The Academy of Management Journal 28: 446-463

    Klein, J. and N. Dawar. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and consumers` attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing 21(3): 203-217.

    Kostova, T. and S. Zaheer. 1999. Organizational Legitimacy under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise. The Academy of Management Review 24: 64-81.

    Lannelongue, G., J. Gonzalez-Benito. and I. Quiroz. 2017. Environmental management and labour productivity: The moderating role of capital intensity. J Environ Manage 190: 158-169.

    Luo, Y. and R. L. Tung. 2017. A general theory of springboard MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies 49(2): 129-152.

    Lys, T., J. P. Naughton and C. Wang. 2015. Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 60: 56-72.

    Maignan, I. and O. C. Ferrell. 2001. Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: an investigation of French businesses. Journal of Business Research 51: 37-51.

    Peloza, J. 2006. Using Corporate Social Responsibility as Insurance for Financial Performance. California Management Review 48: 52-72.

    Peterson, D. K. 2016. The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment. Business & Society 43(3): 296-319.

    Prashantham, S. and J. Birkinshaw. 2015. Choose Your Friends Carefully: Home-Country Ties and New Venture Internationalization. Management International Review 55(2): 207-234.

    Rego, A., Ribeiro, N. and Cunha, M. P. 2009. Perceptions of Organizational Virtuousness and Happiness as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics 93(2): 215-235.

    Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. 2014. The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science 60(11): 2835–2857.

    Roberts, P. W. and G. R. Dowling. 2002. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 23(12): 1077-1093.

    Sánchez, P. E. and S. Benito-Hernández. 2013. CSR Policies: Effects on Labour Productivity in Spanish Micro and Small Manufacturing Companies. Journal of Business Ethics 128(4): 705-724.

    Sassen, R., Hinze, AK. and Hardeck, I. 2016. Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics 86(8): 867-904.

    Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. California: Sage.

    Sharfman, M. P., Shaft, T. M. and Tihanyi, L. 2016. A Model of the Global and Institutional Antecedents of High-Level Corporate Environmental Performance. Business & Society 43(1): 6-36.

    Stuebs, M. and L. Sun. 2010. Business Reputation and Labor Efficiency, Productivity, and Cost. Journal of Business Ethics 96(2): 265-283.

    Sun, L. and T. R. Yu. 2015. The impact of corporate social responsibility on employee performance and cost. Review of Accounting and Finance 14(3): 262-284.

    Surroca, J. and J. A. Tribó. 2008. Managerial Entrenchment and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 35(5-6): 748-789.

    Tajfel, H. and J. C. Turner. 1985. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour: 7- 24.

    Tarmuji, I., Maelah, R. and Tarmuji, N. 2016. The Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance Practices (ESG) on Economic Performance: Evidence from ESG Score. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance 7: 67-74.

    Turban, D. B. and D. W. Greening 1997. Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. The Academy of Management Journal 40: 658-672.

    Velte, Patrick. 2017. Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility 8.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    109353002
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109353002
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201100
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2184View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback