政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/140717
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113873/144892 (79%)
造访人次 : 51899893      在线人数 : 454
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140717


    题名: 資源效應：社會企業如何轉化資源以回應制約
    Resource Effectuation: Converting resources for responding constraints in social enterprises
    作者: 賴會欣
    Lai, Hui-Hsin
    贡献者: 蕭瑞麟
    Hsiao, Ruey-Lin
    賴會欣
    Lai, Hui-Hsin
    关键词: 社會企業
    劣勢創新
    資源延展效應
    資源拮抗效應
    資源槓桿效應
    Social enterprise
    Resource conversion
    Stretching effect
    Antagonistic effect
    Leveraging effect
    日期: 2022
    上传时间: 2022-07-01 16:32:45 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 社會企業要平衡使命與獲利，在解決社會問題的同時有穩定收入能支持營運，但多數社會企業面臨資源匱乏的情境，包含少資源、負資源與亂資源，如何能夠生存下來並持續推動使命，成了重要的課題。隨創理論強調在劣勢下要能善用手邊資源進行創新，然而，資源在過程中如何轉化並產生創新價值，是過去研究較少討論的。本論文透過研究茶籽堂、甘樂文創、鮮乳坊三個案例，分析其中制約、資源轉化過程與隨創成果，進而調查如何讓資源產生多元的效果、如何處理負資源，以及如何解決系統性問題。觀念上，本研究提出了資源水平延展與垂直延展的原則、複數拮抗資源的轉化，以及資源槓動系統的過程。實務上，本研究提供三個資源轉化的作法，包含資源延展效應、資源拮抗效應、資源槓桿效應。如此，制約之於社會企業不再是阻力，而是為資源注入新能量的助力。
    Social enterprises should find a way to balance mission and profit, while solving social problems. However, most social enterprises suffered a range of constraints, such as confronting insufficient resources, negative resources and sophisticated problems. The survival of social enterprises is a premise to sustain their social mission. To survive in disadvantageous circumstances, prior theories on bricolage suggests that resources making-do could prompt creative resolutions. However, how resources are converted and how their values are recreated are less-explored in the previous research. This study examines three social enterprises supported by the coroporate citizenship project in DBS, including the cases of Cha Tzu Tang, CAN (Cultural Art and Nature) and Pure Milk. The goal is to analyze constraints facing these social enteprises and inspect patterns of resource conversion so as to explore new practices of bricolage. Theoretically, this research investigates how to effectuate resources for multiple uses, how to convert negative resources for new values, and how to resolve systemic problems by leveraging limited resources. It elaborates the horizontal and vertical stretching of resources, the conversion of antagonistic resources, and the leveraging of inadequate resources. Practically, this research suggests three creative approaches to resource deployment. Stretching effect facilitates resource expansion for multiple applications. Antagonistic effect encourages the converion of negative resources in order to support creative resolutions. Leveraging effect attempts to identify the least resistance path so that minimum resources could generate maximum influences. By so doing, constraints could be considered less as a pessimistic resistance, but more of a generative resource. The key to adversary innovation thus lies in injecting new capacity into mobilized resources to create wealth.
    參考文獻: 中文文獻
    胡哲生、陳志遠、吳秉恩，2009，「社會企業本質、任務與發展」，《創業管理研究》，第4期，1-28頁。
    胡哲生、張子揚，2009，「社會企業創業議題：社會創新與管理融入」，《創業管理研究》，第4期，第4卷，85-105頁。
    翁晶晶、謝英哲，2019，「績效薪資改革的盲點: 制度邏輯的新視角」，《中山管理評論》，第27期，第1卷，139-178頁。
    蕭瑞麟，2017，《不用數字的研究：質性研究的思辨脈絡》， 台北： 五南學術原創專書系列。
    蕭瑞麟，2019，《服務隨創：少力設計的邏輯思維》，台北：五南書局學術專書。
    蕭瑞麟、徐嘉黛，2020，「境隨心轉：服務隨創中的認知轉移與資源轉換」，《組織與管理》，即將發表。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、吳彥寬，2017，「逆勢拼湊：化資源制約為創新來源」，《中山管理評論》，第1期，第25卷，219-268頁。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳煥宏，2019，「負負得正：相依性如何促成負資源轉換」，《組織與管理》，第12卷，第1期，第127-171頁。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳蕙芬，2014，「劣勢創新：梵谷策展中的隨創行為」，《中山管理評論》，第2期，第22卷，323-367頁。

    英文文獻
    Acar, O. A., Tarakci, M., & van Knippenberg, D. 2019. Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review. Journal of Management, 45(1): 96-121.
    Andersen, O. J. 2008. A bottom-up perspective on innovations: Mobilizing knowledge and social capital through innovative processes of bricolage. Administration & Society, 40(1): 57-78.
    Baker, T. 2007. Resources in play: Bricolage in the toy store(y). Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5): 694-711.
    Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 329-366.
    Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A.-C., & Model, J. 2014. Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58.
    Child, C. 2020. Whence paradox? Framing Away the potential challenges of doing well by doing good in social enterprise organizations. Organization Studies, 41(8): 1147-1167.
    Ciambotti, G., & Pedrini, M. 2021. Hybrid harvesting strategies to overcome resource constraints: Evidence from social enterprises in Kenya. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(3): 631-650.
    Combs, J. G., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. 2011. The role of resource flexibility in leveraging strategic resources. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5): 1098-1125.
    Cornelissen, J., Akemu, O., Jonkman, J., & Werner, M. 2021. Building character: The formation of a hybrid organizational identity in a social enterprise. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5): 1294 - 1330.
    Dalpiaz, E., Rindova, V., & Ravasi, D. 2016. Combining logics to transform organizational agency: Blending industry and art at Alessi. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3): 347-392.
    Deephouse, D. L. 2000. Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6): 1091-1112.
    Delmestri, G., & Greenwood, R. 2016. How Cinderella became a queen. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 507-550.
    Desa, G. 2012. Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 36(4): 727-751.
    Desa, G., & Basu, S. 2013. Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1): 26-49.
    Di Domenico, M., Tracey, P., & Haugh, H. 2009. The dialectic of social exchange: Theorizing corporate-social enterprise collaboration. Organization Studies, 30(8): 887-907.
    Di Domenico, M.-L., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. 2010. Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 34(4): 681-703.
    Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. 2010. Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35(2): 265-293.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.
    Fox, J. R., Park, B., & Lang, A. 2007. When available resources become negative resources: The effects of cognitive overload on memory sensitivity and criterion bias. Communication Research, 34(3): 277-296.
    Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2): 277-300.
    Garud, R., Schildt, H. A., & Lant, T. K. 2014. Entrepreneurial Storytelling, Future Expectations, and the Paradox of Legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(5): 1479-1492.
    Gibbert, M., Hoegl, M., & Välikangas, L. 2007. In praise of resource constraints. Sloan Management Review, 48(3): 15-17.
    Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. 1993. Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5): 1052-1081.
    Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1993. Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2): 75-84.
    Hockerts, K. 2015. How Hybrid Organizations Turn Antagonistic Assets into Complementarities. California Management Review, 57(3): 83-106.
    Kliewe, T., Marquardt, P., & Baaken, T. 2009. Leveraging organizational resources by creative coupling: An evaluation of methods for intellectual asset identification. Journal of Knowledge Globalization, 2(2): 1-23.
    Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 545–564.
    Molecke, G., & Pinkse, J. 2017. Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing.
    Morecroft, J. D. W. 1988. System dynamics and microworlds for policymakers. European Journal of Operational Research, 35: 301-320.
    Orlikowski, W. J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations Organization Science, 11(4): 404–428.
    Orlikowski, W. J. 2002. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3): 249-273.
    Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4): 972-1001.
    Pettigrew, A. M. 1987. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6): 649-670.
    Pettigrew, A. M. 1990. Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3): 267-292.
    Quelch, J. B., & Kenny, D. 1994. The logic of product-line extensions. Harvard Business Review, 72(6): 60-60.
    Reuschl, A. J., Deist, M. K., & Maalaoui, A. 2022. Digital transformation during a pandemic: Stretching the organizational elasticity. Journal of Business Research, 144: 1320-1332.
    Rosso, B. D. 2014. Creativity and constraints: Exploring the role of constraints in the creative processes of Research and Development Teams. Organization Studies, 35(4): 551-585.
    Santos, F. M., Pache, A.-C., & Birkholz, C. 2015. Making hybrids work: Aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. California Management Review, 57(3): 36-58.
    Seelos, C., & Mair, J. 2017. Innovation and Scaling for Impact: How Effective Social Enterprises Do It. Redwood City, California: Stanford University Press.
    Senge, P. M. 1990. The Fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
    Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4): 448-469.
    Shu, E., & Lewin, A. Y. 2016. A resource dependence perspective on low-power actors shaping their regulatory environment: The case of Honda. Organization Studies, 38(8): 1039-1058.
    Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T., & Spee, P. 2015. Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logic in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3): 932-970.
    Sonenshein, S. 2014. How organization foster the creative use of resources. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3): 814-848.
    Sunduramurthy, C., Zheng, C., Musteen, M., Francis, J., & Rhyne, L. 2016. Doing more with less, systematically? Bricolage and ingenieuring in successful social ventures. Journal of World Business, 51(5): 855-870.
    Taggar, S. 2002. Individual creativity and group ability to utilise individual creative resources: A multi level model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2): 315-330.
    Tasavori, M., Kwong, C., & Pruthi, S. 2018. Resource bricolage and growth of product and market scope in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(3/4): 336-361.
    Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. 2016. Managing the consequence of organizational stigmatization: Identity work in a social enterprise. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3): 740-765.
    Whittington, R. 2006. Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5): 613-634.
    Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 70-105.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    109364204
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109364204
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200651
    显示于类别:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    420401.pdf6794KbAdobe PDF2154检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈