政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/140699

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Master for Eminent Public Administrators > Theses > Item 140.119/140699

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140699

Title:	業務與幕僚部門衝突之研究 —以臺北市政府勞務採購為例 Conflicts between Line and Staff Department : A Case Study on Service Procurement of Taipei City Government
Authors:	李建龍 Li, Chan-Long
Contributors:	詹中原李建龍 Li, Chan-Long
Keywords:	業務與幕僚部門衝突管理勞務採購深度訪談法溝通討論 Line and Staff Conflict management Service procurement In-depth interview Communication
Date:	2022
Issue Date:	2022-07-01 16:28:44 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	業務部門肩負機關任務，幕僚部門職司意見提供，兩者有本質、功能或是目標等根本差異；前者著重任務需求面，後者重視法規程序面。且隨者以往權責稱適、相互依存關係變化，幕僚部門逐漸在不獲致權力，透過專業知識影響業務部門及其直屬長官意見或作法，改變以往傳統關係。如不接受，衝突於焉爆發。衝突管理是現今國內外許多學者探討之議題，衝突類型可能是個人內在、個人間、團體間、組織內或組織間等，本研究將以組織內之業務與幕僚部門衝突為主，以探討雙方面對衝突時，所採取之應對方法為何？政府採購案件，以勞務採購居多。本研究以專業服務、後續擴充（含新增工項）和契約變更作為基準，針對臺北市政府轄屬機關民政局、工務局、都發局、財政局和產業局之業務與採購人員進行深度訪談，以求採購衝突原因和應對作法。實際訪談發現，首先在「法令觀念見解差異」，為採購衝突最大主因；其次為「專業知識立場有間」，對於行政慣例或作業流程產生歧見；再者係「任務目標肩負不同」，易在招標時程、需求規範產生摩擦；最後則是「機關待任年資差距」，此點與文獻探討不同，幕僚部門待任時間相較於業務部門，來得資深。故在這方面衝突次數，相對最少，因業務部門大多聽從幕僚部門意見辦理。綜觀而言，採購衝突發生時，業務人員最後大都會尊重採購人員看法。除非提出理由舉證反駁或涉及實際任務需求面時，才會據理力爭。此時，採購人員會尊重其看法。故嚴重採購衝突現象甚少，大都透過溝通討論，達成共識。必要時，洽詢採購諮詢單位或簽請上級裁決。若能夠業務輪調、換位思考、教育訓練或與第三方採購諮詢單位接軌，應更能解決臺北市政府採購衝突。 The Line department is responsible for the tasks of the organization, and the Staff department provides opinions. They are fundamentally different in nature, function or goal; the former focuses on the task requirements, and the latter focuses on the regulations and procedures. In addition, with the changes in the relationship between powers and responsibilities and interdependence in the past, the Staff department influences the opinions or practices of Line department and its immediate supervisors through professional knowledge without gaining power, changing the traditional relationship in the past. If it is not accepted, conflicts will break out. Conflict management is a topic discussed by many scholars at home and abroad. The types of conflicts may be within the individual, between individuals, between groups, within the organization or between organizations. This research will focus on the conflicts between Line and Staff within the organization, to explore the two sides. When faced with conflicts, what is the conflict management? Most government procurement cases are service procurement. Based on professional services, subsequent expansion (including new added items), and amendment of contract , this research conducted in-depth interview on the Line and Procurement personnel of the Civil Affairs Bureau, Public Works Bureau, Metropolitan Development Bureau, Finance Bureau, and Industry Bureau, which are affiliated to the Taipei City Government. To find out the causes of procurement conflicts and how to deal with them. The interviews found that, Firstly, "differences in legal concepts and opinions were the main causes of procurement conflicts; Secondly, "different professional knowledge positions", resulting in differences in administrative practices or operating procedures; Thirdly, "different tasks and goals", which were easily There is friction in the bidding schedule and demand specification; Finally, there is the "gap in the tenure of the office". This is different from the literature discussion. Compared with the Line department, the Staff department tenure is more senior. To sum up , the number of conflicts in this regard is relatively few, because of most of the Line department follow the advice of the Procurement personnel. When a procurement conflicts occur, the Line will eventually respect the opinions of the Procurement personnel. Unless there is a reason to refute the evidence or involve the actual task requirements, it will be argued on the grounds. At this point, the Procurement personnel will respect their views. Therefore, serious procurement conflicts are rare, and most of them reach consensus through communication and discussion. When necessary, consult the procurement consulting unit or sign a higher-level ruling. If the professional work rotation, put oneself in someone`s shoes, education or training, or integration with third-party procurement consulting units can be achieved. It should be able to resolve the procurement conflicts on Taipei City government .
Reference:	一、中文部分文崇一、楊國樞（2000）。訪問調查法。社會及行為科學研究法（下冊）。台北：東華。林欣若（2003）。網路中的女性情誼－以台大椰林「站崗的女人」為例。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士學位論文，未出版，台北。林欽榮（2010）。組織理論與管理。台北：楊智。林寬仁（2007）。政府採購專業人員核心能力之研究。國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文，未出版，台北。胡幼慧、姚美華（2008）。一些質性方法上的思考：信度與效度？如何抽樣？如何收集資料、登錄與分析？載於胡幼慧（編），質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北：巨流。紐文英（2014）。質性研究方法與論文寫作（修訂版）。台北，雙葉。張金鑑（1970）。行政學典範。台北：中國行政學會。張潤書（1976）。行政學。台北：三民。張潤書（1983）。行政學。台北：三民。張潤書（2020）。行政學。台北：三民。戚樹誠（2021）。組織行為：臺灣經驗與全球視野。台北，雙葉。許永聰（1980）。幕僚人員與業務人員衝突之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文，未出版，台北。許南雄（1992）。各國人事制度。台北：商鼎文化出版社。陳木金（1999）。學校的溝通管理與衝突管理。台北，高等教育。陳啟榮（2013）。行政機關的雙核心：淺談業務部門與幕僚部門。公務人員月刊，205，35-39。彭文賢（1980）。行政組織的分化與整合。台北，中央研究院三民主義研究所。彭文賢（1992）。人群關係的生態面。臺北，幼獅。彭文賢（1996）。組織結構。台北，三民。黃炎東（2013）。組織衝突、危機管理與企業經營管理策略。華人經濟研究，11（2），79-90。黃慧娟、王莉珺（2020）。警察機關採購人員專業能力指標之探討。中央警察大學警察行政管理學報，16，1-24。萬文隆（2004）。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊，37（4），17-23。葉志誠、葉立誠（2011）。研究方法與論文寫作。台北：商鼎數位。葉慶輝、吳香錡、葉淑娟、郭泰宏（2008）。醫療單位之組織衝突管理探討。中華職業醫學雜誌，15（4），311-321。魯先華（2003）。教育行政組織業務與幕僚人員的衝突管理。中等教育，54（6），104-119。蕭東根（2008）。臺北市政府採購人員工作壓力之研究。中國文化大學政治學研究所碩士學位論文，未出版，台北。許春寶（2020）。澎湖縣主計與業務單位人員知覺組織衝突原因及其管理策略之探討。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士學位論文，未出版，高雄。戴國良（2021）。圖解管理學。台北：五南。鍾義均（1987）。幕僚作業與管理。台北：幼獅。蘇恆舜（2013）。警察組織採購人力資源調查之研究。中央警察大學警察行政管理學報，9，141-163。楊仁壽、卓秀足（2013）。組織理論與管理：個案、衡量與產業應用（二版）。台北：雙葉。臺北市政府工務局（2022）。組織架構，2021年9月14日，取自 :https：//pwd.gov.taipei/cp.aspx？n=2E68443353FB1EB0。行政院公共工程委員會（2021）。109年度政府採購執行情形，2021年5月24日，取自：https：//www.pcc.gov.tw/cp.aspx？n=2C022C3F6E 9B784E。臺北市政府採購業務資訊網（2021）。109年採購標準作業程序（第14版），2021年12月22日，取自：https：//gpis.taipei/frontFunction /Affair/wfrmEBook.aspx？category=1&PreID=2。二、英文部分 Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organizations. Chandler publishing company,SanFrancisco,246. Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1970). The fifth achievement. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 6(4), 413-426. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.Qualitative research journal. Dale, E., & Urwick, L. F. (1960). Staff in organization. New York:McGraw-Hill. Fayol, H. (1916). General and industrial management (Storrs translation,1949). London:Pitman. Gross, M. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (2000). Managing conflict appropriately and effectively:An application of the competence model to Rahim`s organizational conflict styles. International journal of conflict management. Lorsch, J. W., & Lawrence, P. R. (Eds.). (1970). Studies in organization design. Homewood, Ill.:RD Irwin,6. McGregor, D., & Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. (1960). The human side of enterprise (Vol. 21, p. 166). New York: McGraw-Hill. Merton, R. K., & Merton, R. C. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster. Mintzberg, H. (1989). The structuring of organizations. In Readings in strategic management (pp. 322-352). Palgrave, London. Mooney, J. D., & Reiley, A. C. (1939). The Principles of Organization, Harper and Brothers. Muslih, M. (2021). Towards a Better Organizational Structure. Journal of Business and Economics, ISSN, 2155-7950. Plant, J. F. (2020). Line and Staff. In Organization Theory and Management (pp. 191-216). Routledge. Pondy, L . R . (1967).Organization Conflict:Concepts and Models.Administrative Science Quarterly,12(2),296-320. Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict:A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological reports,44(3_supply), 1323-1344. Rahim, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. International journal of conflict management. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior,15th. Shahrivar, 13, 1393. Taylor, F. W. (1911). Shop management. New York:Harper, 1919 Wall Jr, J. A., & Callister, R. R. (1995). Conflict and its management.Journal of management, 21(3), 515-558. Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnette(Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago:Rand McNally. Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程 109921022
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109921022
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202200546
Appears in Collections:	[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
102201.pdf		7919Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...