政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139622
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造访人次 : 51833363      在线人数 : 523
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139622


    题名: 銀行分離管制之基礎理論──美國法之介紹與比較反省
    Affiliation Control in Banking Law and Its Genealogy: A Primer on the U.S Law and Lessons for Taiwan
    作者: 林建中
    贡献者: 法學評論
    关键词: 金融分離;關係人交易;Glass-Steagall Act;Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act;金融控股公司;大到不能倒;Dodd-Frank Act;伏克爾法則
    Separation of Banking and Commerce;Related Party Transaction;Glass-Steagall Act;Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act;Financial Holding Company;“Too Big To Fail”Problem;Dodd-Frank Act;Volcker Rule
    日期: 2021-12
    上传时间: 2022-04-08 10:23:10 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 近年「媒金分離」、「產金分離」與「金金分離」等金融政策，成為臺灣常提及之概念。美國法上分離政策，經過規模限制、關係人交易限制、業種分離、業種重新允許結合與再次限制等不同階段演變，最終匯聚在金融控股公司型態。此一結論現為各國金融組織主流管制型態。然而該結構也出現眾多問題：包括過於繁複、金融業者性質與風險轉變、商品定性與管制困難、及金融機構規模過大問題，特別是「大到不能倒」的救援困境。而這也正是二○一○年後美國重新引入Volcker Rule的原因。臺灣在此問題上，一方面面對類似變遷，但另方面也出現本地特有的想法與挑戰。準此，美國法上的處理，特別是法條上概念比較法上的溯源、金融控股公司結構下跨業經營所衍生的問題與挑戰、及相關概念與背後理論，對臺灣而言均有理解的必要，並希望能藉此就臺灣在金融分離政策的操作上，產生一定的借鏡。
    In recent years,“separation of banking and commerce”,“separation of banking and media”, and“separation among banking institutions”are all recurring keywords when referring to financial regulation in Taiwan. However, matching concepts in comparative banking law, even imperfect ones, are less often discussed. Using the notions and legal rules developed in the United States as the benchmarks, this Article examines and analyzes these related concepts—in form or of function—and their uses in the United States.The general“firewall”policy in American banking law has gone through several stages, including branch restriction, related-party transaction regulation, separation of commercial and investment banking, breakdown of the Glass-Steagall Wall, and the re-introduction of Volcker Rule by the Dodd-Frank Act as a keystone in mending the fallout of 2008 financial crisis. On the surface, these changes evolve and converge toward the structural design of any financial holding company. However, this organizational form has created unexpected challenges to modern financial regulation, including lack of transparency, obscuring the role as an intermediary and trading opponent, over-complex product design, and excessive size of financial conglomerates, which causes wealth concentration, political unease, as well as“too big to fail”when happened. This is exactly the background of the returning of Volcker Rule in 2010.However, Taiwan not only faces a similar structural threat brought by financial holding companies as what is in the U.S., but also encounters its local idiosyncrasy when crafting its version of“separation policy.”To respond to this intricate nature of this issue, this Article investigates the historical developments in the banking law in the United States. The hope is that these experiences would serve as a useful reference for Taiwan’s handling of this myriad of concepts.
    關聯: 法學評論, 167, 309-401
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/102398202021120167005
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202021120167005
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    45.pdf2680KbAdobe PDF2160检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈