政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139620
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51753334      在线人数 : 540
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139620


    题名: 偵查機關調取歷史性行動電話基地臺位置資訊之合憲性審查──從美國聯邦最高法院判決檢視我國法制
    Historical Cell Site Location Information and Privacy: An Examination of the Taiwanese Current Norm
    作者: 溫祖德
    贡献者: 法學評論
    关键词: 第三人調取令;提出文書命令;調取歷史性行動電話基地臺位置紀錄;第三人原則;合理隱私期待;國家監視
    Subpoena Duces Tecum;Third-Party Doctrine;Reasonable Expectation of Privacy;Cell-Site Location Information;Nation’s Surveillance
    日期: 2021-12
    上传时间: 2022-04-08 10:22:22 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 美國聯邦最高法院於Carpenter v. United States案，針對偵查機關蒐集調取個人行動電話產出之歷史性行動電話基地臺位置紀錄資訊，具有深度揭露性、全面觸及性及蒐集資訊自動性及不可避免性之本質，縱使該等資訊交由第三人蒐集、儲存、持有及控制之，個人對於資訊仍保有合理之隱私期待，因而當國家蒐集取得此類資訊時，構成增修條文第4條搜索，國家應遵循令狀原則，本於相當理由核發之令狀，方得為之。至於我國法制關於歷史性行動電話基地臺位置資訊，屬於通聯紀錄，並訂有通訊保障及監察法第11條之1之規範保護之。然從美國Carpenter案之最新見解及論述，反思我國調取歷史性行動電話基地臺位置資訊之調取令之立法，應重新思考修正之以充分保障人民之隱私權及秘密通訊自由。
    The United States Supreme Court, in 2018, made a landmark decision concerning the constitutionality of a court-ordered subpoena requesting a third party to turn over historical cell site location information to the investigation of an accused party.The Supreme Court considered that an individual holds a reasonable expectation of privacy towards personal historical cell site location information and held that a court order (subpoena duces tecum) compelling a third party to turn over an individual’s historical cell site location information constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment to The Constitution of The United States, and as such, is subject to the warrant requirements. Under this same contextual analysis, an individual’s personal historical cell site location information is subject to the protection of the Republic of China (Taiwan) Constitution Article 12.Under the Communication Security and Surveillance Law, an access warrant for personal historical cell site location information is not subject to the probable cause standard. Additionally, certain felonies are exempted from the requirement that an access warrant be issued by a judge, instead allowing the prosecutor to issue the warrant. This paper suggests that these issues should be reexamined and amended to protect the privacy and freedom of private communications of all individuals.
    關聯: 法學評論, 167, 171-256
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/102398202021120167003
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202021120167003
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    43.pdf2508KbAdobe PDF2209检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈