政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139619
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51734972      Online Users : 601
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139619


    Title: 開放國家及其憲法解釋
    An Open State and the Explanation of Its Constitution
    Authors: 林依仁
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 國家開放性;尊重條約原則;友善國際法原則;克減規則;體系解釋
    Openness of the State;The Principle of Respect for Treaties;The Principle of Friendliness to International Law;Derogation Rule;System Interpretation;Drogrationsregel;Rangzuweisung;Geltungszuweisung
    Date: 2021-12
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:22:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文探討公約適用與內國法間關係的憲法爭議。按國際公約經施行法轉換後，肇致二以上法規範同在、產生規範衝突。釋憲者即應處理規範位階之定序工作、現有法令與公約內容衝突，與適用複數法規之疑義。我國憲法為規範國家在國際交往活動，特於第141條預設融合條款。此一憲法尊重條約原則，蘊含類似德國友善條約原則，體現出憲法之固定與開放性。公約施行法為一特殊的繼受決定，表徵接納國際人權秩序，經此規範增補衍生之適用爭議，亦屬憲法法庭的闡明任務。本文從訴訟類型著手，析論公約相涉之基本權解釋問題，復涉因法定參照義務，而生是否與如何參照的法令適用憲法爭議。前者應側重有無依循憲法尊重原則而未恣意。至於後者，特別是體系解釋與法律續造兩種情況，應調和憲法尊重原則與依法審判與依法行政原則間關係。為此試舉三例分析。最後對我國釋憲權之行使提出若干觀點，俾兼顧公約遵守與維護主權。
    This article aims to examine the dispute in the Constitution between convention application and domestic law-making and application. The dispute began after an international convention was converted following the enforcement of the“Act to Implement the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights”(the International Covenants Implementation Act), resulting in having more than two codes existing simultaneously, thus creating a conflict in domestic law codes. Hence, Constitutional interpreters should resolve the following issues: setting the ranking of the codes, conflict between the present Constitution and content of the conventions, and doubts of applying multiple codes.To regulate the nation’s international exchange activity, the Constitution of Taiwan specifically presets a merging clause in Article 141. The principle of respect for treaties stipulated in the Constitution not only implies a profound meaning that is similar to Germany’s practical principle of friendliness but also embodies the principle’s fixity and openness. Being a special legal reception decision, the International Covenants Implementation Act signifies the nation’s acceptance of the international human rights order. And the disputes that arise from the addition and amendment of related codes should be clarified from the constitutional interpretation. From the angle of the possible litigation types, this article analyzes the interpretation problems of the basic rights involved in the convention.When reference obligations are set by the Act to Implement the International Covenants, it is inevitable that doubt about whether it was referenced and how it was referenced arises. Regarding the question of whether the convention was referenced or not should focus on whether the principle of respect in the Constitution was followed arbitrarily or not arbitrarily. As for the matter of how it was referenced, mediation of the relationship between the principle of respect in the Constitution, trial by the legislature, and law-based administration should be emphasized, especially in the two situations of system approach and legal renewal. Three practical examples are provided for analysis in this study. Lastly, several points for deliberation are suggested regarding the exercise of Taiwan’s constitutional interpretation right, so as to ensure both adherence to conventions and protection of our sovereignty.
    Relation: 法學評論, 167, 77-170
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.53106/102398202021120167002
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202021120167002
    Appears in Collections:[Chengchi law review ] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    42.pdf1483KbAdobe PDF2169View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback