政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139606
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51832410      Online Users : 498
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139606


    Title: 刑事審判中的司法詢問員
    Forensic Interviewers at Criminal Trials
    Authors: 李佳玟
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 弱勢證人;司法詢問員;中介員;詰問權;公平審判權;交互詰問;性侵害犯罪
    Vulnerable Witness;Forensic Interview;Intermediary;Right of Confrontation;Right to Fair Trial;Cross Examination;Sex Crimes
    Date: 2021-03
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:17:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 二○一五年年底，立法院增訂性侵害犯罪防治法第15條之1，引入原施行於英美的司法詢問制度。立法者希望改善弱勢證人的司法困境值得肯定，但由於條文內容過於簡略籠統，法律上路三年以來，各法院作法不一，也引發不少如何與現行制度嫁接的疑問。本文因此參酌他國規定，認為英格蘭與威爾斯之司法實務所建立的監督者模式，最能兼顧被告詰問權與司法詢問專業對於弱勢證人的協助。它一方面保留當事人親自詰問的權利，另一方面它讓當事人的詰問受到司法詢問員的審前指導與審判中監督。這個制度也給法官針對詰問是否適當的最終裁量權，對於既有的刑事審判體制的衝擊最小。一旦確定了審判中司法詢問員應採取的模式，未來的立法就有能夠參照的對象，也能解決現行實務所累積的各種疑問。
    In order to help vulnerable witnesses provide testimonies during the criminal investigations and at trials, in 2015, Taiwanese legislators enacted Article 15-1 in the Sexual Assault Crime Prevention Act to introduce forensic interview. While this new statute has officially recognized the needs of vulnerable witnesses, how forensic interviewers help witness in cross examination at trials is far from clear. There is a call from judges and lawyers for legislators to provide specific rules for the forensic interview at trials. After reviewing four models currently operated in different countries, this Article suggests that Taiwan should adopt the Monitor model from England and Wales. The superiority of the Monitor model is due to its ability to provide the best balance between the right to confront witnesses for criminal defendants and the rights of vulnerable witnesses to give useful testimonies at trials and to be protected from undue embarrassments and confusions. It also retains judges the purview to supervise and control the cross examinations. Once the Monitor model is accepted, relevant English and Welsh laws and regulations will become useful tools for Taiwanese legislators to improve our forensic interview system.
    Relation: 法學評論, 164, 51-126
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202021030164002
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202021030164002
    Appears in Collections:[Chengchi law review ] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    29.pdf2133KbAdobe PDF2194View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback