English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51772585      Online Users : 20
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139589


    Title: 議事阻撓與少數保障之憲法規範初探
    Preliminary Study on Constitutional Rules About Parliamentary Obstructions and the Protection of Minority Parties
    Authors: 陳淳文
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 議事阻撓;少數保障;多數決原則;議會自律;冗長辯論;議會辯論之清晰性與真誠性
    Parliamentary Obstruction;Protection of Minority;Majority Principle;Parliamentary Self-discipline;Filibuster;The Clarity and Loyalty of Parliamentary Debate
    Date: 2019-12
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:10:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 從法規範的層面來看，議事阻撓與少數保障是兩個密不可分的概念。前者通常就是議會內之少數政黨或政治團體，為了極大化其影響力的行為表現。而後者則通常是作為界定前者的理論基礎與規範界線。議事阻撓事件的發生，受到諸如憲政體制 ; 選舉制度 ; 政黨體系 ; 議事規則，乃至政治文化與議員個人行事風格等因素所影響。此類事件固然會妨礙國會立法進程，但也會發揮相當功能。但為避免議事阻撓行為癱瘓民主體制，仍須對其予以適當規範。除了透過憲法 ; 法律或國會議事規則等規範制定途徑外，亦可透過憲法解釋途徑，一方面建置少數黨的憲政地位，另一方面清楚劃定議事阻撓行為的法律界線。
    From the perspective of constitutional rules, parliamentary obstruction and protection of minority parties are two inseparable notions. Generally speaking, the former represents the actions—played by parliamentary minority parties or political alliance—that are performed in order to maximize their influence in Parliament. The latter is generally used as theoretical foundation and regulation boundary of the former. Parliamentary obstructions are affected by different factors such as constitutional regime, electoral system, party system, procedural rules in Parliament, and even political culture and personal style of legislators. While these obstructions certainly impede the legislative process, they can perform some institutional functions. It is necessary to establish appropriate rules about parliamentary obstructions in order to prevent the democratic paralysis. Other than the normative approach through the constitutional or legislative law making, the interpretative approach is also applicable. These two approaches can simultaneously build up the constitutional status of minority parties and the normative boundary of parliamentary obstructions.
    Relation: 法學評論, 159, 69-128
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202019120159002
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202019120159002
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    10.pdf1747KbAdobe PDF2196View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback