English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51725768      Online Users : 642
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139588


    Title: 大學自治與國家監督──國立臺灣大學校長遴選爭議之法理分析
    University Autonomy and State Supervision: A Jurisprudential Analysis on the Controversies of NTU`s Presidential Selection
    Authors: 陳文政
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 大學自治;國家監督;國立大學;校長遴選;法理分析;大學法;行政程序法;規則論證;基準論證;法治
    University Autonomy;State Supervision;National Universities;Presidential Selection;Jurisprudential Analysis;University Act;Administrative Procedure Law;Rule-Based Argumentation;Standard-Based Argumentation;Rule of Law
    Date: 2019-12
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:10:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 二○一八年臺大校長遴選事件衍生若干學術議題。主要爭點包括：國立大學校長遴選是否為大學自治範疇？國立大學校長聘任權究竟歸屬何人？校長候選人與遴選委員間之利益迴避應依何種規範？校長當選人之違法疑義應如何解決？本文首先從整全觀點將大法官有關大學自治與國家監督的解釋，歸納出憲法規範架構，據此分析前述各項爭點。結果顯示，從現行規範架構可直接論證國立大學校長遴選應屬大學自治範疇 ; 其次，校長實質選任權應歸國立大學所有，法律僅授權教育部藉聘任形式對校長遴選程序進行「事後監督」 ; 再者，論者如採「規則論證」，則本案無迴避問題，惟教育部採「基準論證」從而認定本案有違行政正當程序 ; 就校長當選人違法疑義言，司法途徑與臺大解聘途徑是正當解決管道。最後是研究發現與反思。
    The event of National Taiwan University’s presidential selection in 2018 raises some academic concerns. Points at issue include: Is presidential selection of national universities protected by university autonomy? Who will be the powerholder to employ the presidents of national universities? What is the right norm offered to be applied for interest avoidance in the relationship between candidates of university president and presidential selection committeemen? What is the legal mechanism for resolving the controversies pertaining to a university president-elect and suspect? This article delves into above-mentioned issues based on a constitutional normative framework between university autonomy and state supervision, which is holistically inducted from serial Grand Justice Interpretations. Employing a jurisprudential analysis, a number of findings have emerged from this research. Firstly, presidential selection of national universities must be protected by university autonomy. This argument is justified on direct evidence from existing legal norms (i.e., the Constitution and University Act). Secondly, national universities have the substantive power to select their presidents in terms of university autonomy and the current mandate of the University Act. And the said Act only grants the Ministry of Education to proceed an ex-post supervision on university’s presidential selection via formal process of president-elect employment. Thirdly, there is no legal problem of interest avoidance controversy if the subject adopts a rule-based argumentation to illuminate the legal norms applied in NTU’s presidential selection case. The Ministry of Education, however, adopts a standard-based one, and concludes that the process of this case runs against the due process of law by making a flexible reading on the Administrative Process Law ; Furthermore, it is claimed that the controversies caused by NTU’s president-elect and suspect will be legitimately resolved by normal judicial proceeding and NTU’s established mechanism for discharging an incumbent president. This article closes with several concluding remarks and reflective comments.
    Relation: 法學評論, 159, 1-67
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202019120159001
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202019120159001
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    9.pdf1759KbAdobe PDF2160View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback