English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114205/145239 (79%)
Visitors : 52556483      Online Users : 651
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139581


    Title: 現行法下GPS追蹤定位偵查行為之合法性與立法方向——比較法觀點與最高法院106年度臺上字第3788號判決之考察
    The Interpretation and Legislative Policy About the Legality of the GPS Surveillance and Investigation in Taiwan: A Study of the Supreme Court Judgment in 2017 from a Comparative Law Perspective
    Authors: 范耕維
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: GPS偵查;強制處分;任意處分;強制處分法定原則;令狀原則;監視社會;隱私權;馬賽克理論;合理隱私期待;法律保留原則
    GPS Tracking Device;Privacy;Prosecutors` Order;Surveillance;Surveillance Society;Reasonable Expectation;The Code of Criminal Procedure;Warrant Requirement;The Mosaic Theory;Gesetzesvorbehalt
    Date: 2019-06
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:08:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 最高法院於106年度臺上字第3788號判決中，認為透過GPS追蹤器進行跟監之行為，侵害憲法第22條保障之隱私權，構成強制處分，並建議應儘速針對法定要件與事後救濟，進行立法。對此，本文選擇強制處分判斷基準及論述脈絡與我國判決相似之日本最高裁判所平成29年3月15日大法庭判決作為比較對象。首先，本文對該判決中關於使用GPS偵查侵害日本憲法第35條之權利的性質 ; 造成權利侵害的行為方式等構成強制處分的理由，進行說明。接著，透過比較判決，認為GPS偵查全面性 ; 持續性取得被偵查者位置資訊，並透過儲存與分析資訊，解析其生活樣貌，侵害憲法上保障之隱私權，屬於強制處分。未來，建議以控制取得資訊量為立法方向，透過事前令狀審查與事後通知，保障受偵查者之權利。
    This article aims to reexamine the nature and the legitimacy of using GPS tracking device for investigation in the current era of rapid development of technology. In 2017, the Taiwan Supreme Court ruled that using GPS tracking device violates the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 22 of the Constitution and thus constitutes a law enforcement. In order to further investigate the superiority or inferiority of that Supreme Court’s judgment, this Article aims to discuss the Judgment of Supreme Court of Japan dated March 15 2017 through the perspective of comparative law since the aforementioned judgment is similar to Taiwan’s judicial ruling in the terms of law enforcement. The discussion on the nature of using GPS tracking device in Japan’s judgment is then analyzed and compared with the judgment of Taiwan. It is then proposed that collecting and storing the location data of a certain target with GPS tracking device continuously and in the longterm—as well as using the collected data to analyze the target’s everyday life—is a violation of privacy. Consequently, the use of GPS tracking device should be considered as a form of Prosecutors’ Order. In conclusion, it is suggested that before the legislation of using GPS tracking device in The Code of Criminal Procedure, neither public prosecutor, judicial officer nor judicial policeman should have the right to use such form of investigation. In the future, it is recommended that a law that controls and limits the amount of information acquired from the certain target whose movement is under surveillance should be legislated. The privacy of people should also be protected through the warrant requirement and the formal notification after the surveillance.
    Relation: 法學評論, 157, 109-197
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202019060157002
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202019060157002
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    2.pdf1911KbAdobe PDF2214View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback