政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/138879
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造访人次 : 51778951      在线人数 : 479
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138879


    题名: 重複朗讀教學對國小英語學習者閱讀流暢度影響之個案研究
    A Case Study on the Effect of Assisted Repeated Reading on An EFL Young Learner’s Oral Reading Fluency
    作者: 林金燕
    Lin, Chin-Yen
    贡献者: 尤雪瑛
    Yu, Hsueh-Ying
    林金燕
    Lin, Chin-Yen
    关键词: 輔助式重複口語朗讀
    句法分析
    音韻朗讀
    口語朗讀流暢度
    閱讀動機
    自然發音教學
    Repeated reading
    Oral reading fluency
    Syntactic parsing
    Assisted teaching activities
    Prosodic reading
    Reading motivation
    Phonics instruction
    日期: 2021
    上传时间: 2022-02-10 12:52:09 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本個案研究旨在探討，透過輔助式重複口語朗讀教學活動，對於台灣的一所公立小學一位四年級EFL學生其閱讀流暢度的成效。在為期四週的實驗裡，研究者執行了前測、四次教學活動、十二次的課後朗讀練習、後測，以及延遲後測。教材內容為一篇178字的非文學類文章，並在實驗後，請受試者接受訪談，以了解受試者對於輔助式重複口語朗讀教學活動的感受、自身的閱讀能力變化和其閱讀動機。其研究結果顯示，相較於前測，在後測及延遲後測的表現上，受試者在接受重複朗讀教學後，對於單字發音、句法分析、朗讀語調的變化，以及朗讀速度的成效，都有顯著的進步。只有少數單字的發音錯誤，還出現在後測及延遲後測中。朗讀文章的語調變化及語音詞組的長度在結果中，也有正面的進步。同時也降低句子朗讀裡，不合語法的停頓和換氣。經過四週的練習，受試者的閱讀速度在19次閱讀朗讀的錄音記錄中做比較，有大幅提昇。受試者的訪談結果，表達了對輔助式重複口語朗讀教學活動有正向的感受，願意進一步多去閱讀。本研究結果證實重複口語朗讀練習，有助於口語朗讀流暢度，建議英語學習者應該要著重日常口語朗讀練習，並由教學者給予指導而利於進步。
    The current study intends to probe the effect of oral reading fluency through assisted repeated reading activities on a Taiwanese EFL fourth-grade L2 learner. During the four-week experiment, the researcher conducted the tasks of pretest, four teaching sessions, posttest, delayed posttest, and 12 home practices with 178-word nonfiction text. An interview was rendered to the participant in order to realize how the participant viewed the reading program and how she benefited from the program in terms of reading ability and motivation. The learner’s word pronunciation, syntactic parsing, and reading rate have demonstrated prominent progress after the repeated oral reading treatment as shown in the comparison among the pretest, the posttest, and delayed posttest. Only a few miscues still remained in the participant’s oral reading as presented in the results of the posttest and the delayed posttest. As for syntactic parsing, the data is analyzed by Praat. The results show that the length of phonological phrases increases. The numbers of pausal intrusions and improper breath takings also decrease. With regard to reading rate, the participant has reduced the time used in the 19 oral reading recordings. The participant is willing to read more and learn through the assistance of repeated oral reading activities. It is evident that repeated oral reading is an effective way to improve oral reading fluency. Learners are suggested to do daily practices in oral reading and guided by instructors to acquire improvement.
    參考文獻: Allington, R. L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The reading teacher, 36(6), 556-561.
    Aldhanhani, Z. R., & Abu-Ayyash, E. A. (2020). Theories and Research on Oral Reading Fluency: What Is Needed?. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(4), 379-388.
    Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children`s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading research quarterly, 34(4), 452-477.
    Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational psychology, 102(4), 773.
    Daane, M. C. (2005). The nation`s report card: fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading. National Center for Education Statistics.
    Davis, M. H., Tonks, S. M., Hock, M., Wang, W., & Rodriguez, A. (2018). A review of reading motivation scales. Reading Psychology, 39(2), 121-187.
    Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers` fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 389-406.
    Duke, N. k., Pressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2004).Difficulties with reading comprehension. In C. A. Stone, E.R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders(pp. 501-520). New York: Guilford.
    Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Stahl, S., & Willows, D. (2001). Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel`s Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393-447.
    Ehri, L. C. (2002). Phases of acquisition in learning to read words and implications for teaching. In BJEP Monograph Series II, Number 1-Learning and Teaching Reading (Vol. 7, No. 28, pp. 7-28). British Psychological Society.
    Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings.
    Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific studies of reading, 5(3), 239-256.
    Gaskins, I.W., Ehri, L.C., Cress, C.O., O’Hara, C., & Donnelly, K.
    (1996/1997). Procedures for word learning: Making discoveries about words. The Reading Teacher, 50(4), 312–327.
    General English Proficiency Test (GEPT). (n.d). Retrieved May 26, 2021, from
    https://www.geptkids.org.tw/Home/download
    Gredler, G. R. (2002). Snow, CE, Burns, MS, & Griffin, P.(eds.)(1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 432 pp., $35.95.
    Gunning, T. (1995). Word building: A strategic approach to the teaching of phonics. The Reading Teacher, 48(6), 484–488.
    Harpine, William D. (2019). Is Oral Reading Important in Correcting Reading Failure? In After-School Programming and Intrinsic Motivation: Teaching At-Risk Students to Read (pp.21-28). After-School Programming and Intrinsic Motivation: Teaching At-Risk Students to Read.
    Hasbrouck, J. (2006). For Students Who Are Not Yet Fluent, Silent Reading Is Not the Best Use of Classroom Time. American Educator, Summer 2006, 30(2).
    Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The reading teacher, 59(7), 636-644.
    Herman, P. (1985). The Effect of Repeated Readings on Reading Rate, Speech Pauses, and Word Recognition Accuracy. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(5), 553-565.
    Hingston, M. (2017). The Impacts of Explicit Systematic Phonics Instruction on the Areas of Decoding and Fluency for Students with a Specific Learning Disability in Reading.
    Homan, S. P., Klesius, J. P., & Hite, C. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetitive strategies on students` fluency and comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 87(2), 94-99.
    Huang, L. V., Nelson, R. B., & Nelson, D. (2008). Increasing reading fluency through student-directed repeated reading and feedback. The California School Psychologist, 13(1), 33-40.
    Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how?. The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714.
    Huxley, A. B. P. (2006). A text-based intervention of reading fluency, comprehension, and content knowledge. University of Michigan.
    Kim, Y. S., Wagner, R. K., & Foster, E. (2011). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A latent variable study of first-grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 338-362.
    Kuhn, M. R., Rasinski, T., & Young, C. H. A. S. E. (2007). Best practices in fluency instruction. Best practices in literacy instruction, 3.
    Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody and definitions of fluency. Reading research quarterly, 45(2), 230-251.
    Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational psychology, 100(2), 310.
    Kowal, S., O`Connell, D. C., O`Brien, E. A., & Bryant, E. T. (1975). Temporal aspects of reading aloud and speaking: Three experiments. The American Journal of Psychology, 549-569.
    Linnea C. Ehri (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words (pp. 108)
    Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A longitudinal study of the development of reading prosody as a dimension of oral reading fluency in early elementary school children. Reading research quarterly, 43(4), 336-354.
    Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. (1985).Differences in literal and inferential comprehension after reading orally and silently.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 341.
    Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. (1990). Relations among oral reading, silent reading and listening comprehension of students at differing competency levels. Literacy Research and Instruction, 29(2), 73-84
    National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children.
    Nation, P. (2007). The four strands. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2-13.
    Nevo, E., Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Brande, S., & Gambrell, L. (2020). Oral reading fluency, reading motivation and reading comprehension among second graders. Reading and Writing, 1-26.
    Paul Boersma & David Weenink (2005): Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.5.16) [Computer program].Retrieved Feb 22, 2007, from http://www.praat.org/
    Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1979). Coding and comprehension in skilled reading and implications for reading instruction. Theory and practice of early reading, 1, 57-84.
    Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Cognitive research and the misconceptions of reading education. Reading development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective (pp. 43-58). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
    Price, K. W., Meisinger, E. B., Louwerse, M. M., & D’Mello, S. (2016). The contributions of oral and silent reading fluency to reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 37(2), 167-201.
    S. Jay Samuels (1979). The Method of Repeated Readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 4, 403-408
    Schreiber, P. A. (1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12(3), 177-186.
    Schreiber, P. A. (1987). Prosody and structure in children`s syntactic processing. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 243–270). Academic Press.
    Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (1995). How research might inform the debate about early reading acquisition. Journal of Research in Reading.
    Rasinski, T., & Hoffman, J. (2003). Theory and Research into Practice: Oral Reading in the School Literacy Curriculum. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 510-522.
    Rasinski, T., Rupley, W. H., & Nichols, W. D. (2008). Two essential ingredients: Phonics and fluency getting to know each other. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 257-260.
    Reutzel, D. R., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (1993). Effects of fluency training on second graders` reading comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(6), 325-331.
    Reutzel, D., Hollingsworth, P., & Eldredge, J. (1994). Oral Reading Instruction: The Impact on Student Reading Development. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(1), 41-62.
    Reutzel, D. R., Jones, C. D., Fawson, P. C., & Smith, J. A. (2008). Scaffolded silent reading: A complement to guided repeated oral reading that works!. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 194-207.
    Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The reading teacher, 32(4), 403-408.
    Samuels, S. J. (1983). A critique of, A theory of automaticity in reading: Looking back: A retrospective analysis of the LaBerge-Samuels Reading Model. Reading research revisited, 39-55.
    Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in second language acquisition, 357-385.
    Serrano, R., & Huang, H. Y. (2018). Learning vocabulary through assisted repeated reading: How much time should there be between repetitions of the same text?. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 971-994.
    Shen, H. H., Zhou, Y., & Gao, G. (2020). Oral Reading Miscues and Reading Comprehension by Chinese L2 Learners.
    Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing
    reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National
    Academy Press.
    Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (1999). How research might inform the debate about early reading acquisition. In J. Oakhill & R. Beard (Eds.), Reading development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective (pp. 12-41). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    Susan P. Homana, Janell P. Klesiusa & Clare (1993). Effects of Repeated Readings and Nonrepetitive Strategies on Students` Fluency and Comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 87, 2, 94-99.
    Swalm, J. E. (1972). A Comparison of Oral Reading, Silent Reading and Listening Comprehension. Education, 92(4), 111-5.
    Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and special education, 25(4), 252-261.
    Toste, J. R., Didion, L., Peng, P., Filderman, M. J., & McClelland, A. M. (2020). A metaanalytic review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K-12students. Review of Educational Research.
    William J. Therrien. (2004) Fluency and Comprehension Gains as a Result of Repeated Reading. A Meta-Analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25,4,252-261.
    Wolf, G. M. (2018). Developing reading automaticity and fluency: Revisiting what reading teachers know, putting confirmed research into current practice. Creative Education, 9(06), 838.
    Zugel, K. (2012). Success for Students With Diverse Reading Abilities Through the Use of Supplemental Reading Curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 199-209.
    林美瑩（2002）。國小字母拼讀法教學與其教學順序之研究。國立政治大學語言學研究所碩士論文。
    顏惠英（2004）。直接、有系統之字母拼讀教學與有意涵之閱讀讀物練習對國小學童外語閱讀之成效。國立成功大學外國語文學系碩博士班碩士論文。
    陳冠宜（2006）。字母拼讀法融入國小英語科低成就學童補救教學之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士班論文。
    郭翠秀（2007）。閱讀教學與國民小學學童閱讀動機及行為的關係—以2005年PIRLS資料為例。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所碩士論文。
    羅引宏（2008）。朗讀與默讀對於不同年級國小學童閱讀理解與閱讀速率的影響之比較。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文，屏東縣。
    李茵琦（2009）。WordBox及WordSort字母拼讀法對國小三年級學童之音韻覺識及拼字能力之影響。臺北市立教育大學英語教學系碩士班碩士論文。
    林虹伶（2011）。重覆閱讀與非重覆閱讀對國小學童口語閱讀流暢度之效益研究。國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    羅淑如（2013）。英語口語閱讀教學課程對臺灣國小學童口語流暢度之效益。國立雲林科技大學應用外語系碩士班碩士論文。
    王嘉菱（2013）。引導式重複口語閱讀教學法在低成就學生英語認字能力與閱讀流暢度之成效。國立臺北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士班碩士論文。
    馮鈴惠（2014）。閱讀模式與發展因素對台灣國小學童英文閱讀速率和閱讀理解之影響。國立彰化師範大學兒童英語研究所碩士論文。
    李珮甄(2016)。互動式朗讀偏重於字母拼讀對國小低成就學生英文認字和閱讀流暢度影響之研究。國立中正大學外國語文學系碩士在職專班論文。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    102555010
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102555010
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200055
    显示于类别:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    501001.pdf5638KbAdobe PDF251检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈