政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/138026

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/138026

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113873/144892 (79%)
Visitors : 51920653 Online Users : 564

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > MBA Program > Theses > Item 140.119/138026

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138026

Title:	「預見新力－新二代多元培力」課程之社會投資報酬 Social Return on Investment for Dedicated Empowerment Program Courses for 2nd Generation Immigrants
Authors:	蔡孟軒 Tsai, Meng-Syuan
Contributors:	別蓮蒂 Bei, Lien-Ti 蔡孟軒 Tsai, Meng-Syuan
Keywords:	社會投資報酬率社會影響力評估新住民二代培力 Social Return on Investment (SROI) Social Impact Assessment Second Generation of Immigrants Empowerment
Date:	2021
Issue Date:	2021-12-01 14:48:40 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	社會投資報酬率（Social Return on Investment, SROI）為目前評估社會影響力最主流的方法，根據SROI指南，計算SROI共有六大步驟，首先透過定義利害關係人，並決定接觸利害關係人的方式，在接觸利害關係人後建立衡量項目，接著賦予財務衡量項目財務價值，並經過調整因子分析後得出社會影響力價值，進而得出SROI最終結果，並將SROI計算結果運用於提升組織內部效率或外部證明。因為社會投資報酬率的優點在於研究過程中透過與利害關係人的接觸，可以清楚掌握活動或事件對於利害關係人產生影響的路徑，進而達到「增進改善問題效率」與「促進與利害關係人溝通」的目標，而持續追蹤、衡量影響力能協助組織持續改善內部方針，以及讓組織的行動和表現被外界檢視。本研究涵蓋C公司「預見新力－新二代多元培力」計畫中戲劇班課程、培力課程及親子金融理財課程，其分別的SROI為2.26元、1.98元及4.88元，代表本次戲劇班課程、培力課程及親子金融理財課程分別投入1元成本，可分別大約獲得2.26元、1.98元及4.88元的社會效益。透過本研究透過描繪利害關係人的影響路徑掌握影響各式課程社會影響力價值的關鍵處，也發現培養學員的重要性在於長期培養，效果非立竿見影。本研究調查了256位利害關係人，利害關係人年齡層涵蓋學齡前學童至青壯年，是SROI計算中少數規模較大且涵蓋範圍較廣的研究，本研究藉由訪談與問卷對利害關係人進行了詳細的分析，深入地了解課程類活動從規劃、執行及成果展現的階段對不同利害關係人產生之社會影響。 Social return on investment (SROI) is the most popular method to assess social impact. According to the SROI guide, there are six steps for calculating SROI. Firstly, by defining stakeholders and determining the way to contact stakeholders, measurement items are established after contacting stakeholders. Then assign measurement items financial value. After conducting adjusting factor analysis, obtain the social impact value, and then obtain SROI. Finally, apply SROI calculation results to improve the internal efficiency of the organization or external proof. Because the advantage of SROI is that through contact with stakeholders in the research process, one can clearly grasp the impact path of activities or events on stakeholders, and then achieve the goals of "improving efficiency" and "promoting communication with stakeholders". Continuous tracking and measuring of influence can help the organization to continuously improve its internal policies, and allow the organization`s actions and performance to be viewed in public. This study covered three courses in "Dedicated Empowerment Program for 2nd Generation Immigrants" of Company C, with SROI of NTD. 2.26, NTD.1.98, and NTD. 4.88 respectively. This represented the cost of each course invested in NTD.1 respectively, which brought about social benefits of approximately NTD.2.26, NTD.1.98, and NTD.4.88 respectively. Through this study, the key points were the path of impact. It was also found that the importance of training students lies in long-term training, and the effect is not immediate. Through interviews and questionnaires, this study conducted a detailed analysis of stakeholders from pre-school to midlife and an in-depth understanding of the social impact of curriculum activities on different stakeholders from the stages of planning, implementation, and result presentation.
Reference:	中文文獻 CSR One：永續溝通與知識平台（2019），GRI執行長：企業永續將成為主流顯學，倡議家，3月22日，網址https://ubrand.udn.com/ubrand/story/12117/3713038 國泰人壽（2020），2019國泰人壽企業永續報告書，頁51-68，網址：https://patron.cathaylife.com.tw/ODAB/Path/DTPDAB17/20200721130628654_%E5%9C%8B%E6%B3%B0%E4%BA%BA%E5%A3%BD2019CSR_%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87_web.pdf，擷取日期：2020年4月21日伊甸基金會（2020），新二代多元智慧培力課程簡章，5月6日，網址：https://www.eden.org.tw/news_detail.php?bulletin=JCUyIyE%3D&detailId=JCU0MjcyIyE%3D&rePageUrl=L25ld3MucGhwPyZidWxsZXRpbj1KQ1V5SXlFJTNEJmtleXdvcmQ9JUU2JTk2JUIwJUU0JUJBJThDJUU0JUJCJUEz，擷取日期：2021年4月21日吳宗昇與李俊達（2018），政策的社會效益評估：SROI 的應用與反思，國土及公共治理季刊，第六卷，第三期，頁40-49。李宜樺、杜育任、劉凱琳、朱恩言、施香如（2019），公共服務影響評估工具-「社會投資報酬率（SROI）」介紹，國土及公共治理專刊，頁30-41。高增佩（2019），企業社會責任與公益作為之個案分析。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程（EMBA）碩士論文，台北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5946jg 楊雅智（2015）。淺談企業社會責任之國際發展趨勢與國內推動現況。證券暨期貨月刊，第三十三卷，第一期，頁5-15。蔡怡杼（2018），金管會：企業社會責任報告書質量兼備，中央社，3月23日，網址：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201803230121.aspx。龍映涵（2018），打開公益事業的「黑盒子」，尋求更有效的解方，社企流，11月15日，網址：https://www.seinsights.asia/specialfeature/5836/5848。英文文獻 Bichta, C. (2003). Corporate socially responsible (CSR) practices in the context of Greek industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10(1), 12-24. Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social responsibilities of the businessman. University of Iowa Press. Davide Secchi (2007). The cognitive side of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 565–581 Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press. Ilieş, V. I. (2012). Corporate social responsibility between criticism and controversy. Review of Economic Studies and Research Virgil Madgearu, (1), 85-96. Ismail, M. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and its role in community development: An international perspective. Journal of International Social Research, 2(9), 202-206. Lee, M. D. P. (2008), A Review of the Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility: Its Evolutionary Path and the Road Ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10 (1), 53-73. Maier, F., Schober, C., Simsa, R., & Millner, R. (2015). SROI as a Method for Evaluation Research: Understanding Merits and Limitations. Voluntas, 26(5), 1805-1830. Milton Friedman (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazines, 13 Sep., 32-33 Social Value UK (2017). A Guide to Social Return on Investment. Office of the Third Sector, Cabinet Office, United Kingdom. Sridhar, K. (2011). A multi-dimensional criticism of the Triple Bottom Line reporting approach. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 6(1), 49-67. World Business Council of Sustainable Development (2015). The corporate social responsibility practices in the context of sustainable development. The case of Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23(1), 1279-1285.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) 108363068
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108363068
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202100809
Appears in Collections:	[MBA Program] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
306801.pdf		1404Kb	Adobe PDF2	52	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback