English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51717989      Online Users : 582
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137911


    Title: 保護水下文化遺產公約之政策工具研析暨其省思
    Policy Tools and the CPUCH: The Analysis and Evaluation
    Authors: 徐胤承
    Hsu, Yin Cheng
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 水下文化遺產 ; 聯合國教育科學文化組織 ; 現地保存 ; 政策工具 ; 文物返還 
    Underwater Cultural Heritage ; UNESCO ; In Situ ; Policy Tools ; Restitution
    Date: 2021-06
    Issue Date: 2021-11-18 16:02:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在聯合國教育科學文化組織《保護水下文化遺產公約》(Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, CPUCH)之架構下,所謂「保護」,意指現地保存(in situ),以及無法現地保存時之陸上保存。通說認為,現地保存意味著將水下文化遺產留置在海底,避免商業開發或其他非必要之干擾 ; 此即以保護為旨趣之首要考量,僅於遭遇萬不得已之情況下,且經正當程序,認定確有打撈水下文化遺產之必要,方得捨棄現地保存選項,退而尋求其他妥適保存方法。揆諸CPUCH內容,其為達成現地保存之公共政策目標,隱含了政策工具中常見之資訊工具及規則工具,然卻未見經濟工具,誠為一憾。本文試從釋明現地保存乃執行水下文化遺產保護最適方案之緣由為開章,再評述CPUCH暨其關係條約內蘊之政策工具優缺點,最後提出關涉系爭議題,且國際上曾用於水下文化遺產返還之特殊案例為佐證,即一種附帶經濟工具效果之政府沉船豁免承認,繹其效果可謂立竿見影,不惟大幅降低尋寶者不法獲利,亦可能適用於未來絕大多數已知或未知之水下文物所有權爭執事件,職是應堪認係突破既往窠臼之創新思維與方向 ; 爰秉獻曝之忱,謹供識者參酌。
    Within the framework of the UNESCO Convention for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (CPUCH), the first option for the protection of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) is `in situ preservation," which means UCH ought to be left on the sea floor. Shipwreck recovery activities are necessary if and only if the competent authorities require them to happen. While multiple policy instruments are used to achieve the in situ preservation, economic instruments are rarely applied. This paper starts with a short paragraph about the importance of in situ preservation. Then, an analysis on the policy instruments behind the design of the CPUCH and other international treaties is presented. Finally, the paper presents a legal case study that explores the restitution practice at sea. Through the above points, the writer hopes that this article would generate help and understanding for future policies and for law makers.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 60(2), 143-179
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.202106_60(2).0004
    DOI: 10.30390/ISC.202106_60(2).0004
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    223.pdf1379KbAdobe PDF2143View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback