Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137150
|
| Title: | 創投與新創之間的價值共創
Value co-creation between venture capital and startup |
| Authors: | 張容嘉
Zhang, Rong-Jia |
| Contributors: | 鄭至甫
Jeng, Jyh-Fu
張容嘉
Zhang, Rong-Jia |
| Keywords: | 創投
新創
互動過程
價值共創
Venture capital
Startup
Entrepreneur
Interact
Value co-creation |
| Date: | 2021 |
| Issue Date: | 2021-09-02 18:13:01 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 創業投資公司透過將資金投入未上市新創企業，提供其資金、資源、人脈並進行投資後管理，甚至協助其進行上市或併購，期望新創能高速成長以收回高額報酬。與其他資金籌措方式相比，創業投資人的參與具有時限長，較能陪伴新創成長等特點，因此實務上創投與新創間的關係，可說是長時間的「魚水共生」、「共生共榮」。然而關於其互動關係的理論研究卻多認為彼此間僅為了各自利益，最常見的便是利用「代理理論」、「賽局理論」等研究來討論創投與新創間互動關係之影響，這樣的理論與實務間之差距，成為本研究主要的思考點。本研究認為可解釋其雙方間的關係為：雖追求各自利益，但卻於投資後活動階段，藉由合作與互動協助彼此創造價值、達到目標，甚至進一步創造第三方（如：利害關係人、社會、產業）之價值，並期望這樣的互動關係可以用「價值共創理論」之架構進行解釋。本研究試圖解釋「創投與新創之間是利用何種互動方式達到共創價值？」的主要研究問題，利用探索性個案研究法、對偶分析以及滾雪球抽樣三種研究類型，並進行半結構式訪談，從受訪者間的合作，延伸至整體產業的互動。同時亦針對論文進行研究命題、研究貢獻與意涵、研究限制、未來建議之闡述。最終得到以下三項研究發現：(1) 雙方的價值共創關係為：為了同一目標在遵循一定的體制下，站在彼此的立場互相著想，盡力做出想法與資源的互換，期間所造就的價值，將成為未來各階段長期合作中，重要的經驗以及養分；(2) 創投與新創間的互動，可以藉由Ramaswamy提出之價值共創理論兩大架構內的八大元素解釋，而藉由這樣的互動模式可以進一步創造出期待的價值；(3) 在互動過程中，可以歸納出七個共同重視的因素，並不是每一要素都需要達成，但若都達到則可以越緊密、越融洽。
Venture capital invests funds in unlisted startups, provides them with funds, resources, and post-investment management, and even assists them in IPO or mergers and acquisitions, hoping that startups can develop rapidly to recover high returns. Compared with other fundraising methods, venture capitalists involve long-time participation and are more able to accompany the growth of new ventures. Therefore, the relationship between venture capital and new ventures can be regarded as "co-existence" in practice. However, most theoretical studies on their interactions believe that they only interact for their benefit. Most common research includes agency theory, game theory. They discussed the impact of the interactive relationship between venture capital and new ventures. The gap between practices has become the main thinking point of this research. This study believes that their relationship can interpret as: although they are pursuing their profit, they assist each other to co-create value and achieve goals through cooperation in the post-investment activity stage, even further create value to third parties (such as stakeholders, society, industry)and hope that this interactive relationship can explain by the framework of the theory of value co-creation. This research attempts to explain the main research question of "What kind of interaction is a venture capital and new ventures to achieve co-creating value?" Using the explanatory case study method, dual analysis, snowball sampling, and conduct semi-structured interviews. Extend from the cooperation between interviewees to the interaction of the whole industry. At the same time, the research topic, research contribution and meaning, research limitations, and future suggestions explain in the thesis. Finally, there are three research findings: (a) The value co-creation relationship between the two parties is: for the same goal, under a given system, stand on each other standpoints, try to make the exchange of opinions and resources. The values created during the period will become the prime experience and nutrients in the long-term future cooperation; (b) The interaction between venture capital and new ventures can explain by the eight elements in the two frameworks of the value co-creation theory proposed by Ramaswamy, and this interaction mode can further create expected value; (c) In the interaction process, there have seven factors of common concerns that can summarize. Not all elements need to arrive, but the closer and more harmonious they can be if they are all achieved. |
| Reference: | 一、中文文獻
1. Babbie, E.，（2016）。社會科學研究方法。林秀雲譯（三版）。臺北市：新加玻商聖智出版。
2. Du, P., Lee, C.-F., Chou, H.-H., & Fang, S.-C.，（2017）。[(創)串新]的服務模式: 以價值共創觀點探索尚品宅配的服務流程與本質。管理學報， 34（3），頁 401-430。
3. Feld, B., & Mendelson, J.，（2016）。創業投資聖經。陳鴻旻譯。新北市：野人文化出版。
4. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V.，（2003）。消費者王朝：與顧客共創價值。顧淑馨譯。台北市：天下雜誌出版。
5. Ramaswamy, V., & Gouillart, F.，（2011）。共同創造到底有多厲害!。王怡棻譯。台北市：商周出版。
6. 王明鳳（2008）。以管理矩陣及家族因素分析屏東縣民間老人養護機構。未出版之博士論文，東海大學，社會工作學系，台中市。
7. 李明恩（2012）。以價值共創探討臺灣職業棒球球團之經營—以兄弟象為例。未出版之碩士論文，政治大學，科技管理研究所，台北市。
8. 林金定, 嚴嘉楓, & 陳美花，（2005）。質性研究方法: 訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究季刊， 3（2），頁 122-136。
9. 柯美滿（2003）。創業投資事業投資後管理－追蹤監控方式之研究。未出版之碩士論文，交通大學，高階主管管理學程碩士班，新竹市。
10. 夏寧（2019）。以競合觀點探討創投與新創團隊的互動。未出版之碩士論文，政治大學，科技管理與智慧財產研究所，台北市。
11. 高于婷（2011）。簡單中的不簡單：簡單生活節的價值共創。未出版之碩士論文，政治大學，科技管理與智慧財產研究所，台北市。
12. 張紹基，2000。創業投資公司真的能創造價值嗎?。《國科會研究報告》。台南市：成功大學國際企業研究所。
13. 許芳銘, 何祖鳳, & 曾振芳，（2007）。新興產業營運計畫之評估模式—以網際網路產業為例。東吳經濟商學學報，（56），頁 1-26。
14. 許端芳（2002）。以共生/寄生觀點探討台灣創業投資事業與高科技事業之互動關係。未出版之博士論文，交通大學，經營管理研究所，新竹市。
15. 鈕文英，（2021）。質性研究方法與論文寫作(三版)。台北市：雙葉書廊出版。
16. 劉松瑜，（2007）。創業投資事業對高科技公司價值提昇之研究。管理與系統， 14（1），頁 27-49。
17. 蔡家昌（2019）。平台的價值共創機制之研究：以台灣大車隊為例。未出版之博士論文，政治大學，科技管理與智慧財產研究所，台北市。
18. 賴荃賢（2018）。漫談台灣創投事業與投資評估模式，上網日期2021年05月31日，檢自：https://www.cbia.org.tw/news/3498931。
19. 中華民國經濟部（2021）。具創新能力之新創事業認定原則，上網日期2021年08月01日，檢自https://law.moea.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001136。
二、英文文獻
1. Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Muller, E. (1990). Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing. Management Science, 36(10), 1233-1246.
2. Argandoña, A. (2011). Stakeholder theory and value creation. Working Paper WP-922, IESE Business School, Madrid, Spain: University of Navarra.
3. Arvanitis, S., & Stucki, T. (2014). The impact of venture capital on the persistence of innovation activities of start-ups. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 849-870.
4. Brav, A., & Gompers, P. A. (1997). Myth or reality? The long‐run underperformance of initial public offerings: Evidence from venture and nonventure capital‐backed companies. The journal of finance, 52(5), 1791-1821.
5. Bruton, G. D., Fried, V. H., & Manigart, S. (2005). Institutional influences on the worldwide expansion of venture capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 737-760.
6. Busenitz, L. W., Moesel, D. D., Fiet, J. O., & Barney, J. B. (1997). The framing of perceptions of fairness in the relationship between venture capitalists and new venture teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(3), 5-22.
7. Cable, D. M., & Shane, S. (1997). A prisoner`s dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 142-176.
8. Cornelius, B., & Naqi, S. A. (2002). Resource exchange and the Asian venture capital fund/portfolio company dyad. Venture Capital, 4(3), 253-265.
9. Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
10. Davila, A., Foster, G., & Gupta, M. (2003). Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 689-708.
11. De Clercq, D., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). The creation of relational rents in venture capitalist-entrepreneur dyads. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 3(2), 107-127.
12. Elitzur, R., & Gavious, A. (2003). A multi-period game theoretic model of venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(2), 440-453.
13. Fiet, J. O., Busenitz, L. W., Moesel, D. D., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Complementary theoretical perspectives on the dismissal of new venture team members. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(5), 347-366.
14. Fredriksen, Ö., Olofsson, C., & Wahlbin, C. (1997). Are venture capitalists firefighters? A study of the influence and impact of venture capital firms. Technovation, 17(9), 503-532.
15. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
16. Gladstone, D. (1988). Venture Capital Investing: The Complete Handbook for Investing in Small Private Businesses for Outstanding Profits. Prentice-Hall.
17. Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2003). Short-term America revisited? Boom and bust in the venture capital industry and the impact on innovation. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 3, 1-27.
18. Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing theory, 11(3), 279-301.
19. Grönroos, C. (2012). Conceptualising value co-creation: A journey to the 1970s and back to the future. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(13-14), 1520-1534.
20. Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. (2000). The interaction between product market and financing strategy: The role of venture capital. The review of financial studies, 13(4), 959-984.
21. Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. (2002). Venture capital and the professionalization of start‐up firms: Empirical evidence. The journal of finance, 57(1), 169-197.
22. Heugens, P. P., & Van Oosterhout, H. J. (2002). The confines of stakeholder management: Evidence from the Dutch manufacturing sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(4), 387-403.
23. Huang, L., & Knight, A. P. (2017). Resources and Relationships in Entrepreneurship: An Exchange Theory of the Development and Effects of the Entrepreneur-Investor Relationship. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 80-102.
24. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis: Guilford press.
25. Kohtamäki, M., & Rajala, R. (2016). Theory and practice of value co-creation in B2B systems. Industrial Marketing Management, 56(7), pp. 4-13
26. Kortum, S., & Lerner, J. (2001). Does venture capital spur innovation? In D. L. Gary (Ed.), Entrepreneurial inputs and outcomes: New studies of entrepreneurship in the United States (Vol. 13, pp. 1-44). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
27. Megginson, W. L., & Weiss, K. A. (1991). Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. The journal of finance, 46(3), 879-903.
28. Miles, S. (2015). Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), 437-459.
29. Miloud, T., Aspelund, A., & Cabrol, M. (2012). Startup valuation by venture capitalists: an empirical study. Venture Capital, 14(2-3), 151-174.
30. Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. (1993). From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 65-77.
31. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., Smith, A., & Papadakos, T. (2014). Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want. Wiley.
32. Parhankangas, A., & Landström, H. (2004). Responses to psychological contract violations in the venture capitalist-entrepreneur relationship: An exploratory study. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 6(4), 217-242.
33. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004a). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
34. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004b). Co‐creating unique value with customers. Strategy & leadership.
35. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard Business Press.
36. Ramirez, R. (1999). Value co‐production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 49-65.
37. Ritter, J. R. (1991). The long‐run performance of initial public offerings. The journal of finance, 46(1), 3-27.
38. Ruhnka, J. C., & Young, J. E. (1987). A venture capital model of the development process for new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(2), 167-184.
39. Sahlman, W. A. (1990). The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 473-521.
40. Salamzadeh, A., & Kawamorita Kesim, H. (2015). Startup companies: Life cycle and challenges. 4th International conference on employment, education and entrepreneurship (EEE), Belgrade, Serbia.
41. Sapienza, H. J., & Korsgaard, M. A. (1996). Procedural justice in entrepreneur-investor relations. Academy of management Journal, 39(3), 544-574.
42. Smart, S. B., & Zutter, C. J. (2003). Control as a motivation for underpricing: a comparison of dual and single-class IPOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 85-110.
43. Stuck, B., & Weingarten, M. (2005). How venture capital thwarts innovation. IEEE Spectrum, 42(4), 50-55.
44. Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. (2016). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 314-329.
45. Terblanche, N. S. (2014). Some theoretical perspectives of co-creation and co-production of value by customers. Professional Accountant, 14(2), 1-8.
46. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1982). The dyad as the unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 889-900.
47. Tyebjee, T. T., & Bruno, A. V. (1984). A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science, 30(9), 1051-1066.
48. van Dijk, E., Schrevel, L., van Stormbroek-Burgers, R., & Blomme, R. J. (2014). How to create an effective venture capitalist–entrepreneur relationship: An entrepreneur’s perspective. Sage Open, 4(4), 2158244014553602.
49. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization science, 18(2), 181-199. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
108364118 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108364118 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202101337 |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 411801.pdf | | 2511Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
