政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/137092
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51637243      Online Users : 574
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137092


    Title: 國民中學校長正向領導、教師正念與教學效能關係之研究
    The Study of the Relationship among Principals’ Positive Leadership, Teachers’ Mindfulness and Teaching Effectiveness in Junior High Schools
    Authors: 許凱威
    Hsu, Kai-Wei
    Contributors: 秦夢群
    Chin, Meng-Chun
    許凱威
    Hsu, Kai-Wei
    Keywords: 國民中學
    校長領導
    正向領導
    教師正念
    教學效能
    Junior high schools
    Principals’ leadership
    Principals’ positive leadership
    Teachers’ mindfulness
    Teaching effectiveness
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-09-02 17:55:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在瞭解國民中學校長正向領導、教師正念與教學效能之現況，並分析不同背景變項之教師在知覺校長正向領導、教師正念與教學效能之差異情形，且探討三者之間的關係，最後藉由校長正向領導與教師正念對教學效能進行預測。
    本研究採調查研究法，共計抽樣14所學校，發出571份問卷，回收566份有效問卷，問卷有效率達92%。資料處理之部分則分別以描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關、結構方程模式等統計方式進行統計分析。
    本研究獲致以下之結論：
    一.國民中學教師知覺正向領導為高程度，以「營造正向氣氛」之知覺程度相對較高，「運用正向溝通」之知覺程度相對較低。
    二.國民中學教師知覺教師正念為高程度。
    三.國民中學教師知覺教學效能為高程度，以「教學情境」之知覺程度相對較高，「教學策略」之知覺程度相對較低。
    四.國民中學教師，因其年齡、服務年資、擔任職務、學校規模之不同，而有不同的正向領導知覺感受，以51歲以上、服務年資21年以上、兼任行政職務、大型學校之教師知覺程度相對較高。
    五.國民中學教師，因其年齡之不同，而有不同的教師正念感受，以51歲以上之教師知覺程度相對較高。
    六.國民中學教師，因其年齡、服務年資、擔任職務、學校規模之不同，而有不同的教學效能知覺感受，以51歲以上、服務年資21年以上、兼任行政職務、大型學校之教師表現程度較高。
    七.國民中學正向領導、教師正念與教學效能的知覺及各分層面，彼此之間具有正相關。
    八.國民中學校長正向領導可直接影響教學效能，亦可間接透過教師正念之中介機制，對教學效能產生正向影響，教師正念具有部分中介效果。
    最後依據研究結果提出具體建議，提供教育行政機關、國民中學校長、教師及未來研究之參考。
    The purpose of the study is to investigate the current practice of three study variables of “principals’ positive leadership”, “teachers’ mindfulness”, and “teaching effectiveness” in junior high schools. The study is trying to verify the above three variables by the different backgrounds of teachers and investigate the relationship of these three variables. In conclusion, this study will attempt to estimate teaching effectiveness through principals’ positive leadership and teachers’ mindfulness.
    The study will be approached by the survey method, the samples which include 14 schools and 566 valid outcomes within 571 questionnaires, the effective rate reached 92%. All data were analyzed by the methods of descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, Structural equation modeling.
    The findings of this study are as follows:
    1.Junior high schools teachers’ perception of principals’ positive leadership is high degree; “create a positive atmosphere” is the highest, and “use positive communication” is the lowest.
    2.Junior high schools teachers’ perception of teachers’ mindfulness is high degree.
    3.Junior high schools teachers’ perception of teaching effectiveness is above average; “teaching scene” is the highest, and “teaching strategy” is the lowest.
    4.There are different perception levels to junior high schools teachers to the principals’ positive leadership by different ages, years of service, positions, and school size. According to the results, the following groups have higher levels: (1) teachers above 51 years old, (2) teachers with more than 21 years of service, (3) teachers serve as administrative positions, (4) teachers of large schools.
    5.There are different perception levels to junior high schools teachers to teachers’ mindfulness by different ages. According to the results, teachers above 51 years old have higher level.
    6.There are different perception levels to junior high schools teachers to teaching effectiveness by different ages, years of service, positions, and school size, . According to the results, the following groups have higher levels: (1) teachers above 51 years old, (2) teachers with more than 21 years of service, (3) teachers serve as administrative positions, (4) teachers of large schools.
    7.There is a positive correlation among principals’ positive leadership, teachers’ mindfulness, and teaching effectiveness.
    8.Principals’ positive leadership could affect teaching effectiveness directly in junior high schools, and which could also affect teaching effectiveness positively through teachers’ mindfulness.
    In conclusion, this study hopes to provide specific suggestions to educational administration agencies, junior high schools, educational-related bodies, and other future researches.
    Reference: 壹、中文部分
    丁彥維（2017）。國民中學特殊教育教師工作壓力與教學效能現況之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
    尤芊甯（2018）。正念教育在台灣一間國小高年級班級實踐之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中央大學，桃園市。
    王文沁（2014）。自我效能與情緒調節之關係─以正念為中介變項（未出版之碩士論文）。銘傳大學，桃園市。
    王偉旭（2019）。新北市國民中學教師創新教學 與教學效能關係之研究 ―以行動學習推動計畫為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。
    王麗平（2018）。新北市國民中學導師工作壓力、情緒管理與教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，高雄市。
    仲秀蓮（2011）。臺灣地區國民小學校長正向領導、學校文化對學校創新經營效能影響之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
    朱家正（2009）。教師人際關係與教學效能之研究：宜蘭市兩所國小之比較（未出版之碩士論文）。國立花蓮教育大學，花蓮縣。
    朱經明（2010）。教育及心理統計學。臺北市：五南。
    何海鶄（2015）。探討正念靜坐課程對大學生的學習及認知效能的影響（未出版之碩士論文）。南華大學，嘉義縣。
    吳怡佳（2008）。國民小學校長科技領導、知識管理與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
    吳倏銘（2013）。國民中學校長正向領導、學校組織氣氛與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立清華大學，新竹市。
    吳清山（1992）。學校效能研究。臺北市：五南。
    吳清山（2013）。正向領導。教育研究月刊，230，136-137。
    吳碧玉（2019）。國民中學教師情緒勞務與教學效能之研究–以金門縣為例（未出版之碩士論文）。銘傳大學，桃園市。
    吳璧如（2002）。教師效能感之理論分析。教育研究資訊，10（2），45-64。
    宋可力（2011）。氣場心理學：自我暗示的力量。北京市：北京理工大學。
    宋鎮照（2000）。團體動力學。臺北市：五南。
    李佳樺（2019）。臺北市國民中學特教教師情緒勞務與教學效能相關之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立清華大學，新竹市。
    初麗娟、高尚仁（2005）。壓力知覺對負面心理健康影響：靜坐經驗、情緒智能調節效果之探討。中華心理學刊，47（2），157-179。
    林以琳（2018）。正念藝術活動對特殊教育學校高職部 智能障礙學生專注行為之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
    林伯彥（2014）。「無惱療法」對思覺失調症個案的臨床療效研究--以正念正知原理為基礎（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
    林宏泰（2019）。國民中學校長正向領導、教師教學效能、與學生學習成效關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。
    林信志、許凱威（2020）。我國國民中小學候用校長甄選制度之問題與對策。臺灣教育評論月刊，9（4），26-36。
    林海清（1994）。高中教師激勵模式與其工作滿意、服務士氣、教學效能之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
    林得群（2018）。國民中學校長正向領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究 —以桃園市為例（未出版之碩士論文）。銘傳大學，桃園市。
    林紫薇（2019）。國小正念課程實施之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中原大學，桃園市。
    林進材（2001）。國小教師教學效能的理論與實際。高雄市：復文。
    林新發（2009）。正向氛圍促進學校邁向卓越。國民教育，50（2），1-6。
    林新發（2010a）。正向領導的意涵與實施策略。國民教育，50（3），1-5。
    林新發（2010b）。正向領導的理論基礎。國民教育，51（1），1-6。
    林新發、王秀玲、汪宗明、顏如芳、仲秀蓮（2005）。國民小學校長領導行為、知識延續管理對學校創新經營影響之研究─以臺灣北部地區三縣市為例。國科會NSC94-2413-H-152-006研究成果報告。
    林新發、黃秋鑾、蔡麗華、鍾雲英、仲秀蓮（2014）。國民小學校長正向領導指標之建構。縣市教育力與教育發展，國立臺灣師範大學。
    張仁和、林以正、黃金蘭（2011）。中文版「止觀覺察注意量表」之信效度分析。測驗學刊，58，235-260。
    張奕華、吳怡佳（2008）。校長科技領導與教師教學效能關係之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4（1），171-194。
    張春興（1994）。現代心理學。臺北市：東華。
    張家珮（2017）。基隆市國民中學教師知覺校長正向領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，新北市。
    張涵茹（2019）。正念訓練對國中生自律學習、閱讀行為、考試焦慮與情緒幸福感之效果（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
    張新仁、馮莉雅、邱上真（2004）。發展中小學教師教學評鑑工具之研究。教育資料集刊，29，247－270。
    張靖怡（2017）。彰化縣偏遠地區國民中學校長正向領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
    張彌香（2018）。國民小學學生正念、專注力與學習態度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立清華大學，新竹市。
    教育部（2020）。國民中小學專任教師數-依學校所在地區查詢。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/result.aspx?qno=NwA4AA2
    梁振道（2019）。臺北市國民中學校長同儕式領導與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。
    許嘉祐（2019）。臺北市國民中學校長正向領導與教師復原力關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。
    許銘顯（2011）。嘉義縣國民小學教師心理資本與教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。
    陳木金（1997）。國民小學教師教學效能評鑑指標建構之研究。藝術學報，61，221-253。
    陳淑婷、許逸臻（2005）。團隊成功的Yes基因--肯定式探詢一點就通。臺北市：開放智慧引領科技。
    陳寬裕（2018）。結構方程模型分析實務：SPSS與SmartPLS的運用。臺北市：五南。
    湯志民（2008）。教育領導新論：空間領導的理念與策略，載於臺北市政府教育局、臺灣教育政策與評鑑學會、中華民國教育行政學會、暨大教育政策與行政系、市教大教育行政與評鑑所、中小學校長培育中心主辦，2008年教育品質與教育評鑑會議手冊暨論文集（一），（頁35-56），臺北市：作者
    黃鳳英、吳昌衛、釋惠敏、釋果暉、趙一平、戴志達（2015）。「臺灣版五因素正念量表」之信效度分析。測驗學刊，62（3），231-260。
    楊淑貞、林邦傑、沈湘縈（2007）。禪坐之自我療癒力及其對壓力、憂鬱、焦慮與幸福感影響之研究。玄奘佛學研究，7，63-104。
    趙杰（2018）。幼兒園園長正念領導、教師學習文化與專業承諾關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
    趙驛（2020）。彰化縣國民中學教師人格特質、工作壓力與教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
    劉妙珮（2018）。正念教學方案對三年級學童正念、情緒調節及專注力之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。大葉大學，彰化縣。
    劉姿芬（2015）。大學正念靜坐課程學習成效關鍵因素之分析－以南華大學為例（未出版之碩士論文）。南華大學，嘉義縣。
    潘正德（1999）。不同理論取向團體的口語互動行為分析與團體效果研究。中原學報，27（2），95-122。
    蔡尚欽（2020）。新北市公立國民中學校長學習領導、教師自我導向學習與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
    蕭佳芳（2020）。國民中學教師教學風格與教學效能之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。南臺科技大學，臺南市。
    蕭金土、汪成琳（2003）。高中職校長教學領導，特教班教師教學效能及其關係之研究。特殊教育學報，17，147-175。
    戴言儒（2019）。臺北市國民中學校長知識領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
    謝文全（2012）。教育行政學。臺北市，高等教育。
    謝傳崇（2011a）。校長正向領導理念、研究與實踐。臺北市：高等教育。
    謝傳崇（2011b）。校長正向領導對教師教學影響之研究。教育資料與研究，101，59-82。
    謝傳崇（2012）。從正向領導觀點看國際的卓越校長。師友月刊，538，25-29。
    謝傳崇（2014）。國民小學校長正向領導對教師學術樂觀影響之研究-以學校創新文化為中介變項。學校行政，91，33-56。
    謝傳崇（2018）。發展有意義的學校：校長正念領導之探究。教育研究月刊，292，69-86。
    謝傳崇（譯）（2011b）。正向領導（原作者：Kim Cameron）。臺北市：巨流圖書。
    謝傳崇（譯）（2015）。正向領導力（原作者：Kim Cameron）。臺北市︰巨流圖書。
    謝傳崇、許文薇（2014）。國民小學校長正向領導、肯定式探詢與教師希望感關係之研究。教育研究學報，48（1），67-86。
    謝豐宇、賴志峰（2012）。國民中學校長服務領導、教師組織公民行為與教師教學效能關係之研究。學校行政雙月刊，82，47-69。
    鍾榮進（2015）。國小教師教學效能自評之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，8（1），69-104。
    顏采如（2014）。正念減壓課程對醫療人員身心健康之初探（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學，臺北市。
    蘇芳儀（2019）。國小校長正念領導對幸福感影響之研究：以情緒智慧為中介變項（未出版之碩士論文）。國立清華大學，新竹市。
    蘇奕娟（2018）。校長正向領導與教師情緒距離。臺灣教育評論月刊，7（1），236-242。
    蘇郁文（2018）。高雄市國民中學語文領域教師情緒勞務、挫折容忍力與教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
    貳、西文部分
    Alexander, C. N., Langer, E. J., & Newman, R. I. (1989). Transcendental meditation, mindfulness, and longevity: An experimental study with the elderly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 950–964.
    Andrews, T. (1991). How to See and Read the Aura. St. Paul, MN: Llewellyn.
    Ashton P. T. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education,19(5), 28-32.
    Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
    Bandura, A. (1987). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Barsh, J., & Lavoie, J. (2015). Centered Leadership: Leading with Purpose, Clarity, and Impact. New York, Crown Business.
    Beal, B. (2015). Mind how you go towards leadership. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 29(3), 30-32.
    Bollen, K.A., (1989).Structural Equations with Latent Variables, Wiley, New York
    Borich, G. D. (1994). Observation skills for effective teaching. New York, NY: Macmillan.
    Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.
    Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.
    Burnkrant, R. R., & Page, T. (1984). A modification of the Fenigstein, Scheier, and Buss Self-Consciousness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 629–637.
    Buss, A. H. (1980). Self-consciousness and social anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
    Butler, J. P. (2011). Positive leadership in the military: An exploratory study. retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Positive-leadership-in-the-military%3A-An-exploratory-Butler/ca484165521ab76ca2448f3dcd86fa3e04204ea7
    Cameron, K. (2008). Positive Leadership: Strategies for Extraordinary Performance. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
    Cameron, K. S., & Caza, A. (2004). Introduction: Contributions to the discipline of positive organizational scholarship. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 1-9.
    Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn. R. (2003). Positive Organizational Scholarship. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
    Cameron,K. (2012).Positive leadership: Strategiesfor extraordinary performance. San Francisco,CA:Berrett-Koehler.
    Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
    Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Chang, K. M., Chun, Y. T., Chen, S. H., Lu, L., Su, H. T. J., Liang, H. M., Santhosh, J., Ching, C. T. S., & Liu, S. H. (2016). The evaluation of physical stillness with wearable chest and arm accelerometer during Chan Ding practice. Sensors, 2016(16), 11-26.
    Chin, W.W. (2010) How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses. In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J. and Wang, H., Eds., Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York, 655-690.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
    Cooperrider, D. L. & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: a positive revolution in change. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-kohler.
    Cramer, K. M. (2000). Comparing the relative fit of various factor models of the self-consciousness scale in two independent samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 295–307.
    Creed. A. T., & Funder, D. C. (1998). The two faces of private selfconsciousness: Self-report, peer-report, and behavioral correlates. European Journal of Personality, 12, 411–431.
    Davis, M. H., & Franzoi, S. L. (1999). Self-awareness and selfconsciousness. In V. J. Derlega, Winstead, B. A. & Jones, W. H. (Eds.), Personality: Contemporary theory and research, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
    Davison, A.C. and Hinkley, D.V. (1997) Bootstrap Methods and their Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802843
    Delizonna, L., & Anstedt, T. (2015). Mindful leaders: A self-coaching guide & toolkit. North Charleston, South Carolina: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
    Dembo, M. H., & Gibson, S. (1985). Teachers` sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 173-184.
    Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective selfconsciousness. New York, NY: Academic.
    Ellis, A. (1991). Thee revised ABC’s of RET. Journal of RationalEmotive and Cognitive Therapy, 9, 139–172.
    Eren, A (2009). Examining the teacher efficacy and achievement goals as predictors of turkish student teachers’ conceptions about teaching and learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 69-73.
    Esposito Vinzi, V., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS path modeling: From foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. Ching, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp.47-82). New York, NY: Springer.
    Fornell, C. R. & Larcker, F. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-51.
    Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychology Science, 13(2), 172-175.
    Fredrickson, B., & Losada, M. (2005). Positive affect and the positive dynamics of human flourishing. The American Psychologist, 60, 678-686.
    Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communcations of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1-70.
    Gordon, J. (2008). The case for positive energy. Retrieved from: http://www.leader-values.com/Content/detail.asp?ContentDetailID=1207
    Grant, A. M., & Berg, J. M. (2012). Prosocial motivation at work: When, why, and how making a difference makes a difference. In K. Cameron and G. Spreitzer (Eds.). Handbook of positive organizational scholarship. New York, NY：Oxford University.
    Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarsedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Strructural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Washington, DC: Sage Publications.
    Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarsedt, M. (2011, Spring). PLS-SEM: Indeed a sliver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2)，139-151.
    Hammond, S. (1998). The thin book of appreciative inquiry. Bend, OR: Thin Book.
    Harris, B. M., & Hill, J. (1982). The DeTEK handbook. Boston, MA: National Educational Laboratory Publishers.
    Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 195-204.
    Humphrey, M., & Ronald, H. (2008). Affect and emotion: New directions in management theory and research. Retrieved from http://book.google.tw/books?id=5gTYq3s8aiAC&
    Johansson, N. (1991). Effectiveness of a stress management program in reducing anxiety and depression in nursing students. Journal of American College Health, 40, 125-129.
    Jordan, S. R. (2016). Positive leadership behavior. Retrieved from https://163.21.239.102:2132/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-31816-5_1341-1.pdf
    Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York, NY: Delta.
    Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York, NY: Hyperion.
    Kalhotra, S. K., & Satish, A. (2014). A study of teacher effectiveness in relation to attitude towards teaching profession. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR), 3(4),9-13.
    Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
    Lambie, J. A., & Marcel, A. J. (2002). Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: A theoretical framework. PsychologicalReview, 109, 219–259.
    Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
    Langer, E. (2002). Well-being: Mindfulness versus positive evaluation. In Snyder, C.R. & Lopez, S.J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology, (pp. 214–230). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Levesque, C., & Brown, K. W. (2006). Overriding motivational automaticity: Mindfulness as a moderator of the influence of implicit motivation on daytoday behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    Lin, R. L., Xie, J. C., Jeng, Y. C., & Huang, S. H. (2010). The relationship between teacher quality and teaching effectiveness perceived by students from industrial vocational high school. Asian Journal of Arts and Sciences,1(2). 167-187.
    Linehan, M. (1993a). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford.
    Linehan, M. (1993b). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford.
    Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16 (1), 57-72.
    Luthans, F., LuIthans, K. W., Hodgetts, R. M., & Luthans, B. C. (2001). Positive approach to leadership (PAL) implications for today’s organizations. The Journal of leadership studies, 8 (2), 1-20.
    Marsh, H.W., & Baily, M. (1991). Multidimensional student"s evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A profile an analysis. (Report No. TM 019 005).
    Martin, J. R. (1997). Mindfulness: A proposed common factor. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 7, 291–312.
    McBer H. (2000).Research into teacher effectiveness: Amodel of teacher effectiveness. Report to thedepartment for education and employment.
    McHaney, J. H., & Impey, W. D. (1992). Strategies for analyzing and evaluating teaching effectiveness: using a clinical supervision model. Retrieved from ERIC database.( ED354268)
    McKee, A., Boyatzis, R. E., Johnston, F., & Johnston, F. (2008). Becoming a resonant leader: Develop your emotional intelligence, renew your relationships, sustain your effectiveness. Brighton, Massachusetts：Harvard Business Press.
    Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. C. W. Morris (Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Michenbaum, D. (1979). Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York, NY: Plenum.
    Modaff, W.M. (1992). The development of the student audit teacher behaviors. University of Missouri: Missouri.
    Money, S. M. (1992). What is teaching effectiveness？A survey of student and teacher perceptions of teacher effectiveness. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED351056).
    Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292.
    Patricia, A. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32.
    Perls, F., Hefferline, R. F., & Goodman, P. (1958). Gestalt therapy. New York, NY: Julian Press.
    Pirouz, D. M. (2006). An overview of partial least squares. Retrieved February 19, 2008, from http://www.merage.uci.edu/~dpirouz04/research/pls/PLS.pdf.
    Rosch, E. (1997). Mindfulness meditation and the private self. In U. Neisser & D. A. Jopling (Eds.), The conceptual self in context. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, General and Applied, 80(1), 1－28.
    Ruiz, C. E., Hamlin, R. G., & Carioni, A. (2016). Behavioural determinants of perceived managerial and leadership effectiveness in Argentina. Human Resource Development International, 19(4), 267-288.
    Ryan, D.W. (1986). Sharing your skills teaching adults. The training of instructors to teach non-credit adult education courses. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 277838)
    Sandhu, P. K. (2012). A study of teacher effectiveness in relation to school organizational climate and administrative behavior of school heads of Himachal Pradesh. Punjabi University, Patiala.
    Seligman, M. & Csiksszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
    Shapiro, D. (2012). Impact of knowledge probes on student learning and teaching effectiveness. Retrieved form http://dspaceprod.georgiasouthern.edu:8080/xmlui/handle/10518/5643
    Shapiro, S. L., & Carlson, L. E. (2009). The art and science of mindfulness: Integrating mindfulness into psychology and the helping professions.Washington, DC: American Psychology Press.
    Shear, J., & Jevning, R. (1999). Pure consciousness: Scientific exploration of meditation techniques. In F. J. Varela & J. Shear (Eds.), The view from within (pp. 189–209). Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academics.
    Stehle, S., Spinath, B., & Kadmon, M. (2012). Measuring teaching effectiveness: Correspondence between students’ evaluations of teaching and different measures of student learning. Research in Higher Education, 53(8), 888-904.
    Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Images of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 11–26.
    Teasdale, J. D. (1999). Emotional processing, three modes of mind and the prevention of relapse in depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 53–77.
    Trapnell, P. D., & Campbell, J. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284–304.
    Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
    Vasconcelos, F. L.(2012).Multilinear decomposition application into students` evaluation of teaching effectiveness. Retrieved form http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6530215&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D6530215
    Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmuller, V., Kleinknecht, N.,& Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring Mindfulness--The Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1543-1555.
    Westen, D. (1999). Psychology: Mind, brain, & culture, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley.
    Yeung, K. W., & Watkins, D. (2000). Hong kong studentteachers’personal construction of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 213-235.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    教育學系
    105152509
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105152509
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202101497
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Education] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2223View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback