English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51837044      Online Users : 497
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/136917
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136917


    Title: 宰制、臣屬或自由:性工作不道德嗎?
    Dominance, Subordination or Freedom: Is Prostitution Immoral?
    Authors: 黃姿容
    Huang, Tsu-Jung
    Contributors: 鄭光明
    Cheng, Kuang-Ming
    黃姿容
    Huang, Tsu-Jung
    Keywords: 宰制與臣屬
    理想的社會
    性改革
    根除性工作
    絕對性自由
    不平等
    Dominance and subordination
    Ideal society
    Sexual reform
    Abolish prostitution
    Absolute sexual freedom
    Inequality
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-09-02 16:33:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文預計探討反對性工作的常見理由,兼闡述有什麼理由該支持或反對性工作的存在。過往探討性工作散見於各類文章,直至Ericsson集大成,將其反對理由分為八個論證並回應。在八個論證之中最息息相關的,是女性主義所質疑的問題,Ericsson的回應也主要是針對這個論證,即性工作是否會造成性別不平等。而筆者打算將Ericsson與女性主義的爭執點釐清,說明性工作這份職業是否會使女性永遠臣屬於男性,也藉由此探討性工作是否該被剷除,或僅須改革即可。與此相關的,則是筆者想要藉由性工作的哲學探討,進一步探究理想的社會應是甚麼模樣。

    對此,筆者的回答是性工作沒有不道德的問題。性工作的爭議不易消解的原因,在於社會多數人帶有強烈的偏見,及女性主義認為「性工作會不斷強化男性宰制女性」的形象。筆者將探究「性工作」不只應為一份工作,也沒有不道德。在實現了Ericsson的改革理想社會後,性工作的宰制問題也將被解決。
    Reference: 參考文獻
    英文文獻
    Ericsson, Lars 0. (1980). Charges Against Prostitution: An Attempt at a Philosophical Assessment. Ethics, 90: 335-366. Reprinted in Boonin, David and Graham Oddie (eds.), What’s Wrong? Applied Ethicists and Their Critics (pp. 258-268). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Ericsson, Lars O. (1980). ‘Charges Against Prostitution: An Attempt at a Philosophical Assessment’. Ethics, 90: 335-366. Reprinted in Boonin, David and Graham Oddie (eds.), What’s Wrong? Applied Ethicists and Their Critics (pp. 258-268). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Green, Karen (1989). Prostitution, Exploitation, and Taboo. Philosophy, 64, 250: 525-534. Reprinted in Boonin, David and Graham Oddie (eds.), What’s Wrong? Applied Ethicists and Their Critics (pp. 274-277). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Nussbaum, Martha C. (1998). Whether From Reason Or Prejudice: Taking Money For Bodily Services. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27, S2: 693-723.

    Pateman, Carole (1983). Defending Prostitution: Charges Against Ericsson. Ethics, 93: 561-565. Reprinted in Boonin, David and Graham Oddie (eds.), What’s Wrong? Applied Ethicists and Their Critics (pp. 269-271). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Shrage, Laurie. (1989). Should Feminists Oppose Prostitution? Ethics, 99: 347-361. Reprinted in Boonin, David and Graham Oddie (eds.), What’s Wrong? Applied Ethicists and Their Critics (pp. 272-274). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.




    中文文獻
    寜應斌(2002),性工作是否為「工作」?—馬克思的商品論與性工作的社會建構論,《台灣社會研究》季刊,46期,87-139。新版本收入《異議》讀本,陳光興編(2008),台灣社會研究叢刊,99-144。
    甯應斌(2002),〈性工作是否為「工作」?—馬克思的商品論與性工作的社會建構論〉,《台灣社會研究》季刊,46期,頁87-139。新版本收入《異議》讀本,陳光興編(2008),台灣社會研究叢刊,頁99-144。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學系
    107154005
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107154005
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202101414
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    400501.pdf3127KbAdobe PDF2165View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback