政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136720

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136720

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51731574 Online Users : 597

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > MBA Program > Theses > Item 140.119/136720

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136720

Title:	跨國企業避險與避稅之關連性分析 The Relationship of Corporate Hedging and Tax Avoidance of Multinational Firms
Authors:	張郁敏 Chang, Yuh-Miin
Contributors:	張元晨羅明琇 Chang, Yuan-Chen Lo, S.M. 張郁敏 Chang, Yuh-Miin
Keywords:	財務避險營運避險避稅避稅天堂 Financial hedging Operational hedging Tax avoidance Tax haven
Date:	2021
Issue Date:	2021-08-04 16:35:49 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	跨國企業會使用財務和營運避險來規避匯率風險，但是企業在進行財務避險同時，可能也會透過衍生性金融工具的稅務擇時機會來避稅。另外企業透過海外設立工廠時作為營運避險，若設立國家的稅率較母國低，可能亦會被作為避稅的工具，而當企業在避稅天堂設立營運機構，也可能會有更好的避稅效果。因此本文將探討美國企業使用財務避險及營運避險和跨國企業有效稅率間的關連性，實證結果顯示使用財務及營運避險有助於美國跨國企業避稅，在避稅天堂營運避險效果較在非避稅天堂國家佳。 Multinational firms use financial operational hedges to hedge foreign exchange risks. Both financial and operational derivatives provide firms with opportunities to avoid taxes. While the tax savings of currency derivatives primarily result from tax timing opportunities, operational hedging enables firms to shift their profit to companies located in a country with a lower income tax rate. Moreover, more taxes can be avoided if firms establish their operations in tax havens. This paper examines the relationship between financial and operational hedges and the effective tax rates of U.S. multinational corporations. The empirical results show that financial and operational hedges help U.S. multinational firms avoid taxes. The effect of operational hedge in Tax haven countries is better than in other countries.
Reference:	Allayannis, G., Ihrig, J., & Weston, J. P. (2001). Exchange-rate hedging: Financial versus operational strategies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 391-395. Allayannis, G., & Ofek, E. (2001). Exchange rate exposure, hedging, and the use of foreign currency derivatives. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 273-296. Berkman, H., & Bradbury, M. E. (1996). Empirical evidence on the corporate use of derivatives. Financial Management, 5-13. Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?. Journal of financial economics, 95(1), 41-61. Chernenko, S., & Faulkender, M. (2011). The two sides of derivatives usage: Hedging and speculating with interest rate swaps. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), 1727-1754. Chowdhry, B., & Howe, J. T. (1999). Corporate risk management for multinational corporations: Financial and operational hedging policies. Review of Finance, 2(2), 229-246. Cohen, M. A., & Huchzermeier, A. (1999). Global supply chain management: a survey of research and applications. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management, 669-702. Contractor, F. J. (2016). Tax avoidance by multinational companies: Methods, policies, and ethics. Rutgers Business Review, 1(1). DeAngelo, H., & Masulis, R. W. (1980). Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1), 3-29. Demeré, P., Donohoe, M. P., & Lisowsky, P. (2020). The economic effects of special purpose entities on corporate tax avoidance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(3), 1562-1597. Deng, Z. (2020). "Foreign exchange risk, hedging, and tax‐motivated outbound income shifting." Journal of Accounting Research 58(4): 953-987. Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. The review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537-546. Desai, M. A., Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2007). Theft and taxes. Journal of financial economics, 84(3), 591-623. Dharmapala, D., & Hines Jr, J. R. (2009). Which countries become tax havens?. Journal of Public Economics, 93(9-10), 1058-1068. Donohoe, M. P. (2015). "The economic effects of financial derivatives on corporate tax avoidance." Journal of Accounting and Economics 59(1): 1-24. Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long‐run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61-82. Faulkender, M. (2005). Hedging or market timing? Selecting the interest rate exposure of corporate debt. The Journal of Finance, 60(2), 931-962. Géczy, C., Minton, B. A., & Schrand, C. (1997). Why firms use currency derivatives. the Journal of Finance, 52(4), 1323-1354. Graham, J. R., & Smith, C. W. (1999). Tax incentives to hedge. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2241-2262. Graham, J. R., & Rogers, D. A. (2002). Do firms hedge in response to tax incentives?. The Journal of Finance, 57(2), 815-839. Graham, J. R., & Tucker, A. L. (2006). Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(3), 563-594. Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178. Hanlon, M., & Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2), 126-141. Hoberg, G., & Moon, S. K. (2017). Offshore activities and financial vs operational hedging. Journal of Financial Economics, 125(2), 217-244. Huchzermeier, A., & Cohen, M. A. (1996). Valuing operational flexibility under exchange rate risk. Operations Research, 44(1), 100-113. Kim, Y. S., Mathur, I., & Nam, J. (2006). Is operational hedging a substitute for or a complement to financial hedging?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(4), 834-853. Lee, Y. (2017). The impact of hedging and non-hedging derivatives on tax avoidance (Doctoral dissertation, UC Irvine) Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 479-502. Richardson, G., & Taylor, G. (2015). Income shifting incentives and tax haven utilization: Evidence from multinational US firms. The International Journal of Accounting, 50(4), 458-485. Rego, S. O. (2003). Tax‐avoidance activities of US multinational corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(4), 805-833. Smith, C. W., & Stulz, R. M. (1985). The determinants of firms` hedging policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 391-405. Wilson, R. J. (2009). An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 969-999.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) 108363032
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108363032
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202100626
Appears in Collections:	[MBA Program] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
303201.pdf		1251Kb	Adobe PDF2	66	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback