政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136718
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51778548      Online Users : 629
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > MBA Program > Theses >  Item 140.119/136718


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136718


    Title: 性別一致性嗅覺刺激對產品評價與購買意圖的影響
    The Effect of Gender-Congruent Scents on Product Evaluation and Purchase Intention
    Authors: 施懿容
    Shih, Yi-Jung
    Contributors: 朴星俊
    別蓮蒂
    Park, Sung-Jun
    Bei, Lien-Ti
    施懿容
    Shih, Yi-Jung
    Keywords: 感官行銷
    性別一致性
    產品評價
    購買意圖
    嗅覺
    Sensory marketing
    Gender-congruent effect
    Product evaluation
    Purchase intention
    Smell
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-08-04 16:35:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究主要探討性別一致性的嗅覺刺激對產品評價與購買意圖的影響。消費者每天面臨無數的感官刺激，人們唯一無法自行關閉的感官就是嗅覺。近年來， 當行銷人員想不出新的視覺行銷方式時，越來越多行銷人員開始使用嗅覺刺激來吸引消費者。例如，一家位於台灣台北的電商女裝品牌，每一個售出的貨品，都會在包裝紙上噴上香水 (Wstyle, 2016)。然而，當具有明顯男性特質的消費者收到一種帶有甜味、花香和水果香味的產品時，消費者會不會因為矛盾感而對產品產生不好的評價？ 因此，本研究欲探討生理性別、自我性別意識和性別特質與嗅覺刺激一致時對產品評價與購買意圖的影響。

    根據上述研究目的，採用實驗方法驗證不同知覺性別的嗅覺刺激與個人性別認同一致時對產品評價和購買意願的影響。本研究經過兩階段前測，第一階段，選擇具有知覺性別差異的香水，男士香水選擇Chanel Allure Homme，女士香水選擇Jo Malone London English Pear and Freesia cologne；第二階段選擇T-shirt為目標產品，代表不具性別特色的中性產品。正式實驗施測於86位政治大學18-25歲之學生。

    實驗結果有三個重點發現：一、就知覺性別差異的嗅覺刺激而言，當嗅覺刺激與自我性別認同一致時，可以提高消費者對產品的評價。其次，進一步利用性別特質發現產品評價是受女性特質所影響。第三，性別一致性嗅覺刺激對購買意願沒有顯著影響。總體而言，性別一致性嗅覺刺激確實會影響消費者對產品的評價。

    本研究結果提供行銷人員未來在採用嗅覺刺激行銷時，更多的考量因素，以利行銷人員選擇合適的嗅覺刺激物加以應用。
    This study mainly explores the influence of gender-congruent effect on product evaluation and purchase intention. Consumers face countless sensory stimulation every day, the only sense that people cannot turn off is olfactory. In recent years, when marketers cannot think of new ways of visual marketing, more and more marketers have begun to use olfactory marketing to attract consumers. For example, an e -commerce women`s clothing brand located in Taipei, Taiwan, sprays perfume on the wrapping paper in every package sold (Wstyle, 2016). However, when a consumer with obvious masculine characteristics receives a product packaging fragrance that is sweet, floral and fruity. Will consumers have a bad evaluation of the product because of sense of conflict? Therefore, this research explores the moderation effects of physical gender, self-concept regarding gender identity, and gender characteristics.
    According to research purposes, experimental methods are used to verify the influence of different perceived gender olfactory stimuli on product evaluation and purchase intention when they are consistent with one’s gender identity. This research has gone through two stages of pretest. In the first stage, fragrances with perceived gender difference are selected, Chanel Allure Homme is selected for masculine fragrance, Jo Malone London English Pear and Freesia cologne is selected for feminine fragrance. T-shirt is selected as focal product for main test experiment in the second stage, which represents neutral products with no gender characteristics. The main test experiment was conducted on 86 students aged 18-25 from National Chengchi University.
    There are three key findings: First, when perceived gender of olfactory stimuli is congruent with one’s self-concept of gender identity, it can improve the consumer`s evaluation of the product. Second, use of gender characteristics to find that product evaluation was mainly affected by the moderation of female characteristic. Third,
    gender-congruent effect did not significantly affected consumers’ purchase intention. In conclusion, gender-congruent effect does affect consumers` evaluation of products.
    This study provides marketers more factors to consider when they use olfactory marketing in the future to better select appropriate olfactory stimuli to apply.
    Reference: 中文
    1. 郭為藩 (1972)。自我心理學。台南 : 開山書店。
    2. 張春興、林清山（民71）　教育心理學。台北：東華書局。
    3. 陳明怡 (2010). 愉悅性嗅覺刺激對產品評價與資訊處理的影響（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。

    English
    1. Aaker, J. L. (1999). The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379903600104
    2. Achrol, R. S., & Kotler, P. (2012). Frontiers of the marketing paradigm in the third millennium. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0255-4
    3. Allison, N. K., Golden, L. L., Mullet, G. M., & Coogan, D. (1980). Sex-Typed Product Images: The Effects of Sex, Sex Role Self-Concept and Measurement Implications. Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 604–609.
    4. Belch, G. (1978). Belief Systems and the Differential Role of the Self-Concept. Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 320–325.
    5. Belch, G., & Landon, E. (1977). Discriminant Validity of a Product-Anchored Self-Concept Measure. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(2), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400213
    6. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
    7. Birdwell, A. E. (1968). A Study of the Influence of Image Congruence on Consumer Choice. The Journal of Business, 41(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1086/295047
    8. Bittner, A., & Goodyear-Grant, E. (2017). Sex isn’t Gender: Reforming Concepts and Measurements in the Study of Public Opinion. Political Behavior, 39(4), 1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9391-y
    9. Bone, P., & Jantrania, S. (1992). Olfaction as a Cue for Product Quality. Marketing Letters, 3(3), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994136
    10. Bosmans, A. (2006). Scents and Sensibility: When Do (In)Congruent Ambient Scents Influence Product Evaluations? Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.3.32
    11. Chebat, J.-C., & Michon, R. (2003). Impact of ambient odors on mall shoppers’ emotions, cognition, and spending: A test of competitive causal theories. Journal of Business Research, 56(7), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00247-8
    12. Ehrlichman, H., & Halpern, J. N. (1988). Affect and memory: Effects of pleasant and unpleasant odors on retrieval of happy and unhappy memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 769–779. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.55.5.769
    13. Ellen, P. S., & Bone, P. F. (1998). Does it Matter If it Smells? Olfactory Stimuli as Advertising Executional Cues. Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1998.10673567
    14. Fitzgerald Bone, P., & Scholder Ellen, P. (1999). Scents in the marketplace: explaining a fraction of olfaction. Journal of Retailing, 75(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)00007-X
    15. Furby, L. (1978). Possessions in Humans: An Exploratory Study of Its Meaning and Motivation, Social Behavior and Personality, 6(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1978.6.1.49
    16. Laird, D. A. (1932). How the consumer estimates quality by subconscious sensory impressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 16(3), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074816
    17. Gardner, B. B. and Levy, S. J. (1955). The Product and the Brand,” Harvard Business Review, 33(2), 33–39.
    18. Golden, L. L., Allison, N., & Clee, M. (1979). The role of sex role self-concept in masculine and feminine product perceptions. Advances in Consumer Research, 6(1), 599-605.
    19. Greeno, D. W., Sommers, M. S., & Kernan, J. B. (1973). Personality and Implicit Behavior Patterns. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377301000109
    20. Grubb, E., & Grathwohl, H. (1967). Consumer Self-Concept, Symbolism and Market Behavior: A Theoretical Approach. Journal of Marketing, 31(4), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224296703100405
    21. Grubb, E. L., & Hupp, G. (1968). Perception of Self, Generalized Stereotypes, and Brand Selection. Journal of Marketing Research, 5(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224376800500107
    22. Gutman, J. (1973). Self-Concepts and Television Viewing Among Women. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(3), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1086/268100
    23. Gulas, C., & Bloch, P. (1995). Right under Our Noses: Ambient Scent and Consumer Responses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249272
    24. Haberland, M. F. (2010). The Power of Scent Empirical Field Studies of Olfactory Cues on Purchase Behavior (dissertation).
    25. Jacobson, E., & Kossoff, J. (1963). Self-percept and consumer attitudes toward small cars. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47(4), 242–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047538
    26. Joan Meyers-Levy, & Alice M. Tybout. (1989). Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation. The Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1086/209192
    27. Lindstrom, M. (2005). Brand sense: how to build powerful brands through touch, taste, smell, sight and sound. Kogan Page.
    28. Mandler, G. (1981). The structure of value: accounting for taste. Center for Human Information Processing, Dept. of Psychology, University of California, San Diego.
    29. Martin, W. S. (1973). Personality and product symbolism. Bureau of Business Research, University of Texas at Austin, Graduate School of Business.
    30. Meyers-Levy, J., & Zhu, R. (Juliet). (2010). Gender differences in the meanings consumers infer from music and other aesthetic stimuli. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.006
    31. Mitchell, D., Kahn, B., & Knasko, S. (1995). There’s Something in the Air: Effects of Congruent or Incongruent Ambient Odor on Consumer Decision Making. The Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1086/209447
    32. Morrin, M., & Ratneshwar, S. (2003). Does It Make Sense to Use Scents to Enhance Brand Memory? Journal of Marketing Research, 40(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.1.10.19128
    33. Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership. The Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1086/598614
    34. Peracchio, L., & Tybout, A. (1996). The Moderating Role of Prior Knowledge in Schema-Based Product Evaluation. The Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1086/209476
    35. Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84
    36. Pryzgoda, J., & Chrisler, J. C. (2000). Definitions of Gender and Sex: The Subtleties of Meaning. Sex Roles, 43(7), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007123617636
    37. Schenk, C., & Holman, R. (1980). A Sociological Approach to Brand Choice: The Concept of Situational Self Image. Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 610–614.
    38. Schlinger, M. J. (1969), Cues on Q-Technique. Journal of Advertising Research, 9(3), 53-60.
    39. Silke Bambauer-Sachse. (2012). Through Which Mechanisms Does Ambient Scent Affect Purchase Intention in Retail Settings? Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 319–326.
    40. Sirgy, M. (1982). Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review. The Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924
    41. Sommers. Montrose S. (1964). Product Symbolism and the Perception of Social Strata. Proceedings of the American Marketing Association, 22, 200-216.
    42. Spangenberg, E. R., Crowley, A. E., & Henderson, P. W. (1996). Improving the Store Environment: Do Olfactory Cues Affect Evaluations and Behaviors? Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251931
    43. Spangenberg, E., Sprott, D., Grohmann, B., & Tracy, D. (2006). Gender-congruent ambient scent influences on approach and avoidance behaviors in a retail store. Journal of Business Research, 59(12), 1281–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.08.006
    44. McGarty, C., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Spears, R. (2002). Stereotypes as Explanations: The Formation of Meaningful Beliefs about Social Groups. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489877
    45. Stephenson, W. (1968). The study of behavior : Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press.
    46. Knasko, S., Gilbert, A. N., & Sabini, J. (1990). Emotional state, physical well-being and performance in the presence of feigned ambient odor. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 479-487.
    47. Kotler (2003) , Marketing Management, 11th ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    48. Krishna, A., Lwin, M., & Morrin, M. (2010). Product Scent and Memory. The Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1086/649909
    49. Krishna, A., Elder, R. S., & Caldara, C. (2010). Feminine to smell but masculine to touch? Multisensory congruence and its effect on the aesthetic experience. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 410–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.010
    50. Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.003
    51. Krishna, A., & Schwarz, N. (2014). Sensory marketing, embodiment, and grounded cognition: A review and introduction. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.12.006
    52. van den Hende, E. A., & Mugge, R. (2014). Investigating Gender-Schema Congruity Effects on Consumers’ Evaluation of Anthropomorphized Products. Psychology & Marketing, 31(4), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20693
    53. Vidales Giovannetti, M. D. (2003). El mundo del envase: Manual para el diseño y producción de envases y embalajes. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
    54. Worth, L. T., Smith, J., & Mackie, D. M. (1992). Gender schematicity and preference for gender-typed products. Psychology & Marketing, 9(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220090104
    55. Zeithaml, V. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302

    Website
    1. Wstyle. (2016). Homepage. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/wstyle2016/posts/1124926444264016/ (July 15, 2021)
    2. Euromonitor International. (2019). Fragrances in Taiwan. Passport. Retrieved from https://www.euromonitor.com/fragrances-in-taiwan/report (June 23, 2020)
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    108363024
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108363024
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202101109
    Appears in Collections:[MBA Program] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    302401.pdf3381KbAdobe PDF285View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback