English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51735285      Online Users : 640
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136579


    Title: 臺灣縣市的人口結構變遷對中小學教育品質之影響
    The Impacts of Demographic Changes on Educational Quality of Elementary and Secondary School in Taiwan
    Authors: 徐燕翎
    Hsu, Yen-Ling
    Contributors: 吳文傑
    張峯彬

    Wu, Wen-Chieh
    Chang, Feng-Bin

    徐燕翎
    Hsu, Yen-Ling
    Keywords: 人口結構變遷
    教育品質
    追蹤資料
    固定效果模型
    demographic changes
    educational quality
    panel data
    fixed-effect model
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-08-04 16:03:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   臺灣少子化與高齡化情形日益嚴重及新住民子女逐年增加,這些人口結構的變化可能影響國家的教育品質。本文欲了解具有不同人口結構特徵的縣市在教育品質上的表現為何。在教育品質指標上,除了以過去研究常使用的每位學生之平均教育經費與生師比衡量,亦加入代理教師比例與國中小教師具有碩士以上學歷比例來衡量,以期能從不同面向瞭解臺灣的教育品質。
      本研究主要以民國95年至108年共14年間的22個直轄市與縣市,共308筆樣本數進行實證分析。本研究資料為追蹤資料(panel data),除了使用普通最小平方法(Ordinary Least Squares,OLS),亦考慮到各縣市及各年度的特性差異,使用固定效果模型(fixed effect model)。使用加入區域固定效果的一元固定效果模型,再加上時間固定效果,使用二元固定效果模型(two-way fixed effect model)。
      實證結果發現,高齡化越嚴重的地區,平均教育經費越高、生師比越低,而代理教師比例越高,但代理教師比例較高的地區可能教師的學歷較高。表示高齡化地區雖然看似有較好的平均教育資源量,但可能其中的師資結構較不穩定。少子化越嚴重的地區除了以平均教育經費衡量的結果與高齡化地區不同,其餘教育品質指標的結果與高齡化嚴重的地區結果相似。新住民子女中小學學生比例較高的地區,平均教育經費、教師具有碩士以上學歷的比例越高,顯示政府針對少數族群的資源投入。
      The problems of declining birth rate and aging population are becoming increasingly serious in Taiwan, and the number of new immigrant children is increasing recent year. These demographic changes may affect the educational quality. This paper wants to understand the educational quality of counties and cities with different demographic characteristics. In terms of educational quality indicators, in addition to using the per student education expenditure and student-teacher ratio often used in past research, this article also uses the ratio of supply teachers and the ratio of primary and secondary school teachers with a master’s degree or above to measure the educational quality in Taiwan from different perspectives.
      The data used in this paper are panel data of 22 counties and cities in the 14 years from 2006 to 2019, i.e. 308 samples. In addition to the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method, the fixed effect model is also used in consideration of the characteristics of each county and city and each year. One-way fixed effect model with region-specific fixed effects and two way fixed-effect model with region-specific and time fixed effects are also used.
      The results show that the more aging the area, the higher per student education expenditure, the lower the student-teacher ratio, and the higher the supply teacher ratio, but the higher the supply teacher ratio may be that the teachers have higher academic qualifications. Said that although the aging areas seem to have better average educational resources, the teacher structure may be unstable. In the areas with more declining proportion of child population, except for the results measured by per student education expenditure are different from those of aging areas, and the results of other education quality indicators are similar to aging areas. The higher proportion of new immigrant children in primary and secondary school students in the areas, the higher the per student education expenditure and the higher the proportion of teachers with a master’s degree or above, shows that the government has invested in resources for minority groups.
    Reference: 參考文獻
    英文文獻
    Case, A. C., Rosen, H. S., & Hines, J. R. (1993). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence. Journal of public economics, 52(3), 285-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)90036-s
    Cheng, Y. C., & Tam, W. M. (1997). Multi‐models of quality in education. Quality assurance in Education.
    Croninger, R. G., Rice, J. K., Rathbun, A., & Nishio, M. (2007). Teacher qualifications and early learning: Effects of certification, degree, and experience on first-grade student achievement. Economics of education review, 26(3), 312-324.
    Goldhaber, D., & Anthony, E. (2003). Indicators of Teacher Quality. ERIC Digest.
    Gradstein, M., & Kaganovich, M. (2004). Aging population and education finance. Journal of public economics, 88(12), 2469-2485. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(03)00065-3
    Grob, U., & Wolter, S. C. (2007). Demographic change and public education spending: A conflict between young and old? Education Economics, 15(3), 277-292.
    Harris, A. R., Evans, W. N., & Schwab, R. M. (2001). Education spending in an aging America. Journal of public economics, 81(3), 449-472.
    Inman, R. P. (1978). Testing political economy’s ‘as if’proposition: is the median income voter really decisive? Public Choice, 33(4), 45-65.
    Koc, N., & Celik, B. (2015). The impact of number of students per teacher on student achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 65-70.
    Ladd, H. F., & Murray, S. E. (2001). Intergenerational conflict reconsidered: County demographic structure and the demand for public education. Economics of education review, 20(4), 343-357.
    Oakes, J. (1986). Educational Indicators: A Guide for Policymakers. Office of Educational Research and Improvement
    Porter, A. C. (1991). Creating a System of School Process Indicators. 13(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164455
    Poterba, J. M. (1997). Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 16(1), 48-66.
    Rubinfeld, D. L. (1977). Voting in a local school election: A micro analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 30-42.
    Rundall & Terrell(1985). A Child`s Problem: The Substitute Teacher. Education . Winter85, Vol. 106 Issue 2, p183.
    Schumacker & Brookshire(1990)Defining Quality Indicators.
    Smet, M. (2001). Determining the optimal size of study fields in Flemish secondary education. Economics of education review, 20(5), 443-457.
    Vinovskis, M. (1993). An historical perspective on support for schooling by different age cohorts. The Changing Contract Across Generations, New York, Aldine de Gruyter, 45-65.

    中文文獻
    朱麗文 (2015)。 檢視我國國民教育經費資源分配的十年趨勢以及未來展望。臺灣教育評論月刊, 4(2),頁 72-77。
    何俊青 (2017)。 偏鄉教育問題的迷思。臺灣教育評論月刊, 6(9),頁 15-19。
    吳清山、賴協志 (2007)。 桃園縣國民中小學教育品質之研究── 判斷指標, 影響因素及提升途徑。當代教育研究, 15,頁 1-37。
    呂文惠 (2015)。 少子化更需要保障教育品質。臺灣教育評論月刊, 1(5),頁 49-50。
    呂玟霖 (2016)。 淺談偏鄉學校教師人力的困境與突破。臺灣教育評論月刊, 5(2),頁 26-28。
    徐秀鈴、孫國華 (2018)。 少子化現象對國民教育的衝擊與因應。臺灣教育評論月刊, 7(2),頁 75-79。
    張淑貞 (2003)。 國小碩士教師研究所進修學習意涵之探究。
    張憲庭 (2005)。 少子化現象對學校經營管理之衝擊與因應之道。學校行政(36),頁 87-93。
    陳秀雲(2016)。桃園市國小教師專業成長與教學效能關係之研究。國立中正大學教學專業發展數位學習碩士在職專班。
    陳燕嬌(2006)。國民小學教師專業成長與學校效能關係之研究。國立花蓮教育大學學校行政碩士班,花蓮縣。
    曾郁凡、許恆瑜、張國楨、周學政 (2020)。 少子化下,全臺學齡人口時空分布差異與影響因素研究。地理研究(72),頁 1-33。
    楊英君(2008)。城鄉教育資源差異對學生學習成就影響之個案研究。世新大學行政管理學研究所(含博、碩專班),臺北市。
    董凌芳(2017)。人口結構變遷對財政教育支出之影響。國立中央大學。產業經濟研究所在職專班,桃園市。
    蕭秀玉(2004)。雲嘉地區國民小學教師專業成長與學校效能關係之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,嘉義市。
    蕭佳純、董旭英、黃宗顯 (2009)。 少子化現象對國小教育發展之影響及其因應對策。臺中教育大學學報: 教育類, 23(1),頁 25-47。
    鍾德馨(2006)。少子化趨勢對國民教育師資供需影響與對策之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所。
    蘇珍慧 (2017)。 偏鄉師資的問題, 迷思與解決途徑。臺灣教育評論月刊, 6(9),頁 137-143。

    網頁參考資料
    Education at a Glance 2014 OECD Indicators:OECD Indicators http://www.oecd.org/education/Education-at-a-Glance-2014.pdf
    中華民國統計資訊網──縣市重要統計指標,取用日期:2020年10月5日https://statdb.dgbas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp
    師資培育統計年報,取用日期:2021年1月10日https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2600/News.aspx?n=C6A181E8F32C2BBA&sms=EA1FA0326D3BA142
    教育統計指標,取用日期:2020年10月5日https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=829446EED325AD02&sms=26FB481681F7B203&s=B19AF3B0B4D7BFAC
    教育部統計處──103學年偏遠地區國民中小學概況,取用日期:2021年5月11日https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/brief/103%E5%AD%B8%E5%B9%B4%E5%81%8F%E9%81%A0%E5%9C%B0%E5%8D%80%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%AD%E5%B0%8F%E5%AD%B8%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81.pdf
    教育部新住民子女就學概況https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=829446EED325AD02&sms=26FB481681F7B203&s=4C810A112728CC60
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    108255006
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108255006
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100705
    Appears in Collections:[財政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    500601.pdf4180KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback